Journal of personality assessment最新文献_第3页

Development and Validation of the Narrative Identity Self-Evaluation Scale (NISE). 叙事身份自我评价量表（NISE）的开发与验证。

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Journal of personality assessment Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2425663

Majse Lind, Henry R Cowan, Jonathan M Adler, Dan P McAdams

{"title":"Development and Validation of the Narrative Identity Self-Evaluation Scale (NISE).","authors":"Majse Lind, Henry R Cowan, Jonathan M Adler, Dan P McAdams","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2425663","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2024.2425663","url":null,"abstract":"In narrative identity research, variables are typically captured through detailed content-coding of personal narratives. Yet, alternative methods have been suggested, notably self-report scales, because they capture a participant's own interpretation of their personal narratives, and because they are efficient to administer as a supplement to more labor-intensive coding methods. This study developed and validated the Narrative Identity Self-Evaluation (NISE) questionnaire. In Study 1, the questionnaire was developed through exploratory factor analysis (n = 425) and its criterion validity examined. In Study 2, the NISE factor structure and criterion relationships were confirmed (n = 304). In Study 3 (based on the same sample as Study 1), content-coding of 11 narrative identity characteristics in open-ended personal story accounts was conducted, and NISE scores were compared to corresponding content-coded variables. The 20-item NISE has three factors replicating common dimensions in narrative identity (autobiographical reasoning, desire for structure, positive motivational/affective themes) and a novel fourth factor capturing disturbances of narrative identity. The NISE correlated in theoretically-coherent ways with content coded narrative identity variables, self-report traits, and measures relevant for narrative identity, self-concept, well-being, and psychopathology. We discuss the scale's advantages in complementing content-coding of narrative accounts to assess variation in narrative identity within both clinical and non-clinical populations.","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142639243","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Developing the Short Form of the Survey on Social and Emotional Skills (SSES-SF). 开发社会和情感技能调查简表（SSES-SF）。

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Journal of personality assessment Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2416416

Faming Wang, Ronnel B King

{"title":"Developing the Short Form of the Survey on Social and Emotional Skills (SSES-SF).","authors":"Faming Wang, Ronnel B King","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2416416","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2024.2416416","url":null,"abstract":"Given the critical role of socio-emotional skills in students' academic success, psychological well-being, and other critical life outcomes, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) developed the Survey on Social and Emotional Skills (SSES) to measure these skills among school-age students. However, the broad conceptual scope of socio-emotional skills necessitated the use of a large number of items (i.e., 120 items) in the original SSES, which poses challenges regarding survey administration and participant fatigue. To address these issues, this study aimed to develop a short form of the SSES (i.e., SSES-SF). The sample included 29,798 15-year-old students across 10 regions. We developed a 45-item version of SSES-SF using the machine learning approach of genetic algorithm, which is 62.5% shorter than the original 120-item SSES. The reliability, construct validity, reproduced information, concurrent validity, and measurement invariance of the SSES-SF were investigated. We found that the SSES-SF demonstrated satisfactory reliability, construct validity, and concurrent validity. Furthermore, the SSES-SF was able to reproduce a substantial amount of information from the original full-form SSES and exhibited measurement invariance across genders, regions, and language groups. Theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed.","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142622734","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Equally vs. unequally keyed blocks in forced-choice questionnaires: Implications on validity and reliability. 强迫选择问卷中的等键块与不等键块：对有效性和可靠性的影响

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Journal of personality assessment Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2420869

Diego F Graña, Rodrigo S Kreitchmann, Francisco J Abad, Miguel A Sorrel

{"title":"Equally vs. unequally keyed blocks in forced-choice questionnaires: Implications on validity and reliability.","authors":"Diego F Graña, Rodrigo S Kreitchmann, Francisco J Abad, Miguel A Sorrel","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2420869","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2024.2420869","url":null,"abstract":"Forced-choice (FC) questionnaires have gained scientific interest over the last decades. However, the inclusion of unequally keyed item pairs in FC questionnaires remains a subject of debate, as there is evidence supporting both their usage and avoidance. Designing unequally keyed pairs may be more difficult when considering social desirability, as they might allow the identification of ideal responses. Nevertheless, they may enhance the reliability and the potential for normative interpretation of scores. To empirically investigate this topic, data were collected from 1,125 undergraduate Psychology students who completed a personality item pool measuring the Big Five personality traits in Likert-type format and two FC questionnaires (with and without unequally keyed pairs). These questionnaires were compared in terms of reliability, convergent and criterion validity, and ipsativity of the scores, along with insights on the construction process. While constructing questionnaires with unequally keyed blocks presented challenges in matching items on their social desirability, the differences observed in terms of reliability, validity, or ipsativity were sporadic and lacked systematic patterns. This suggests that neither questionnaire format exhibited a clear superiority. Given these results, it is recommended using only equally keyed blocks to minimize potential validity issues associated with response biases.","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142622740","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Ultra-Brief Therapeutic Assessment with Three Chinese Adult Clients: A Case-Based Time-Series Pilot Study. 对三位中国成人客户进行超简短治疗评估：基于案例的时间序列试点研究。

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Journal of personality assessment Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2422432

Qi-Wu Sun, Zhi-Huan Wang, Ming Wang, Stephen E Finn

引用次数: 0

Language Dominance and Cultural Identity Predict Variation in Self-Reported Personality in English and Spanish Among Hispanic/Latino Bilingual Adults. 语言优势和文化认同感可预测西班牙裔/拉美裔双语成年人用英语和西班牙语自我描述的人格差异。

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Journal of personality assessment Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2416412

Morgan Gianola, Maria M Llabre, Elizabeth A Reynolds Losin

{"title":"Language Dominance and Cultural Identity Predict Variation in Self-Reported Personality in English and Spanish Among Hispanic/Latino Bilingual Adults.","authors":"Morgan Gianola, Maria M Llabre, Elizabeth A Reynolds Losin","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2416412","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2024.2416412","url":null,"abstract":"Language is a fundamental aspect of human culture that influences cognitive and perceptual processes. Prior evidence demonstrates personality self-report can vary across multilingual persons' language contexts. We assessed how cultural identification, language dominance, or both dynamically influence bilingual respondents' self-conception, via self-reported personality, across English and Spanish contexts. During separate English and Spanish conditions, 133 Hispanic/Latino bilingual participants (70 female) completed the Big Five Inventory of personality. We used language use and acculturation surveys completed in both languages to calculate participants' relative language dominance and identification with U.S.-American and Hispanic culture. Participants reported higher levels of agreeableness, conscientiousness, and neuroticism in English relative to Spanish. Language dominance predicted cross-language differences in personality report, with higher extraversion reported in participants' dominant language. Within each language, greater endorsement of U.S.-American identity was associated with higher extraversion and conscientiousness and lower reported neuroticism. Agreeableness report in both languages was positively predicted by Hispanic identification. Our results clarify existing literature related to language and cultural effects on personality report among U.S. Hispanics/Latinos. These findings could inform assessments of self-relevant cognitions across languages among bilingual populations and hold relevance for health outcomes affected by cultural processes.","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142605051","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Understanding Alpha and Beta and Sources of Common Variance: Theoretical Underpinnings and a Practical Example. 理解 Alpha 和 Beta 以及共同方差的来源：理论依据和实例。

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Journal of personality assessment Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2420175

Steven P Reise, Mark G Haviland

{"title":"Understanding Alpha and Beta and Sources of Common Variance: Theoretical Underpinnings and a Practical Example.","authors":"Steven P Reise, Mark G Haviland","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2420175","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2024.2420175","url":null,"abstract":"Coefficient alpha estimates the degree to which scale scores reflect systematic variation due to one or more common dimensions. Coefficient beta, on the other hand, estimates the degree to which scale scores reflect a single dimension common among all the items; that is, the target construct a scale attempts to measure. As such, the magnitude of beta, relative to alpha, informs on the ability to meaningfully interpret derived scale scores as reflecting a single construct. Despite its clear interpretative usefulness, coefficient beta is rarely reported and, perhaps, not well understood. As such, we first describe how coefficient alpha and beta are analogues to model-based reliability coefficients omega total and omega hierarchical. We then demonstrate with simulated data how these indices function under a variety of data structures. Finally, we perform a hierarchical cluster analysis of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire's Stress Reaction Scale, estimating alpha and beta, as clusters form. This demonstrates a chief advantage of alpha and beta; they do not require a formal structural model. Moreover, we illustrate how scales that primarily are based on sets of homogeneous item clusters can \"ramp up\" to yield reliable scores with conceptual breadth and predominantly reflect the intended target construct.","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142605053","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Validation of the Persian Version of the ICD-11 Compatible Personality Inventory for DSM-5- Brief Form Plus, Modified. 针对 DSM-5 的 ICD-11 兼容人格量表波斯语版本的验证--简表增强版（修订版）》（Validation of the Persian Version of the ICD-11 Compatible Personality Inventory for DSM-5- Brief Form Plus, Modified）。

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Journal of personality assessment Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2420872

Saeid Komasi, Andre Kerber, Christopher J Hopwood

{"title":"Validation of the Persian Version of the ICD-11 Compatible Personality Inventory for DSM-5- Brief Form Plus, Modified.","authors":"Saeid Komasi, Andre Kerber, Christopher J Hopwood","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2420872","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2024.2420872","url":null,"abstract":"Clinical assessment increasingly emphasizes six maladaptive domains of the DSM-5 and ICD-11 trait models, including negative affectivity, detachment, antagonism/dissociality, disinhibition, psychoticism, and anankastia. The present study aimed to validate the Persian version of the ICD-11 compatible Personality Inventory for DSM-5-Brief Form Plus, Modified (PID5BF + M). Data from a mixed sample including 1,615 adults (community N = 1,476 and outpatient N = 139) were used to assess the latent structure, congruence coefficients, reliability, convergent validity, and criterion validity of the PID5BF + M. The results supported the six-factor structure of the PID5BF + M whose traits are largely congruent with those from previous studies. The scale reliabilities were acceptable, and strong associations were observed with personality disorder-type symptom counts (r ranging from .15 to .59, all p < .001). PID5BF + M scales also distinguished clinical and non-clinical samples. The present results support the validity and utility of the PID5BF + M for personality psychopathology screening in the Iranian population.","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142583392","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Can Forced-Choice Response Format Reduce Faking of Socially Aversive Personality Traits? 强迫选择回答格式能否减少社会厌恶型人格特质的伪造？

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Journal of personality assessment Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-19 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2326893

Amanda L Y Valone, Adam W Meade

{"title":"Can Forced-Choice Response Format Reduce Faking of Socially Aversive Personality Traits?","authors":"Amanda L Y Valone, Adam W Meade","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2326893","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2326893","url":null,"abstract":"Self-report assessments are the standard for personality measurement, but motivated respondents are able to manipulate or fake their responses to typical Likert scale self-report. Although progress has been made in research seeking to reduce faking, most of it has focused on normative personality traits such as those measured by the five factor model. The measurement of socially aversive personality (e.g., the Dark Triad) is less well-researched. The negative aspects of socially aversive traits increase the opportunity and motivation of respondents to fake typical single-stimulus self-report assessments underscoring the need for faking resistant response formats. A possible way to reduce faking that has been explored in basic personality research is the use of the forced-choice response format. This study applied this method to socially aversive traits and illustrated best practices to create new multidimensional forced-choice and single-stimulus measures of socially aversive personality traits. Results indicated that participants were able to artificially alter their scores when asked to respond like an ideal job applicant, and counter to expectations, the forced-choice format did not decrease faking. Our results indicate that even when best practices are followed, forced-choice format is not a panacea for respondent faking.","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"819-831"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140158294","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Establishing Levels of Personality Functioning Using the Structured Interview of Personality Organization (STIPO-R): A Latent Profile Analysis. 利用人格组织结构化访谈（STIPO-R）确定人格功能等级：潜在特征分析。

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Journal of personality assessment Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-02 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2330502

Marko Biberdzic, Julia F Sowislo, Nicole Cain, Kevin B Meehan, Emanuele Preti, Rossella Di Pierro, Eve Caligor, John F Clarkin

{"title":"Establishing Levels of Personality Functioning Using the Structured Interview of Personality Organization (STIPO-R): A Latent Profile Analysis.","authors":"Marko Biberdzic, Julia F Sowislo, Nicole Cain, Kevin B Meehan, Emanuele Preti, Rossella Di Pierro, Eve Caligor, John F Clarkin","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2330502","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2330502","url":null,"abstract":"Both the new ICD-11 and the latest Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders focus on self and interpersonal functioning as the central feature of personality pathology, also acknowledging that personality disorders are organized along a dimensional continuum of severity. This revised understanding is in line with long-standing psychodynamic conceptualisations of personality pathology, in particular Kernberg's object relations model of personality organization. Despite existing evidence for the clinical utility of the derived Structured Interview of Personality Organization (STIPO-R), empirical support for the identification of clear cut-points between the different levels of personality functioning is missing. For this purpose, a total of 764 adult participants were recruited across two clinical (outpatient and inpatient) settings (n = 250) and two non-clinical (university students and general community) samples (n = 514). Results from the mixture modeling suggested the existence of five groups across the clinical and non-clinical samples that covered: healthy personality functioning, maladaptive personality rigidity, and mild, moderate, and severe levels of personality pathology. All five indicators of personality organization were found to be reliable predictors of personality pathology. Of the five STIPO-R indicators, Aggression and Moral Values had the most discriminative power for differentiating between the Mild, Moderate, and Severe personality disorder groups. Implications of these findings are discussed.","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"727-739"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140336056","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Broader Issues in Test Translation and Validation: A Commentary Inspired by Macina et al. (2023). 测试翻译和验证中的更广泛问题：受 Macina 等人启发的评论》（2023 年）。

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Journal of personality assessment Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-10 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2375213

Dominick Gamache, Philippe Leclerc, Alexandre Côté, David Théberge, Claudia Savard

{"title":"Broader Issues in Test Translation and Validation: A Commentary Inspired by Macina et al. (2023).","authors":"Dominick Gamache, Philippe Leclerc, Alexandre Côté, David Théberge, Claudia Savard","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2375213","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2375213","url":null,"abstract":"Macina et al. (2023) recently reported mixed results on the German translation of the Self and Interpersonal Functioning Scale (SIFS). By focusing on suboptimal indices of structural validity, they recommended choosing other available instruments over the SIFS in future research on personality impairment. Reflecting on Macina et al.'s overall conclusions inspired us to consider broader issues in the field of personality impairment assessment. In this commentary, we discuss some issues regarding test translation and validity raised by Macina et al.'s article. We advise against assuming equivalence between original and translated versions of a test and discuss some caveats regarding comparison between different instruments based on structural validity. We also call into question whether the latter should be the litmus test for judging the quality of a measure. Finally, we discuss how the proliferation of personality impairment measures can benefit the broader field. Notably, this would allow moving toward a \"what works for whom\" approach that considers the match between psychometric property, desired use of the instrument, and characteristics of the target population.","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"724-726"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141580039","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0