Prehospital Emergency Care最新文献

{"title":"Implementation of EMS Clinician Feedback Tool Encourages Patient Feedback Requests and Professional Development: A Mixed-Methods Study.","authors":"Katherine L Schneider, Zachary W Case, J Priyanka Vakkalanka, Nicholas M Mohr, Azeemuddin Ahmed","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2448831","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2448831","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians express dissatisfaction with the quality and quantity of clinical feedback received from hospitals, which is exacerbated by the absence of standardized feedback processes. A reported lack of regular feedback impedes their ability to learn and improve care. We evaluated a newly implemented feedback tool's utilization and perceived impact on EMS clinicians and our health system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We employed a mixed-methods study design in a single academic medical center emergency department. Quantitative data collected focused on patients' clinical characteristics and characteristics of utilizers of the feedback tool during implementation (September 2023-July 2024). Qualitative data involved semi-structured interviews with EMS clinicians who had diverse experiences with the feedback tool and years of EMS service Semi-structured interviews applied a phenomenological framework, and were videorecorded, transcribed, and independently coded to identify key themes surrounding the utilization and impact of the implemented tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 381 feedback requests, 139 (36.5%) pertained to patients aged ≥65 years, while 44 (11.5 %) included patients <18 years; 343 (90%) had an Emergency Severity Index score of ≥2. Major complaints included traumatic (<i>n</i> = 165; 43.3%), neurologic (<i>n</i> = 90; 23.6%), and cardiac (<i>n</i> = 82; 21.5%). Emergency responder agencies included ground ambulance 227 (59.6%), air medical 90 (23.6%), public safety answering points 37 (9.7%), and fire service 27 (7.1%). The primary response method was e-mail 353 (93.7%). There was an average of 35 feedback requests per month (interquartile range: 27-59). EMS clinicians from multiple agencies with varying levels of knowledge of the feedback mechanism provided qualitative insights regarding the feedback tool, which covered several key areas: application and technological design, utilization, utility of feedback provided, barriers, comparisons to other systems, and areas for improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong> The standardized feedback mechanism implemented for EMS clinicians showed engagement, especially among ground responders caring for high-acuity patients, highlighting its importance in patient care. The preference for email emphasizes the need for efficient communication channels. Clinicians found the system accessible and user-friendly. The feedback tool was perceived as crucial for professional development and personal growth, allowing clinicians to gain closure on patient cases and potentially improve future patient care practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142953730","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Precipitated Withdrawal Induced by Prehospital Naloxone Administration.","authors":"Lindsey A Vandergrift, Amber D Rice, Keith Primeau, Joshua B Gaither, Rachel D Munn, Philipp L Hannan, Mary C Knotts, Adrienne Hollen, Brian Stevens, Justin Lara, Melody Glenn","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2449505","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2449505","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Buprenorphine is becoming a key component of prehospital management of opioid use disorder. It is unclear how many prehospital patients might be eligible for buprenorphine induction, as traditional induction requires that patients first have some degree of opioid withdrawal. The primary aim of this study was to quantify how many patients developed precipitated withdrawal after receiving prehospital naloxone for suspected overdose, as they could be candidates for prehospital buprenorphine. The secondary objective was to identify associated factors contributing to precipitated withdrawal, including dose of naloxone administered, and identify rate of subsequent transport.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study reviewing electronic patient care reports (ePCRs) from March 2019 to April 2023 in a single Emergency Medical Services (EMS) system was performed. Cases were included if naloxone was administered during the prehospital interval and excluded if the patient was in cardiac arrest upon arrival and died on scene. Precipitated opioid withdrawal was defined using reliably available ePCR data points measured by the Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale: administration of an antiemetic or sedative, persistent tachycardia, or new tachycardia after naloxone. Descriptive statistics were calculated to quantify the incidence of precipitated withdrawal. Risk ratios were calculated to identify variables associated with outcomes of interest. A subgroup analysis was performed examining patients explicitly diagnosed with an overdose by EMS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 4561 individuals were given naloxone, and 2124 (46.2%) met our proxy criteria for precipitated withdrawal. Patients who received multiple doses of naloxone were more likely to meet our precipitated withdrawal definition versus those who received a single dose (RR 1.2, 95% CI 1.12-1.28). Patients who experienced precipitated withdrawal were more likely to accept transportation than those who did not experience withdrawal (RR 1.08 95% CI 1.04-1.12). Persistent tachycardia (80.3%) was the most common criterion met for our definition of precipitated withdrawal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Almost half of patients who received a dose of prehospital naloxone for suspected overdose met our proxy criteria for precipitated withdrawal. Patients who met our precipitated withdrawal definition were more likely to have received greater doses of naloxone and were more likely to accept transport to an emergency department.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142953797","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Effect of Fatigue During Search and Rescue Efforts in Debris on the Quality of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.","authors":"Kadir Çavuş, Oğuzhan Tiryaki, Elif Tiryaki, Suat Çelik, Hüseyin Bora Saçar","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2025.2450072","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10903127.2025.2450072","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), which is used in cases of life-threatening cardiopulmonary arrest, is a physically exhausting procedure. Adding to that, sometimes, even before performing CPR, interventions to rescue the injured person from a challenging environment have caused significant fatigue. In this study, taking a novel research approach, we generated a scenario of fatigue during a rescue from earthquake debris and aimed to measure the effect of that fatigue on the quality of CPR performed by paramedics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research followed an experimental design with 2 groups (experimental/control) and 2 measurements (pretest/post-test). The study population was selected using power analysis. The sample, consisting of 84 paramedic students, was randomly divided into 42 control and 42 experimental participants. Current American Heart Association (AHA 2020) and European Resuscitation Council (ERC 2021) guidelines were strictly followed when performing CPR. In order to assess the accuracy of CPR, a General Doctor GD-CPR200S-A (2010 standard) simulator was utilized. The participants were fatigued by practicing the process of extracting and transporting earthquake victims from rubble. A personal information form with 20 questions and a CPR measurement form were used to obtain the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the analysis performed to measure the differences between the CPR indicators for the control and experimental groups in the post-test and pretest, the difference in compression (control: 6.5 ± 50.1 and experimental: -10.3 ± 46.0) was not significant. Meanwhile, we found that the difference in ventilation (control: 0.3 ± 5.4 vs. experiment: 8.1 ± 4.6) and the difference in CPR completion times (control: 0.2 ± 1.2 vs. experiment: -0.7 ± 0.7) between the post-test and pretest were significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no significant difference in correct compressions between the control and experimental groups, but there was a significant difference in ventilation and CPR completion times. For this reason, it is recommended to focus on the effect of fatigue on CPR quality, especially on the ventilation process. It is also recommended to include fatigue scenarios in CPR trainings.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142953818","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Numerical Cincinnati Stroke Scale Versus Stroke Severity Screening Tools for the Prehospital Determination of Large Vessel Occlusion.","authors":"Holden M Wagstaff, Remle P Crowe, Scott T Youngquist, H Hill Stoecklein, Ali Treichel, Yao He, Jennifer J Majersik","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2430442","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2430442","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Previous research demonstrated that the numerical Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (CPSS) identifies large vessel occlusion (LVO) at similar rates compared to dedicated LVO screening tools. We aimed to compare numerical CPSS to additional stroke scales using a national emergency medical services (EMS) database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the ESO Data Collaborative, the largest EMS database with linked hospital data, we retrospectively analyzed prehospital patient records from 2022. Each EMS record was linked to corresponding emergency department (ED) and inpatient records through a data exchange platform. Prehospital CPSS was compared to the Cincinnati Stroke Triage Assessment Tool (C-STAT), the Field Assessment Stroke Triage for Emergency Destination (FAST-ED), and the Balance Eyes Face Arm Speech Time (BE-FAST). The optimal prediction cut points for LVO screening were determined by intersecting the sensitivity and specificity curves for each scale. To compare the discriminative abilities of each scale among those diagnosed with LVO, we used the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 17,442 prehospital records from 754 EMS agencies with ≥1 documented stroke scale of interest: 30.3% (<i>n</i> = 5,278) had a hospital diagnosis of stroke, of which 71.6% (<i>n</i> = 3,781) were ischemic; of those, 21.6% (<i>n</i> = 817) were diagnosed with LVO. CPSS score ≥2 was found to be predictive of LVO with 76.9% sensitivity, 68.0% specificity, and AUROC 0.787 (95%CI 0.722-0.801). All other tools had similar predictive abilities, with sensitivity/specificity/AUROC of: C-STAT 62.5%/76.5%/0.727 (0.555-0.899); FAST-ED 61.4%/76.1%/0.780 (0.725-0.836); BE-FAST 70.4%/67.1%/0.739 (0.697-0.788).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The less complex CPSS exhibited comparable performance to three frequently employed LVO detection tools. The EMS leadership, medical directors, and stroke system directors should weigh the complexity of stroke severity instruments and the challenges of ensuring consistent and accurate use when choosing which tool to implement. The straightforward and widely adopted CPSS may improve compliance while maintaining accuracy in LVO detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142676614","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Barriers to Implementation of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment in the Prehospital Setting.","authors":"Nicola Baker, Melody Glenn, Amber D Rice, Joyce Hospodar, Jill Bullock, Gail Bradley, Daniel W Spaite, Daniel Derksen, Joshua B Gaither","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2447566","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2447566","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) framework is a validated process that is used to identify individuals with substance use disorders (SUDs) and then encourage them to engage in and facilitate entry into treatment. It is not known how well SBIRT can be incorporated into prehospital practice and what barriers to Emergency Medical Services (EMS) implementation of an SBIRT program might arise. The aim of this project was to implement a pilot EMS based SBIRT program. Then, after program implementation, to identify barriers to the prehospital use of SBIRT programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a mixed methodology study utilizing a retrospective review of program quality improvement data and structured interviews to collect both objective and subjective data on the prehospital SBIRT implementation. Eight EMS agencies participated in the SBIRT pilot program. Paramedics and Emergency Medical Technicians (EMT) were trained to use the SBIRT process then asked to use the SBIRT tool during their day to day activities. The screening tools utilized were the Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST) and the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). Referral tools were tailored to the unique SUD treatment programs available in each community. The pilot program was run for 6 months after which time structured focus group meetings were conducted to identify barriers to broader SBIRT program utilization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 28 EMS clinicians from 8 agencies attended the train the trainer SBIRT education session. None of the agencies subsequently implemented the routine use of the SBIRT model or DAST/AUDIT tools. The agencies reported significant barriers to implementation on EMS calls, including short transport times, current drug and/or alcohol intoxication, and hesitation of patients to participate. Community paramedicine clinicians, who typically spend more time with patients, found the tools more useful but found limited opportunities to implement them. Common cited themes were the lack of local community-based organizations and frequent personnel turnover within local agencies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although EMS clinicians found the SBIRT training to be useful, they did not incorporate the use of the SBIRT model into their prehospital patient care, citing too many barriers to its implementation and use.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142953561","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Prehospital Buprenorphine in Treating Symptoms of Opioid Withdrawal - A Descriptive Review of the First 131 Cases in San Francisco, CA.","authors":"Amelia L Gurley, Jeremy Lacocque, Mary P Mercer, Michael Mason, Jenni Wiebers, Vanessa Lara, Eric C Silverman, John F Brown, Joseph Graterol, Elaina Gunn, Mikaela T Middleton, Andrew A Herring, H Gene Hern","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2449512","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2449512","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Opioid use disorder (OUD) remains a common cause of overdose and mortality in the United States. Emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians often interact with patients with OUD, including during or shortly after an overdose. The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients receiving prehospital buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid withdrawal in an urban EMS system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective chart review of all initial cases of administration of buprenorphine-naloxone from April 2023 to July 2024 during the first 16 months of a program involving prehospital EMS administration of buprenorphine-naloxone by EMS clinicians to patients with OUD experiencing acute opioid withdrawal in San Francisco. The primary outcome involved reduction in Clinical Opioid Withdrawal Score (COWS) and other adverse events including worsened withdrawal (or increased COWS), nausea, patient destination, and loss to follow up were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Buprenorphine was administered to 131 patients. In 82 (62.6%) cases, patients presented in withdrawal after receiving naloxone from bystanders or EMS as a treatment for overdose. The average COWS prior to administration was 16.1 ± 6.5 and the median COWS prior to administration was 15 (IQR: 11-19). Of the 78 cases where a COWS was available, 74 (94.9%) experienced symptom improvement, with the median COWS dropping from 15 (IQR: 11-19) to 7 (IQR: 4-13) between first and last recorded values. No adverse effects were reported in prehospital records. There was one reported in-hospital incident of withdrawal in the Emergency Department presumably precipitated by buprenorphine. Data on outcomes after EMS transport were limited. Only six patients were successfully contacted at 30 day follow up, but five of these patients were in long-term OUD treatment programs, and three reported sustained abstinence from opioid use. During case review, we found two cases where physicians assisted EMS personnel in recognizing recent methadone use, but no other missed exclusion criteria requiring physician input.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In San Francisco, prehospital administration of buprenorphine for acute opioid withdrawal by EMS clinicians resulted in symptomatic improvement, and case review suggests administration can be safe without direct EMS physician oversight.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142953799","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Prehospital Endotracheal Intubation Success Rates for Critical Care Nurses Versus Paramedics.","authors":"Nicholas H George, Jacob B Cihla, Francis X Guyette, Sriram Ramgopal, Christian Martin-Gill","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2448246","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2448246","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Prehospital endotracheal intubation (ETI) is a lifesaving procedure with known complications. To reduce ETI-associated morbidity and mortality, organizations prioritize first-pass success (FPS). However, there are few data evaluating the association of FPS with clinician licensure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective chart review of all paramedic and nurse ETI attempts by a multi-state air and ground critical care transport service between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2023. Our outcomes of interest were FPS and last-pass success (LPS). The exposure of interest was clinician license. We performed a multivariable logistic regression controlling for multiple common patient/operational confounders: age, sex, referring/procedure location, medical category, year, paralytic use, and proceduralist experience. As an exploratory analysis we assessed FPS by licensure and years of experience using time since first patient mission as a surrogate (<1 year, 1 to <2 years, 2 to <3 years, and 3+ years).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 171,804 encounters over the study period, 8,307 (4.8%) required ETI. Included encounters were mostly adult (≥18 years old; 91.0%), male (64.0%), and victims of trauma (57.4%). Most intubations were performed on primary retrieval (scene) missions (70.5%) with neuromuscular blockade (93.3%). Nurses and paramedics intubated with similar success on the first (88.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 87.9-89.8 vs. 89.7%; 95% CI 88.7-90.7) and last (97.4%; 95% CI 96.9-97.9 vs. 97.3%; 95% CI 96.7-97.8) attempts. Multivariable analysis revealed no significant difference between two groups for FPS (aOR 0.90; 95% CI 0.77-1.04]) or LPS (aOR 1.00; 95% CI 0.76-1.32). FPS was also similar for nurses (74.7%; 95% CI 69.8-79.7) and paramedics (80.6%; 95% CI 75.6-85.6) within the first year, and after 3 years of experience (91.6%; 95% CI 90.6-92.5 vs. 91.5%; 95% CI 90.5-92.6).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Critical care paramedics and nurses perform ETI with similar proficiency. In this analysis of 7,812 intubations, clinician licensure was not associated with FPS nor LPS after controlling for multiple common confounders. Further research evaluating training schemes especially in early years of experience is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142953812","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Lessons Learned from the Implementation of the Wake County, North Carolina EMS Medication for Opioid Use Disorder Program.","authors":"Andrew W Godfrey, Vicki L Coles, Michael D Lyons, Jefferson G Williams, Jonathan R Studnek, Kristin M Cain, Brandon Smith, Benjamin W Powell, Gabrielle D Newsam, José G Cabañas","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2025.2450773","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10903127.2025.2450773","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Buprenorphine has recently emerged as a prehospital treatment for opioid use disorder. Limited data exist regarding the implementation of prehospital buprenorphine programs. Our objective was to describe the development, deployment, lessons learned, and ongoing evolution of the Wake County EMS buprenorphine program using data from the first year following implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a protocol to provide buprenorphine in the prehospital setting to patients who 1) suffered an opioid overdose with reversal using naloxone, or 2) experienced withdrawal symptoms at least 72 hours after last opioid use. Measures included encounters with screening for buprenorphine induction, successful inductions with buprenorphine, successful follow up with outpatient treatment, and successful continued outpatient treatment. For the period 7/5/2023-7/4/2024, we report descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 1,378 encounters for adult patients who received naloxone, of which 953 had documentation of opioid overdose as the primary impression. During the same timeframe, 342 encounters included screening for prehospital buprenorphine induction. Of encounters with screened patients, 66 (19.3%) encounters were eligible for buprenorphine induction and of these, 61 encounters (92.4%) resulted in buprenorphine induction. Of encounters with induction, 29 (47.5%) resulted in successful follow up with our outpatient provider, and 7 (11.4%) remained in treatment at the end of the review period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our prehospital buprenorphine induction program successfully inducted eligible patients and connected them with follow up. Almost half of inducted patients were able to follow up with our outpatient provider. One in ten patients who received buprenorphine from EMS remained in treatment. There exists an opportunity for EMS to screen more patients for buprenorphine induction as only one in four patients who received naloxone were screened for buprenorphine induction. Lessons learned include the need for recurrent EMS clinician education regarding buprenorphine screening, the need for a \"buprenorphine champion\" to follow up with inducted patients and addressing early administrative and technological barriers to ensure data exchange.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142953735","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Stuck in Transition: Clinical and Patient Factors Behind Prolonged Paramedic to Emergency Department Transfer of Care.","authors":"Ryan P Strum, John McPhee, Michael Wionzek, Russell MacDonald","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2025.2451217","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10903127.2025.2451217","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Paramedic services face increasing challenges due to delays in patient transfer of care (TOC) at emergency departments (EDs). Prolonged TOC times directly impact paramedic services' ability to provide emergency response, though the patient and clinical factors contributing to these delays remain unclear. We examined TOC times for all transports to the ED and analyzed factors associated with prolonged TOC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using paramedic call data from Toronto Paramedic Services from September 1, 2022, to July 31, 2024. We included all paramedic-transported patient records to EDs following a 9-1-1 call, excluding inter-facility transfers and records with missing TOC timestamps. The TOC times were categorized into four intervals: 0-29, 30-59, 60-89, and ≥ 90 min. We conducted a cohort and subgroup analysis of patients aged 60 years or older using multivariable binary logistic regression models to identify factors independently associated with TOC times exceeding 60 min, using odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 418,196 patients were transported to EDs, of which 214,612 were 60 years or older. Overall, mean TOC was 39.9 min (SD 54.2). Patients aged 0-17 years had the lowest proportion in longer TOC intervals (5% for 60-89 mins; 2% for ≥ 90 mins), while patients 75 years or older had the highest (9%; 9% respectively). A TOC of at least 60 min was independently associated with older age (60 to 74 years OR 1.19, 1.15-1.22; 75 years or greater OR 1.27, 1.23-1.30), medical complexity (seven to eight diagnoses OR 1.15, 1.10-1.20; nine or greater diagnoses OR 1.29, 1.23-1.36), polypharmacy and specific presenting complaints (altered level of consciousness, respiratory distress, general weakness, head trauma). Medical acuity and receiving a paramedic intervention were not associated with prolonged TOC. Similar findings were determined in the subgroup analysis of older adults.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prolonged TOC times disproportionately affect older or clinically complex patients, regardless of their acuity or need for paramedic intervention. Our findings highlight the importance for paramedic services, hospitals, and stakeholders to develop targeted care models and collaborations to reduce prolonged TOC.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142953816","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comparison of Patient Comfort and Acceleration Exposure During Lifting and Loading Operations Using Manual and Powered Stretchers.","authors":"Yutaka Takei, Gen Toyama, Tetsuhiro Adachi, Taiki Nishi, Yasuharu Yasuda, Shinji Ninomiya, Akane Ozaki","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2447565","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2447565","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the effects of powered and manual stretchers on participants' perceived comfort and measured acceleration during lifting and loading operations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This non-randomized, laboratory-based crossover study involved forty-one participants (thirty-one firefighters and ten third-year paramedic students) who served as simulated patients experiencing lifting, lowering, loading, and unloading maneuvers using manual and powered stretchers. Four stretcher types were evaluated: one powered stretcher (Power-PRO^™ XT) and three manual stretchers (Matsunaga GT, Exchange 4070, Scad Mate), with each group using the manual stretcher they routinely operated. Linear acceleration data were collected using a nine-axis inertial measurement unit placed at the participants' anterior waist. Root mean square (RMS) and peak accelerations along the X-, Y-, and Z-axes were calculated. Participants completed a twenty-three-item comfort questionnaire based on the Semantic Differential method. Due to non-normal data distribution, nonparametric statistical tests were employed for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The lifting/lowering and loading/unloading movements showed that the powered stretcher significantly reduced the RMS values, maximum accelerations, and minimum accelerations in the vertical axis (Z-axis) compared to manual stretchers. Specifically, the powered stretcher demonstrated lower RMS acceleration (0.29 m/s² vs. 0.73 m/s², <i>p</i> < 0.001), maximum acceleration (1.60 m/s² vs. 2.90 m/s², <i>p</i> < 0.001), and minimum acceleration (-1.48 m/s² vs. -3.30 m/s², <i>p</i> < 0.001) in the vertical direction compared to other manual stretchers. Similar results were observed in the comparison of participant loading/unloading movements. However, no significant differences were observed between the powered and Exchange stretchers in X-axis minimum acceleration, Y-axis maximum and minimum accelerations, or Z-axis maximum acceleration. Similarly, Y-axis minimum accelerations did not significantly differ between the powered stretcher and Matsunaga GT or Scad Mate stretchers. After loading and unloading movements, the questionnaire results showed that the powered stretcher was rated significantly higher on comfort-related items including \"comfortable,\" \"secure,\" \"like,\" \"smooth,\" and \"relaxing.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a controlled, laboratory-based setting, simulated use of manual and powered stretchers showed that powered stretchers significantly minimize patient discomfort and vibrations. This study underscores the potential for enhancing patient safety and quality of care. In conclusion, the powered stretcher is a promising tool for improving the quality and safety of patient transportation in prehospital settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142953670","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}