Cell biology education最新文献_第5页

Analysis of the Response Characteristics on Items of Life Science of Science Subject of National Assessment of Educational Achievement (NAEA) according to Item Type and Behavior Dimension 基于项目类型和行为维度的全国教育成就评估理科科目生命科学题响应特征分析

Cell biology education Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.15717/BIOEDU.2020.48.1.130

Jaebong Lee, Kew Cheol Shim

引用次数: 0

The Influence of Background Knowledge on EEG Activation in High School Students’ Life Science Hypothesis Generation Process 背景知识对高中生生命科学假设生成过程中脑电图激活的影响

Cell biology education Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.15717/BIOEDU.2020.48.4.521

Yongshik Kim, Jeong, Jin-Su

引用次数: 0

An Analysis of the Meaning, Process, and Learning Task of Self-Regulation in Science Learning 科学学习中自我调节的意义、过程与学习任务分析

Cell biology education Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.15717/BIOEDU.2020.48.3.477

Sang-Hee Park, Na-Rae Hwang, Jin-Sun Park, Se-Ri Lee, Kwon, Seung-Hyuk, Kwon, Yong-Ju

引用次数: 0

Analysis on the Science Subject Competencies in Inquiry Activity of Elementary Science Textbooks according to 2015 Revised National Curriculum 2015年国家课程修订基础科学教材探究活动中的科学学科能力分析

Cell biology education Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.15717/BIOEDU.2020.48.1.1

S. Song, K. Shim

引用次数: 0

학교 안 야외 생태학습에서 관찰된 초등학생들의 참여 양상 변화와 그 요인 탐색 在校内野外生态学习中观察到的小学生参与形态变化及其原因探索

Cell biology education Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI: 10.15717/bioedu.2019.47.4.463

주은정

引用次数: 0

Bloom의 신교육목표분류에 기초한 2015 개정 교육과정 생명과학 I성취기준과 교과서 학습목표 분석 全球的教育目标分类为基础的2015生命科学i成就标准修改教育课程和教科书学习目标分析

Cell biology education Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI: 10.15717/bioedu.2019.47.4.438

김형미, 강경희

{"title":"Bloom의 신교육목표분류에 기초한 2015 개정 교육과정 생명과학 I성취기준과 교과서 학습목표 분석","authors":"김형미, 강경희","doi":"10.15717/bioedu.2019.47.4.438","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2019.47.4.438","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to analyze the 2015 revised national curriculum 『Life science I』 achievement standards and the learning objectives in accordance with Bloom’s revised taxonomy. The subjects of this study were 2015 revised national curriculum achievement standards and eight 『Life science I』 textbooks. The results of the achievement standards analysis presented that conceptual knowledge was the most utilized. The second was factual knowledge, and the next was procedural knowledge. Analysis of the cognitive process showed that understanding was the most utilized. The analysis of textbook learning objectives showed a tendency very similar to the results of achievement standards analysis. Conceptual knowledge was the largest, and factual knowledge was presented next. In the analysis of the cognitive process, comprehension was most often presented. Achievement standards and learning objectives are very important because they present the direction of teachinglearning in the field of school education. In particular, the use of various knowledge and cognitive processes in setting achievement standards and learning objectives can be seen as essential to fostering the competencies of the subject. Therefore, efforts should be made to utilize various types of knowledge and cognitive processes in the process of constructing 『Life science I』 achievement standards and learning objectives.","PeriodicalId":84416,"journal":{"name":"Cell biology education","volume":"144 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81791829","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

생물1급 정교사 연수 프로그램에 대한 중등생물교사의 관심단계와 실행 의지 中等生物教师对生物一级正式教师进修计划的关心阶段和落实意志

Cell biology education Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI: 10.15717/bioedu.2019.47.4.535

김보성, Jae-Ho Sim

引用次数: 0

예비 생물교사의 진화 개념에 대한 이해와 수업 내용 분석 预备生物教师进化概念的理解与授课内容分析

Cell biology education Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI: 10.15717/bioedu.2019.47.4.448

윤영민, Eunyoung Jeong

引用次数: 0

초등학생들의 효과적인 짚신벌레 관찰을 위한 슬라이드 글라스 개발과 적용 开发并应用幻灯片观察小学生草虫

Cell biology education Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI: 10.15717/bioedu.2019.47.4.491

신원섭

{"title":"초등학생들의 효과적인 짚신벌레 관찰을 위한 슬라이드 글라스 개발과 적용","authors":"신원섭","doi":"10.15717/bioedu.2019.47.4.491","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2019.47.4.491","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to develop Slide Glass(SG) which allows elementary students to easily and effectively observe protist such as paramecium. For this purpose, the science curriculum, textbooks, and guidebooks related to the paramecium were analyzed. In addition, learning and teaching experiences on the paramecium were surveyed with 83 primary school teachers. SG, developed in this study, has a square-shaped structure for observing protist in a certain space. The SG were developed in three forms; 3D printing, acrylic processing and mesh to create a single space. SG’s size is shown in horizontal and vertical lines. The SG was tested the effects of 6 on-site primary school teachers and 96 elementary school students. The results of this study are as follows. First, the educational experience in paramecium of the elementary school teachers was low; the experience of learning was 49.4% and the experience of teaching was 24.1%. Second, elementary school teachers were having difficulty collecting (48.2%), difficulty observing (24.1 %), difficulty preparing (20.5%), and difficulty manipulating microscopes (7.2 %). Third, the developed SG was effective for elementary school students to observe the appearance, movement and size of paramecium. Finally, I hope that SG developed in this study will reduce the instructional burden of elementary school teachers and expand opportunities for elementary school students to observe directly the protist such as the paramecium.","PeriodicalId":84416,"journal":{"name":"Cell biology education","volume":"61 1","pages":"491-498"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80085022","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

국내 생물교육 분야의 질적 연구 동향- ｢생물교육｣ 학회지를 중심으로 - 国内生物教育领域质的研究动向——以《生物教育》学会杂志为中心——

Cell biology education Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI: 10.15717/bioedu.2019.47.4.411

강은희, 이영미, Nam-Il Kim

{"title":"국내 생물교육 분야의 질적 연구 동향- ｢생물교육｣ 학회지를 중심으로 -","authors":"강은희, 이영미, Nam-Il Kim","doi":"10.15717/bioedu.2019.47.4.411","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2019.47.4.411","url":null,"abstract":"Qualitative research, which has emerged as a method to overcome the limitations of quantitative research, has been increasingly used in various fields since the 1990s. In this study, we analyzed 200 qualitative research studies published in the journal of Biological Education between 1976 and June, 2019. These studies were analyzed according to (1) the research method, (2) qualitative research approach, (3) data collection, and (4) validation method. Results showed that the use of qualitative research has continuously increased: 104 of the analyzed papers (52%) used mixed qualitative research, while 96 papers (48%) used qualitative research approach alone. While the basic qualitative research method among qualitative research approaches accounts for the 65% of the total studies analyzed, the recent trend reflects more diversified approach, due to the increase of case studies, narratives, grounded theories, etc. In terms of the data collection, various sources, such as interviews, artifacts, discourses, and documents, were collected with relatively even frequency. Finally, various strategies were used to validate data analysis, such as triangulation through several investigators or multiple sources of data, expert review, and member checks. Different trends between the qualitative research alone and mixed research method studies are further discussed.","PeriodicalId":84416,"journal":{"name":"Cell biology education","volume":"42 1","pages":"411-421"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82722306","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0