心理模型衍生主题对危险品运输技术人员辐射应急响应质量的影响:案例研究的启示。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Angela E Leek, Nir Keren, Mack C Shelley, Warren Franke, Gretchen A Mosher, Stephen A Simpson, Timothy Rice, Andrew Lawson
{"title":"心理模型衍生主题对危险品运输技术人员辐射应急响应质量的影响:案例研究的启示。","authors":"Angela E Leek, Nir Keren, Mack C Shelley, Warren Franke, Gretchen A Mosher, Stephen A Simpson, Timothy Rice, Andrew Lawson","doi":"10.1097/HP.0000000000001886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>This paper investigates the link between gaps in emergency responders' notions of mental model regarding radiation and risk and their effectiveness in responding to radiological incidents. Particularly, this work focused on exploring themes that emerged in prior work related to improper understanding and application of knowledge concepts related to radiation risks and Radiological Dispersal Device (RDD) scenarios (Leek et al., 2024b). The research uses a quantitative approach to correlate various thematic elements, such as responders' confidence levels, comprehension, and application of radiation risk principles, with the quality of the emergency response score gained through a virtual reality simulation. The results underscore a strong effect of responders' confidence level on response quality scores. Additionally, the study identifies that improper understanding of knowledge concepts and incorrect application of radiation risk and RDD concepts are factors that detract from the quality of response, especially the tendency to overestimate health risks associated with a 25-rem (0,25 Sv) dose and to misapply principles of radiation risk. The implications of this research are significant for the development and refinement of training programs for hazardous materials (HAZMAT) technicians and other emergency responders. The findings suggest the need for a comprehensive review of current training methodologies to address the identified deficiencies that had impacts on the quality of response. The findings provide a foundation for reshaping training priorities and operational readiness, driving the development of training that is both grounded in empirical evidence and that directly addresses the knowledge gaps influencing response quality. The methodological framework developed and employed, including the quality scoring system and the Expected Mental Model State (EMMS) Diagnostic Matrix, also hold potential for broader application in future investigations, extending to diverse types of responders and emergency scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":12976,"journal":{"name":"Health physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of Mental Model-derived Themes on the Quality of Radiological Emergency Response by HAZMAT Technicians: Insights from a Case Study.\",\"authors\":\"Angela E Leek, Nir Keren, Mack C Shelley, Warren Franke, Gretchen A Mosher, Stephen A Simpson, Timothy Rice, Andrew Lawson\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HP.0000000000001886\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>This paper investigates the link between gaps in emergency responders' notions of mental model regarding radiation and risk and their effectiveness in responding to radiological incidents. Particularly, this work focused on exploring themes that emerged in prior work related to improper understanding and application of knowledge concepts related to radiation risks and Radiological Dispersal Device (RDD) scenarios (Leek et al., 2024b). The research uses a quantitative approach to correlate various thematic elements, such as responders' confidence levels, comprehension, and application of radiation risk principles, with the quality of the emergency response score gained through a virtual reality simulation. The results underscore a strong effect of responders' confidence level on response quality scores. Additionally, the study identifies that improper understanding of knowledge concepts and incorrect application of radiation risk and RDD concepts are factors that detract from the quality of response, especially the tendency to overestimate health risks associated with a 25-rem (0,25 Sv) dose and to misapply principles of radiation risk. The implications of this research are significant for the development and refinement of training programs for hazardous materials (HAZMAT) technicians and other emergency responders. The findings suggest the need for a comprehensive review of current training methodologies to address the identified deficiencies that had impacts on the quality of response. The findings provide a foundation for reshaping training priorities and operational readiness, driving the development of training that is both grounded in empirical evidence and that directly addresses the knowledge gaps influencing response quality. The methodological framework developed and employed, including the quality scoring system and the Expected Mental Model State (EMMS) Diagnostic Matrix, also hold potential for broader application in future investigations, extending to diverse types of responders and emergency scenarios.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000001886\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000001886","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文研究了应急响应人员有关辐射和风险的心智模式概念中的差距与他们应对辐射事件的有效性之间的联系。特别是,这项工作侧重于探索先前工作中出现的主题,这些主题涉及对辐射风险和放射性扩散装置(RDD)情景相关知识概念的不当理解和应用(Leek 等人,2024b)。该研究采用定量方法,将各种主题要素(如响应者的信心水平、理解能力和辐射风险原则的应用)与通过虚拟现实模拟获得的应急响应评分质量相关联。结果表明,响应者的信心水平对响应质量得分有很大影响。此外,研究还发现,对知识概念的不正确理解以及对辐射风险和 RDD 概念的不正确应用是影响响应质量的因素,尤其是高估与 25 雷姆(0.25 希沃特)剂量相关的健康风险和错误应用辐射风险原则的倾向。这项研究对于制定和完善危险材料(HAZMAT)技术人员和其他应急响应人员的培训计划具有重要意义。研究结果表明,有必要对当前的培训方法进行全面审查,以解决已发现的影响响应质量的缺陷。研究结果为重塑培训优先事项和行动准备奠定了基础,推动了既以实证为基础又能直接解决影响响应质量的知识差距的培训发展。所开发和采用的方法框架,包括质量评分系统和预期心理模型状态(EMMS)诊断矩阵,也有可能在未来的调查中得到更广泛的应用,扩展到不同类型的响应者和紧急情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of Mental Model-derived Themes on the Quality of Radiological Emergency Response by HAZMAT Technicians: Insights from a Case Study.

Abstract: This paper investigates the link between gaps in emergency responders' notions of mental model regarding radiation and risk and their effectiveness in responding to radiological incidents. Particularly, this work focused on exploring themes that emerged in prior work related to improper understanding and application of knowledge concepts related to radiation risks and Radiological Dispersal Device (RDD) scenarios (Leek et al., 2024b). The research uses a quantitative approach to correlate various thematic elements, such as responders' confidence levels, comprehension, and application of radiation risk principles, with the quality of the emergency response score gained through a virtual reality simulation. The results underscore a strong effect of responders' confidence level on response quality scores. Additionally, the study identifies that improper understanding of knowledge concepts and incorrect application of radiation risk and RDD concepts are factors that detract from the quality of response, especially the tendency to overestimate health risks associated with a 25-rem (0,25 Sv) dose and to misapply principles of radiation risk. The implications of this research are significant for the development and refinement of training programs for hazardous materials (HAZMAT) technicians and other emergency responders. The findings suggest the need for a comprehensive review of current training methodologies to address the identified deficiencies that had impacts on the quality of response. The findings provide a foundation for reshaping training priorities and operational readiness, driving the development of training that is both grounded in empirical evidence and that directly addresses the knowledge gaps influencing response quality. The methodological framework developed and employed, including the quality scoring system and the Expected Mental Model State (EMMS) Diagnostic Matrix, also hold potential for broader application in future investigations, extending to diverse types of responders and emergency scenarios.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health physics
Health physics 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
324
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Physics, first published in 1958, provides the latest research to a wide variety of radiation safety professionals including health physicists, nuclear chemists, medical physicists, and radiation safety officers with interests in nuclear and radiation science. The Journal allows professionals in these and other disciplines in science and engineering to stay on the cutting edge of scientific and technological advances in the field of radiation safety. The Journal publishes original papers, technical notes, articles on advances in practical applications, editorials, and correspondence. Journal articles report on the latest findings in theoretical, practical, and applied disciplines of epidemiology and radiation effects, radiation biology and radiation science, radiation ecology, and related fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信