Journal of personality assessment最新文献_第2页

Equally vs. unequally keyed blocks in forced-choice questionnaires: Implications on validity and reliability. 强迫选择问卷中的等键块与不等键块：对有效性和可靠性的影响

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Journal of personality assessment Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-11 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2420869

Diego F Graña, Rodrigo S Kreitchmann, Francisco J Abad, Miguel A Sorrel

{"title":"Equally vs. unequally keyed blocks in forced-choice questionnaires: Implications on validity and reliability.","authors":"Diego F Graña, Rodrigo S Kreitchmann, Francisco J Abad, Miguel A Sorrel","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2420869","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2420869","url":null,"abstract":"Forced-choice (FC) questionnaires have gained scientific interest over the last decades. However, the inclusion of unequally keyed item pairs in FC questionnaires remains a subject of debate, as there is evidence supporting both their usage and avoidance. Designing unequally keyed pairs may be more difficult when considering social desirability, as they might allow the identification of ideal responses. Nevertheless, they may enhance the reliability and the potential for normative interpretation of scores. To empirically investigate this topic, data were collected from 1,125 undergraduate Psychology students who completed a personality item pool measuring the Big Five personality traits in Likert-type format and two FC questionnaires (with and without unequally keyed pairs). These questionnaires were compared in terms of reliability, convergent and criterion validity, and ipsativity of the scores, along with insights on the construction process. While constructing questionnaires with unequally keyed blocks presented challenges in matching items on their social desirability, the differences observed in terms of reliability, validity, or ipsativity were sporadic and lacked systematic patterns. This suggests that neither questionnaire format exhibited a clear superiority. Given these results, it is recommended using only equally keyed blocks to minimize potential validity issues associated with response biases.","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"392-405"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142622740","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Language Dominance and Cultural Identity Predict Variation in Self-Reported Personality in English and Spanish Among Hispanic/Latino Bilingual Adults. 语言优势和文化认同感可预测西班牙裔/拉美裔双语成年人用英语和西班牙语自我描述的人格差异。

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Journal of personality assessment Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-08 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2416412

Morgan Gianola, Maria M Llabre, Elizabeth A Reynolds Losin

{"title":"Language Dominance and Cultural Identity Predict Variation in Self-Reported Personality in English and Spanish Among Hispanic/Latino Bilingual Adults.","authors":"Morgan Gianola, Maria M Llabre, Elizabeth A Reynolds Losin","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2416412","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2416412","url":null,"abstract":"Language is a fundamental aspect of human culture that influences cognitive and perceptual processes. Prior evidence demonstrates personality self-report can vary across multilingual persons' language contexts. We assessed how cultural identification, language dominance, or both dynamically influence bilingual respondents' self-conception, via self-reported personality, across English and Spanish contexts. During separate English and Spanish conditions, 133 Hispanic/Latino bilingual participants (70 female) completed the Big Five Inventory of personality. We used language use and acculturation surveys completed in both languages to calculate participants' relative language dominance and identification with U.S.-American and Hispanic culture. Participants reported higher levels of agreeableness, conscientiousness, and neuroticism in English relative to Spanish. Language dominance predicted cross-language differences in personality report, with higher extraversion reported in participants' dominant language. Within each language, greater endorsement of U.S.-American identity was associated with higher extraversion and conscientiousness and lower reported neuroticism. Agreeableness report in both languages was positively predicted by Hispanic identification. Our results clarify existing literature related to language and cultural effects on personality report among U.S. Hispanics/Latinos. These findings could inform assessments of self-relevant cognitions across languages among bilingual populations and hold relevance for health outcomes affected by cultural processes.","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"361-373"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11981866/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142605051","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Understanding Alpha and Beta and Sources of Common Variance: Theoretical Underpinnings and a Practical Example. 理解 Alpha 和 Beta 以及共同方差的来源：理论依据和实例。

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Journal of personality assessment Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-07 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2420175

Steven P Reise, Mark G Haviland

{"title":"Understanding Alpha and Beta and Sources of Common Variance: Theoretical Underpinnings and a Practical Example.","authors":"Steven P Reise, Mark G Haviland","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2420175","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2420175","url":null,"abstract":"Coefficient alpha estimates the degree to which scale scores reflect systematic variation due to one or more common dimensions. Coefficient beta, on the other hand, estimates the degree to which scale scores reflect a single dimension common among all the items; that is, the target construct a scale attempts to measure. As such, the magnitude of beta, relative to alpha, informs on the ability to meaningfully interpret derived scale scores as reflecting a single construct. Despite its clear interpretative usefulness, coefficient beta is rarely reported and, perhaps, not well understood. As such, we first describe how coefficient alpha and beta are analogues to model-based reliability coefficients omega total and omega hierarchical. We then demonstrate with simulated data how these indices function under a variety of data structures. Finally, we perform a hierarchical cluster analysis of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire's Stress Reaction Scale, estimating alpha and beta, as clusters form. This demonstrates a chief advantage of alpha and beta; they do not require a formal structural model. Moreover, we illustrate how scales that primarily are based on sets of homogeneous item clusters can \"ramp up\" to yield reliable scores with conceptual breadth and predominantly reflect the intended target construct.","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"267-282"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142605053","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Ultra-Brief Therapeutic Assessment with Three Chinese Adult Clients: A Case-Based Time-Series Pilot Study. 对三位中国成人客户进行超简短治疗评估：基于案例的时间序列试点研究。

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Journal of personality assessment Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-11 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2422432

Qi-Wu Sun, Zhi-Huan Wang, Ming Wang, Stephen E Finn

引用次数: 0

Development of an Inconsistent Responding Scale for the Big Five Inventory-2. 为 "大五量表-2 "开发不一致反应量表。

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Journal of personality assessment Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-21 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2411557

Jared R Ruchensky, John F Edens, M Brent Donnellan

{"title":"Development of an Inconsistent Responding Scale for the Big Five Inventory-2.","authors":"Jared R Ruchensky, John F Edens, M Brent Donnellan","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2411557","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2411557","url":null,"abstract":"The Big Five Inventory - 2 (BFI-2) is a commonly used self-report assessment of normal personality trait domains (Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Negative Emotionality, Open-Mindedness) and facets. To date, however, no direct measures of response distortion have been developed for it to identify potentially invalid responses. Such distortions (e.g., careless or random responding) can adversely impact data quality. The current study developed and provided initial validation data for an inconsistent responding scale within the BFI-2 to identify careless responders using two large undergraduate samples and a community sample. To create the scale, we first identified highly correlated BFI-2 item pairs in one undergraduate sample (N = 1,461) and then computed a total score by summing the absolute differences of these item pairs. This scale, the Detection of Response Inconsistency Procedure (DRIP), differentiated randomly generated and genuine data and generally correlated as expected with personality domains and other inconsistent responding scales across samples. The DRIP also incrementally predicted random data beyond a composite of items with exceptionally high or low base rates of endorsement from the Comprehensive Infrequency/Frequency Item Repository. We provide recommendations for DRIP cut scores that can detect careless responding while balancing sensitivity and specificity.","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"384-391"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142468254","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Problem No One is Talking About: Forensic Evaluators' Lack of Familiarity with Dimensional Approaches to Personality and Psychopathology. 无人问津的问题：法医评估人员对人格和精神病理学的维度方法缺乏了解。

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Journal of personality assessment Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-31 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2420172

Abby L Mulay, Emily D Gottfried, Jared R Ruchensky, Tiffany Russell, Adam P Natoli, Christopher J Hopwood

{"title":"The Problem No One is Talking About: Forensic Evaluators' Lack of Familiarity with Dimensional Approaches to Personality and Psychopathology.","authors":"Abby L Mulay, Emily D Gottfried, Jared R Ruchensky, Tiffany Russell, Adam P Natoli, Christopher J Hopwood","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2420172","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2420172","url":null,"abstract":"Historically, forensic evaluators have relied heavily upon various editions of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders when rendering psycholegal opinions. The field of mental health is increasing moving toward dimensional models of personality and psychopathology in lieu of traditional DSM categorical models, though the domains of forensic psychology and psychiatry have been slow to make this transition. The current study therefore sought to examine forensic evaluators' familiarity with dimensional approaches to personality and psychopathology, namely the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) and the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP). Forensic psychologists and psychiatrists (N = 54) completed an online survey designed to assess their familiarity with these models, as well as to determine if forensics practitioners are using these models in clinical practice. Participants endorsed greater familiarity with the AMPD, with a large majority of participants indicating they were unfamiliar with the HiTOP model. Few participants endorsed using these models in their clinical forensic practice. Implications for making the transition to dimensional models within forensic evaluation are discussed, as are paths forward for future research.","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"283-291"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142558013","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Comparing the Comprehensibility of Personality Measures Used to Measure New Diagnostic Approaches to Personality Disorders. 比较用于测量人格障碍新诊断方法的人格测量的可理解性。

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Journal of personality assessment Pub Date : 2025-04-28 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2025.2491491

Ashmita Ghosh, Nathaniel L Phillips, Kaela Van Til, Donald R Lynam, Joshua D Miller

{"title":"Comparing the Comprehensibility of Personality Measures Used to Measure New Diagnostic Approaches to Personality Disorders.","authors":"Ashmita Ghosh, Nathaniel L Phillips, Kaela Van Til, Donald R Lynam, Joshua D Miller","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2491491","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2025.2491491","url":null,"abstract":"In the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), an Alternative Model of Personality Disorder (AMPD) was proposed that considers the severity of impairment in personality functioning (Criterion A) and elevations in five pathological personality traits (Criterion B) as the primary diagnostic criteria. The present study examined whether self-report measures of personality impairment are longer, more complex, difficult, and require more introspection than items from measures of pathological personality traits. Participants from two undergraduate university research pools (N = 460) completed two measures of personality impairment and one measure of pathological personality traits. For all measures, participants rated item difficulty and introspection needed to answer each item. Additionally, the study compared the readability statistics of each measure automatically calculated by Microsoft Word. Results indicated that personality trait measures were significantly easier to read than personality impairment measures, and that answering personality trait items required less perceived introspection compared to personality impairment items; however, no significant differences were found in the perceived difficulty of items across measures. These results provide the first empirical examination of differences between personality trait and impairment measures in terms of readability statistics and participant perceptions of difficulty of items and required introspection.","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143970858","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Development of Past Self-Continuity Scale from Narrative and Essentialist Perspectives. 叙事与本质主义视角下过去自我延续量表的发展。

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Journal of personality assessment Pub Date : 2025-04-28 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2025.2494119

Akira Asayama, Miki Toyama

引用次数: 0

Distinguishing Interpersonal Problems, Sensitivities, Values, and Efficacies. 区分人际问题、敏感性、价值观和有效性。

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Journal of personality assessment Pub Date : 2025-04-22 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2025.2486654

Christopher J Hopwood, Maxim Trenkenschuh, Aaron L Pincus

{"title":"Distinguishing Interpersonal Problems, Sensitivities, Values, and Efficacies.","authors":"Christopher J Hopwood, Maxim Trenkenschuh, Aaron L Pincus","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2486654","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2025.2486654","url":null,"abstract":"Covariation among the octant scales of Interpersonal Circumplex (IPC) measures can be accounted for by a general elevation factor and two stylistic factors that can be rotated to reflect dominance and warmth. IPC measures are available to assess different interpersonal surfaces, or different kinds of interpersonal functioning. Administration of multiple IPC measures enables multisurface interpersonal assessment, in which both convergences and divergences across surfaces are considered clinically informative. This approach assumes that IPC measures are capturing qualitatively distinct variations in interpersonal functioning, but this assumption has not been formally tested. We fit CFA models with IPC measures of problems, sensitivities, values, and efficacies that had 12 dimensions (distinct general, dominance, and warmth factors for each surface) or which collapsed either general (9 factor) or stylistic (6 factor) dimensions across surfaces. The results favored the twelve-factor model, indicating that the four IPC measures provide distinct information regarding interpersonal functioning and supporting multisurface interpersonal assessment.","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144000777","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Developing an Evaluation Grid for the "Drawn Stories Technique": Exploring the Indicators of Children's Socio-Emotional Development, Anxiety, and Depression Levels. 发展“画故事技术”的评估网格：探索儿童社会情绪发展、焦虑和抑郁水平的指标。

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Journal of personality assessment Pub Date : 2025-04-14 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2025.2488438

Marco Andrea Piombo, Sabina La Grutta, Filippo Del Zozzo, Vittoria Spicuzza, Maria Stella Epifanio, Federica Andrei, Elena Trombini

{"title":"Developing an Evaluation Grid for the \"Drawn Stories Technique\": Exploring the Indicators of Children's Socio-Emotional Development, Anxiety, and Depression Levels.","authors":"Marco Andrea Piombo, Sabina La Grutta, Filippo Del Zozzo, Vittoria Spicuzza, Maria Stella Epifanio, Federica Andrei, Elena Trombini","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2488438","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2025.2488438","url":null,"abstract":"Since the first development of psychology, drawing has been considered a useful tool to understand an individual's development and personality. The graphic method has been regarded as a valuable means of expressing not only personality traits but also a child's emotions and the emotional tone they \"invest\" in the surrounding environment. However, empirical evaluations have raised substantial doubts about the reliability and validity of this kind of technique, and the lack of studies that provide empirical scoring methods represents a significant limitation in the field. This study aims to develop a tailored evaluation grid for the Drawn Stories Technique to explore which drawing indicators-story outcomes, themes, content, and formal aspects might reflect children's socio-emotional functioning in terms of emotional and social intelligence, as well as clinical levels of anxiety and depression. The Drawn Stories Technique along with four self-report questionnaires assessing trait Emotional Intelligence, Social Intelligence, Anxiety, and Depression, were administered to 228 primary school children in groups during class time. Negative outcomes were positively related to depression scores but not to anxiety scores, while social skills were associated with fewer death-related themes. Children that exhibited clinical levels of depression tended to draw significantly fewer themes related to fables and animals, and more everyday life events. Conversely, children with clinical levels of anxiety showed differences in some formal aspects in their drawings, including fewer empty spaces and more heavy line traits. This study has shown the potential use of graphic techniques with primary school children to obtain potential indicators of maladjustment through an evaluation grid to collect information.","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144015178","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0