Prehospital Trauma Compendium: Prehospital Administration of Antibiotics in Trauma Patients - an NAEMSP Resource Document.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Whitney J Barrett, Kevin A Kaucher, Ross E Orpet, Christopher B Colwell, John W Lyng
{"title":"Prehospital Trauma Compendium: Prehospital Administration of Antibiotics in Trauma Patients - an NAEMSP Resource Document.","authors":"Whitney J Barrett, Kevin A Kaucher, Ross E Orpet, Christopher B Colwell, John W Lyng","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2025.2460203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To conduct a literature review and provide a summary of the evidence surrounding prehospital administration of antibiotics for open fractures and other major open wounds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a literature search and summarized the evidence following the methodology established for the NAEMSP Prehospital Trauma Compendium. We searched PubMed from inception to 23 December 2022 for articles relevant to Emergency Medical Services, trauma, and antibiotics. Due to resource limitations, the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was not used during review of the evidence, and no formal assessment of bias or strength of evidence was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 105 articles identified in the initial search, 13 articles were included in the final evidence review and synthesis. Prehospital administration of antibiotics in combat and civilian trauma patients consists of mostly observational, retrospective studies that describe use as likely safe, but with uncertainty as to its effect on important clinical outcomes. Both combat and civilian analyses of protocol adherence and inter-rater reliability for recognition and treatment of injuries have also produced variable and inconsistent results. These results pose a challenge for implementation and highlight the inherent limitations and external validity of efficacy outcomes published to date.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prehospital administration of prophylactic antibiotics for trauma appears safe and may be considered in some specific patient populations. Universal and widespread adoption of this intervention needs further study to identify the true impact on patient-centered outcomes and identification of patients who might confer greatest benefit. Local practice characteristics may support adoption of multidisciplinary-developed prudent and practicable protocols incorporating the use of prophylactic antibiotics for some trauma patients such as those with open fractures or those with significant delays in transport to definitive care. Future research should attempt to address the appropriate identification of wounds and injury patterns that have the highest likelihood of benefit from prehospital administration of antibiotics, the ideal timing of administering the antibiotic(s) following initial injury, impact on infection rates, and other important patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2025.2460203","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To conduct a literature review and provide a summary of the evidence surrounding prehospital administration of antibiotics for open fractures and other major open wounds.

Methods: We performed a literature search and summarized the evidence following the methodology established for the NAEMSP Prehospital Trauma Compendium. We searched PubMed from inception to 23 December 2022 for articles relevant to Emergency Medical Services, trauma, and antibiotics. Due to resource limitations, the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was not used during review of the evidence, and no formal assessment of bias or strength of evidence was performed.

Results: Of 105 articles identified in the initial search, 13 articles were included in the final evidence review and synthesis. Prehospital administration of antibiotics in combat and civilian trauma patients consists of mostly observational, retrospective studies that describe use as likely safe, but with uncertainty as to its effect on important clinical outcomes. Both combat and civilian analyses of protocol adherence and inter-rater reliability for recognition and treatment of injuries have also produced variable and inconsistent results. These results pose a challenge for implementation and highlight the inherent limitations and external validity of efficacy outcomes published to date.

Conclusions: Prehospital administration of prophylactic antibiotics for trauma appears safe and may be considered in some specific patient populations. Universal and widespread adoption of this intervention needs further study to identify the true impact on patient-centered outcomes and identification of patients who might confer greatest benefit. Local practice characteristics may support adoption of multidisciplinary-developed prudent and practicable protocols incorporating the use of prophylactic antibiotics for some trauma patients such as those with open fractures or those with significant delays in transport to definitive care. Future research should attempt to address the appropriate identification of wounds and injury patterns that have the highest likelihood of benefit from prehospital administration of antibiotics, the ideal timing of administering the antibiotic(s) following initial injury, impact on infection rates, and other important patient outcomes.

院前创伤简编:创伤患者院前抗生素管理- NAEMSP资源文件。
目的:对开放性骨折和其他主要开放性伤口院前应用抗生素的相关文献进行综述和总结。方法:我们进行文献检索,并根据NAEMSP院前创伤纲要建立的方法总结证据。我们从PubMed成立到2022年12月23日检索了与紧急医疗服务、创伤和抗生素相关的文章。由于资源限制,在证据审查期间未使用推荐、评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)方法,也未进行正式的偏倚或证据强度评估。结果:在最初检索到的105篇文章中,有13篇文章被纳入最终的证据回顾和综合。战斗和平民创伤患者的院前抗生素管理主要由观察性、回顾性研究组成,这些研究描述抗生素的使用可能是安全的,但其对重要临床结果的影响不确定。战斗和平民对协议遵守情况和识别和治疗损伤的内部可靠性的分析也产生了不同和不一致的结果。这些结果对实施提出了挑战,并突出了迄今为止发表的疗效结果的固有局限性和外部有效性。结论:院前使用预防性抗生素治疗创伤是安全的,在一些特定的患者群体中可以考虑。普遍和广泛采用这种干预措施需要进一步研究,以确定对以患者为中心的结果的真正影响,并确定可能带来最大益处的患者。当地的实践特点可能支持采用多学科制定的谨慎和可行的方案,包括对一些创伤患者使用预防性抗生素,如开放性骨折患者或在转移到最终治疗时明显延误的患者。未来的研究应尝试正确识别最可能从院前抗生素治疗中获益的伤口和损伤模式,在初次损伤后施用抗生素的理想时机,对感染率的影响以及其他重要的患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信