{"title":"Bridging boundaries: Antecedents and consequences of external relationship quality in project portfolios","authors":"Doreen Gehl, Alexander Kock","doi":"10.1016/j.plas.2026.100215","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.plas.2026.100215","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Organizations actively involve external partners in their project activities to access valuable knowledge, expand their resource pools, and enhance the quality of project outcomes. Research shows that participating in interorganizational collaboration is crucial to fostering the organization's competitive edge. While previous studies have assessed the importance of external collaborations on the project level, research on the role of external partners on the project portfolio level is scarce. Applying a relational view, we studied 116 project portfolios from medium to large-sized organizations across different industries and assessed antecedents and consequences of external relationship quality at the project portfolio level. Our findings indicate that maintaining high-quality relationships with external project partners across the portfolio is positively associated with overall portfolio success and, eventually, business success. Results further indicate that cultural support and structural formalization are critical portfolio-level antecedents to external relationship quality. When testing for the interaction of the cultural and structural antecedents, we find that culture and structure act as substitutes; a highly supportive culture can balance out low formalization and vice versa. By shedding light on the antecedents and consequences of external relationship quality in project portfolios, our research adds to the understanding of project portfolio management in its context. It gives practitioners new insights into mechanisms that need to be considered when opening project portfolios to external partners.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101050,"journal":{"name":"Project Leadership and Society","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100215"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146080474","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Udechukwu Ojiako , Malcolm Higgs , Khalid Khalfan Mohamed Al Naqbi , M.K.S. Al-Mhdawi , Maxwell Chipulu , Terry Williams , Taiwo Adedeji
{"title":"Dark personality traits in project management: A bibliometric analysis and agenda for future research","authors":"Udechukwu Ojiako , Malcolm Higgs , Khalid Khalfan Mohamed Al Naqbi , M.K.S. Al-Mhdawi , Maxwell Chipulu , Terry Williams , Taiwo Adedeji","doi":"10.1016/j.plas.2026.100214","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.plas.2026.100214","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>For the past thirty-five years, project management research has been largely dominated by studies emphasizing the prosocial, and therefore positive, traits of project managers and their influence on project outcomes. Alongside this tradition, however, a growing body of work has begun to examine alternative traits, specifically project manager dark personality (PMDP) traits, which are frequently described as ‘dark’. These traits are generally characterized as aversive, deviant, or malevolent. Despite increasing scholarly interest, the intellectual structure of research on PMDP traits remains underexplored. To address this gap, the present study undertakes a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of PMDP literature published between 1989 and 2024, with the aim of uncovering the thematic focus and publication patterns within this field. Our analysis reveals seven recurring project-focused themes: ‘<em>Corruption, unethical, and negative behaviours</em>’; ‘<em>Impact of dark traits</em>’; ‘<em>Causes and effects of biases</em>’; ‘<em>Dark leadership and well-being</em>’; ‘<em>Causes of selective reporting</em>’; ‘<em>Authoritarian leadership and toxicity</em>’; and ‘<em>PM traits and outcomes</em>’. The study makes two key contributions: first, it provides a pioneering primer on PMDP traits and traces their developmental trajectory; second, it highlights emerging themes and trends that merit further investigation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101050,"journal":{"name":"Project Leadership and Society","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100214"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146080475","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Understanding multilevel paradoxes in agile projects: between autonomy and control in self-managing teams","authors":"Sigrid Bjerre, Timo Leimbach","doi":"10.1016/j.plas.2026.100213","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.plas.2026.100213","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With a focus on paradoxes, this paper aims to analyze the current state of research on self-managing teams within an agile project context. It centers on the interdisciplinary concepts of autonomy and control, particularly their paradoxical interrelations, to understand their varying manifestations and to propose strategies for addressing them. Methodologically, the paper is based on a systematic literature review of the published interdisciplinary research related to agile self-managing teams, and the findings were analyzed using thematic coding. The review identifies three core paradoxes: (1) between individual autonomy and team cohesion, (2) between team autonomy and organizational control, and (3) between agile structures and team practices. These paradoxes emerge across different organizational levels. Although they appear distinct, it is important to recognize that they originate from the same fundamental paradox of autonomy and control. We suggest that understanding this core paradox is essential for identifying and managing its various dimensions. Furthermore, we argue that a key to addressing these paradoxes lies in grasping the conceptual complexity of autonomy and control. More specifically, these paradoxes often occur at multiple levels, individual, team, and organizational, and are caused by factors such as misaligned priorities, competing institutional logics, or uneven information flows. The study highlights the need to embrace paradoxical thinking and foster shared understanding and salience throughout the organization to address these paradoxes effectively. Lastly, the paper calls for further research that adopts a multilevel perspective when studying agile self-managing teams.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101050,"journal":{"name":"Project Leadership and Society","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100213"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145993614","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Anna Lund Jepsen , Pernille Eskerod , Kon Shing Kenneth Chung , Jingbo Zhang , Mauro Ortiz
{"title":"Using websites and social media to support local community stakeholder attendance at project town hall meetings","authors":"Anna Lund Jepsen , Pernille Eskerod , Kon Shing Kenneth Chung , Jingbo Zhang , Mauro Ortiz","doi":"10.1016/j.plas.2024.100164","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.plas.2024.100164","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Engaging local community stakeholders in projects is important. A project town hall meeting is a common practice to do so. However, many project town hall meetings suffer from low attendance. This study investigates how the project organization can use its website and social media to support attendance. The study draws on literature on social media marketing, the customer journey concept, and the use of different appeal elements. It applies a case study approach with two cases: The Western Sydney Airport project and the London Heathrow Expansion project. We found that the project organizations used their websites and the social media Facebook, X and YouTube to a limited extent. Furthermore, they mostly used rational and transactional appeals, thus foregoing the chance to engage stakeholders in attending by application of interactional appeals. Based on the findings, we offer a framework for use of own websites and social media to support the stakeholder journey towards attending project town hall meetings. Our research enriches project management knowledge by highlighting what to consider in the application of websites and social media for local community stakeholder engagement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101050,"journal":{"name":"Project Leadership and Society","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143097263","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Helene Berg , Anne Strand Alfredsen Larsen , Ole Jonny Klakegg , Morten Welde
{"title":"Cost estimation in major public projects’ front-end phase: An empirical study on how to improve current practices","authors":"Helene Berg , Anne Strand Alfredsen Larsen , Ole Jonny Klakegg , Morten Welde","doi":"10.1016/j.plas.2024.100171","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.plas.2024.100171","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cost estimates in the front-end phase of public projects are critical in ensuring the selection of good projects that provide value for society. In this study, we use theoretical perspectives of front-end and cost estimation under uncertainty to address the gap in project management research on practices to produce realistic cost estimates. We interviewed 31 cost engineers and held a workshop with 53 participants who had a background in costing. The findings demonstrate substantial information and input data challenges in the front-end, and that cost estimation cannot be understood as an isolated process. This study contributes to the literature by demonstrating that the organization and management of the estimation process are critical for achieving realistic front-end cost estimates beyond merely applying specific models or methods. Our results also highlight that focusing on uncertainty is essential for realistic budgeting and responsible decision-making in major public projects. Finally, the study provides practical recommendations to enhance the quality of front-end cost estimates, such as improving the preservation and storage of historical data and maintaining a focus on uncertainty throughout the process.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101050,"journal":{"name":"Project Leadership and Society","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143097264","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Blanka Székely , Szilvia Erdeiné Késmárki-Gally , Zoltán Lakner
{"title":"Hybrid project management: Scoping review","authors":"Blanka Székely , Szilvia Erdeiné Késmárki-Gally , Zoltán Lakner","doi":"10.1016/j.plas.2025.100182","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.plas.2025.100182","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The hybrid project management (HPM) approach aims to leverage the strengths of various methodologies while mitigating their weaknesses, thereby supporting project managers in achieving project success. However, there is limited comprehensive knowledge about the practical implementation of HPM in organizations. This paper seeks to bridge the gap in academic literature regarding HPM, as examined in Web of Science and Scopus, and to investigate the existence and application of HPM in practice. The authors analyze the significance, benefits, and drawbacks of different project management methodologies. The research follows PRISMA guidelines, addressing five specific research questions to ensure a systematic, transparent, and rigorous process. The findings are presented in structured tables, offering a thorough understanding of the subject. This study provides a foundational basis for future research on HPM, particularly within the business administration field. It focuses exclusively on hybrid methodologies relevant to business products and service development areas, excluding unrelated hybrid approaches. In summary, this paper aims to enhance the understanding and application of HPM, offering valuable insights for both academic and practical advancements in project management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101050,"journal":{"name":"Project Leadership and Society","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143776545","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Next practice in agile project management: Putting tailoring into agile transformation","authors":"Fangyuan Shen , Ian Stewart","doi":"10.1016/j.plas.2025.100207","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.plas.2025.100207","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Agile transformation in projects requires configuring agile practices and frameworks to better fit project needs, goals and circumstances. It is rarely delivered through a systematic process, thereby challenging transformation performance and leading to dissatisfaction and failure. We propose a new, analogical tailoring process model, based on the interactive garment tailor-customer process of garment tailoring, and empirically examine the validity of the model through eight semi-structured interviews and a focus group discussion with agile coaches and project team members. A refined analogical agile tailoring process model is structured to reflect steps for both agile coaches and project teams to exchange, collaborate and achieve agile transformation in projects. The practice innovation we present demonstrates the process-based interactions required to increase the degree of fit of agile techniques and create a stronger agile coach-client team relationship. It clarifies the process for agile transformation at project level and presents a critical view of tailoring that is largely missing from the project management literature.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101050,"journal":{"name":"Project Leadership and Society","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100207"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145623384","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"AI as artificial ignorance","authors":"Bent Flyvbjerg","doi":"10.1016/j.plas.2025.100208","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.plas.2025.100208","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>First, we present a number of simple tests of AI, which document a profound gap between the hype and the reality of AI. Second, we explain the gap in terms of a confusion of artificial general intelligence with generative artificial intelligence in the promotion of AI. Finally, we analyze AI as bullshit (in the strong philosophical sense of Harry Frankfurt). We find that AI and bullshit are similar in the sense that both prioritize rhetoric over truth. They mix true, false, and ambiguous statements in ways that make it difficult to distinguish which is which. AI sounds convincing even when it's wrong. As such, current AI is more about persuasion than about truth. This is a problem because it means AI produces faulty and ignorant results. For now, we need to be highly skeptical of AI for its lack of a concept of truth.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101050,"journal":{"name":"Project Leadership and Society","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100208"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145736813","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}