Psychological Assessment最新文献_第6页

Supplemental Material for Assessing Dynamic Violence Risk in Youth: Updated Risk Levels and Recidivism Estimates for the Violence Risk Scale–Youth Version 青少年动态暴力风险评估补充材料：暴力风险量表的最新风险水平和累犯估计-青少年版

IF 3.6 2区心理学

Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2026-07-16 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001488.supp

引用次数: 0

Supplemental Material for A Real-Time Examination and Comparison of Differentiation Among Suicidal Thinking and Affect Items in an Adolescent Sample 青少年样本中自杀念头和情绪项目的实时检查和差异比较补充材料

IF 3.6 2区心理学

Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2026-07-16 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001489.supp

引用次数: 0

Careless responding in ambulatory assessment: Comparing individuals with and without chronic pain. 在门诊评估中的粗心反应：比较有和没有慢性疼痛的个体。

IF 3.6 2区心理学

Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2026-07-09 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001485

Malin Müller,Marcel C Schmitt,Lea Schemer,Ulrike Basten,Julia A Glombiewski,Julia Karbach,Tanja Könen,Tanja Lischetzke

{"title":"Careless responding in ambulatory assessment: Comparing individuals with and without chronic pain.","authors":"Malin Müller,Marcel C Schmitt,Lea Schemer,Ulrike Basten,Julia A Glombiewski,Julia Karbach,Tanja Könen,Tanja Lischetzke","doi":"10.1037/pas0001485","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001485","url":null,"abstract":"One key challenge in ambulatory assessment (AA)-the collection of intensive longitudinal data in daily life-is careless responding, which can compromise data quality. However, research on its prevalence and predictors in AA, particularly in clinical populations, remains limited. Using multilevel latent class analysis, we examined momentary careless responding and individual differences therein 233 individuals with chronic pain and 168 without, over a 14-day AA phase with five daily assessments. We tested whether the groups differed in the type, extent, and predictors of careless responding. Across both groups, three Level 1 profiles emerged: careful responding, fast and invariable responding, and inconsistent responding. At Level 2, we identified four respondent classes: careful, infrequently careless, and two frequently careless types. Multigroup multilevel latent class analysis indicated partial measurement invariance at Level 1, reflecting group-specific shifts in three indicator means, while the substantive interpretation of profiles remained stable. Full measurement invariance at Level 2 showed that individuals with and without chronic pain did not differ in the type or overall likelihood of careless responding. Additionally, higher stress and poorer sleep were associated with membership in the frequently careless classes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148408471","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Testing measurement invariance of the Brief Symptom Inventory across race, sex, and time among adults with cocaine use disorder. 成人可卡因使用障碍患者简短症状量表在种族、性别和时间上的不变性检验。

IF 3.6 2区心理学

Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2026-07-09 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001486

Melissa R Schick,Yudilyn Jaramillo,Brian D Kiluk,Charla Nich,Donna LaPaglia,Angela M Haeny

{"title":"Testing measurement invariance of the Brief Symptom Inventory across race, sex, and time among adults with cocaine use disorder.","authors":"Melissa R Schick,Yudilyn Jaramillo,Brian D Kiluk,Charla Nich,Donna LaPaglia,Angela M Haeny","doi":"10.1037/pas0001486","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001486","url":null,"abstract":"The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) is a commonly used measure to understand the influence of psychological distress on substance use treatment outcomes. However, few studies have examined whether the BSI functions equivalently across groups to allow for interpretable comparisons among individuals who use substances. The present study evaluated measurement invariance of the full 53-item BSI and the BSI-18 across race, sex, and time among individuals with cocaine use disorder. Data from seven clinical trials evaluating behavioral and/or pharmacological treatments for cocaine use were combined, providing a total sample of 629 participants with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition, cocaine abuse/dependence (42.0% Black, 58.0% White; 38.3% female, 61.5% male; Mage = 39.74 years, SD = 9.49). Factor analyses supported an eight-factor model for the BSI and a three-factor model for the BSI-18, largely consistent with recommended scoring guidelines. We did not find support for measurement invariance of either the full BSI or the BSI-18 across race, sex, or time. After model trimming, we were able to identify models for which invariance testing could be conducted. We found evidence for weak factorial invariance of versions of the BSI and BSI-18 by race and versions of the BSI by sex, and strict factorial invariance of versions of the BSI by time and versions of the BSI-18 by sex and time. Findings suggest that caution is warranted when making comparisons across race, sex, or time using the full BSI or BSI-18 among individuals seeking treatment for cocaine use. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148408472","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Supplemental Material for Risk Assessment Instruments for Predicting the Risk of Sexual Recidivism: A Meta-Analytic Comparison of 10 Instruments 预测性再犯风险评估工具的补充材料：10种工具的荟萃分析比较

IF 3.6 2区心理学

Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2026-06-29 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001472.supp

引用次数: 0

Supplemental Material for Testing Measurement Invariance of the Brief Symptom Inventory Across Race, Sex, and Time Among Adults With Cocaine Use Disorder 成人可卡因使用障碍患者简短症状量表跨种族、性别和时间的测量不变性检验补充材料

IF 3.6 2区心理学

Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2026-06-29 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001486.supp

引用次数: 0

Modeling of parent-rated psychopathology in children and adolescents using the Child Behavior Checklist. 使用儿童行为检查表对儿童和青少年家长评定的精神病理进行建模。

IF 3.3 2区心理学

Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2026-06-15 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001477

Laurence Nawab, Julia Plück, Ann-Kathrin Thöne, Manfred Döpfner

{"title":"Modeling of parent-rated psychopathology in children and adolescents using the Child Behavior Checklist.","authors":"Laurence Nawab, Julia Plück, Ann-Kathrin Thöne, Manfred Döpfner","doi":"10.1037/pas0001477","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001477","url":null,"abstract":"Research on modeling psychopathology in childhood and adolescence has proposed theoretical and empirical models, but these models have not yet been analyzed within a single clinical data set considering different methodological approaches. Therefore, the present study explores clinical child and adolescent psychopathology as rated by parents using the Child Behavior Checklist. The sample consisted of 2,848 children and adolescents (Mage = 11.74; SDage = 3.5; 57.1% male) with a wide range of mental disorders, who had been referred to a university outpatient clinic for assessment and treatment. Confirmatory factor analyses and exploratory structural equation modeling were employed to test one-dimensional, correlated first-, second-, and third-order models and a fully symmetrical bifactor model. Additionally, the retained models were analyzed for measurement invariance across age and gender. Models that allow cross-loadings were superior. As expected, symptoms seem to be attributed to more than one dimension. The eight-factor exploratory structural equation modeling model provided a better factor structure than the more complex models such as the bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling model, showing consistent factor structure and loading patterns across age and gender. A higher order structure of internalizing and externalizing dimensions was demonstrated. In our clinical sample, parent-reported juvenile psychopathology seems to be better represented by several latent variables than by only one general factor of psychopathology. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148252748","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Depression and suicidal ideation and behavior measurement invariance: A comparison of foreign-born and U.S.-born service members. 抑郁、自杀意念和行为测量的不变性：国外和美国出生的军人的比较。

IF 3.1 2区心理学

Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2026-06-15 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001484

Kayla Reed-Fitzke, Florence Lewis, Angela L Lamson, Erin L Cobb

{"title":"Depression and suicidal ideation and behavior measurement invariance: A comparison of foreign-born and U.S.-born service members.","authors":"Kayla Reed-Fitzke, Florence Lewis, Angela L Lamson, Erin L Cobb","doi":"10.1037/pas0001484","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pas0001484","url":null,"abstract":"This study examined if screening scores for depression and suicidal ideation and behavior can be interpreted comparably across U.S.- and foreign-born service members using data from the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers. Data from 18,208 service members across various stages of their military career were used; all analyses used data that were adjusted using combined analysis weights, which resulted in a weighted sample of 567,337 (9.8% identified as foreign-born). A series of increasingly constrained multigroup measurement models were fit using structural equation modeling to assess for measurement invariance. Results suggest scores derived from the entry questions of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview Screening Scale for a major depressive episode can be interpreted comparably for hypothesis testing when samples include both U.S.-born and foreign-born service members. In contrast, response patterns to two entry screening items from the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale suggested nonequivalence in how scores were interpreted across groups; post hoc logistic regressions were conducted to further probe the nature of variance. Scores on items regarding passive ideation and suicidal behavior varied by sex, age, race/ethnicity, and English proficiency between U.S.- and foreign-born groups. Findings indicate caution is warranted when using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale entry items when utilizing samples that include U.S.- and foreign-born service members and highlight the importance of attending to the intersectionality of factors such as nation of origin, sex, age, race/ethnicity, and English proficiency when screening for suicidal ideation and behavior. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148252528","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Longitudinal measurement invariance and psychometric properties of the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS), Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale (ODSIS), and Positive Emotion Scale (PES) among community-dwelling adults. 社区成人总体焦虑严重程度与损害量表（OASIS）、总体抑郁严重程度与损害量表（ODSIS）和积极情绪量表（PES）的纵向测量不变性及心理测量特征

IF 3.3 2区心理学

Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2026-06-15 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001483

Antonella Somma, Leda Mastinu, Todd J Farchione, Laura J Long, Andrea Fossati

{"title":"Longitudinal measurement invariance and psychometric properties of the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS), Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale (ODSIS), and Positive Emotion Scale (PES) among community-dwelling adults.","authors":"Antonella Somma, Leda Mastinu, Todd J Farchione, Laura J Long, Andrea Fossati","doi":"10.1037/pas0001483","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001483","url":null,"abstract":"This study evaluated the basic measurement properties of the Italian-translated versions of the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS), Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale (ODSIS), and Positive Emotion Scale (PES) in a sample of community-dwelling adults. A total of 885 participants (all native to the Italian geographical region; 71.2% female, 27.3% male, and 1.5% other) completed these scales, along with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition Level 2 Anxiety, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition Level 2 Depression, and Differential Emotions Scale-PES measures. A subset of participants (n = 84) also participated in a 1-month longitudinal follow-up, completing the OASIS, ODSIS, and PES weekly across four time points. Both confirmatory bifactor analyses and exploratory graph analysis results supported the essential unidimensionality and dissociability of the OASIS, ODSIS, and PES items. Convergent validity coefficient values for all three measures were positive, significant, and large and were significantly greater than all discriminant validity coefficients. Longitudinal invariance model results indicated that the OASIS, ODSIS, and PES scores maintained stable measurement properties across four weekly assessments. Overall, these findings extend the existing literature, providing the first evidence of the dissociability of the OASIS, ODSIS, and PES dimensions, their basic measurement properties, and the longitudinal measurement invariance of their scores, at least among community-dwelling adults. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148252727","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Differential utility of immediate versus delayed memory measures for the identification of episodic memory impairment: Systematic review and meta-analysis. 即时记忆测量与延迟记忆测量鉴别情景记忆障碍的差异效用：系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.3 2区心理学

Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2026-06-11 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001478

Hannah Cruickshank Campbell, Stephen C Bowden, Geoff Saw, Mike W-L Cheung

{"title":"Differential utility of immediate versus delayed memory measures for the identification of episodic memory impairment: Systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Hannah Cruickshank Campbell, Stephen C Bowden, Geoff Saw, Mike W-L Cheung","doi":"10.1037/pas0001478","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pas0001478","url":null,"abstract":"Delayed recall measures are considered sensitive to episodic long-term memory impairment, and longer delays are argued to aid diagnostic accuracy. This meta-analysis examined whether delayed recall provides an advantage in identifying memory impairment relative to very short-delay or \"immediate\" recall. Eligible studies included a patient sample with suspected or known episodic memory impairment and a healthy control sample, both administered immediate and delayed recall trials. The standardized mean difference (Hedges' g) between patients and controls on immediate and delayed recall was calculated using multivariate random-effects meta-analysis. The meta-analysis included 290 studies, comprising 71,381 controls and 45,054 patients. Delayed recall ranged from 40 s filled delay to 6 weeks. Controls outperformed patients on immediate (g = 1.074, 95% CI [0.973, 1.176]) and delayed recall (g = 1.148, 95% CI [1.034, 1.261]). Patient-control differentiation was greater on delayed compared to immediate recall (g = -0.083, 95% CI [-0.126, -0.041]), though the difference was not clinically meaningful. Delay length (minutes) did not predict the delayed recall effect (β^ < 0.001) or moderate the difference between immediate and delayed recall (β^ = 0.020). Analyzed separately, word list, story, and shape recall measures showed no effect for increasing delay, and word list measures showed no delayed recall advantage. In mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease, delayed recall offered a small to medium advantage, but this was not present across all measures. All clinical subgroups analyzed showed no effect for increasing delay length. Further research is needed to clarify the utility of delayed recall. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148219466","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0