Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Release of Protected Test Information Under Protective Order: Viable Solution or Illusory Safeguard? An Interorganizational† Position Paper. 根据保护令公开受保护的测试信息:可行的解决方案还是虚幻的保障?组织间立场文件》。
IF 2.1 4区 心理学
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2025-05-21 DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acae101
Kyle Brauer Boone, Jerry J Sweet, Robert A Beattey, Paul M Kaufmann, Nancy Hebben, Catherine Marreiro, Joette James, Delia Silva, Tara Victor, Anita Hamilton, Tannahill Glen, Thomas F Kinsora, H Allison Bender, Mark Barisa
{"title":"Release of Protected Test Information Under Protective Order: Viable Solution or Illusory Safeguard? An Interorganizational† Position Paper.","authors":"Kyle Brauer Boone, Jerry J Sweet, Robert A Beattey, Paul M Kaufmann, Nancy Hebben, Catherine Marreiro, Joette James, Delia Silva, Tara Victor, Anita Hamilton, Tannahill Glen, Thomas F Kinsora, H Allison Bender, Mark Barisa","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acae101","DOIUrl":"10.1093/arclin/acae101","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To critically examine the assumption that protective orders are adequately protective of sensitive psychological/neuropsychological test information. Attorneys at times claim that to adequately cross-examine neuropsychological experts, they require direct access to protected test information, rather than having test data analyzed by retained neuropsychological experts. As a compromise, judges sometimes order that protected test information be released to attorneys under a protective order.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An appointed writing group of forensic experts developed a position paper addressing the history of protective orders and their presumed effectiveness in protecting psychological and neuropsychological test content. The expert panel consisted of 12 forensic neuropsychologists, a forensic neuropsychologist/attorney, and a forensic psychologist/attorney.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight reasons are enumerated as to why protective orders do not sufficiently safeguard protected psychological/neuropsychological information and thereby jeopardize future use of the tests. Recommendations are provided to the expert witness practitioner for navigating demands by non-psychologists for direct access to protected test information.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is strong agreement within the practicing neuropsychology community that test security is a vital matter, which, if properly enforced, can ensure the validity of present and future psychological and neuropsychological assessments but, if ineffectively managed, will undermine such evaluations. Because the effectiveness of protective orders has not been, and cannot be, guaranteed, protected psychological and neuropsychological test information should not be released under a protective order.</p>","PeriodicalId":8176,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"723-733"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142602868","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Diagnosed and Nondisclosed Concussions Among Young Athletes With ADHD. 患有多动症的年轻运动员中确诊和未披露的脑震荡。
IF 2.1 4区 心理学
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2025-05-21 DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acae108
Ara J Schmitt, Michael Matta, Abigail C Bretzin, Maria Tina Benno, Kirstin Franklin, Erica Beidler
{"title":"Diagnosed and Nondisclosed Concussions Among Young Athletes With ADHD.","authors":"Ara J Schmitt, Michael Matta, Abigail C Bretzin, Maria Tina Benno, Kirstin Franklin, Erica Beidler","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acae108","DOIUrl":"10.1093/arclin/acae108","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Within a sample of young athletes with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), to explore the frequency of disclosed and nondisclosed concussions, identify reasons the youth did not report a suspected concussion, and learn the frequency that the youth still practiced or played in a game after a suspected concussion.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Cross-sectional surveys were completed by 448 youth athletes (ages 8-14 years) and a corresponding parent (or caregiver). As part of larger respective surveys, questions regarding ADHD status and concussion history were asked of the youth and parents. Data regarding 40 youth with ADHD were available for analyses. Due to the low frequency of concussive injuries within the total sample, descriptive statistics and qualitative techniques were used to contextualize the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The youth with ADHD were not more likely to experience at least one diagnosed concussion or nondisclosed concussion as compared to non-ADHD controls. Three of 40 youth athletes with ADHD (8%) had been diagnosed with a concussion, whereas 5 (13%) self-reported a nondisclosed concussion. Not wanting to lose playing time and not wanting to miss a game were the two most endorsed reasons for concussion nondisclosure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>More research is needed to understand the present results considering other research that puts similarly aged athletes with ADHD at greater risk for concussion. Education for youth with ADHD might help reduce the number of nondisclosed concussions that have a more complex recovery trajectory in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":8176,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"794-801"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142675003","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Just the Tip of the Iceberg: a Brief Report of the Tip-of-the-Tongue Score as an Embedded Validity Indicator for the Children's Auditory and Visual Naming Tests. 只是冰山一角:舌尖得分作为儿童听觉和视觉命名测试的嵌入效度指标的简要报告。
IF 2.1 4区 心理学
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2025-05-21 DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acae117
Jared B Hammond, Jonathan D Lichtenstein
{"title":"Just the Tip of the Iceberg: a Brief Report of the Tip-of-the-Tongue Score as an Embedded Validity Indicator for the Children's Auditory and Visual Naming Tests.","authors":"Jared B Hammond, Jonathan D Lichtenstein","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acae117","DOIUrl":"10.1093/arclin/acae117","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Explore the tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) scores from the Children's Auditory and Visual Naming Tests (cANT, cVNT) as embedded validity indicators (EVIs).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective design of 98 consecutively referred youth aged 6-15 years (M = 11.28, SD = 2.80) that completed neuropsychological evaluation at a tertiary-care academic medical center.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Invalid performance (i.e., ≥2 failed PVTs) occurred in 12.2% of the sample, with base rates of failure on individual PVTs ranging from 1.0% to 30.6%. Area under the curve (AUC) showed statistical significance for the auditory (AUC = 0.811, p = .004) but not the visual TOT. Logistic regression indicated the combination of both TOT scores with other PVTs increased correct identification of invalid performance to 85.7% versus 75% without TOT scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The utility of the TOT as a language-based EVI is one of many potential advantages of the cANT and cVNT compared to other confrontation naming tests. To confirm this, future studies with more diverse populations are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":8176,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"858-862"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142875811","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Ubiquity of Cognitive Impairment in Human Illness: a Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses. 认知障碍在人类疾病中的普遍性:Meta 分析的系统性回顾。
IF 2.1 4区 心理学
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2025-05-21 DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acae113
David J Schretlen, John-Christopher A Finley, Victor A Del Bene, Mark Varvaris
{"title":"The Ubiquity of Cognitive Impairment in Human Illness: a Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses.","authors":"David J Schretlen, John-Christopher A Finley, Victor A Del Bene, Mark Varvaris","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acae113","DOIUrl":"10.1093/arclin/acae113","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cognitive dysfunction occurs in many neurological, psychiatric, and other health conditions. This review aimed to characterize the breadth and degree of cognitive morbidity associated with varied health conditions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We systematically reviewed Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for meta-analyses of cognitive dysfunction associated with any health condition. Meta-analyses were eligible if they reviewed studies that compared patients with health conditions to healthy controls on cognitive testing and provided effect sizes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found 91 meta-analyses for 94 health conditions. Among >800,297 participants, healthy controls out-performed clinical participants in every condition on cognitive testing. Mean effect sizes ranged from -2.02 to -0.00 across conditions and were ≤ -0.5 on average, denoting moderate to very severe dysfunction for 41% of them.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cognitive dysfunction is ubiquitous in medicine. Both primary care and specialist physicians likely treat patients with cognitive dysfunction. Depending on its severity, cognitive dysfunction can affect treatment adherence, everyday functioning, quality of life, and the capacity to provide informed consent for treatment. These findings highlight the transdiagnostic nature of cognitive symptoms and the potential value of establishing collaborations between physicians and clinical neuropsychologists to integrate cognitive assessment into patient care. Even brief assessments can identify cognitive deficits that likely affect treatment adherence and functional outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8176,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"863-877"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142817072","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Recognition Subtests for Form B of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status: Preliminary Validation. 神经心理状态评估可重复电池表格 B 的识别子测试:初步验证。
IF 2.1 4区 心理学
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2025-05-21 DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acae095
Kevin Duff, Nora Grace Turok, Irene Piryatinsky
{"title":"Recognition Subtests for Form B of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status: Preliminary Validation.","authors":"Kevin Duff, Nora Grace Turok, Irene Piryatinsky","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acae095","DOIUrl":"10.1093/arclin/acae095","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Develop and preliminarily validate recognition subtests for Form B of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>49 older adults with no cognitive impairment were compared to 53 individuals with a primary neurocognitive disorder (e.g., dementia, mild cognitive impairment, and traumatic brain injury) and 22 individuals with a primary psychiatric disorder (e.g., depression and anxiety) on three recognition subtests (list, story, and figure) for Form B of the RBANS in this observational study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The individuals with a primary neurocognitive disorder performed significantly poorer on most of the recognition scores compared to those with no cognitive impairment and those with a primary psychiatric disorder, with these latter two groups being largely comparable. In the entire sample, for the recognition subtests, education only correlated with figure recognition scores, and neither age nor gender influenced recognition scores. The RBANS indexes correlated with most of the recognition scores in the expected directions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The group differences in performance on these recognition subtests preliminarily validate these scores on Form B, which were not previously available. Furthermore, these scores tended to not be influenced by age, education, or gender, although they were related to overall cognitive functioning. Additional validation is needed in larger, better clinically-defined, and more diverse samples. Nonetheless, these findings support the inclusion of the newly-developed Form B recognition subtests in future clinical practice and research settings to enhance the accuracy of diagnoses and treatment recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":8176,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"814-821"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12093225/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142456716","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Longitudinal Patterns and Predictors of Cognitive Impairment Classification Stability. 认知障碍分类稳定性的纵向模式和预测因素。
IF 2.1 4区 心理学
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2025-05-21 DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acae107
Cynthia McDowell, Nicholas Tamburri, Jodie R Gawryluk, Stuart W S MacDonald
{"title":"Longitudinal Patterns and Predictors of Cognitive Impairment Classification Stability.","authors":"Cynthia McDowell, Nicholas Tamburri, Jodie R Gawryluk, Stuart W S MacDonald","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acae107","DOIUrl":"10.1093/arclin/acae107","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Classifications such as Cognitive Impairment, No Dementia (CIND) are thought to represent the transitory, pre-clinical phase of dementia. However, increasing research demonstrates that CIND represents a nonlinear, unstable entity that does not always lead to imminent dementia. The present study utilizes a longitudinal repeated measures design to gain a thorough understanding of CIND classification stability patterns and identify predictors of future stability. The objectives were to i) explore patterns of longitudinal stability in cognitive status across multiple assessments and ii) investigate whether select baseline variables could predict 6-year CIND stability patterns.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants (N = 259) included older adults (aged 65-90 years) from Project MIND, a six-year longitudinal repeated measures design in which participants were classified as either normal cognition (NC) or CIND at each annual assessment. A latent transition analysis approach was adapted in order to identify and characterize transitions in CIND status across annual assessments. Participants were classified as either Stable NC, Stable CIND, Progressers, Reverters, or Fluctuaters. Multinomial logistic regression was employed to test whether baseline predictors were associated with cognitive status stability patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample demonstrated high rates of reversion and fluctuation in CIND status across annual assessments. Additionally, premorbid IQ and CIND severity (i.e., single vs. multi-domain impairment) at baseline were significantly associated with select stability outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CIND status was unstable for several years following baseline assessment and cognitive reserve may delay or protect against demonstrable cognitive impairment. Further, consideration of cognitive impairment severity at the time of initial classification may improve CIND classifications.</p>","PeriodicalId":8176,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"802-813"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12093227/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142666950","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Improving Access to Dementia Care in the Era of Monoclonal Antibody Treatments for Alzheimer's Disease: a Pilot Clinical Protocol Using Abbreviated Neuropsychological Assessment. 在单克隆抗体治疗阿尔茨海默病的时代,改善痴呆症护理的可及性:使用简略神经心理评估的试点临床方案。
IF 2.1 4区 心理学
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2025-05-21 DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acae111
Savana M Naini, Ryan C Thompson, Maria Agustina Rossetti, Virginia T Gallagher, Carol A Manning, Kathleen Fuchs, Anelyssa D'Abreu, Tanya Prachar, Shannon E Reilly
{"title":"Improving Access to Dementia Care in the Era of Monoclonal Antibody Treatments for Alzheimer's Disease: a Pilot Clinical Protocol Using Abbreviated Neuropsychological Assessment.","authors":"Savana M Naini, Ryan C Thompson, Maria Agustina Rossetti, Virginia T Gallagher, Carol A Manning, Kathleen Fuchs, Anelyssa D'Abreu, Tanya Prachar, Shannon E Reilly","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acae111","DOIUrl":"10.1093/arclin/acae111","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To meet the growing demand for timely diagnosis in the new era of disease-modifying medications for Alzheimer's disease (AD), the present study aimed to reduce clinic wait times by developing and refining an abbreviated neuropsychological battery to assess individuals with a suspected amnestic process (i.e., Early-Stage AD Pathway).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Early-Stage AD Pathway patients were referred by an internal neurology provider who determined that the patient had: (1) an amnestic clinical presentation, (2) a normal neurological examination, and (3) a Montreal Cognitive Assessment total score between 18 and 25. These patients were scheduled for a 2-h neuropsychological evaluation, including a brief clinical interview and an abbreviated testing battery. We evaluated n = 19 patients in the Early-Stage AD Pathway and compared them to 114 older adults referred via traditional clinic procedures (i.e., General Clinic).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most individuals evaluated via the Early-Stage AD Pathway were diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment (MCI; 68.4%) or mild dementia (21.1%) through the neuropsychological evaluation. Rate of diagnosis of MCI/dementia was comparable between groups. The average number of days between initial referral and completion of the neuropsychological evaluation was significantly lower (Mdiff = 145.8 days, U = 1867.500, p < 0.001) for the Early-Stage AD Pathway group than for the General Clinic group, as the former could be scheduled more flexibly.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementing an abbreviated neuropsychological assessment process significantly reduced the time between referral and evaluation to identify individuals who may be eligible for emerging pharmacological treatments for AD and/or non-pharmacological interventions in a timely manner.</p>","PeriodicalId":8176,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"767-774"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142738253","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Examining the Discrepancy between Subjective Cognitive Complaints and Processing Speed Performance in Military Personnel with Traumatic Brain Injury. 外伤性脑损伤军人主观认知抱怨与加工速度表现差异的研究。
IF 2.1 4区 心理学
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2025-05-21 DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acae112
Daija A Jackson, Sara M Lippa, Tracey A Brickell, Louis M French, Rael T Lange
{"title":"Examining the Discrepancy between Subjective Cognitive Complaints and Processing Speed Performance in Military Personnel with Traumatic Brain Injury.","authors":"Daija A Jackson, Sara M Lippa, Tracey A Brickell, Louis M French, Rael T Lange","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acae112","DOIUrl":"10.1093/arclin/acae112","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine correlates of the discrepancy between subjective cognitive complaints and processing speed performance in a sample of military personnel with and without traumatic brain injury (TBI).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>About 235 U.S. military service members (31 noninjured controls [NIC], 69 injured controls [IC], 70 uncomplicated mild TBI [mTBI], and 65 complicated mild/moderate/severe TBI [sTBI]) prospectively enrolled in a longitudinal TBI study completed neuropsychological testing, performance validity tests, and self-report measures of cognitive complaints and psychological symptoms. Service members were categorized as \"Accurate Estimators,\" \"Underestimators,\" and \"Overestimators\" based on discrepancies between their subjective cognition and processing speed performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NIC group was less likely to underestimate their cognitive abilities than the mTBI group (p < .05). Discrepancy groups significantly differed in processing speed scores (p < .001), with underestimators demonstrating the best objective cognitive performance. Spearman correlations revealed significant positive correlations between unadjusted discrepancy scores and psychological symptoms in the NIC, IC, and sTBI groups (ps < 0.05) but not the mTBI group (ps > 0.05). In contrast, discrepancy scores adjusted for premorbid intelligence were consistently and positively correlated with psychological symptoms across all injury groups (ps < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest that mTBI injuries may increase the likelihood of a patient underestimating their cognitive performance. Further, premorbid cognitive functioning is an important factor in evaluating discrepancies in self-reported cognitive complaints and processing speed performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":8176,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"833-841"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142845691","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Case Reports in the Integration of Technology with Cognitive Rehabilitation for Individuals with Memory Concerns and Their Care Partners. 技术与认知康复对记忆问题个体及其护理伙伴的整合案例报告。
IF 2.1 4区 心理学
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2025-05-21 DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acae115
Karl S Grewal, Eric S Grewal, Allison Cammer, Lachlan A McWilliams, Raymond J Spiteri, Megan E O'Connell
{"title":"Case Reports in the Integration of Technology with Cognitive Rehabilitation for Individuals with Memory Concerns and Their Care Partners.","authors":"Karl S Grewal, Eric S Grewal, Allison Cammer, Lachlan A McWilliams, Raymond J Spiteri, Megan E O'Connell","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acae115","DOIUrl":"10.1093/arclin/acae115","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Technology can be combined with psychological interventions to support older adults with memory concerns. Using a bi-phasic design, cognitive rehabilitation (CR) was integrated with off-the-shelf technology and delivered to two people with cognitive impairment, and one care partner.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Pre- and post-intervention assessments were completed for all participants. Individuals with memory problems received pre- and post-intervention remote neuropsychological assessment (i.e., Rey auditory verbal learning test; mental alternations test; animal fluency), and the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS). The care partner completed the HADS, Zarit burden interview, and neuropsychiatric inventory questionnaire. Change metrics incorporated reliable change indices where possible. Goals were tracked using the Canadian occupation performance measure; these data were analyzed through visual inspection. A research journal (used to document intervention process) was analyzed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results cautiously suggested our integration was feasible and acceptable across several technologies and varying goals. Across participants, significant changes in goal progress suggested the integration of technology with CR successfully facilitated goal performance and satisfaction. The research journal underscored the importance of a visual component, intervention flexibility, and a strong therapeutic alliance in integrating technology and CR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CR and technology present a promising avenue for supporting people living with cognitive impairment. Further exploration of technology and CR with a range of etiologies and target goals is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":8176,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"878-906"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12093230/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142875798","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Retraction and replacement of: Development and Preliminary Validation of Standardized Regression-Based Change Scores as Measures of Transitional Cognitive Decline. 撤销和替代:基于标准化回归的变化评分作为过渡性认知衰退的测量方法的发展和初步验证。
IF 2.1 4区 心理学
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2025-05-21 DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acaf016
{"title":"Retraction and replacement of: Development and Preliminary Validation of Standardized Regression-Based Change Scores as Measures of Transitional Cognitive Decline.","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acaf016","DOIUrl":"10.1093/arclin/acaf016","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8176,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"907"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12093222/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143584476","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信