Antonia Kubiatowicz, Michael Sherer, Ayaka Owaga, Andrew Sharabi, Xenia Ray
{"title":"Assessing dosimetric benefit from daily online adaptive radiation therapy for esophageal cancer","authors":"Antonia Kubiatowicz, Michael Sherer, Ayaka Owaga, Andrew Sharabi, Xenia Ray","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A cohort of 19 esophageal cancer patients treated at our institution were analyzed to assess the clinical feasibility and dosimetric benefit from daily adaptive radiation therapy (ART). An Ethos-planning template was developed to generate the initial ethos reference plan and daily adaptive plans using 9-field IMRT for reduced on-treatment optimization time. The template included relevant OAR goals and used an institutionally validated esophagus RapidPlan model. Clinical planning margins were used. Ethos-generated plans were validated against the clinically-approved plans which used 2-arc VMAT. Weekly on-treatment CBCT images were used to simulate doses from daily nonadaptive and adaptive techniques using the Ethos 2.0 Emulator. Timing data was recorded for each fraction. Dose metrics from institutional guidelines were compared between standard-of-care (SOC) and adaptive plans using a Wilcoxon signed rank test; these included mean dose for heart, lungs and liver, lungs V20Gy, and max dose for heart, spinal canal, and stomach. All Ethos template-generated plans were found equivalent to clinical plans. The daily adaptive workflow required 14.1 ± 6.8 min. Dosimetric improvements were variable by patient. Some patients experienced large metric reductions while others saw very minor benefits if any. For a sub cohort of patients that received high benefit, statistically significant (<i>p</i> < 0.05) reductions in the lung mean, lung V20, heart mean, and heart V30 and V40 were observed. From these results we conclude that Ethos ART is feasible in terms of plan quality and on-treatment time for esophageal cancer. ART can produce significant normal tissue dose reductions; however, not all patients benefited equally. Thus, identifying high-benefit patients prior to treatment is necessary. Preliminary modeling results suggest this can be done prospectively, but these models are internally validated and require larger datasets to fully develop.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70244","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70244","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A cohort of 19 esophageal cancer patients treated at our institution were analyzed to assess the clinical feasibility and dosimetric benefit from daily adaptive radiation therapy (ART). An Ethos-planning template was developed to generate the initial ethos reference plan and daily adaptive plans using 9-field IMRT for reduced on-treatment optimization time. The template included relevant OAR goals and used an institutionally validated esophagus RapidPlan model. Clinical planning margins were used. Ethos-generated plans were validated against the clinically-approved plans which used 2-arc VMAT. Weekly on-treatment CBCT images were used to simulate doses from daily nonadaptive and adaptive techniques using the Ethos 2.0 Emulator. Timing data was recorded for each fraction. Dose metrics from institutional guidelines were compared between standard-of-care (SOC) and adaptive plans using a Wilcoxon signed rank test; these included mean dose for heart, lungs and liver, lungs V20Gy, and max dose for heart, spinal canal, and stomach. All Ethos template-generated plans were found equivalent to clinical plans. The daily adaptive workflow required 14.1 ± 6.8 min. Dosimetric improvements were variable by patient. Some patients experienced large metric reductions while others saw very minor benefits if any. For a sub cohort of patients that received high benefit, statistically significant (p < 0.05) reductions in the lung mean, lung V20, heart mean, and heart V30 and V40 were observed. From these results we conclude that Ethos ART is feasible in terms of plan quality and on-treatment time for esophageal cancer. ART can produce significant normal tissue dose reductions; however, not all patients benefited equally. Thus, identifying high-benefit patients prior to treatment is necessary. Preliminary modeling results suggest this can be done prospectively, but these models are internally validated and require larger datasets to fully develop.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission.
JACMP will publish:
-Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500.
-Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed.
-Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references.
-Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents.
-Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews.
-Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics.
-Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic