国内生物教育领域质的研究动向——以《生物教育》学会杂志为中心——

강은희, 이영미, Nam-Il Kim
{"title":"国内生物教育领域质的研究动向——以《生物教育》学会杂志为中心——","authors":"강은희, 이영미, Nam-Il Kim","doi":"10.15717/bioedu.2019.47.4.411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Qualitative research, which has emerged as a method to overcome the limitations of quantitative research, has been increasingly used in various fields since the 1990s. In this study, we analyzed 200 qualitative research studies published in the journal of Biological Education between 1976 and June, 2019. These studies were analyzed according to (1) the research method, (2) qualitative research approach, (3) data collection, and (4) validation method. Results showed that the use of qualitative research has continuously increased: 104 of the analyzed papers (52%) used mixed qualitative research, while 96 papers (48%) used qualitative research approach alone. While the basic qualitative research method among qualitative research approaches accounts for the 65% of the total studies analyzed, the recent trend reflects more diversified approach, due to the increase of case studies, narratives, grounded theories, etc. In terms of the data collection, various sources, such as interviews, artifacts, discourses, and documents, were collected with relatively even frequency. Finally, various strategies were used to validate data analysis, such as triangulation through several investigators or multiple sources of data, expert review, and member checks. Different trends between the qualitative research alone and mixed research method studies are further discussed.","PeriodicalId":84416,"journal":{"name":"Cell biology education","volume":"42 1","pages":"411-421"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"국내 생물교육 분야의 질적 연구 동향- 「생물교육」 학회지를 중심으로 -\",\"authors\":\"강은희, 이영미, Nam-Il Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.15717/bioedu.2019.47.4.411\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Qualitative research, which has emerged as a method to overcome the limitations of quantitative research, has been increasingly used in various fields since the 1990s. In this study, we analyzed 200 qualitative research studies published in the journal of Biological Education between 1976 and June, 2019. These studies were analyzed according to (1) the research method, (2) qualitative research approach, (3) data collection, and (4) validation method. Results showed that the use of qualitative research has continuously increased: 104 of the analyzed papers (52%) used mixed qualitative research, while 96 papers (48%) used qualitative research approach alone. While the basic qualitative research method among qualitative research approaches accounts for the 65% of the total studies analyzed, the recent trend reflects more diversified approach, due to the increase of case studies, narratives, grounded theories, etc. In terms of the data collection, various sources, such as interviews, artifacts, discourses, and documents, were collected with relatively even frequency. Finally, various strategies were used to validate data analysis, such as triangulation through several investigators or multiple sources of data, expert review, and member checks. Different trends between the qualitative research alone and mixed research method studies are further discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":84416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cell biology education\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"411-421\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cell biology education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2019.47.4.411\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell biology education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2019.47.4.411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

定性研究作为一种克服定量研究局限性的方法,自20世纪90年代以来在各个领域得到了越来越多的应用。在这项研究中,我们分析了1976年至2019年6月期间发表在《生物教育》杂志上的200项定性研究。根据(1)研究方法,(2)定性研究方法,(3)数据收集,(4)验证方法对这些研究进行分析。结果表明,定性研究的使用不断增加:分析论文中有104篇(52%)使用混合定性研究方法,96篇(48%)单独使用定性研究方法。虽然定性研究方法中的基本定性研究方法占所分析研究总数的65%,但由于案例研究、叙述、扎根理论等的增加,最近的趋势反映出方法更加多样化。在数据收集方面,以相对均匀的频率收集各种来源,如访谈、人工制品、话语和文件。最后,使用各种策略来验证数据分析,例如通过几个调查员或多个数据源进行三角测量,专家审查和成员检查。进一步讨论了单独定性研究与混合研究方法研究的不同趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
국내 생물교육 분야의 질적 연구 동향- 「생물교육」 학회지를 중심으로 -
Qualitative research, which has emerged as a method to overcome the limitations of quantitative research, has been increasingly used in various fields since the 1990s. In this study, we analyzed 200 qualitative research studies published in the journal of Biological Education between 1976 and June, 2019. These studies were analyzed according to (1) the research method, (2) qualitative research approach, (3) data collection, and (4) validation method. Results showed that the use of qualitative research has continuously increased: 104 of the analyzed papers (52%) used mixed qualitative research, while 96 papers (48%) used qualitative research approach alone. While the basic qualitative research method among qualitative research approaches accounts for the 65% of the total studies analyzed, the recent trend reflects more diversified approach, due to the increase of case studies, narratives, grounded theories, etc. In terms of the data collection, various sources, such as interviews, artifacts, discourses, and documents, were collected with relatively even frequency. Finally, various strategies were used to validate data analysis, such as triangulation through several investigators or multiple sources of data, expert review, and member checks. Different trends between the qualitative research alone and mixed research method studies are further discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信