Michelle Smit , Reinhard F. Wagner , Taryn Jane Bond-Barnard
{"title":"Ambiguous regulations for dealing with AI in higher education can lead to moral hazards among students","authors":"Michelle Smit , Reinhard F. Wagner , Taryn Jane Bond-Barnard","doi":"10.1016/j.plas.2025.100187","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.plas.2025.100187","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The aim of this study was to investigate the ethical dilemmas and expectations surrounding the use of generative AI in academic work within a South African-based hybrid online master's program in engineering management. Central to this program is its strong focus on project management and engineering leadership, to drive ethical decision-making in their professional contexts. A total of 102 current and graduated students from the master's program were surveyed to explore their use of generative AI tools, such as ChatGPT and Grammarly, in both professional and academic contexts. The survey showed that 98 % of students actively use generative AI, demonstrating an awareness of its potential and usefulness. While anecdotal evidence suggests moral hazard including plagiarism, undisclosed AI use and reliance on AI without independent reasoning. 94 % Of students seek clear institutional policies at the university and program levels to guide the ethical use of AI in academia.</div><div>Students with higher confidence in their academic writing tend to perceive the quality of AI-generated content to be slightly inferior to their own work, highlighting varying dependency levels across the cohort. Furthermore, many students believe that universities should adopt explicit guidelines to define when and how AI tools are appropriate for academic work. These findings suggest that the absence of clear policies exacerbates ethical conflicts, impacting both educators and students.</div><div>The results of this research underscore the urgency of developing transparent guidelines to safeguard academic integrity while embracing the potential of generative AI. By framing the findings within the moral hazard theory, this study highlights the risks of over-reliance on AI tools and opens avenues for future research into their responsible integration in higher education.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101050,"journal":{"name":"Project Leadership and Society","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144702654","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The race for AI skills as an obstacle course: Institutional challenges and low threshold suggestions","authors":"Oliver Vettori, Johanna Warm","doi":"10.1016/j.plas.2025.100183","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.plas.2025.100183","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Overall, the global labor market shows a clear surge of demand for AI-related skills, pressuring education systems and institutions across the globe, in particular those in higher education, to adapt policies and curricula and address the current skills gap. This paper examines the delaying factors which higher education institutions are facing in heeding a swift call for action, including problems related to the current AI skills frameworks, the heterogeneity of student populations, the lack of institutional policies as well as the slow process of translating new knowledge into curricula. The paper concludes with some suggestions for low threshold actions, which would help prevent the skills gap from becoming even wider in the near future as well as pave the way for more holistic solutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101050,"journal":{"name":"Project Leadership and Society","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143877102","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Blanka Székely , Szilvia Erdeiné Késmárki-Gally , Zoltán Lakner
{"title":"Hybrid project management: Scoping review","authors":"Blanka Székely , Szilvia Erdeiné Késmárki-Gally , Zoltán Lakner","doi":"10.1016/j.plas.2025.100182","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.plas.2025.100182","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The hybrid project management (HPM) approach aims to leverage the strengths of various methodologies while mitigating their weaknesses, thereby supporting project managers in achieving project success. However, there is limited comprehensive knowledge about the practical implementation of HPM in organizations. This paper seeks to bridge the gap in academic literature regarding HPM, as examined in Web of Science and Scopus, and to investigate the existence and application of HPM in practice. The authors analyze the significance, benefits, and drawbacks of different project management methodologies. The research follows PRISMA guidelines, addressing five specific research questions to ensure a systematic, transparent, and rigorous process. The findings are presented in structured tables, offering a thorough understanding of the subject. This study provides a foundational basis for future research on HPM, particularly within the business administration field. It focuses exclusively on hybrid methodologies relevant to business products and service development areas, excluding unrelated hybrid approaches. In summary, this paper aims to enhance the understanding and application of HPM, offering valuable insights for both academic and practical advancements in project management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101050,"journal":{"name":"Project Leadership and Society","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143776545","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The confluence of project and innovation management: A scientometric analysis of emerging trends and research frontiers","authors":"Lihong Zhang , Saeed Banihashemi , Yujue Zhang , Song Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.plas.2025.100181","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.plas.2025.100181","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The convergence of project management (PM) and innovation management (IM) has become an increasingly significant research domain, yet a comprehensive scientometric analysis of their intersection remains underexplored. This study bridges this gap by conducting a two-decade scientometric analysis (2003–2023) of 521 articles retrieved from Web of Science (WOS), Scopus, and PubMed. Using bibliometric techniques and CiteSpace visualization, key research trends, collaborative networks, and emerging fields within PM-IM literature are identified. The findings reveal three dominant disciplinary pillars—management, engineering, and business—shaping the PIM domain, while collaboration across institutions and countries remains sparse. Furthermore, foundational research landmarks, particularly the influence of the Stage-Gate system and dynamic capabilities in innovation-driven projects are revealed. The analysis highlights three dominant research streams: (1) managing project uncertainty in high-VUCA environments, (2) innovation-driven project methodologies, and (3) applications of PIM across diverse sectors. Furthermore, emerging research frontiers indicate increasing interest in artificial intelligence (AI), agile product management, and digital transformation in innovation projects. By providing a structured overview of the PM-IM confluence, this study offers valuable insights for researchers, policymakers, and industry professionals aiming to navigate the evolving landscape of project-based innovation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101050,"journal":{"name":"Project Leadership and Society","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100181"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143776546","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Shared team mental models when using Building Information Models in construction projects","authors":"Sander Siebelink , Hans Voordijk , Maaike Endedijk , Arjen Adriaanse","doi":"10.1016/j.plas.2025.100180","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.plas.2025.100180","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores Team Mental Models in the context of inter-organizational use of Building Information Models in construction. Through a multiple case study of four construction projects, it is shown that most of the variations in sharedness of mental models can be explained by geographical, organizational, and technological proximity of parties to the core project team. It is also indicated that the level of consensus on the use of Building Information Models is positively related with the project's Building Information Model maturity and that parties with a central role in a project team score higher on the level of the sharedness of mental models for the use of this technology. This study emphasizes significant risks and challenges in collaboration based on Building Information Models among project participants arising from variations in sharedness of mental models. It is crucial for project management to engage in explicit and open discussions between project partners about risks and challenges related to the Team Mental Models, and implement measures to mitigate and resolve these issues.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101050,"journal":{"name":"Project Leadership and Society","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143874942","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Dynamic resource orchestration in production equipment design: Towards enhanced operational effectiveness","authors":"Seyoum Eshetu Birkie, Zuhara Zemke Chavez, Monica Bellgran","doi":"10.1016/j.plas.2025.100179","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.plas.2025.100179","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores the application of resource orchestration (RO) theory to explain the management of production equipment design in large manufacturing firms. It sheds light on a customized application of dynamic RO in the context of production equipment design projects through an in-depth multiple case study. The findings suggest that effective RO across a portfolio of capital projects and leveraging equipment suppliers’ capabilities is essential for effective achievement of operational targets early on. The study showcases a broadening scope of RO beyond boundaries of an organization (unit) to a portfolio of projects spanning a network of manufacturers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101050,"journal":{"name":"Project Leadership and Society","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143463639","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Making sense of collaboration in major infrastructure construction projects","authors":"Christoffer Rönndahl , Petra Bosch-Sijtsema , Rasmus Rempling , Mats Karlsson","doi":"10.1016/j.plas.2025.100178","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.plas.2025.100178","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>For complex and major infrastructure construction projects, relational governance and the importance of collaboration between project partners have led to the emergence of collaborative project delivery models. While collaboration has been studied from different perspectives, few studies focus on how collaboration is maintained and developed over time in major construction projects. Sensemaking is used as a theoretical lens to give more insight in how project actors give and make sense in relation to collaboration. Through a longitudinal case study with interviews (42) and observations, events, triggers and sensebreakers that stimulate sensemaking and sensegiving in the project are discussed. The study contributes with an empirical insight in how project actors make sense of collaboration through sensegiving, stimulating a sensemaking process while also exploring the influence of triggers and sensebreakers on this process. It underscores the dynamic and evolving nature of collaboration within the project context through sensemaking.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101050,"journal":{"name":"Project Leadership and Society","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143097220","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The holistic view in forecasting: A conceptual framework to analyze and mitigate cost underestimation arising from optimism bias","authors":"Giuseppe Sassano","doi":"10.1016/j.plas.2025.100177","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.plas.2025.100177","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the intricate landscape of project planning literature, optimism bias emerges as a significant factor influencing estimation inaccuracies. This research delves into the interplay between support and prospect theories, aiming to elucidate the underpinnings of biases in decision-making processes. By juxtaposing these theories within the broader framework of project management, I present an innovative conceptual model that seeks to bridge the gap between the so-called internal and external views in forecasting. This model highlights the potential for a more synergistic approach to forecasting, challenging the traditionally held notion of incompatibility between these perspectives. Through this lens, the author advocates for a holistic approach to project estimation, emphasizing the potential to counteract the pitfalls of cost underestimation stemming from optimism bias. Indeed, by adopting this holistic view, I maintain that project managers and stakeholders can be better equipped to navigate the complexities of project estimation, thereby mitigating the adverse effects of cost underestimation that are intrinsically linked to optimism bias.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101050,"journal":{"name":"Project Leadership and Society","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143097219","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}