Journal of personality assessment最新文献_第2页

Validation of the Approach-Avoidance Temperament Questionnaire in Individuals with Anxiety and Depression. 焦虑症和抑郁症患者接近-回避气质问卷的验证。

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Journal of personality assessment Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-22 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2350466

Madeleine Rassaby, Jeffrey M Rogers, Charles T Taylor

{"title":"Validation of the Approach-Avoidance Temperament Questionnaire in Individuals with Anxiety and Depression.","authors":"Madeleine Rassaby, Jeffrey M Rogers, Charles T Taylor","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2350466","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2350466","url":null,"abstract":"The Approach-Avoidance Temperament Questionnaire (ATQ) is a well-established measure assessing heightened sensitivity and reactivity to reward/positive stimuli (approach temperament) and to punishment/negative stimuli (avoidance temperament). These basic dimensions of personality are believed to be important for understanding the etiology and maintenance of anxiety and depressive disorders. Despite the ATQ's potential utility in clinical psychology research, its psychometric properties and factor structure have yet to be examined in a psychiatric sample. The aims of the present study were to 1) conduct confirmatory factor analysis to replicate the ATQ's factor structure in individuals diagnosed with an anxiety or depressive disorder (N = 244), 2) assess internal consistency and convergent and divergent validity, and 3) explore differences in approach and avoidance temperaments in individuals with versus without a diagnosis of anxiety or depression. Results confirmed the original two-factor structure of the ATQ in a clinical sample, with approach and avoidance temperaments representing orthogonal dimensions. The measure demonstrated strong internal consistency, convergent and divergent validity, and predictive validity. Individuals with anxiety and depression scored higher on avoidance items and lower on approach items compared to those without clinical diagnoses. This study supports the use of the ATQ in clinical populations.","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"114-126"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11582082/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141081731","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Better Theories and Better Research Will Make Personality Disorder Assessment More Clinically Useful.

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Journal of personality assessment Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2443409

Christopher J Hopwood

引用次数: 0

CAT-PD and MMPI-3 Validity Scales Detect Simulated Overreporting and Underreporting.

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Journal of personality assessment Pub Date : 2024-12-09 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2430315

Omeed Tartak, Leah T Emery, Leonard J Simms

{"title":"CAT-PD and MMPI-3 Validity Scales Detect Simulated Overreporting and Underreporting.","authors":"Omeed Tartak, Leah T Emery, Leonard J Simms","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2430315","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2024.2430315","url":null,"abstract":"Individuals can sway legal, medical, employment, or other decisions by dishonestly self-reporting on psychological tests. Accordingly, the Comprehensive Assessment of Traits relevant to Personality Disorder (CAT-PD) and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3 (MMPI-3) include validity scales to detect overreporting and underreporting. Although many studies have empirically tested the validity scales of the MMPI-2 and the MMPI-2-RF, fewer have done so with the updated MMPI-3, and none with the CAT-PD. Therefore, in the present study, a simulation design was conducted to determine how successfully the CAT-PD and MMPI-3 validity scales would discriminate between credible responders and noncredible responders (i.e., overreporters and underreporters). Undergraduates and crowd-sourced adults (Total N = 484) were randomly assigned to respond honestly, overreport, or underreport while completing the MMPI-3 and the CAT-PD. Relative to honest responders, overreporters and underreporters significantly increased their respective validity scale scores (Cohen's d range = 1.04 - d = 4.87); they also significantly biased their substantive scale profiles. Moreover, CAT-PD validity scales demonstrated convergent and discriminant validity with MMPI-3 validity scales and similar classification accuracy estimates via receiver operating characteristic curves. These results suggest that, within a nonclinical simulation design, CAT-PD and MMPI-3 validity scales both effectively detect noncredible responding.","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142801188","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Evaluator Disagreement about the Association between Psychopathy Checklist-Revised Scores and Risk for Future Sexual Violence.

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Journal of personality assessment Pub Date : 2024-12-06 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2433513

Samantha J Kurus, Marcus T Boccaccini, Jorge G Varela, Ramona M Noland

{"title":"Evaluator Disagreement about the Association between Psychopathy Checklist-Revised Scores and Risk for Future Sexual Violence.","authors":"Samantha J Kurus, Marcus T Boccaccini, Jorge G Varela, Ramona M Noland","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2433513","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2024.2433513","url":null,"abstract":"It is common for forensic evaluators to use assessment instruments in risk assessment evaluations. This study examines whether different evaluators use instrument results the same way when coming to conclusions about risk for sexual recidivism in Sexually Violent Predator (SVP) evaluations. Three evaluators who each used both the Static-99R and Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in more than 60 SVP evaluations (Total N = 338) provided data for the study. There were clear evaluator differences in how instrument scores were associated with risk opinions. For one evaluator, multiple regression results revealed that PCL-R Facet 2 (Affective) and Facet 3 (Lifestyle) scores were the only statistically significant predictors of risk. In other words, this evaluator's risk opinions were more clearly associated with scores on a psychopathy measure (PCL-R) than scores on a measure specifically designed to assess risk (Static-99R). For another evaluator, only Static-99R scores were independent predictors of risk. For the final evaluator, Static-99R scores and, to a lesser extent, PCL-R Facet 2 scores were independent predictors of risk. These findings add to the growing body of research suggesting that forensic evaluation results can depend, to a non-trivial extent, on the specific evaluator conducting the evaluation.","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142786192","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Machiavellian Approach and Avoidance Questionnaire: Further Validation and Evidence of Cross-National Validity.

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Journal of personality assessment Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2431123

Christian Blötner, Bojana M Dinić, Andrew Denovan, Neil Dagnall, Petar Krstić, Kostas A Papageorgiou, Cassidy Trahair, Rachel A Plouffe

{"title":"The Machiavellian Approach and Avoidance Questionnaire: Further Validation and Evidence of Cross-National Validity.","authors":"Christian Blötner, Bojana M Dinić, Andrew Denovan, Neil Dagnall, Petar Krstić, Kostas A Papageorgiou, Cassidy Trahair, Rachel A Plouffe","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2431123","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2024.2431123","url":null,"abstract":"Researchers on antagonistic personality traits debate about an appropriate measurement approach to Machiavellianism. One measure intended to resolve this discourse, the Machiavellian Approach and Avoidance Questionnaire (MAAQ), distinguishes motivational aspects of Machiavellianism (https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001069). Machiavellian Approach reflects strategic striving for advantages (even at others' expense), and Machiavellian Avoidance encompasses misanthropically driven prevention of loss. Using two German samples (ntotal = 1,583; 63% women), evidence from our first study confirmed assumed relations between both facets and disagreeableness, as well as Machiavellian approach with dominance seeking, and Machiavellian avoidance with mistrust. However, the nomological networks of Machiavellian approach and measures of subclinical psychopathy were almost identical in both samples. Thus, the MAAQ failed to sufficiently differentiate from subclinical psychopathy. In a second study, partial scalar cross-national invariance was established across samples from Germany, Canada, United Kingdom, and Serbia (ntotal = 1,853). Thereby, participants from Germany scored lower in Machiavellian approach compared to other samples, lower in Machiavellian avoidance compared to samples from the United Kingdom and Canada, but higher compared to the Serbian sample. Overall, findings supported cross-national equivalence of the MAAQ but undermined construct validity.","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142770043","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Beyond Descriptive Models of Personality Problems. 超越人格问题的描述性模型。

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Journal of personality assessment Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2430322

Orestis Zavlis, Peter Fonagy

引用次数: 0

Self-Reported Spite Predicts Spiteful Behavior in an Online Crowd-Sourced Sample. 自我描述的 "唾弃 "可预测在线人群来源样本中的 "唾弃 "行为。

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Journal of personality assessment Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2429489

David S Gordon, Megan E Birney

引用次数: 0

Opportunities for the AMPD: Commentary on Hopwood, 2024. AMPD 的机遇：对 Hopwood 的评论，2024 年。

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Journal of personality assessment Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2430321

Joost Hutsebaut, Carla Sharp

引用次数: 0

Further Validation of the Triarchic Model of Grit Scale (TMGS) in Chinese Adolescents. 在中国青少年中进一步验证勇气量表（TMGS）的三元模型。

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Journal of personality assessment Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2430318

Jie Gong, Dong-Li Bei, Dai-Li Pi, Jie Luo

{"title":"Further Validation of the Triarchic Model of Grit Scale (TMGS) in Chinese Adolescents.","authors":"Jie Gong, Dong-Li Bei, Dai-Li Pi, Jie Luo","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2430318","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2024.2430318","url":null,"abstract":"The Triarchic Model of Grit Scale (TMGS) was developed as an innovative measurement designed to evaluate general grit levels, encompassing perseverance of effort, consistency of interests, and adaptability to situations within a collectivism culture. The present study was undertaken with the aim of examining the factor structure, measurement invariance, empirical validity, and incremental validity of the TMGS among in a sample of Chinese adolescents (N = 997, 43.4% males, Mage = 16.64, SDage = 1.05). The results revealed that the original three-factor model of TMGS exhibited the best fit to the data, and supported partial scalar invariance across gender. Additionally, the internal consistency values of the TMGS scores ranged from marginal to acceptable, and the stability coefficients across time were acceptable. Moreover, the TMGS scores showed satisfactory criterion-related validity, correlating with scores of external criteria variables (e.g., Grit-S, self-control, and big five personality). Finally, the TMGS scores demonstrated superior incremental validity in predicting academic burnout compared to conscientiousness. Overall, although further studies are needed, our findings suggested that the TMGS demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties within a collectivist culture and may serve as a promising tool for assessing grit levels in Chinese adolescents.","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142676114","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Moving Toward an Online Thematic Apperception Test (TAT): The Impact of Administration Modifications on Narrative Length and Story Richness. 向在线主题感知测验（TAT）迈进：管理修改对叙述长度和故事丰富度的影响。

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Journal of personality assessment Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2425660

Jenelle M Slavin-Mulford, Elyse M Vincent, Savanna G Coleman, Havilah P Ravula, Jeremy J Coleman, Melanie M Wilcox, Michelle B Stein

{"title":"Moving Toward an Online Thematic Apperception Test (TAT): The Impact of Administration Modifications on Narrative Length and Story Richness.","authors":"Jenelle M Slavin-Mulford, Elyse M Vincent, Savanna G Coleman, Havilah P Ravula, Jeremy J Coleman, Melanie M Wilcox, Michelle B Stein","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2425660","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2024.2425660","url":null,"abstract":"The Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) is the second most commonly used performance-based task. However, traditional TAT administration is time-consuming and raises accessibility issues. Research exploring administration modifications has found that within a lab setting, having participants type their own narratives leads to richer responses than when participants narrate the stories out loud to an examiner. The current study extends prior research by investigating the impact of card presentation (hard copy versus computer screen) and setting (in the lab versus online) on narrative quality. A four-card TAT protocol was administered to 134 college students in three separate conditions: in lab with hard copies of cards, in lab with images on the computer, and online in which participants could take the TAT wherever they wished. In all conditions, participants typed their narratives. The narratives were scored using the Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale- Global Rating Method (SCORS-G). MANOVA procedures showed that SCORS-G ratings were not affected by card presentation or setting and add to prior work to suggest that the TAT can be administered online without a diminution in the quality of SCORS-G ratings at least with some populations.","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142676117","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0