院前全血管理与输血反应增加无关:大都会EMS机构的经验。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Emily Raetz, David Wampler, Leslie Greebon, Donald Jenkins, Erika Brigmon, Jacquelyn Messenger, Vipulkumar Prajapati, William Bullock, Emmanuel Rayas, Lauren Barry, Brian Ferguson, Rachel Ely, Christopher Winckler
{"title":"院前全血管理与输血反应增加无关:大都会EMS机构的经验。","authors":"Emily Raetz, David Wampler, Leslie Greebon, Donald Jenkins, Erika Brigmon, Jacquelyn Messenger, Vipulkumar Prajapati, William Bullock, Emmanuel Rayas, Lauren Barry, Brian Ferguson, Rachel Ely, Christopher Winckler","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2025.2464247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Low titer O<sup>+</sup> whole blood (LTO+WB) has been shown to improve outcomes in trauma patients and use is increasingly common. Studies on prehospital use and efficacy have been published throughout the literature, but few of these fully address the risks of transfusion reactions and other side effects. The focus of this study is to look at prehospital LTO+WB transfusions in trauma patients and review for transfusion reactions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective review of consecutive trauma patients who received prehospital LTO+WB over a 4.5-year period. We used EMS agency transfusion records and institutional blood bank data from two urban level I trauma centers for records on blood transfusion reactions. Excluded from the study were patients declared dead on arrival to the hospital, patients transfused for non-traumatic complaints, patients for whom hospital records were unavailable, and any transfusion reaction that occurred more than 10 days after the prehospital transfusion. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1126 prehospital transfusions 572 met inclusion criteria. There were 2 (0.35%) suspected transfusion reactions, none of which were determined to be hemolytic reactions. There was 1 febrile non-hemolytic reaction on hospital day 1 and there was 1 allergic reaction with hives and shortness of breath that occurred on hospital day 1.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prehospital LTO+WB is safe to use and has a similar rate of transfusion reaction as when given in-hospital. Concerns about transfusion reactions caused by LTO+WB should not preclude its use prehospital. Regardless of the low incidence of transfusion reactions, prehospital personnel should be trained in their recognition and management. Limitations include retrospective study design and the inability to distinguish transfusion reactions from prehospital LTO+WB versus reaction to blood products transfused at the trauma center.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prehospital Whole Blood Administration Not Associated with Increased Transfusion Reactions: The Experience of a Metropolitan EMS Agency.\",\"authors\":\"Emily Raetz, David Wampler, Leslie Greebon, Donald Jenkins, Erika Brigmon, Jacquelyn Messenger, Vipulkumar Prajapati, William Bullock, Emmanuel Rayas, Lauren Barry, Brian Ferguson, Rachel Ely, Christopher Winckler\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10903127.2025.2464247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Low titer O<sup>+</sup> whole blood (LTO+WB) has been shown to improve outcomes in trauma patients and use is increasingly common. Studies on prehospital use and efficacy have been published throughout the literature, but few of these fully address the risks of transfusion reactions and other side effects. The focus of this study is to look at prehospital LTO+WB transfusions in trauma patients and review for transfusion reactions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective review of consecutive trauma patients who received prehospital LTO+WB over a 4.5-year period. We used EMS agency transfusion records and institutional blood bank data from two urban level I trauma centers for records on blood transfusion reactions. Excluded from the study were patients declared dead on arrival to the hospital, patients transfused for non-traumatic complaints, patients for whom hospital records were unavailable, and any transfusion reaction that occurred more than 10 days after the prehospital transfusion. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1126 prehospital transfusions 572 met inclusion criteria. There were 2 (0.35%) suspected transfusion reactions, none of which were determined to be hemolytic reactions. There was 1 febrile non-hemolytic reaction on hospital day 1 and there was 1 allergic reaction with hives and shortness of breath that occurred on hospital day 1.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prehospital LTO+WB is safe to use and has a similar rate of transfusion reaction as when given in-hospital. Concerns about transfusion reactions caused by LTO+WB should not preclude its use prehospital. Regardless of the low incidence of transfusion reactions, prehospital personnel should be trained in their recognition and management. Limitations include retrospective study design and the inability to distinguish transfusion reactions from prehospital LTO+WB versus reaction to blood products transfused at the trauma center.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2025.2464247\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2025.2464247","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:低滴度O+全血(LTO + WB)已被证明可以改善创伤患者的预后,并且使用越来越普遍。关于院前使用和疗效的研究已经发表在整个文献中,但这些研究很少充分解决输血反应和其他副作用的风险。本研究的重点是观察创伤患者院前LTO + WB输注并回顾输注反应。方法:回顾性分析4.5年期间接受院前LTO + WB治疗的连续创伤患者。我们使用EMS机构的输血记录和两个城市一级创伤中心的机构血库数据来记录输血反应。本研究排除了在抵达医院时宣布死亡的患者、因非创伤性疾病输血的患者、无法获得医院记录的患者以及院前输血后10天以上发生的任何输血反应。采用描述性统计进行数据分析。结果:1126例院前输血中572例符合纳入标准。疑似输血反应2例(0.35%),均未确定为溶血反应。住院第1天出现1例发热非溶血反应,住院第1天出现1例荨麻疹、呼吸急促的过敏反应。结论:院前使用LTO + WB是安全的,输血反应率与院内使用相似。对LTO + WB引起的输血反应的担忧不应排除院前使用。尽管输血反应发生率较低,院前人员仍应接受输血反应识别和管理方面的培训。局限性包括回顾性研究设计和无法区分院前LTO + WB与创伤中心输注血液制品的输血反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prehospital Whole Blood Administration Not Associated with Increased Transfusion Reactions: The Experience of a Metropolitan EMS Agency.

Objectives: Low titer O+ whole blood (LTO+WB) has been shown to improve outcomes in trauma patients and use is increasingly common. Studies on prehospital use and efficacy have been published throughout the literature, but few of these fully address the risks of transfusion reactions and other side effects. The focus of this study is to look at prehospital LTO+WB transfusions in trauma patients and review for transfusion reactions.

Methods: This was a retrospective review of consecutive trauma patients who received prehospital LTO+WB over a 4.5-year period. We used EMS agency transfusion records and institutional blood bank data from two urban level I trauma centers for records on blood transfusion reactions. Excluded from the study were patients declared dead on arrival to the hospital, patients transfused for non-traumatic complaints, patients for whom hospital records were unavailable, and any transfusion reaction that occurred more than 10 days after the prehospital transfusion. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis.

Results: Of 1126 prehospital transfusions 572 met inclusion criteria. There were 2 (0.35%) suspected transfusion reactions, none of which were determined to be hemolytic reactions. There was 1 febrile non-hemolytic reaction on hospital day 1 and there was 1 allergic reaction with hives and shortness of breath that occurred on hospital day 1.

Conclusions: Prehospital LTO+WB is safe to use and has a similar rate of transfusion reaction as when given in-hospital. Concerns about transfusion reactions caused by LTO+WB should not preclude its use prehospital. Regardless of the low incidence of transfusion reactions, prehospital personnel should be trained in their recognition and management. Limitations include retrospective study design and the inability to distinguish transfusion reactions from prehospital LTO+WB versus reaction to blood products transfused at the trauma center.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信