评估食管癌每日在线适应性放射治疗的剂量学获益

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Antonia Kubiatowicz, Michael Sherer, Ayaka Owaga, Andrew Sharabi, Xenia Ray
{"title":"评估食管癌每日在线适应性放射治疗的剂量学获益","authors":"Antonia Kubiatowicz,&nbsp;Michael Sherer,&nbsp;Ayaka Owaga,&nbsp;Andrew Sharabi,&nbsp;Xenia Ray","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A cohort of 19 esophageal cancer patients treated at our institution were analyzed to assess the clinical feasibility and dosimetric benefit from daily adaptive radiation therapy (ART). An Ethos-planning template was developed to generate the initial ethos reference plan and daily adaptive plans using 9-field IMRT for reduced on-treatment optimization time. The template included relevant OAR goals and used an institutionally validated esophagus RapidPlan model. Clinical planning margins were used. Ethos-generated plans were validated against the clinically-approved plans which used 2-arc VMAT. Weekly on-treatment CBCT images were used to simulate doses from daily nonadaptive and adaptive techniques using the Ethos 2.0 Emulator. Timing data was recorded for each fraction. Dose metrics from institutional guidelines were compared between standard-of-care (SOC) and adaptive plans using a Wilcoxon signed rank test; these included mean dose for heart, lungs and liver, lungs V20Gy, and max dose for heart, spinal canal, and stomach. All Ethos template-generated plans were found equivalent to clinical plans. The daily adaptive workflow required 14.1 ± 6.8 min. Dosimetric improvements were variable by patient. Some patients experienced large metric reductions while others saw very minor benefits if any. For a sub cohort of patients that received high benefit, statistically significant (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) reductions in the lung mean, lung V20, heart mean, and heart V30 and V40 were observed. From these results we conclude that Ethos ART is feasible in terms of plan quality and on-treatment time for esophageal cancer. ART can produce significant normal tissue dose reductions; however, not all patients benefited equally. Thus, identifying high-benefit patients prior to treatment is necessary. Preliminary modeling results suggest this can be done prospectively, but these models are internally validated and require larger datasets to fully develop.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70244","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing dosimetric benefit from daily online adaptive radiation therapy for esophageal cancer\",\"authors\":\"Antonia Kubiatowicz,&nbsp;Michael Sherer,&nbsp;Ayaka Owaga,&nbsp;Andrew Sharabi,&nbsp;Xenia Ray\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acm2.70244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A cohort of 19 esophageal cancer patients treated at our institution were analyzed to assess the clinical feasibility and dosimetric benefit from daily adaptive radiation therapy (ART). An Ethos-planning template was developed to generate the initial ethos reference plan and daily adaptive plans using 9-field IMRT for reduced on-treatment optimization time. The template included relevant OAR goals and used an institutionally validated esophagus RapidPlan model. Clinical planning margins were used. Ethos-generated plans were validated against the clinically-approved plans which used 2-arc VMAT. Weekly on-treatment CBCT images were used to simulate doses from daily nonadaptive and adaptive techniques using the Ethos 2.0 Emulator. Timing data was recorded for each fraction. Dose metrics from institutional guidelines were compared between standard-of-care (SOC) and adaptive plans using a Wilcoxon signed rank test; these included mean dose for heart, lungs and liver, lungs V20Gy, and max dose for heart, spinal canal, and stomach. All Ethos template-generated plans were found equivalent to clinical plans. The daily adaptive workflow required 14.1 ± 6.8 min. Dosimetric improvements were variable by patient. Some patients experienced large metric reductions while others saw very minor benefits if any. For a sub cohort of patients that received high benefit, statistically significant (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) reductions in the lung mean, lung V20, heart mean, and heart V30 and V40 were observed. From these results we conclude that Ethos ART is feasible in terms of plan quality and on-treatment time for esophageal cancer. ART can produce significant normal tissue dose reductions; however, not all patients benefited equally. Thus, identifying high-benefit patients prior to treatment is necessary. Preliminary modeling results suggest this can be done prospectively, but these models are internally validated and require larger datasets to fully develop.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"26 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70244\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70244\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70244","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对19例食管癌患者进行队列分析,以评估每日适应性放射治疗(ART)的临床可行性和剂量学获益。开发了ethos -计划模板,使用9场IMRT生成初始ethos参考计划和日常适应性计划,以减少治疗优化时间。该模板包括相关的OAR目标,并使用了经过机构验证的食管RapidPlan模型。使用临床规划边界。ethos生成的计划与临床批准的使用2弧VMAT的计划进行了验证。使用Ethos 2.0模拟器使用每周治疗CBCT图像来模拟每日非适应和自适应技术的剂量。记录每个分数的计时数据。采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较机构指南的剂量指标在标准护理(SOC)和适应性计划之间的差异;包括心、肺和肝的平均剂量,肺V20Gy,心、椎管和胃的最大剂量。发现所有Ethos模板生成的计划都等同于临床计划。每日自适应工作流程需要14.1±6.8分钟。剂量学的改善因患者而异。一些患者的体重大幅下降,而另一些患者的体重则略有下降。对于获得高获益的患者亚队列,观察到肺平均、肺V20、心脏平均、心脏V30和V40的降低具有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。从这些结果来看,我们认为Ethos ART在食管癌的计划质量和治疗时间方面是可行的。抗逆转录病毒治疗可以显著降低正常组织的剂量;然而,并不是所有的患者都同样受益。因此,在治疗前确定高效益患者是必要的。初步的建模结果表明,这是可以实现的,但这些模型是内部验证的,需要更大的数据集才能完全开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Assessing dosimetric benefit from daily online adaptive radiation therapy for esophageal cancer

Assessing dosimetric benefit from daily online adaptive radiation therapy for esophageal cancer

Assessing dosimetric benefit from daily online adaptive radiation therapy for esophageal cancer

Assessing dosimetric benefit from daily online adaptive radiation therapy for esophageal cancer

A cohort of 19 esophageal cancer patients treated at our institution were analyzed to assess the clinical feasibility and dosimetric benefit from daily adaptive radiation therapy (ART). An Ethos-planning template was developed to generate the initial ethos reference plan and daily adaptive plans using 9-field IMRT for reduced on-treatment optimization time. The template included relevant OAR goals and used an institutionally validated esophagus RapidPlan model. Clinical planning margins were used. Ethos-generated plans were validated against the clinically-approved plans which used 2-arc VMAT. Weekly on-treatment CBCT images were used to simulate doses from daily nonadaptive and adaptive techniques using the Ethos 2.0 Emulator. Timing data was recorded for each fraction. Dose metrics from institutional guidelines were compared between standard-of-care (SOC) and adaptive plans using a Wilcoxon signed rank test; these included mean dose for heart, lungs and liver, lungs V20Gy, and max dose for heart, spinal canal, and stomach. All Ethos template-generated plans were found equivalent to clinical plans. The daily adaptive workflow required 14.1 ± 6.8 min. Dosimetric improvements were variable by patient. Some patients experienced large metric reductions while others saw very minor benefits if any. For a sub cohort of patients that received high benefit, statistically significant (p < 0.05) reductions in the lung mean, lung V20, heart mean, and heart V30 and V40 were observed. From these results we conclude that Ethos ART is feasible in terms of plan quality and on-treatment time for esophageal cancer. ART can produce significant normal tissue dose reductions; however, not all patients benefited equally. Thus, identifying high-benefit patients prior to treatment is necessary. Preliminary modeling results suggest this can be done prospectively, but these models are internally validated and require larger datasets to fully develop.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信