{"title":"Potential of isotoxic dose escalation with robustly optimized VMAT and IMPT for large hepatocellular carcinoma according to baseline liver function","authors":"Elise Cherek, Mark Ka Heng Chan, Diane Schott","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70846","DOIUrl":"10.1002/acm2.70846","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) adjacent to gastrointestinal (GI) organs presents a constrained radiotherapy problem because dose escalation is limited by both hepatic reserve and serial-organ tolerance. Although intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) can reduce uninvolved liver irradiation, its achievable advantage over volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) may depend on baseline liver function and robustness to treatment uncertainties.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To present and demonstrate a robust isotoxic dose-escalation framework for evaluating IMPT and VMAT in large HCC adjacent to GI organs while accounting for baseline liver function and treatment uncertainty.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Thirteen patients with HCC (equivalent tumor diameter, 3.0–20.9 cm) underwent comparative IMPT and VMAT treatment planning. Robust optimization incorporated 5-mm setup uncertainty for both modalities and 3% range uncertainty for IMPT. Dose escalation was performed using a fixed dose per fraction of 3.87 Gy while varying the maximum acceptable number of fractions, <i>N</i><sub>max</sub>, under non-cirrhotic, Child-Pugh A (CP-A), and Child-Pugh B (CP-B) liver-function assumptions. Liver mean dose constraints were evaluated on nominal dose, while serial-organ constraints were assessed using both nominal dose and voxel-wise maximum dose across uncertainty scenarios. Unirradiated liver volume normalized to standard liver volume (ULV/SLV) was used to estimate the relative hazard of radiation-induced liver disease (RILD).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In the nominal-dose analysis, IMPT achieved a higher <i>N</i><sub>max</sub> than VMAT in 5 of 13, 8 of 13, and 8 of 13 patients under non-cirrhotic, CP-A, and CP-B assumptions, respectively, with mean Δ<i>N</i><sub>max</sub> values of 0.38, 1.23, and 1.69 fractions. Similar trends were observed in the voxel-wise maximum-dose analysis, where mean Δ<i>N</i><sub>max</sub> values were 0.00, 1.08, and 1.77 fractions, respectively. VMAT dose escalation was predominantly limited by mean liver dose, whereas IMPT was more frequently constrained by GI maximum-dose limits, indicating a shift from liver reserve to serial-organ tolerance as the primary limiting factor. Among patients with an IMPT dose-escalation advantage, IMPT maintained higher ULV/SLV and correspondingly lower estimated RILD hazard despite treatment escalation.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> ","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"27 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13643040/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149109887","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Joseph R. Steiner, Shengwen Deng, Ching-Mei Feng, Joshua M. Wilson, Mary Ellen Jafari, Megan E. Lipford, Lei Qin, Dustin Gress, David Jordan
{"title":"AAPM DWWSS report 449: Evaluation of imaging physics workforce, workload, and future needs in the United States","authors":"Joseph R. Steiner, Shengwen Deng, Ching-Mei Feng, Joshua M. Wilson, Mary Ellen Jafari, Megan E. Lipford, Lei Qin, Dustin Gress, David Jordan","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70843","DOIUrl":"10.1002/acm2.70843","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In 2020, the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) conducted a comprehensive imaging physics workforce survey (2020 Survey) to evaluate staffing needs, validate prior time and effort estimates, and explore workforce satisfaction. This report summarizes key findings, highlighting gaps between training and professional demands, challenges in recruitment, and shifts in workforce demographics and employment patterns.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The 2020 Survey, administered by the American Institute of Physics (AIP) Statistical Research Center (SRC) to AAPM and Health Physics Society members, had 953 responses from participants who were primarily diagnostic and nuclear medical physicists. The data were analyzed across four key areas: professional task workloads, workforce demographics and retirement outlook, lifestyle factors, and skill gaps.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results and Discussion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The AIP SRC analyzed the results of the 2020 Survey (results archived on the AAPM members-only website). The 2020 Survey validated the relative time required for equipment performance evaluations and the wide range of Level 2 services performed by the imaging physics workforce relative to AAPM Report 301. The 2020 Survey showed that the imaging physics workforce is aging (30% of respondents providing their age stated they were 66 years or older) and that many of these individuals could retire within 5 years of completing the survey. Finally, the 2020 Survey demonstrated that there were gaps between the skills and knowledge employers look for when hiring compared to the same self-identified qualities of the imaging physics workforce.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The 2020 Survey provided insights into the imaging physics workforce that validated prior publications estimating imaging physics workforce activities. The 2020 Survey indicates the imaging physics workforce is aging, with a wave of retirements on the horizon, and that individuals entering the workforce may not possess the skills and knowledge desired by employers. The data from this survey can be used to guide analyses and address future trends of the imaging physics field and workforce.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"27 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13643047/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149110057","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Assessment of image quality and detectability in computed tomography: Inter-laboratory comparison of Fourier-based metrics","authors":"Pascal Monnin, Damien Racine, Luis Ammour, Yves Barbotteau, Davide Cester, Dimitar Petrov, Kwinten Torfs, Raffaele Villa, Nicoletta Paruccini, Joël Greffier, Anaïs Viry","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70838","DOIUrl":"10.1002/acm2.70838","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The task-based assessment of image quality in computed tomography (CT) is increasingly used for benchmarking, optimizing acquisition and reconstruction parameters, and predicting observers’ performance. To achieve consistent and reproducible results rely on standardized methodologies and guidelines.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study performed an inter-laboratory comparison to evaluate the consistency of CT image quality metrics and assess inter-laboratory variability.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Six series of images of a Catphan 500 phantom were acquired at three dose levels (1.5/5.0/15.0 mGy) with two (standard and high-resolution) kernels and sent to seven independent laboratories. Participants calculated the task transfer function (TTF) for spatial resolution and noise power spectrum (NPS) for noise magnitude and texture using standardized Fourier-based analysis on the shared images. The TTFs and NPS were used in the non-prewhitening observer model without (NPW) and with eye filter (NPWE) to calculate a detectability index for small (2 mm) and large targets (10 mm).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The difference observed in TTFs resulted mainly from the different noise reduction techniques used during the calculation. The frequency corresponding to the TTF value 50% varied from 0.27 to 0.43 mm<sup>−1</sup> for the standard images and from 0.73 to 0.92 mm<sup>−1</sup> for the high-resolution images. Variability in NPS primarily stemmed from the choice of regions of interest location in non-stationary noise images that lead to magnitude differences up to 40% for the standard kernel and 70% for the high-resolution kernel. The combined differences in TTF and NPS resulted in differences up to 39% in the NPW detectability index. The large variability in the human visual transfer function and visualization parameters increased the differences by a factor of 6.25 in the NPWE model and highlighted the lack of standardization.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Adapting TTF and NPS to a more complex and localized analysis of CT images with non-uniform CNRs, rather than a simple global evaluation, increases computational variability and requires a move towards more standardization of metrics. In the absence of complete standardization of image quality measurement, documentation of methods and all calculation parameters is essential for more robust e","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"27 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13641360/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149109816","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Evaluation of registration accuracy using short-arc cone-beam computed tomography for image-guided radiotherapy in breast cancer","authors":"Shuhei Wada, Masahide Tominaga, Motoharu Sasaki, Koichi Yamanashi, Yoshio Iwai, Shunsuke Furutani, Yusei Shinohara, Yoshihiro Uto","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70804","DOIUrl":"10.1002/acm2.70804","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) enables highly accurate imaging registration; however, increased radiation exposure remains a concern. Recently, short-arc CBCT (SA-CBCT), which reduces projection data and reconstructs images, has become available. Although previous studies have shown that image quality deteriorates when projection data are reduced, no study has directly evaluated the clinical usefulness of SA-CBCT or its effect on registration accuracy.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We verified the registration accuracy of SA-CBCT in breast tangential irradiation using an anthropomorphic phantom and clinical data, and examined its clinical feasibility compared with the commonly used 200° scan.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>An anthropomorphic phantom was placed on the treatment bed, and CT and CBCT images acquired during treatment planning were aligned. Bed movement was measured for both conventional CBCT and SA-CBCT images. The difference between the two measurements was quantified as <i>N</i>, defined as the norm of the vector difference between CBCT and SA-CBCT registration shifts, to evaluate registration accuracy. The acquisition angle was varied to assess the effects of central and total angles. In the clinical study, registration data from 30 consecutive patients who underwent whole-breast irradiation were analyzed. Data were reconstructed by changing the acquisition angle from 200° to 120°, and <i>N</i> was calculated as in the phantom experiment.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In the phantom experiment, <i>N</i> was within 0.15 mm (3-axis) and 0.55 mm (6-axis) when the acquisition angle was reduced to 120°. In clinical data, the average <i>N</i> was 0.64 mm in 3-axis registration (84.7% within 1 mm) and 0.85 mm in 6-axis registration (71.3% within 1 mm). Even with a 120° acquisition angle, the body contour and chest wall edges were sufficiently preserved.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>SA-CBCT maintained adequate registration accuracy in breast tangential irradiation. These findings suggest its clinical applicability with appropriate acquisition angle settings.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"27 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13643054/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149109884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nabaa Mohammed Alsiraj, Haydar Hamza Alabedi, Mustafa Salih Almusawi, Moneer K. Faraj, Rozilawati Ahmad, Sura Abdulkareem Madlool Alzuabidi
{"title":"Introducing a novel prediction index for treatment quality of gamma knife and stereotactic-based radiotherapy: Nabaa Efficiency Index (\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 η\u0000 Nabaa\u0000 \u0000 $eta^{{mathrm{Nabaa}}}$\u0000 )","authors":"Nabaa Mohammed Alsiraj, Haydar Hamza Alabedi, Mustafa Salih Almusawi, Moneer K. Faraj, Rozilawati Ahmad, Sura Abdulkareem Madlool Alzuabidi","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70805","DOIUrl":"10.1002/acm2.70805","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>An accurate assessment of the radiotherapy plans requires an accurate dose to the target and efficient confinement of the doses. However, present indices do not completely cover these aspects in a single framework.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To develop a unified, dimensionless metric that integrates geometric conformity and dosimetric efficiency for evaluating stereotactic and fractionated radiotherapy plans aims to reduce QA workload by providing a rapid, quantitative estimate of plan acceptability, allowing early prediction of treatment plan performance.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In this study, the Nabaa Efficiency Index <span></span><math>\u0000 <semantics>\u0000 <msup>\u0000 <mi>η</mi>\u0000 <mrow>\u0000 <mi>N</mi>\u0000 <mi>a</mi>\u0000 <mi>b</mi>\u0000 <mi>a</mi>\u0000 <mi>a</mi>\u0000 </mrow>\u0000 </msup>\u0000 <annotation>$eta^{Nabaa}$</annotation>\u0000 </semantics></math> is introduced and defined as the product of the Conformity Index (CI) and a Dose-Efficiency Ratio (DER), evaluated at 50% and 90% isodose levels (<span></span><math>\u0000 <semantics>\u0000 <msubsup>\u0000 <mi>η</mi>\u0000 <mrow>\u0000 <mn>50</mn>\u0000 <mo>%</mo>\u0000 </mrow>\u0000 <mrow>\u0000 <mi>N</mi>\u0000 <mi>a</mi>\u0000 <mi>b</mi>\u0000 <mi>a</mi>\u0000 <mi>a</mi>\u0000 </mrow>\u0000 </msubsup>\u0000 <annotation>$eta _{50% }^{Nabaa}$</annotation>\u0000 </semantics></math>, <span></span><math>\u0000 <semantics>\u0000 <msubsup>\u0000 <mi>η</mi>\u0000 <mrow>\u0000 <mn>90</mn>\u0000 <mo>%</mo>\u0000 </mrow>\u0000 <mrow>\u0000 <mi>N</mi>\u0000 <mi>a</mi>\u0000 <mi>b</mi>\u0000 <mi>a</mi>\u0000 <mi>a</mi>\u0000 </mrow>\u0000 </msubsup>\u0000 ","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"27 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13643063/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149110110","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}