Bloom의 신교육목표분류에 기초한 2015 개정 교육과정 생명과학 I성취기준과 교과서 학습목표 분석

김형미, 강경희
{"title":"Bloom의 신교육목표분류에 기초한 2015 개정 교육과정 생명과학 I성취기준과 교과서 학습목표 분석","authors":"김형미, 강경희","doi":"10.15717/bioedu.2019.47.4.438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to analyze the 2015 revised national curriculum 『Life science I』 achievement standards and the learning objectives in accordance with Bloom’s revised taxonomy. The subjects of this study were 2015 revised national curriculum achievement standards and eight 『Life science I』 textbooks. The results of the achievement standards analysis presented that conceptual knowledge was the most utilized. The second was factual knowledge, and the next was procedural knowledge. Analysis of the cognitive process showed that understanding was the most utilized. The analysis of textbook learning objectives showed a tendency very similar to the results of achievement standards analysis. Conceptual knowledge was the largest, and factual knowledge was presented next. In the analysis of the cognitive process, comprehension was most often presented. Achievement standards and learning objectives are very important because they present the direction of teachinglearning in the field of school education. In particular, the use of various knowledge and cognitive processes in setting achievement standards and learning objectives can be seen as essential to fostering the competencies of the subject. Therefore, efforts should be made to utilize various types of knowledge and cognitive processes in the process of constructing 『Life science I』 achievement standards and learning objectives.","PeriodicalId":84416,"journal":{"name":"Cell biology education","volume":"144 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell biology education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2019.47.4.438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the 2015 revised national curriculum 『Life science I』 achievement standards and the learning objectives in accordance with Bloom’s revised taxonomy. The subjects of this study were 2015 revised national curriculum achievement standards and eight 『Life science I』 textbooks. The results of the achievement standards analysis presented that conceptual knowledge was the most utilized. The second was factual knowledge, and the next was procedural knowledge. Analysis of the cognitive process showed that understanding was the most utilized. The analysis of textbook learning objectives showed a tendency very similar to the results of achievement standards analysis. Conceptual knowledge was the largest, and factual knowledge was presented next. In the analysis of the cognitive process, comprehension was most often presented. Achievement standards and learning objectives are very important because they present the direction of teachinglearning in the field of school education. In particular, the use of various knowledge and cognitive processes in setting achievement standards and learning objectives can be seen as essential to fostering the competencies of the subject. Therefore, efforts should be made to utilize various types of knowledge and cognitive processes in the process of constructing 『Life science I』 achievement standards and learning objectives.
全球的教育目标分类为基础的2015生命科学i成就标准修改教育课程和教科书学习目标分析
本研究的目的是分析2015年修订后的国家课程“生命科学I”的成就标准和学习目标,按照布鲁姆修订后的分类法。本研究以2015年修订的国家课程成就标准和8本《生命科学1》教材为研究对象。成绩标准分析的结果表明,概念性知识是使用最多的。第二是事实性知识,第三是程序性知识。对认知过程的分析表明,理解是使用最多的。教科书学习目标的分析与成绩标准分析的结果呈现出非常相似的趋势。概念知识是最大的,其次是事实知识。在对认知过程的分析中,最常出现的是理解。成绩标准和学习目标非常重要,因为它们代表了学校教育领域的教与学方向。特别是,在制定成就标准和学习目标时使用各种知识和认知过程,可被视为对培养该学科的能力至关重要。因此,在构建“生命科学1”成就标准和学习目标的过程中,应努力利用各类知识和认知过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信