Taking a Selfie: Researcher-practitioner positionality and reflexivity in project scholarship

Simon Addyman
{"title":"Taking a Selfie: Researcher-practitioner positionality and reflexivity in project scholarship","authors":"Simon Addyman","doi":"10.1016/j.plas.2024.100175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The move in project scholarship towards understanding the lived experience of projects has led to researchers engaging more deeply in project practice. Despite this, there is little evidence of how their position as researcher-practitioner influences the theorising process. This paper presents analytic autoethnography as a conceptual frame for explicating researcher-practitioner positionality as one actor. Drawing on prior data from an autoethnography, it studies an autoethnographer's reflexive engagement with participants through the interview process. It identifies four themes of reflexive engagement, leading to four dimensions of reflexivity that have a constitutive effect on positionality: The Role of the Self; Relationality - Connecting Interviews, Participants, and Diary Entries; The Role of Chance and Circumstance; Bridging Research and Practice. These four dimensions contribute to project scholarship by showing how accounting for researcher positionality in the field helps demonstrate rigour and relevance when foregrounding the lived experience of research and practice in theory development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101050,"journal":{"name":"Project Leadership and Society","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Project Leadership and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666721524000607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The move in project scholarship towards understanding the lived experience of projects has led to researchers engaging more deeply in project practice. Despite this, there is little evidence of how their position as researcher-practitioner influences the theorising process. This paper presents analytic autoethnography as a conceptual frame for explicating researcher-practitioner positionality as one actor. Drawing on prior data from an autoethnography, it studies an autoethnographer's reflexive engagement with participants through the interview process. It identifies four themes of reflexive engagement, leading to four dimensions of reflexivity that have a constitutive effect on positionality: The Role of the Self; Relationality - Connecting Interviews, Participants, and Diary Entries; The Role of Chance and Circumstance; Bridging Research and Practice. These four dimensions contribute to project scholarship by showing how accounting for researcher positionality in the field helps demonstrate rigour and relevance when foregrounding the lived experience of research and practice in theory development.
自拍:项目奖学金中的研究实践者定位与反身性
项目学术向理解项目的生活经验的转变导致研究人员更深入地参与项目实践。尽管如此,很少有证据表明他们作为研究实践者的地位如何影响理论化过程。本文提出分析自我民族志作为一个概念框架来解释作为一个行动者的研究者-实践者的地位。根据先前的民族志数据,它研究了民族志研究者通过访谈过程与参与者的反射性接触。它确定了反身性参与的四个主题,从而得出对位置性具有构成性影响的反身性的四个维度:自我的角色;关系-连接访谈,参与者和日记条目;机遇与环境的作用;桥梁研究与实践。这四个维度通过展示研究人员在该领域的地位如何有助于在理论发展中突出研究和实践的生活经验时展示严谨性和相关性,从而为项目奖学金做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信