Prevalence and Indications for Applying Prehospital Spinal Motion Restriction in Children at Risk for Cervical Spine Injury.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Caleb E Ward, Lorin R Browne, Alexander J Rogers, Monica Harding, Lawrence J Cook, Robert E Sapien, Kathleen M Adelgais, Leah Tzimenatos, Fahd A Ahmad, Sylvia Owusu-Ansah, Julie C Leonard
{"title":"Prevalence and Indications for Applying Prehospital Spinal Motion Restriction in Children at Risk for Cervical Spine Injury.","authors":"Caleb E Ward, Lorin R Browne, Alexander J Rogers, Monica Harding, Lawrence J Cook, Robert E Sapien, Kathleen M Adelgais, Leah Tzimenatos, Fahd A Ahmad, Sylvia Owusu-Ansah, Julie C Leonard","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2025.2472269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Spinal motion restriction (SMR) is commonly applied to injured children with potential cervical spine injuries (CSI). There are, however, risks to indiscriminate SMR application. We recently derived the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) CSI clinical prediction rule. Effective implementation of this prediction rule requires an accurate understanding of current emergency medical services (EMS) SMR practices. Little is known about the prevalence of prehospital SMR application in children. Our primary objective was to determine the proportion of children sustaining blunt trauma who are placed in SMR by EMS. Our secondary objective was to identify factors associated with SMR placement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a secondary analysis of data collected during a prospective study of children 0-17 years with blunt trauma transported by EMS to one of 18 PECARN-affiliated emergency departments. Prehospital clinicians completed surveys regarding CSI risk factors and SMR application. We summarized SMR prevalence, techniques used, reasons for application, and clinician suspicion for CSI by patient age. We conducted univariable and multivariable logistic regression to determine factors associated with SMR placement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 13,453 children transported by EMS, we enrolled a convenience sample of 7,721 (57.4%) of whom 1.6% had a CSI and 41.5% had SMR placed. Older children were more likely to have SMR placed (35.5-50.4%) compared to those < 2 years (22.0%). Factors associated with SMR placement included patient demographics (non-Hispanic White race/ethnicity, age >2 years), mechanisms of injury (high-risk motor vehicle crash (MVC), unrestrained MVC passenger, high-risk fall, axial load), clinical history (loss of consciousness, self-reported neck pain, paresthesia, numbness, or extremity weakness) and physical examination findings (altered mental status, neck tenderness, inability to move neck, focal neurological deficits, and substantial head or torso injuries).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Of children transported by EMS after blunt trauma in this study, 41.5% had SMR placed, while only 1.6% had CSIs. Factors associated with SMR placement included patient demographics, mechanism of injury, history, and examination findings. Many of these factors are not in the new PECARN CSI clinical prediction rule. Implementation of a risk-centered EMS decision aid for SMR in children after blunt trauma must address this discrepancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2025.2472269","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Spinal motion restriction (SMR) is commonly applied to injured children with potential cervical spine injuries (CSI). There are, however, risks to indiscriminate SMR application. We recently derived the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) CSI clinical prediction rule. Effective implementation of this prediction rule requires an accurate understanding of current emergency medical services (EMS) SMR practices. Little is known about the prevalence of prehospital SMR application in children. Our primary objective was to determine the proportion of children sustaining blunt trauma who are placed in SMR by EMS. Our secondary objective was to identify factors associated with SMR placement.

Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of data collected during a prospective study of children 0-17 years with blunt trauma transported by EMS to one of 18 PECARN-affiliated emergency departments. Prehospital clinicians completed surveys regarding CSI risk factors and SMR application. We summarized SMR prevalence, techniques used, reasons for application, and clinician suspicion for CSI by patient age. We conducted univariable and multivariable logistic regression to determine factors associated with SMR placement.

Results: Of 13,453 children transported by EMS, we enrolled a convenience sample of 7,721 (57.4%) of whom 1.6% had a CSI and 41.5% had SMR placed. Older children were more likely to have SMR placed (35.5-50.4%) compared to those < 2 years (22.0%). Factors associated with SMR placement included patient demographics (non-Hispanic White race/ethnicity, age >2 years), mechanisms of injury (high-risk motor vehicle crash (MVC), unrestrained MVC passenger, high-risk fall, axial load), clinical history (loss of consciousness, self-reported neck pain, paresthesia, numbness, or extremity weakness) and physical examination findings (altered mental status, neck tenderness, inability to move neck, focal neurological deficits, and substantial head or torso injuries).

Conclusions: Of children transported by EMS after blunt trauma in this study, 41.5% had SMR placed, while only 1.6% had CSIs. Factors associated with SMR placement included patient demographics, mechanism of injury, history, and examination findings. Many of these factors are not in the new PECARN CSI clinical prediction rule. Implementation of a risk-centered EMS decision aid for SMR in children after blunt trauma must address this discrepancy.

院前脊柱运动限制在有颈椎损伤危险的儿童中的患病率和适应症。
目的:脊柱运动限制(SMR)通常应用于有潜在颈椎损伤的受伤儿童。然而,不加区分地应用SMR存在风险。我们最近导出了儿科急诊应用研究网络(PECARN) CSI临床预测规则。有效实施这一预测规则需要对当前紧急医疗服务(EMS) SMR实践有准确的理解。关于院前SMR在儿童中的应用,我们知之甚少。我们的主要目的是确定由EMS安置在SMR的遭受钝性创伤的儿童的比例。我们的第二个目标是确定与SMR放置相关的因素。方法:我们对一项前瞻性研究中收集的0-17岁钝性创伤儿童的数据进行了二次分析,这些儿童由EMS运送到pecarn附属的18个急诊科之一。院前临床医生完成了关于CSI危险因素和SMR应用的调查。我们总结了SMR的患病率、使用的技术、应用的原因以及临床医生对CSI的怀疑。我们进行了单变量和多变量逻辑回归来确定与SMR放置相关的因素。结果:在13453名EMS运送的儿童中,我们招募了7721名(57.4%)的方便样本,其中1.6%有CSI, 41.5%有SMR。与小于2岁的儿童(22.0%)相比,年龄较大的儿童更有可能被放置SMR(35.5-50.4%)。与SMR安置相关的因素包括患者人口统计学(非西班牙裔白人种族/民族,年龄bb - 2岁),损伤机制(高风险机动车碰撞(MVC),无约束的MVC乘客,高风险跌倒,轴向负荷),临床病史(意识丧失,自述颈部疼痛,感觉异常,麻木或四肢无力)和体格检查结果(精神状态改变,颈部压痛,颈部无法活动,局灶性神经功能障碍,头部或躯干严重受伤)。结论:在本研究中,钝器创伤后EMS转运的儿童中,41.5%放置了SMR,而只有1.6%放置了csi。与SMR放置相关的因素包括患者人口统计学、损伤机制、病史和检查结果。许多这些因素都不在新的PECARN CSI临床预测规则中。实施以风险为中心的EMS决策援助在钝性创伤后的儿童SMR必须解决这一差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信