{"title":"A personalized tumor kV-IORT navigation system based on hybrid twin","authors":"Shan Jiang, Shuo Yang, Zhiyong Yang, Daguang Zhang, Yingkai Luan, Zeyang Zhou","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study proposes a multidimensional hybrid twin navigation system to enhance applicator placement accuracy in low-energy x-ray intraoperative radiotherapy (kV-IORT), particularly for less-experienced practitioners. The system integrates augmented reality (AR) and digital twin technologies to improve intraoperative precision and usability.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The system comprises three core modules: (1) a holographic dose (Holo-dose) model visualizing clinically relevant radiation layers based on Zeiss TARGIT data, (2) a patient-specific applicator positioning strategy with real-time AR feedback adapted to tumor bed geometry, and (3) a bidirectional hybrid twin control linking a physical radiotherapy robot with its virtual twin for precise navigation. Phantom experiments utilized a 20 mm spherical applicator within a 30 mm tumor bed boundary. Target dose range was 18.50–19.50 Gy (15 mm radius) over 25 min. Accuracy was evaluated via root mean square error (RMSE) and target registration error (TRE). Mean RMSE was 0.383 mm (phantom) and 0.106 mm (robot); mean TRE was 0.41 mm.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The system significantly enhanced positioning accuracy for novice users. Medical students achieved an average precision of 2.971 mm (<i>p</i> = 0.00015), and inexperienced physicians reached 2.803 mm (<i>p</i> = 0.00038). No significant improvement was observed for experienced surgeons (<i>p</i> > 0.05), indicating the system's potential as a training and assistance tool. The average System Usability Scale (SUS) score was 83.5, suggesting high user satisfaction, especially among younger participants.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The hybrid twin navigation system significantly improved applicator placement accuracy for novice users, demonstrating its value as an effective training and assistance tool for kV-IORT. High user satisfaction and sub-millimeter registration and alignment accuracy confirm its potential for clinical translation, particularly in enhancing usability and precision for less-experienced practitioners.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70243","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70243","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
This study proposes a multidimensional hybrid twin navigation system to enhance applicator placement accuracy in low-energy x-ray intraoperative radiotherapy (kV-IORT), particularly for less-experienced practitioners. The system integrates augmented reality (AR) and digital twin technologies to improve intraoperative precision and usability.
Methods
The system comprises three core modules: (1) a holographic dose (Holo-dose) model visualizing clinically relevant radiation layers based on Zeiss TARGIT data, (2) a patient-specific applicator positioning strategy with real-time AR feedback adapted to tumor bed geometry, and (3) a bidirectional hybrid twin control linking a physical radiotherapy robot with its virtual twin for precise navigation. Phantom experiments utilized a 20 mm spherical applicator within a 30 mm tumor bed boundary. Target dose range was 18.50–19.50 Gy (15 mm radius) over 25 min. Accuracy was evaluated via root mean square error (RMSE) and target registration error (TRE). Mean RMSE was 0.383 mm (phantom) and 0.106 mm (robot); mean TRE was 0.41 mm.
Results
The system significantly enhanced positioning accuracy for novice users. Medical students achieved an average precision of 2.971 mm (p = 0.00015), and inexperienced physicians reached 2.803 mm (p = 0.00038). No significant improvement was observed for experienced surgeons (p > 0.05), indicating the system's potential as a training and assistance tool. The average System Usability Scale (SUS) score was 83.5, suggesting high user satisfaction, especially among younger participants.
Conclusions
The hybrid twin navigation system significantly improved applicator placement accuracy for novice users, demonstrating its value as an effective training and assistance tool for kV-IORT. High user satisfaction and sub-millimeter registration and alignment accuracy confirm its potential for clinical translation, particularly in enhancing usability and precision for less-experienced practitioners.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission.
JACMP will publish:
-Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500.
-Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed.
-Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references.
-Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents.
-Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews.
-Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics.
-Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic