Health physics最新文献

{"title":"Measurement of 238 U, 232 Th, 222 Rn and 220 Rn Contents in Optical Contact Lenses: Resulting Alpha and Beta Equivalent Doses to the Eye Tissues of Adult Patients.","authors":"M A Misdaq, B Elouardi","doi":"10.1097/HP.0000000000001755","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HP.0000000000001755","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>To estimate equivalent doses received by eye tissues of patients, contents of uranium ( 238 U), thorium ( 232 Th), radon ( 222 Rn), and thoron ( 220 Rn) were determined inside various optical contact lenses used for vision correction. 238 U, 232 Th, 222 Rn, and 220 Rn contents varied between (3.44 ± 0.24) mBq kg -1 and (18.3 ± 1.28) mBq kg -1 , (0.57 ± 0.04) mBq kg -1 and (3.53 ± 0.25) mBq kg -1 , (3.44 ± 0.24) mBq kg -1 and (18.3 ± 1.28) mBq kg -1 , and (0.57 ± 0.04) mBq kg -1 and (3.53 ± 0.25) mBq kg -1 , respectively. New external dosimetric models, depending on the cornea eye surface of patients, 238 U, 232 Th, and 222 Rn concentrations inside optical contact lenses, half-life of the emitting radionuclides, and exposure time of patients, have been developed. It has been shown that alpha-particles emitted by the 238 U and 232 Th series inside the studied optical lenses transfer their energies essentially to the cornea tissues whereas the emitted beta-particles may reach and lose their energies in the crystalline lens of eyes of patients. Alpha-equivalent doses received by eye tissues of patients due to the diffusion of 222 Rn and 220 Rn gases present in the considered optical lenses were determined. The higher value of the total (alpha plus beta) equivalent dose to the left and right eyes of adult patients wearing optical contact lenses (14 hours per day) has been found equal to 1.32 mSv y -1 cm - 2 . It is recommended for patients to reduce the wearing period of optical contact lenses to reduce eye disease risks such as cataract.</p>","PeriodicalId":12976,"journal":{"name":"Health physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41234832","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Exploratory Data Analysis of the Groundwater Contaminants at the Former Panna Maria Uranium Recovery Facility.","authors":"Mark C Harvey, Nancy L Glenn Griesinger","doi":"10.1097/HP.0000000000001765","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HP.0000000000001765","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The former Panna Maria mill was a uranium recovery facility that operated from 1979 to December 1992. Sulfuric acid leach was used to process several tons of ore daily. Therefore, the groundwater was sampled at the site to monitor the concentration of background chemical pollutants. The purpose of this study was to perform exploratory data analysis to evaluate whether the arsenic, nickel, selenium, sulfate, and uranium concentrations were in accord with state-regulated groundwater drinking standards at the site. To accomplish this, a substitution method was used to replace concentration values that were below measurable ranges of well monitoring units. Additionally, random forest regression was employed to account for missing not-at-random values in the dataset. Groundwater samples collected in wells before the facility began operations were used to determine an upper bound on background pollutants consistent with US Environmental Protection Agency Standards. The upper tolerance limit comprising 90% of the groundwater sample at a confidence coefficient of 95% was used to establish alternate concentration limits for each chemical based on well data from the National Uranium Resource Hydrogeochemical and Stream Sediment Reconnaissance program. Results obtained in this analysis establish a baseline on the chemical concentrations in the background groundwater at the former Panna Maria mill.</p>","PeriodicalId":12976,"journal":{"name":"Health physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49676950","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Natural Radioactivity of Granitic Rocks and Their Health Risk around Ingesana Mountains, Sudan.","authors":"Nooreldin Fadol, Ali Abdelrazig, Hajo Idriss, Yazeed Alashban, Nasser Shubayr","doi":"10.1097/HP.0000000000001760","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HP.0000000000001760","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>This work was carried out mainly to analyze radioactive elements 40 K, 232 Th, and 226 Ra and non-radioactive elements in some granitic rocks and study their health risk for humans and non-humans. Radioisotope activity was evaluated using a high-purity germanium (HPGe) detector, and various radiological hazard indices were calculated. We also measured some non-radioactive elements using x-ray fluorescence analysis and performed Pearson correlation analysis to examine the relationships between the radionuclides and the non-radioactive elements. Furthermore, we used the ERICA software to estimate the total dose rate per organism for some non-human biota. The means of 226 Ra, 232 Th, and 40 K are 25.13 ± 5.22 Bq kg -1 , 29.01 ± 6.95 Bq kg -1 , and 323.07 ± 97.83 Bq kg -1 , respectively. Hence, 226 Ra, 232 Th, and 40 K radioactivities were lower than the worldwide average limits. The 226 Ra, 232 Th, and 40 K levels were under the global average values. The hazardous radiometric variables were computed, and the findings observed that the mean absorbed dosage was 23.48 ± 7.36 nGy h -1 , the yearly effective dose rate was 29.82 ± 10.46 μSv y -1 , and the radium equivalent activity was 88.88 ± 18.64 Bq kg -1 . The average dose and yearly effective dose rates were lower than the global average absorbed dose rate of 60 nGy h -1 and the ICRP standard of 1.0 mSv y -1 . The results of Ra-equivalent activity were lower than the recommended maximum criterion for building materials limit of Ra-equivalent activity (370 Bq kg -1 ) proposed by UNSCEAR. Tests of Pearson correlation coefficients indicate a substantial positive relationship between 226 Ra and 232 Th and a modest correlation between 226 Ra and 40 K. Meanwhile, no association between 226 Ra and 40 K and non-radioactive components has been identified. Thorium-232 exhibits a moderately favorable connection with Ti, Fe, and Ni. The estimated total dose rate per organism for the studied non-human is less than the ambient dose rate. However, the total dose rate for small burrowing mammals and reptiles exceeds the background exposure rate. In accordance with the findings, granite rocks may be safe to use as construction materials and pose no threat to human health.</p>","PeriodicalId":12976,"journal":{"name":"Health physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49676952","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Underestimation of Occupational Radiation Exposure During Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.","authors":"Hsien-Wen Chiang, Tzu-Chao Chuang, Tou-Rong Chen","doi":"10.1097/HP.0000000000001744","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HP.0000000000001744","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>During interventional procedures of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR), the dosimeter was conventionally placed on chest facing toward the surgical table, instead of the main source of scatter radiation. Purpose of this study is to evaluate the underestimation of occupational radiation exposure. Phantom experiments were performed in a hybrid operating room equipped with an interventional angiography system. Electric personal dosimeters were placed at the level of eyes, chest, abdomen, and gonad of three positions, representing the principal operator (PO), assistant operator (AO), and sterile nurse (SN). Personal dose equivalent was measured with two different orientations of radiation detection, facing the table and facing the phantom, respectively. In addition to fluoroscopy, the dose produced by digital subtraction angiography was also measured to estimate the radiation exposure of routine EVAR. In this study, staff doses of 26 EVAR cases were also collected in our hospital to correlate the estimated dose. Our results show that the facing-phantom dose normalized by dose area product of patient is significantly higher than the facing-table dose when the latter is regularly seen in clinical practice. This underestimation could be even worse at a more distant position (e.g., AO and SN) as the incident angle of scatter radiation is larger. Besides, the estimated dose is highly correlated with the on-site measured dose (R 2 ~ 0.8) at chest and gonad of the PO.</p>","PeriodicalId":12976,"journal":{"name":"Health physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41199356","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Is It Appropriate to Completely Eliminate Contact Shielding during CT Examination? A Discourse Based on Experimental Findings.","authors":"Jiwei Chen, Jianchun Tu, Shengyan Huang, Zhenhua Zhu, Yu Tu","doi":"10.1097/HP.0000000000001742","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HP.0000000000001742","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Through the integration of experimental data and literature, this study examines whether complete elimination of contact shielding during CT examination is warranted, with a particular focus on potential impacts to children's thyroid and pregnant women, as well as limitations associated with contact shielding. Methods: The thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) tablets were inserted into the phantom's five organs and tissues. Select fixed exposure, automatic exposure control (AEC), and use contact shielding combined into four experimental modes, with scanning of the phantom's four parts. Obtain the absorbed dose measurements within or outside the FOV. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS software. Results: (1) The AEC significantly reduces dose within and outside the FOV, with a dose reduction of 40%-60%. (2) The application of contact shielding outside the FOV significantly reduced the dose adjoin the FOV. (3) Both the use of AEC mode and contact shielding can effectively minimize the dose, with a reduction of 50-80%. (4) The shielding within the FOV may introduce image artifacts or interfere with AEC, the implementation of contact shielding outside FOV provides little reduction in radiation exposure risk through previous literature. (5) Contact shielding exhibits certain drawbacks in all aspects. Conclusion: The utilization of AEC mode in clinical CT should be widely adopted to minimize patient radiation exposure. In general, contact shielding both inside and outside the FOV should be avoided during exposure. However for children under 12 years old with thyroid gland examination, contact shielding could maximally reduce external radiation and may be appropriate. Pregnant women require careful evaluation when considering the use of contact shielding. Contact shielding should not be entirely abandoned.</p>","PeriodicalId":12976,"journal":{"name":"Health physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41121832","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Response to Mark Harvey Regarding the Educational Curricula for Students Interested in Health Physics.","authors":"Robert Emery, Janet Gutierrez","doi":"10.1097/HP.0000000000001739","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HP.0000000000001739","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12976,"journal":{"name":"Health physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138459626","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Radiation Protection Considerations for Cancer Patients with End-stage Renal Disease Receiving 131 I Treatment.","authors":"Matthew Louis, Emmanuel M Mate-Kole, Landon Aziz, Shaheen A Dewji","doi":"10.1097/HP.0000000000001743","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HP.0000000000001743","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) is commonly treated first with a partial or complete thyroidectomy, followed by radioiodine (RAI) ablative therapy to eliminate remaining cancer cells. In such treatments, physical decay and urinary excretion are the primary means of 131 I. As such, patients with impaired urinary ability clearance, such as patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) whose urinary ability is impaired by dysfunction, can retain abnormally high activities of RAI, posing a concern to both the patient and those with whom the patient interacts. Additionally, ESRD patients are commonly administered dialysis therapy, wherein their blood is externally cycled through a dialyzer (hemodialysis) or filtered by instilling a dialysate fluid into the peritoneum (peritoneal dialysis) to filter uremic toxins from their blood that accumulate due to kidney dysfunction. These factors make determining release and dosing for ESRD patients receiving RAI therapy dependent on a plurality of variables. An evaluation of the current patient release guidelines, as given in US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (US NRC) Regulatory Guide 8.39 Rev. 1 for ESRD patients receiving RAI, has yet to be addressed. In this study, a biokinetic model for 131 I in ESRD patients receiving dialysis has been developed, improving on traditional two-compartment models, reflective of kinetics from multi-compartment models with updated transfer coefficients modified to reflect the different physiological functions of compartments. This updated biokinetic model was integrated with Monte Carlo radiation transport calculations using stylized computational hermaphroditic phantoms to calculate dose rate coefficients in exposure scenarios and compared with those of the point source models of NRC Reg Guide 8.39 Rev. 1 (and the proposed verbiage in Rev. 2). Results demonstrated that the baseline models of Rev. 1 and Rev. 2 overestimated the effective dose rate to an exposed individual for the majority of time post-administration, where both models overestimated the total dose to the maximally exposed individual. However, the application of several patient-specific modifying factors to the Rev. 2 model resulted in an overestimation by only a factor of 1.25, and in general, the results produced with the patient-specific modifications provide improved convergence with the dose rate coefficients computed in this study for ESRD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12976,"journal":{"name":"Health physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41126252","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"THE HEALTH PHYSICS SOCIETY","authors":"","doi":"10.1097/01.hp.0000997296.47782.b1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hp.0000997296.47782.b1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12976,"journal":{"name":"Health physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139126566","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Radiation Safety Education Adjustment in the Future: An HBCU's Response to Trends in Health Physics.","authors":"Mark C Harvey","doi":"10.1097/HP.0000000000001738","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HP.0000000000001738","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12976,"journal":{"name":"Health physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138459623","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"THE HEALTH PHYSICS SOCIETY","authors":"","doi":"10.1097/01.hp.0000989964.79689.f2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hp.0000989964.79689.f2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12976,"journal":{"name":"Health physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136371305","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}