Clinical Oral Implants Research最新文献

{"title":"Bi-Layered Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Bone Substitute to Improve Bone Formation in Lateral Jaw Defects Applying the Principle of Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR)—A Pre-Clinical Randomized Controlled Study","authors":"Kiri N. Lang,&nbsp;Niklaus P. Lang,&nbsp;Fernando M. Muños Guzon,&nbsp;Nikola Saulacic","doi":"10.1111/clr.14460","DOIUrl":"10.1111/clr.14460","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Aim</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To evaluate the application of a synthetic bi-layered biphasic calcium-phosphate (BBCP) bone substitute for its capacity for new bone formation in Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) in an acute-defect model in Beagle dogs.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Standardized bone defects were created following the extraction of the maxillary ¹P¹, ²P², ⁴P⁴ and the mesial root of ³P³ in six Beagle dogs. The defects were treated according to the GBR principle using the tested material, synthetic bi-layered biphasic calcium-phosphate bone substitute (Group T), deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM, positive control = PC), a mixture of the test substance and DBBM in a ratio of 1:1 (Group M) and a sham-operated empty control (negative control = NC). The defects were covered with a resorbable collagen barrier membrane. Bone formation was evaluated radiologically, microtomographically, and histomorphometrically after 11 weeks of healing.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>All biomaterials resulted in increased volume of the augmented bone compared to the negative control. The augmented ridge volume developed to a greater extent in the tested area and in the combination of the tested bone substitute and the DBBM compared to the positive control alone (DBBM). A significant increment in a mineralized tissue and bone-biomaterial contact was observed between the test groups and the positive control.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The synthetic BBCP appeared to result in greater bone formation volumes than the positive control (DBBM) and resulted in less contact with soft tissue. Hence, the tested material appeared to be at least as effective as the applied standard for lateral bone augmentation (DBBM).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":10455,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","volume":"36 9","pages":"1115-1125"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/clr.14460","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144233392","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Multifactorial Analysis of Trueness in Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery: A Retrospective Study","authors":"Weie Song,&nbsp;Chen Deng,&nbsp;Chenyu Rao,&nbsp;Yilin Luo,&nbsp;Xingmei Yang,&nbsp;Yingying Wu,&nbsp;Yili Qu,&nbsp;Yi Man","doi":"10.1111/clr.14458","DOIUrl":"10.1111/clr.14458","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To investigate the clinically acceptable deviation threshold and the factors associated with trueness across three computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS) approaches: static CAIS (s-CAIS), dynamic CAIS (d-CAIS), and robotic CAIS (r-CAIS).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A total of 314 implants in 194 patients were retrospectively included, with preoperative and postoperative CBCT scans collected. Outcome measures included platform, apex, and angular deviations, which were assessed by registering postoperative CBCT scans to preoperative implant plans using a jawbone matching technique. Generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) were employed to identify significant factors associated with implant trueness.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In r-CAIS, mean global deviations were 0.65 ± 0.137 mm (platform), 0.73 ± 0.39 mm (apex), and 1.66° ± 0.99° (angular), significantly smaller than s-CAIS and d-CAIS (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Deviations in d-CAIS were 1.15 ± 0.55 mm, 1.23 ± 0.56 mm, and 2.87° ± 1.71°, whereas s-CAIS showed 0.96 ± 0.56 mm, 1.32 ± 0.67 mm, and 3.42° ± 1.85°. No significant differences were found between s-CAIS and d-CAIS (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.01). All approaches met clinical acceptability thresholds of 1.5 mm for linear and 5° for angular deviation (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Analysis revealed that bone inclinations exceeding 45° significantly increased implant deviations at apex and angular (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Additionally, deviations were greater in the molar region, particularly at the second molar (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>All three CAIS approaches demonstrated clinically acceptable trueness, with the r-CAIS showing superior performance. Bone inclination and molar placement were identified as key factors contributing to increased deviations.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2400083777</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":10455,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","volume":"36 9","pages":"1095-1105"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144201427","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Effect of Placement Accuracy of Customized Titanium Mesh on Bone Regeneration: A Retrospective Study","authors":"Yi Cheng,&nbsp;Gang Chen,&nbsp;Chao Wang,&nbsp;Dan Chen,&nbsp;Pengyu Zhao,&nbsp;Haitao Huang","doi":"10.1111/clr.14447","DOIUrl":"10.1111/clr.14447","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of three-dimensional printed individualised titanium mesh (3D-PITM) placement in protected bone regeneration surgery for alveolar bone defects.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study included 15 patients with alveolar bone defects who underwent protected bone regeneration surgery using 3D-PITM as a scaffold. The 3D-PITM was removed 6–9 months post-bone regeneration surgery. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) data allowed for digital comparison between the actual titanium mesh and the preoperative design, analyzing the overall deviation and deformation angle of the titanium mesh. Additionally, morphology modification of the augmented areas was analyzed, and the volume was calculated.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The deviation of the titanium mesh immediately post-bone regeneration surgery from the preoperative design was 0.93 ± 0.22 mm. The maximum deformation angle of the titanium mesh immediately post-bone regeneration surgery was 21.49°, averaging 10.85° ± 6.70°. Correlation analysis indicated that a larger deformation angle post-bone regeneration surgery resulted in a greater deviation from the preoperative titanium mesh design. With one failure case excluded, the average actual bone augmentation achieved was 92.83% ± 26.12% of the design. Due to the small sample size, no significant correlation was found between the actual percentage of bone fill and the Root Mean Square (RMS) deviation and deformation angle of the titanium mesh.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Although 3D-PITM-protected bone regeneration provided effective bone augmentation, a noticeable deviation remained between the titanium mesh's actual position and preoperative design. However, due to the small sample size, there was a non-significant correlation between the actual percentage of bone fill volume and the RMS deviation and deformation angle of the titanium mesh.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":10455,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","volume":"36 8","pages":"1000-1016"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144198365","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Effects of Smoking on Macrophage Polarization in Peri-Implantitis Lesions","authors":"Ettore Amerio,&nbsp;Francesco Sparano,&nbsp;Agustín Muñoz-Sanz,&nbsp;Cristina Valles,&nbsp;Jose Nart,&nbsp;Alberto Monje","doi":"10.1111/clr.14448","DOIUrl":"10.1111/clr.14448","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The study aimed to investigate the relationship between cigarette smoking and macrophage polarization in peri-implantitis (PI) lesions. Additionally, it sought to characterize clinical, radiological, microbiological, and immunological features of PI in smokers and non-smokers.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A cross-sectional study included 40 patients (20 smokers, ≥ 10 cigarettes/day, and 20 non-smokers) requiring surgical treatment for PI. Samples of peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) and granulation tissue were collected during surgery for immunofluorescence and cytokine analyses. Smoking exposure was assessed through cotinine levels. Macrophage polarization (M1/M2) was determined using immunofluorescence. Clinical, radiological, and microbiological parameters were also evaluated.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Smokers showed a significantly higher proportion of M1 macrophages (70.23%) compared to non-smokers (25.09%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.005). This pro-inflammatory shift correlated positively with cotinine levels (<i>ρ</i> = 0.694; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.005) and pack-years (<i>ρ</i> = 0.81; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.005). No significant differences in M2 macrophage counts, cytokine concentrations, or microbiota diversity were observed between the groups. However, smokers exhibited more severe PI lesions (<i>p</i> = 0.04).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Smoking is associated with a pro-inflammatory shift at the cellular level due to an increase in M1 macrophage polarization in PI lesions, suggesting a pro-inflammatory response that may exacerbate tissue destruction and hinder treatment outcomes. These findings highlight the need for incorporating smoking cessation into comprehensive peri-implant care strategies to improve disease management and implant prognosis.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":10455,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","volume":"36 8","pages":"1017-1029"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/clr.14448","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143992056","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Accuracy of a Novel Intraoral Photogrammetry Technique for Complete-Arch Implant Impressions: An In Vitro Study","authors":"Xiao-Jiao Fu,&nbsp;Zheng-Zhen Cai,&nbsp;Jun-Yu Shi,&nbsp;Shi-Chong Qiao,&nbsp;Maurizio S. Tonetti,&nbsp;Hong-Chang Lai,&nbsp;Bei-Lei Liu","doi":"10.1111/clr.14445","DOIUrl":"10.1111/clr.14445","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To compare the accuracy of complete-arch implant impressions using four digital techniques: extraoral photogrammetry (EPG), intraoral scanning with original scan body (IOS), intraoral scanning with prefabricated aids (IOSA), and intraoral photogrammetry (IPG).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>One edentulous maxillary master model with six parallel abutment analogs was scanned by a laboratory scanner as the reference scan. EPG, IOS, IOSA, and IPG were used to scan the master model with respective scan bodies as test scans. Ten scanning data were gained for each technique. Trueness and precision of root mean square (RMS) errors were measured between the test and reference scans. Deviations in distance and angle relative to the reference scan between all pairs of abutment analogs were measured. Scanning time was recorded.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>IPG showed significantly best trueness in RMS errors (IPG, 26.37 ± 1.02 μm; EPG, 31.72 ± 0.59 μm; IOS, 39.93 ± 7.98 μm; IOSA, 50.60 ± 12.46 μm), (all <i>p</i> &lt; 0.050). EPG showed significantly best precision in RMS errors (EPG, 2.30 ± 1.31 μm; IPG, 4.12 ± 0.87 μm; IOS, 33.38 ± 13.95 μm; IOSA, 28.35 ± 11.48 μm), (all <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). IPG demonstrated significantly best performance in distance deviation (IPG, 28.59 ± 24.75 μm; EPG, 55.55 ± 37.82 μm; IOS, 62.97 ± 50.60 μm; IOSA, 93.37 ± 72.15 μm), (all <i>p</i> &lt; 0.050). No significant differences were found regarding angle deviation (<i>p</i> = 0.313). IOSA showed the longest scanning duration (IPG: 50.30 ± 6.77 s; EPG: 57.40 ± 5.19 s; IOS: 91.10 ± 20.31 s; IOSA: 125.00 ± 18.74 s), (all <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>IPG achieved comparable accuracy with EPG in complete-arch implant digital impressions in vitro. IPG offers an efficient and straightforward workflow, making it a valuable alternative method; however, further clinical studies are needed to validate its efficacy.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":10455,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","volume":"36 8","pages":"991-999"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143914923","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Effectiveness of Restoration Strategies for Posterior Missing Teeth With Dental Implants: A Retrospective Study","authors":"Jiayu Gao,&nbsp;Xuemei Tang,&nbsp;Chen Deng,&nbsp;Xiangqi Zhao,&nbsp;Yili Qu,&nbsp;Xingmei Yang,&nbsp;Yingying Wu,&nbsp;Lin Xiang,&nbsp;Yi Man","doi":"10.1111/clr.14444","DOIUrl":"10.1111/clr.14444","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Aim</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a treatment strategy involving only implant restoration of the first molars (M1s) in cases where both M1s and second molars (M2s) lost.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A retrospective study design compared two groups: one underwent simultaneous implant restoration of both M1s and M2s (Group 1), while the other underwent restoration of only M1s (Group 2). Statistical models were used to evaluate implant survival, complication-free survival rates, cumulative treatment costs, peri-implant conditions, and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study included 247 patients, with 283 partially edentulous posterior regions. Group 1 consisted of 195 areas, and Group 2 comprised 88 regions. The analysis revealed no significant differences between the two groups in implant survival rates (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.66, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.29–9.50, <i>p</i> = 0.567) or complication-free survival rates (HR = 1.21, 95% CI: 0.49–3.04, <i>p</i> = 0.678). Group 2 showed 1.7 times lower cumulative costs (<i>β</i> = −14.40, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and had no peri-implantitis cases compared to a 16.2% incidence in Group 1 over 3 years (<i>p</i> = 0.043). Radiological assessment indicated that Group 2 was a protective factor against more than 0.5 mm marginal bone loss (<i>β</i> = 0.34, <i>p</i> = 0.012). PROMs demonstrated no significant differences in chewing ability for soft and hard foods between Group 1 and Group 2. Group 2 reported lower post-surgery pain scores, while both groups had similar discomfort and food impaction rates.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Considering the limitations of this study, implant restoration with only M1s may be an effective and cost-efficient treatment option for patients who have lost both M1s and M2s.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":10455,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","volume":"36 8","pages":"978-990"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143901415","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A Randomised Controlled Trial Evaluating 3-Year Survival Rates and Technical Complications of Screw-Retained Hybrid Abutment Crowns on Two-Piece Zirconia and Titanium Implants","authors":"Guido Sterzenbach,&nbsp;Kristin Richter,&nbsp;Klara Alpen,&nbsp;Hediyeh Khoshreza,&nbsp;Florian Beuer,&nbsp;Theodor Thiele","doi":"10.1111/clr.14443","DOIUrl":"10.1111/clr.14443","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study compares the cumulative survival and technical complications of screw-retained implant-supported lithium disilicate crowns (SICs) on polyether ketone ketone (PEKK) base abutments and zirconia implants with those of titanium base abutments and titanium implants.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Sixty participants were randomly and evenly assigned to receive zirconia or titanium implants. Survival and technical complications were assessed at 6 weeks after crown placement (baseline) up to 36 months. The cumulative survival of the SICs was analysed as a non-inferiority design, assuming that the difference between the titanium group and the zirconia group is not more than 10%. Technical complications were assessed based on modified USPHS criteria and Pink Aesthetic Score (PES).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In the zirconia group, three early implant failures occurred; all of them were successfully revised. After baseline, three implants in the zirconia group were lost due to insufficient osseointegration, and therefore the SICs have to be categorised as failures even though none of the SICs failed. The non-inferiority of the zirconia group could not be confirmed, as the cumulative survival was 10.7% lower compared to the titanium group (100%). The technical complication rate was low, with no statistically significant difference between the groups. The PESs improved significantly compared to baseline, with no significant difference between the groups at 12 months.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Hybrid abutment SICs with PEKK base abutments on two-piece zirconia implants could be an alternative to hybrid abutments SICs with titanium base on titanium implants. However, the lower osseointegration rate of the zirconia implants has to be considered.</p>\u0000 \u0000 <p><b>Trial Registration:</b> This study was registered in the German Clinical Trial Register (Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien) (number: DRKS00014866)</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":10455,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","volume":"36 8","pages":"965-977"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/clr.14443","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143889312","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"EAO Milan 2024—A Scientific Digest Report From the 31st Annual Congress, a Joint Meeting of the EAO, IAO, and SIdP","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/clr.14423","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14423","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10455,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","volume":"36 4","pages":"518-523"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143831449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Accuracy of Digital Impression Methods for Capturing the Peri-Implant Emergence Profile: A Systematic Review","authors":"Krisztina Mikulás,&nbsp;Xinyi Qian,&nbsp;Péter Tajti,&nbsp;Gergely Agócs,&nbsp;German O. Gallucci,&nbsp;Ignacio Pedrinaci,&nbsp;Péter Hermann","doi":"10.1111/clr.14441","DOIUrl":"10.1111/clr.14441","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Accurately replicating the emergence profile (EP) of conditioned soft tissue is pivotal for the success of implant-supported restorations. In the field of digital technology, various methods have emerged to capture EP. This review aims to critically assess current digital methodologies for capturing peri-implant EP.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Prospective interventional or observational clinical studies focusing on digitally mapping the emergence profile (EP) around single implant-supported restorations were included. Systematic reviews, in vitro and animal studies, and those not emphasizing EP capture were excluded. A systematic search across four databases (MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Embase, Web of Science) was conducted on 7th August 2024 based on a previously registered protocol (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023459484). Risk of bias was assessed with RoB 2, ROBINS-I, and JBI critical appraisal tools. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were carried out.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Twenty-four eligible studies were identified, comprising 5 dental techniques, 12 case reports, 1 randomized controlled study, 2 cross-sectional studies, and 4 cross-over studies. The studies reported semi-digital pathways, direct scanning, indirect scanning, coded-healing abutments, and individualized use of scan bodies. Notably, the direct scanning technique showed considerable soft tissue collapse. Similar results can be achieved with indirect scanning and the conventional method.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Indirect EP scanning appears as the most promising method for capturing peri-implant EP. However, a confirmation of this finding requires a quantitative analysis through randomized clinical trials.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":10455,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","volume":"36 8","pages":"930-943"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/clr.14441","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143822627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Clinical Performance of Immediately Placed and Restored Implants With a Novel Design in the Esthetic Zone. A 3-Year Follow-Up of Prospective Case Series","authors":"Frank Schwarz,&nbsp;Georgina Trimpou,&nbsp;Alexa Montada,&nbsp;Karina Obreja,&nbsp;Puria Parvini,&nbsp;Amira Begić","doi":"10.1111/clr.14438","DOIUrl":"10.1111/clr.14438","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Aim</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To assess the medium-term implant success and survival rates of immediately placed and restored implants with a novel design in the esthetic zone.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A total of <i>n</i> = 20 patients had received immediately placed tapered, two-part implants with a progressive thread design (PL) (<i>n</i> = 20) and an immediate “non full-functional” loading (patient-specific abutments) for single tooth replacements in the anterior maxilla. Implant survival and success (e.g., bleeding on probing—BOP, probing pocket depth—PD, mucosal recession—MR) were assessed at 24 and 36 months following final restoration (i.e., 12 weeks after implant placement). Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated at 36 months.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A total of four patients were lost to follow-up, resulting in 16 patients included in the analysis. At 24 and 36 months, implant survival amounted to 100%, respectively. Non-significant changes to baseline were noted at 24 and 36 months for mean BOP (9.37 (29.7)%, 9.38 (26.5)%), PD (−0.45 (0.88)mm, −0.34 (0.74)mm), and MR (0.0 (0.0)mm, 0.0 (0.02)mm) values. Pink esthetic score—PES values amounted to 13.0 (1.22) and 12.62 (1.42) at 24 and 36 months. Technical and mechanical complications were not observed. Patients expressed an overall high satisfaction at 36 months.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The presented immediacy protocol was associated with high survival and success rates as well as a high patient satisfaction in the medium-term.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":10455,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","volume":"36 7","pages":"903-911"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2025-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/clr.14438","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143789945","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}