Ecology最新文献

{"title":"Contrasting cryptofaunal responses to seabird nutrient inputs illuminate coral reef productivity pathways","authors":"Laura-Li Jeannot,&nbsp;Ruth E. Dunn,&nbsp;M. Joyce P. Velos,&nbsp;Gareth J. Williams,&nbsp;Cassandra E. Benkwitt,&nbsp;Nicholas A. J. Graham,&nbsp;Simon J. Brandl","doi":"10.1002/ecy.70453","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ecy.70453","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Nutrients moving across ecosystems can propagate through food webs via distinct trophic pathways. Their integration into food webs is often mediated by small, abundant taxa that channel subsidies from primary producers to higher trophic levels. On coral reefs, cryptobenthic fishes and invertebrates can fill these roles, yet their responses to allochthonous nutrients are poorly understood. We compared cryptofaunal communities and associated trophic dynamics across nutrient-rich islands with intact seabird populations and nutrient-poor rat-infested islands in the Chagos Archipelago, Indian Ocean. Specifically, we evaluated how the presence of seabird colonies influenced cryptofaunal nutrient assimilation, biomass, structure, and isotopic niche dynamics, and how these shifts propagated to mesopredators and higher order piscivorous and invertivorous fishes. Most cryptobenthic fishes and some invertebrates showed nutrient enrichment near seabird colonies. Although the isotopic niches of cryptobenthic fishes and invertebrates overlapped, niche widths diverged in nutrient-rich environments, with invertebrates exhibiting broader niches and cryptobenthic fishes remaining comparatively constrained, reflecting differential access to shared resources. Mixing models also reflected a shift toward cryptobenthic fishes in the diet of a mixed carnivore near seabird colonies. Community patterns revealed strong asymmetries: Nutrient-rich reefs supported twice the amount of cryptobenthic fish biomass and a 10-fold increase in larger piscivorous fish productivity, while reefs near rat-infested islands were characterized by relatively greater cryptic invertebrate biomass and higher invertivore productivity. Taken together, these results suggest that cryptobenthic fishes' capacity to capitalize on seabird nutrients may allow them to exert competitive dominance and top-down control over invertebrates in nutrient-rich environments, thereby amplifying piscivorous pathways, while nutrient-poor environments appear to favor invertebrates and their consumers. Rather than reflecting uniform biomass loss under rat invasion, these patterns indicate a shift in trophic routing from fish-mediated to invertebrate-mediated energy channels. Our findings demonstrate that cross-ecosystem nutrient vectors do not simply enhance reef productivity but reorganize trophic structure. Therefore, invasive species that sever these linkages can drive the emergence of alternative food-web configurations with distinct energetic pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"107 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2026-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13390649/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148551815","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Guarding behavior in Heliconius sapho females?","authors":"Denise Dalbosco Dell'Aglio","doi":"10.1002/ecy.70467","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ecy.70467","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"107 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2026-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148551788","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Fat-tailed dispersal shapes connectivity in a solitary bee","authors":"Nicholas N. Dorian,&nbsp;Elizabeth E. Crone","doi":"10.1002/ecy.70437","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ecy.70437","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dispersal—movement potentially leading to gene flow—is a fundamental ecological process yet notoriously difficult to measure. For solitary bees in particular, determining the spatial scale of dispersal movements and how landscape features influence connectivity is key to achieving conservation goals. Over 2 years, we marked 1698 females of the solitary bee <i>Colletes validus</i> at nesting sites, recaptured marked bees as they dispersed to build nests and as they foraged on flowers, and fit statistical kernels to observed movement distances. In total, we observed 349 dispersal events by 313 individual bees including 13 natal dispersal events (movement from emergence to the first nesting site) and 336 renesting dispersal events (movement among subsequent nesting sites). Solitary bee dispersal kernels were fat-tailed: Most bees made local movements (mean = 143 m), but a small proportion in the distributional tails made substantially longer movements (99% kernel quantile = 1.2 km) and the farthest dispersers were expected to move nearly 3 km. We also recorded 38 foraging movements from nests to flowers by 38 individual bees, allowing us to compare two ecologically distinct movement types. Mean foraging (131 m) and dispersal distances were similar, but upper foraging distances (99% kernel quantile = 554 m) were substantially lower than dispersal. Movement patterns also depended on landscape composition: Both foraging and dispersal movement propensity decreased with increasing inter-patch distance and number of road crossings. Our study highlights fundamental differences in the tails of foraging and dispersal in a central-place forager, demonstrates how landscape features constrain solitary bee movements, and contributes quantitative metrics on the spatial scale of movement for pollinator conservation planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"107 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2026-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13389559/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148551793","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The diving katydid: A unique predator escape behavior in Ragoniella pulchella (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae)","authors":"Charlie Woodrow,&nbsp;Benjamin C. Bluck,&nbsp;Fabio Sarria-S,&nbsp;Lewis B. Holmes,&nbsp;Juan Sebastián Ulloa,&nbsp;Fernando Montealegre-Z","doi":"10.1002/ecy.70466","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ecy.70466","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Since their colonization of land over 400 million years ago, insects have made several transitory and permanent returns to aquatic environments. In particular, many adult forms have evolved specialized diving behaviors for transitory use of water and possess unique traits for enhancing dive duration, such as external connections to the air and physical gills. These behaviors have various purposes, including predator and parasitoid avoidance (Calosi et al., &lt;span&gt;2007&lt;/span&gt;), foraging (Hounslow et al., &lt;span&gt;2022&lt;/span&gt;), and thermoregulation (Kooyman, &lt;span&gt;2005&lt;/span&gt;). As such, diving has independently evolved across many major insect lineages. One insect order with a diversity of semiaquatic behaviors is the Orthoptera. These range from simple water associations in many taxa (Song, &lt;span&gt;2019&lt;/span&gt;) to hind leg adaptations for swimming in Acrididae (Carbonell, &lt;span&gt;1957&lt;/span&gt;) and to true diving in Tetrigidae (Amédégnato &amp; Devriese, &lt;span&gt;2008&lt;/span&gt;), Acrididae (Gudowska et al., &lt;span&gt;2016&lt;/span&gt;), and Anostostomatidae (Derka &amp; Fedor, &lt;span&gt;2010&lt;/span&gt;; Issa &amp; Jaffe, &lt;span&gt;1999&lt;/span&gt;). In adults of the genus &lt;i&gt;Hydrolutos&lt;/i&gt; Issa &amp; Jaffe, &lt;span&gt;1999&lt;/span&gt; (Anostostomatidae), a plastron-like adaptation on the pleuro-sternal area of the thorax and abdomen allows for diving times of up to 20 minutes (Derka &amp; Fedor, &lt;span&gt;2010&lt;/span&gt;; Issa &amp; Jaffe, &lt;span&gt;1999&lt;/span&gt;). It has also been suggested that the extinct Mesozoic family Elcanidae used flattened spurs of the hind tibiae for evasive locomotion in water like modern Tridactylidae (Burrows &amp; Sutton, &lt;span&gt;2012&lt;/span&gt;; Chopard &amp; Callan, &lt;span&gt;1956&lt;/span&gt;; Kim et al., &lt;span&gt;2021&lt;/span&gt;), suggesting a long evolutionary history of semiaquatic associations in Orthoptera. However, in katydids (Tettigoniidae) and crickets (Gryllidae), few interactions with water for swimming or diving behaviors have been identified (Song, &lt;span&gt;2019&lt;/span&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;During recent field work (2022–2024) to the cloud forests of Valle del Cauca, Colombia, we discovered a novel antipredator diving behavior in &lt;i&gt;Ragoniella pulchella&lt;/i&gt; (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Conocephalinae) Hebard 1927, a tropical katydid reported initially from Boyacá, Colombia, and subsequently in the cloud forest of the Western Cordillera (Chamorro-Rengifo et al., &lt;span&gt;2011&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span&gt;2015&lt;/span&gt;; Montealegre-Z, &lt;span&gt;1997&lt;/span&gt;). This species is found to inhabit large tropical bromeliads (Figure 1A) and was observed to dive into the central bromeliad pool in response to vibratory cues. Primarily, we observed this behavior in response to the presence of bromeliad-dwelling spiders, but a similar response could be elicited by the observer tapping the bromeliad leaf. To formally describe this behavior, we conducted simple experiments in the lab and field to understand dive duration and identify potential oxygen-carrying mechanisms and temperature sensitivity of dive duration. For measurements in the field","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"107 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2026-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13389546/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148551754","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Beyond the treeline: Are wood-nesting bees and wasps limited by nesting habitat at high elevations?","authors":"Lydia H. Wong,&nbsp;Jessica R. K. Forrest","doi":"10.1002/ecy.70438","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ecy.70438","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although climate suitability is often thought to be the most important determinant of species ranges, non-climate variables such as biotic interactions, dispersal abilities, and habitat quality may play equally important roles as range-limiting factors. For some organisms, the constraints imposed by these non-climate variables may explain their failure to establish in novel habitats that appear suitable with respect to climate. Determining whether or not organisms can respond to rising temperatures via range shifts therefore requires understanding the extent to which non-climate variables limit species ranges. We examined the potential for range shifts in montane populations of wood-nesting bees and wasps in the Colorado Rocky Mountains and assessed the extent to which future range shifts to higher elevations may be limited by the lack of wood substrates beyond treeline. We tracked wood-nesting bee and wasp occupancy in artificial wooden nesting structures placed at increasing elevations from treeline. We also quantified the relative abundance of wood- versus ground-nesting bees and wasps at each site. Over the course of the study, wood-nesting bee or wasp nesting activity was observed at least once at all sites, regardless of distance from treeline. The total number of nests constructed at each site decreased with increasing elevation; however, the average number of offspring per nest remained constant for the three most commonly observed taxa. The abundance of wood-nesting bees and wasps declined with increasing elevation more rapidly than that of ground-nesting bees and wasps. These findings suggest that wood-nesting bees and wasps are capable of nesting beyond treeline, but that the extent to which their ranges can shift upward in elevation may be limited by the lack of nesting substrate. Our work highlights the importance of considering non-climate variables such as essential habitat requirements in evaluating the capacity of organisms to respond adaptively to climate change.</p>","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"107 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2026-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecy.70438","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148522008","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Bats attack birds in the air","authors":"Dai Fukui,&nbsp;Emyo Fujioka,&nbsp;Megumi Watanabe,&nbsp;Yoshiaki Watanabe,&nbsp;Yushi Osawa,&nbsp;Keiko Osawa,&nbsp;Noboru Numata,&nbsp;Shizuko Hiryu,&nbsp;Seiichi Hara","doi":"10.1002/ecy.70459","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ecy.70459","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Bats are the second most species-rich mammalian group after rodents and exhibit a wide range of dietary habits ranging from insects and plants to vertebrates (Patterson et al., &lt;span&gt;2003&lt;/span&gt;). Among these, 14 species from the families Phyllostomidae, Megadermatidae, Vespertilionidae, and Nycteridae are known to feed on terrestrial vertebrates through gleaning, with six species regularly or seasonally preying on such animals (Gual-Suárez &amp; Medellín, &lt;span&gt;2021&lt;/span&gt;). More recently, three species of aerial hawking bats from the family Vespertilionidae, which include the birdlike noctule &lt;i&gt;Nyctalus aviator&lt;/i&gt; in Japan, have been found to prey on birds during the spring and autumn bird migration periods (Fukui et al., &lt;span&gt;2013&lt;/span&gt;; Ibáñez et al., &lt;span&gt;2001&lt;/span&gt;; Thabah et al., &lt;span&gt;2007&lt;/span&gt;). DNA metabarcoding analyses revealed that these bats preferentially target small migratory birds (Gong et al., &lt;span&gt;2021&lt;/span&gt;; Ibáñez et al., &lt;span&gt;2016&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span&gt;2020&lt;/span&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, how bats capture relatively large prey such as birds was, until recently, unclear. Two hypotheses had been proposed: that bats attacked resting birds in their roosts (Dondini &amp; Vergari, &lt;span&gt;2000&lt;/span&gt;), or that they intercepted birds during flight (Russo et al., &lt;span&gt;2024&lt;/span&gt;). Recent GPS telemetry and behavioral experiments have suggested the latter (Gong et al., &lt;span&gt;2022&lt;/span&gt;). Additionally, Stidsholt et al. (&lt;span&gt;2025&lt;/span&gt;) used onboard sound and movement tags to support that European &lt;i&gt;Nyctalus lasiopterus&lt;/i&gt; tracks and preys on birds in the air while descending from altitudes of over 1000 m. This European study was the first across any species or region to provide direct evidence that bats prey on birds while flying. However, this was based on acoustic observations, and no visual observations of bats capturing birds in flight have been reported to date.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Tsugaru bird observatory in northern Japan offers a rare opportunity to observe nocturnal bird migrations visually. Using dim ground lighting and searchlights, observers can detect and identify birds flying below an altitude of 150 m (Senzaki et al., &lt;span&gt;2022&lt;/span&gt;). In autumn 2022, we witnessed a large bat—likely &lt;i&gt;N. aviator&lt;/i&gt;—attacking a small bird. We then conducted systematic visual observations in autumn 2023, quantifying bird and bat pass rates and bat behavior through visual counts, photography, and infrared and thermo video recordings. Additionally, to determine the species of bat that attacked the bird, we collected the bird dropped by the bat and analyzed DNA from the wound using DNA barcoding techniques (Appendix S1: Section S1).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;During the visual observation period, we recorded 56 instances of bats pursuing birds, some of which resulted in a chase or attack, and six that resulted in successful captures. Furthermore, DNA sequences matching &lt;i&gt;N. aviator&lt;/i&gt; were detected in wound samples from a Japanese Bush Warbler (&lt;i&gt;Horornis dipho","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"107 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2026-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecy.70459","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148498838","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Historical vertebrate herbivory drives ontogenetic shifts in plant defense across oceanic islands","authors":"Xoaquín Moreira,&nbsp;Luis Abdala-Roberts,&nbsp;Cláudia Baider,&nbsp;Kevin C. Burns,&nbsp;Lydia S. Dean,&nbsp;F. B. Vincent Florens,&nbsp;Cristina González-Montelongo,&nbsp;Sierra N. Hellwitz,&nbsp;Thomas Ibanez,&nbsp;Beatriz Lago-Núñez,&nbsp;Sofía Martínez,&nbsp;Carla Pastoriza,&nbsp;Silvia Portela,&nbsp;María José Ramírez,&nbsp;Nereida M. Rancel-Rodríguez,&nbsp;Irene Virseda,&nbsp;Kailen A. Mooney","doi":"10.1002/ecy.70460","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ecy.70460","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Islands with contrasting herbivore histories provide a natural framework to investigate the evolution of plant defenses. Theory predicts that on islands with historically intense vertebrate herbivory, juveniles maintain strong defenses while adults may reduce them once out of reach, whereas islands lacking vertebrate browsers show minimal ontogenetic differences and generally lower defenses. Alternatively, when extinct herbivores were particularly large, selection might also favor stronger adult defenses. Despite these theoretical expectations, empirical tests across multiple island systems remain scarce. In this study, we quantified leaf physical, chemical, and nutritional traits related to resistance and palatability in juvenile and adult individuals of 60 woody plant species across 33 families from six archipelagos: three with extinct large herbivores (New Zealand, New Caledonia, Mauritius) and three without vertebrate browsers (the Canary Islands, Azores, Channel Islands of California). We found that species from islands with historical herbivory exhibited overall lower defenses, with trait expression strongly shaped by ontogeny. Adults displayed higher phenolic concentrations and lower nutrient content than juveniles, reducing leaf palatability. By contrast, species from islands lacking herbivores showed no ontogenetic variation. These results reveal the lasting evolutionary legacy of extinct herbivores and show how herbivore history and ontogeny shape island plant defenses.</p>","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"107 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2026-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecy.70460","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148498972","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A salinity gradient mediates plant diversity–function–stability relationships across a coastal marsh landscape","authors":"Robert P. Dunn,&nbsp;Steven C. Pennings","doi":"10.1002/ecy.70436","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ecy.70436","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ecosystem function and stability are often positively related to species richness in experiments, but in nature, abiotic gradients may over-ride or obscure the effects of richness on function and stability. In addition, community stability may be driven by distinct mechanisms along diversity or abiotic gradients and exhibit different responses to differing degrees of variability in an abiotic condition. We explored relationships between salinity, plant diversity, ecosystem function (annual biomass production), and stability of biomass over 25 years for seven coastal marsh plant communities arranged across an estuarine salinity gradient in Georgia, USA. In contrast to expectations, neither plant biomass nor its stability was related to species richness. Plant richness was positively correlated to within-year high tide salinity range and peaked at intermediate values of mean salinity. Biomass stability was negatively correlated with mean salinity but was unrelated to salinity range. Stability was driven by dominant species at sites with low richness, but asynchrony likely contributes to stability at intermediate salinity sites with higher diversity. Our results illustrate the importance of studying variability in abiotic conditions in addition to their mean and demonstrate that stability and richness may not necessarily be correlated in nature due to underlying abiotic gradients affecting both.</p>","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"107 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2026-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecy.70436","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148459636","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Ad hoc editors of manuscripts","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/ecy.70457","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ecy.70457","url":null,"abstract":"<p>For their service as ad hoc editors of one or more manuscripts for <i>Ecology</i>, <i>Ecological Applications</i>, <i>Ecological Monographs</i>, <i>Ecosphere, Earth Stewardship</i>, and <i>Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment</i> during the past year (1 January 2025 through 31 December 2025), the Society is especially grateful to:</p><p>Sumanta Bagchi*</p><p>M. Noelia Barrios-Garcia</p><p>Jeannine Cavender-Bares*</p><p>Andrew Davis</p><p>Gerardo de la Vega</p><p>Emily Francis</p><p>Alain Frantz</p><p>Michelle Gierach</p><p>Paulo Guimarães</p><p>Brian Harvey</p><p>Richard Karban</p><p>Jason Keller</p><p>Shannon Klein</p><p>Jesse Kreye</p><p>Guillermo Martínez Pastur</p><p>Margaret Mayfield</p><p>Natalia Pérez Harguindeguy*</p><p>Susan Prichard</p><p>Christina Prokopenko</p><p>Peter Reich</p><p>Gabriela Schaepman-Strub</p><p>Brian Sedio</p><p>Megan Seeley</p><p>Mariana Tadey</p><p>Justin Valliere</p><p>Saskya van Nouhuys*</p><p>Christine Whitcraft</p><p>Kenneth Zillig</p>","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"107 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2026-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecy.70457","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148459638","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Reviewers of manuscripts","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/ecy.70456","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ecy.70456","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;These referees have served in the past year for manuscripts submitted to &lt;i&gt;Ecology&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Ecological Applications&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Ecological Monographs&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Ecosphere&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Earth Stewardship&lt;/i&gt;, and &lt;i&gt;Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment&lt;/i&gt; (1 January 2025 through 31 December 2025). The authors, editors, staff, and members of ESA are indebted to these individuals for their thoughtful and critical reviews. We extend our deepest appreciation for the time and energy they have devoted to the ESA journals.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Geert Aarts*&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Peter Aastrup&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Fitsum Abadi&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mariana Abarca&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;David Abecasis&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Christian Abizaid&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Andrew J. Abraham&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nerea Abrego*&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Rodolfo Abreu&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tyler Joseph Achatz&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Victoria J. Ackroyd&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Fabian Horacio Acuña&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jared Adam*&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Peter Adamík&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Amanda M. Adams*&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Evan Michael Adams*&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Michael J. Adams&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Rosangela Addesso&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Patrick Addo-Fordjour&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Gautam Aditya&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Andre S. Afonso&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mickey Agha&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anurag A. Agrawal*&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jon Ågren&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Beatriz A. Aguirre&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Armando Aguirre-Jaimes&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Folashade B. Agusto&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Rameez Ahmad&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nahian Ahmed&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Shamim Ahmed&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;T. Mitchell Aide&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ellen O. Aikens&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Gillian Barbara Ainsworth&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Matthew Ajemian*&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Molly Albecker&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jasmin Albert&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lindsey K. Albertson*&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Greg F. Albery*&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Steve D. Albon&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Marina Alcantar&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jack Alexander&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Julie D. Alexander&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Elias Alfaro&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Scott B. Alford&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jamin Ali&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Kara Allen&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Benjamin L. Allen&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Daniel Clinton Allen*&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jonathan D. Allen&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Maximilian L. Allen*&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Michael F. Allen&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jacob Edward Allgeier*&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Austin Z. T. Allison&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Andrew J. Allyn&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Rafaela Alão Almeida*&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Brianna Almeida&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Karie A. Altman&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Artur Alves&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Luis Amador&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bruna R. Amaral&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Alongkorn Amnuaykanjanasin&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Luisa Amo&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Felipe Wanderley de Amorim*&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Angelos Amyntas*&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hui An*&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;José Daniel Anadón&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jaime Mauricio Anaya-Rojas&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;William Anderegg&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;John Marty Anderies&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Erik M. Andersen&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Kurt E. Anderson&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sean Anderson&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;T. Michael Anderson&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thomas Lee Anderson*&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Karl Andraczek&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Serge Andréfouët&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Kieran J. Andreoni*&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;John Andrews*&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Kelly Andrews&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Robert A. Andrus&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Samantha Andrzejaczek&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Christine Holdredge Angelini&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jay P. Angerer&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Chinenye Ani&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;R. James Ansley&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Daniel N. Anstett&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tyler L. Anthony*&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cara Applestein&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ayrton Aquino&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Marco Aquino-López&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ricard Arasa-Gisbert*&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Muthusamy Arasumani&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Patricia I. Araujo&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Suzanne Arbeiter*&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Enrique Arbeláez-Cortés&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stephanie K. Archer&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Aneta Arct&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Aldo Arellano&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Salvador Arenas-Castro&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Carina I. Arganaraz&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Margarita Arianotsou&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sarella Arkkila*&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Peter Armbruster*&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;W. Scott Armbruster&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anna R. Armitage*&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;David W. Armitage&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Doug P","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"107 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2026-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecy.70456","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148459758","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}