{"title":"Personalised learning in project management education: Insights from an artificial intelligence-driven chatbot","authors":"Helgi Thor Ingason , Kirsi Aaltonen , Atli Snaer Asmundarson , Thordur Vikingur Fridgeirsson , Daniel Huemann , Martina Huemann , Jaakko Kujala , Hannele Lampela , Mauro Mancini , Costanza Mariani , Claudia Ringhofer","doi":"10.1016/j.plas.2025.100193","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.plas.2025.100193","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The increasing complexity of project-based work in contemporary organisations calls for a transformation in how project management is taught. Traditional teaching approaches struggle to support self-directed, context-sensitive, and motivationally engaging learning experiences—skills that are critical for preparing future project leaders. In this context, there is growing interest in the potential of artificial intelligence-powered tools to enhance the quality and adaptability of educating future project managers. This paper explores the application of artificial intelligence-driven chatbots in university-level project management education through the lens of the two-year international project ”ChatLearn” conducted across four European countries. Using an action design research methodology, the project iteratively developed and tested a chatbot in three versions, progressively integrating feedback from students and educators. The study suggests that artificial intelligence-based chatbots hold significant promise for supporting personalised learning journeys and increasing student motivation; however, their integration requires careful design, ongoing dialogue within the teaching community, and a strong alignment with pedagogical objectives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101050,"journal":{"name":"Project Leadership and Society","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100193"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145324157","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Mitigating the negative aspects of project work: The roles of psychological capital and coworker and family support","authors":"Maria Magdalena Aguilar Velasco, Andreas Wald","doi":"10.1016/j.plas.2025.100176","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.plas.2025.100176","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research on mitigating the negative effects of project work on project workers is scarce. This study analyzes the roles of psychological capital as an individual factor and coworker and family support as environmental factors in reducing the negative effects of project work. Building on the job demands-resources model and conservation of resources theory, the influence of these factors on the relationships between subjective stress, job burnout, and individual job performance is examined. The research model is empirically tested using data from a sample of 304 project workers. The results show that coworker and family support are positively associated with psychological capital. Additionally, psychological capital mediates the effects of social resources on subjective stress, which can lead to job burnout and poor work performance. Thus, coworker and family support and psychological capital can mitigate stress, job burnout, and their negative consequences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101050,"journal":{"name":"Project Leadership and Society","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143097218","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Thomas Tepstad Berge, Bassam Hussein, Haavard Haaskjold
{"title":"A new holistic framework for megaproject portfolio success","authors":"Thomas Tepstad Berge, Bassam Hussein, Haavard Haaskjold","doi":"10.1016/j.plas.2025.100190","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.plas.2025.100190","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Portfolios comprising multiple megaprojects are increasingly prevalent across various industries, yet literature at the intersection of project portfolio management and megaproject management remains limited. This study addresses this research gap through a systematic literature review of 37 peer-reviewed articles, identifying specific practices that significantly impact megaproject portfolio success. Three critical drivers for success have emerged from this study: Proactive disposition, emphasizing a culture of continuous knowledge sharing and uncertainty mitigation; Flexible governance, reflecting adaptable portfolio structures accommodating diverse contexts; and aligned leadership, highlighting the importance of strategic involvement and commitment of top management. The identified drivers have been used to develop a novel framework that is specifically tailored for megaproject portfolio management. The framework shows how each driver supports core project portfolio management activities like strategic alignment, resource allocation, and risk management, and how they influence key success measures including project performance, strategic fit, portfolio balance, and synergy realization. Our novel contribution is to transcend the potential silos of the established project portfolio management activities by using the three drivers for an outcome-based approach, better suited to navigate the complexity of managing multiple megaprojects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101050,"journal":{"name":"Project Leadership and Society","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100190"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144907357","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Taking a Selfie: Researcher-practitioner positionality and reflexivity in project scholarship","authors":"Simon Addyman","doi":"10.1016/j.plas.2024.100175","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.plas.2024.100175","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The move in project scholarship towards understanding the lived experience of projects has led to researchers engaging more deeply in project practice. Despite this, there is little evidence of how their position as researcher-practitioner influences the theorising process. This paper presents analytic autoethnography as a conceptual frame for explicating researcher-practitioner positionality as one actor. Drawing on prior data from an autoethnography, it studies an autoethnographer's reflexive engagement with participants through the interview process. It identifies four themes of reflexive engagement, leading to four dimensions of reflexivity that have a constitutive effect on positionality: The Role of the Self; Relationality - Connecting Interviews, Participants, and Diary Entries; The Role of Chance and Circumstance; Bridging Research and Practice. These four dimensions contribute to project scholarship by showing how accounting for researcher positionality in the field helps demonstrate rigour and relevance when foregrounding the lived experience of research and practice in theory development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101050,"journal":{"name":"Project Leadership and Society","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143097224","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Infrastructure project cost overrun and schedule delay in Ghana: Is it an issue of resource misallocation or financial constraints?","authors":"Doe Precious","doi":"10.1016/j.plas.2025.100188","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.plas.2025.100188","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the cost overrun and schedule delay of four major infrastructure projects in the Greater Accra Region of Ghana. The study collected data from 201 project staff and managers. The study adopted canonical correlation analysis using SPSS v. 25. The findings revealed a complex and counterintuitive relationship between cost and schedule variables. The study found a strong negative correlation between cost and schedule variables, whereas cost overruns positively influence schedule performance. The study also documented a negative correlation between cost variance and schedule variance. The counterintuitive findings point to a phenomenon of “crisis-driven acceleration”, where high-visibility projects facing cost overruns attract additional resources and attention to maintain schedule adherence despite mounting costs. This study advances the Triple Constraint Theory in three significant ways: revealing complex, non-linear relationships between cost and schedule variables that challenge conventional assumptions; introducing the concept of “contextual constraint prioritisation” as an extension to the theory; and advancing methodological approaches to examining constraint relationships. These contributions enhance our understanding of how the Triple Constraint Theory applies in developing-economy contexts and provide a foundation for further theoretical development in this area. This study bridges the gap between abstract theoretical principles and practical realities, contributing to a more robust and contextually relevant understanding of project constraints.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101050,"journal":{"name":"Project Leadership and Society","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100188"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144749255","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pedro M. Almeida , Gabriela Fernandes , José M.R.C.A. Santos
{"title":"Artificial intelligence tools for project management: A knowledge-based perspective","authors":"Pedro M. Almeida , Gabriela Fernandes , José M.R.C.A. Santos","doi":"10.1016/j.plas.2025.100196","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.plas.2025.100196","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence is pressing the need to understand how organisations can integrate it into namely project management to enhance performance and outcomes. Through a systematic literature review, this paper explores artificial intelligence's potential use in project management. The thematic analysis of relevant literature identified key project management knowledge areas, such as integration, scope, communication, risk and stakeholder management, were as domains where artificial intelligence holds significant potential. The study further investigates the relationship between these knowledge areas and the most suitable types of artificial intelligence tools, such as generative artificial intelligence, and machine learning algorithms for optimisation and automation, based on the dominant knowledge type each knowledge area requires, namely formal, data-driven, or tacit knowledge. Based on the main findings, the study proposes a conceptual framework for the integration of artificial intelligence tools in project management, offering valuable insights for scholars and practitioners. Moreover, guidelines for future research to accelerate the wide adoption of artificial intelligence in the field are proposed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101050,"journal":{"name":"Project Leadership and Society","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100196"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145264440","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Michelle Smit , Reinhard F. Wagner , Taryn Jane Bond-Barnard
{"title":"Ambiguous regulations for dealing with AI in higher education can lead to moral hazards among students","authors":"Michelle Smit , Reinhard F. Wagner , Taryn Jane Bond-Barnard","doi":"10.1016/j.plas.2025.100187","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.plas.2025.100187","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The aim of this study was to investigate the ethical dilemmas and expectations surrounding the use of generative AI in academic work within a South African-based hybrid online master's program in engineering management. Central to this program is its strong focus on project management and engineering leadership, to drive ethical decision-making in their professional contexts. A total of 102 current and graduated students from the master's program were surveyed to explore their use of generative AI tools, such as ChatGPT and Grammarly, in both professional and academic contexts. The survey showed that 98 % of students actively use generative AI, demonstrating an awareness of its potential and usefulness. While anecdotal evidence suggests moral hazard including plagiarism, undisclosed AI use and reliance on AI without independent reasoning. 94 % Of students seek clear institutional policies at the university and program levels to guide the ethical use of AI in academia.</div><div>Students with higher confidence in their academic writing tend to perceive the quality of AI-generated content to be slightly inferior to their own work, highlighting varying dependency levels across the cohort. Furthermore, many students believe that universities should adopt explicit guidelines to define when and how AI tools are appropriate for academic work. These findings suggest that the absence of clear policies exacerbates ethical conflicts, impacting both educators and students.</div><div>The results of this research underscore the urgency of developing transparent guidelines to safeguard academic integrity while embracing the potential of generative AI. By framing the findings within the moral hazard theory, this study highlights the risks of over-reliance on AI tools and opens avenues for future research into their responsible integration in higher education.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101050,"journal":{"name":"Project Leadership and Society","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144702654","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marion Karppi , Ursula Hyrkkänen , Markku Jokisaari
{"title":"The consequences of shared leadership on job demands and job resources in project teams","authors":"Marion Karppi , Ursula Hyrkkänen , Markku Jokisaari","doi":"10.1016/j.plas.2025.100203","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.plas.2025.100203","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Shared leadership has been identified as an important form of team-centric leadership that complements vertical leadership practices in project teams. It has been connected with many positive outcomes on team performance and effectiveness, and it has been reported to enhance team members' job satisfaction. However, less is known about how team members experience the consequences of shared leadership. Hence the aim of our study was to explore how shared leadership consequences are experienced amongst project team members, and how these consequences are related to job demands and resources. We conducted a qualitative study with 31 participants from 15 project teams from private and public sector. The data was analysed with a lens of job demands-resources (JD-R) theory to capture how team members perceive shared leadership consequences, and how these experiences are reflected as job demands and resources. We found that project team members’ experiences of shared leadership consequences were reflected as increasing hindrance and challenge demands, and as enhancing job resources. Our findings bring new knowledge on shared leadership consequences and highlight both the benefits and cautions of these consequences for project teams.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101050,"journal":{"name":"Project Leadership and Society","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100203"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145527955","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Novel research methods in project studies","authors":"Natalya Sergeeva , Johan Ninan","doi":"10.1016/j.plas.2025.100186","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.plas.2025.100186","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":101050,"journal":{"name":"Project Leadership and Society","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100186"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144757311","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}