A 10-year Retrospective Clinical Study to Identify Risk Indicators for Peri-Implant Bone Loss and Implant Failure.

IF 4.8 1区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Simon Windael,Bruno Collaert,Stefanie De Buyser,Stijn Vervaeke,Hugo De Bruyn
{"title":"A 10-year Retrospective Clinical Study to Identify Risk Indicators for Peri-Implant Bone Loss and Implant Failure.","authors":"Simon Windael,Bruno Collaert,Stefanie De Buyser,Stijn Vervaeke,Hugo De Bruyn","doi":"10.1111/clr.14375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM\r\nTo evaluate long-term survival and success of dental implants and evaluate indicators affecting the long-term outcome.\r\n\r\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\r\nImplant survival, success and crestal bone loss (BL) over time were evaluated. For covariates at patient level, Kaplan-Meier estimates of implant survival were compared between groups with the log-rank test. Observed mean bone loss (MBL) was plotted as a function of time. Cumulative frequencies of BL were plotted for different post-op times. Uni- and multivariate analysis was performed. Simple linear mixed and multiple linear mixed models for BL at 1, 5 and 10 years were fitted.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\n407 patients (221 women, 186 men; mean age 64.86 years (range 28-92, SD 10.11)), with 1482 implants, responded. Absolute implant survival was 94.74%; MBL was 0.81 mm (SD 1.58, range 0.00-17.00) after an average follow-up of 10.66 years (range 10-14, SD 0.87). Implant survival was influenced on implant level by smoking, implant width and early bone loss (EBL) > 0.5 mm; on patient level by a history of periodontitis. Indicators influencing MBL after the 1st year were abutment height, type of surgery and implant width, while after 5 and 10 years of function were abutment height, EBL > 0.5 mm and smoking.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nImplant survival was significantly affected by a history of periodontitis on patient level and by smoking, implant width and EBL > 0.5 mm on implant level. Late bone loss was significantly affected by abutment height, EBL > 0.5 mm and smoking.\r\n\r\nTRIAL REGISTRATION\r\nB670201524796.","PeriodicalId":10455,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14375","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AIM To evaluate long-term survival and success of dental implants and evaluate indicators affecting the long-term outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS Implant survival, success and crestal bone loss (BL) over time were evaluated. For covariates at patient level, Kaplan-Meier estimates of implant survival were compared between groups with the log-rank test. Observed mean bone loss (MBL) was plotted as a function of time. Cumulative frequencies of BL were plotted for different post-op times. Uni- and multivariate analysis was performed. Simple linear mixed and multiple linear mixed models for BL at 1, 5 and 10 years were fitted. RESULTS 407 patients (221 women, 186 men; mean age 64.86 years (range 28-92, SD 10.11)), with 1482 implants, responded. Absolute implant survival was 94.74%; MBL was 0.81 mm (SD 1.58, range 0.00-17.00) after an average follow-up of 10.66 years (range 10-14, SD 0.87). Implant survival was influenced on implant level by smoking, implant width and early bone loss (EBL) > 0.5 mm; on patient level by a history of periodontitis. Indicators influencing MBL after the 1st year were abutment height, type of surgery and implant width, while after 5 and 10 years of function were abutment height, EBL > 0.5 mm and smoking. CONCLUSION Implant survival was significantly affected by a history of periodontitis on patient level and by smoking, implant width and EBL > 0.5 mm on implant level. Late bone loss was significantly affected by abutment height, EBL > 0.5 mm and smoking. TRIAL REGISTRATION B670201524796.
一项为期 10 年的回顾性临床研究,旨在确定种植体周围骨质流失和种植失败的风险指标。
材料与方法对种植体的存活率、成功率和骨嵴骨质流失(BL)进行评估。对于患者水平的协变量,采用对数秩检验比较不同组间种植体存活率的 Kaplan-Meier 估计值。观察到的平均骨质流失(MBL)与时间呈函数关系。根据术后不同时间,绘制平均骨量累积频率图。进行单变量和多变量分析。结果407名患者(221名女性,186名男性;平均年龄64.86岁(28-92岁,SD 10.11))接受了治疗,共植入了1482颗种植体。种植体绝对存活率为 94.74%;平均随访 10.66 年(10-14 年,SD 0.87)后,MBL 为 0.81 mm(SD 1.58,范围 0.00-17.00)。吸烟、种植体宽度和早期骨质流失 (EBL) > 0.5 mm 对种植体的存活率有影响;牙周炎病史对患者的存活率有影响。第一年后影响 MBL 的指标是基台高度、手术类型和种植体宽度,而 5 年和 10 年后影响 MBL 的指标是基台高度、EBL > 0.5 mm 和吸烟。基台高度、EBL > 0.5 mm 和吸烟对晚期骨质流失有明显影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Clinical Oral Implants Research 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
11.60%
发文量
149
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Oral Implants Research conveys scientific progress in the field of implant dentistry and its related areas to clinicians, teachers and researchers concerned with the application of this information for the benefit of patients in need of oral implants. The journal addresses itself to clinicians, general practitioners, periodontists, oral and maxillofacial surgeons and prosthodontists, as well as to teachers, academicians and scholars involved in the education of professionals and in the scientific promotion of the field of implant dentistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信