Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology最新文献

{"title":"Relationship Between Cognitive Estimation, Executive Functions, and Theory of Mind in Patients With Prefrontal Cortex Damage.","authors":"Riadh Ouerchefani, Naoufel Ouerchefani, Mohamed Riadh Ben Rejeb, Didier Le Gall","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acae109","DOIUrl":"10.1093/arclin/acae109","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Conflicting evidence has arisen from the few studies that have examined the role of the prefrontal cortex and executive control functions in theory of mind (ToM). Moreover, the involvement of other cognitive domains in the ability to infer mental states is still under debate. This study aims to examine, in addition to the potential contribution of executive functions, the role of cognitive estimation in ToM abilities, given that cognitive estimation processes are strongly associated with some aspects of executive control functions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The cognitive estimation task, along with a set of neuropsychological tasks assessing executive functions, was administered to 30 patients with prefrontal cortex damage and 30 control subjects matched by gender, age, and education level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with prefrontal cortex damage were impaired in all measures of executive functions, cognitive estimation, and theory of mind compared with control subjects. Regression analysis showed a significant interaction between executive measures and cognitive estimation in predicting ToM performance for patients with prefrontal cortex damage. Additionally, voxel-based lesion analysis identified a partially common bilaterally distributed prefrontal network involved in all three domains, centered within the ventral and dorsomedial areas with extension to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings highlight that, apart from executive functions, cognitive estimation plays a crucial role in the ability to interpret others' cognitive and emotional states in both patients with prefrontal cortex damage and control subjects.</p>","PeriodicalId":8176,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"744-766"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142738220","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Transdiagnostic Attentional Deficits Are Associated with Depressive and Externalizing Symptoms in Children and Adolescents with Neuropsychiatric Disorders.","authors":"Gian M DePamphilis, Christopher Legere, Megan M Vigne, Eric Tirrell, Karen Holler, Linda L Carpenter, Brian C Kavanaugh","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acae103","DOIUrl":"10.1093/arclin/acae103","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although inattention, impulsivity, and impairments to vigilance are most associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), transdiagnostic attentional deficits are prevalent across all psychiatric disorders. To further elucidate this relationship, the present study investigated parent-reported neuropsychiatric symptom correlates of attention deficits using the factor structure of the Conners' Continuous Performance Test (CPT-II), a neuropsychological test of attention.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Two-hundred and eighteen children and adolescents (7-21 years old) completed the CPT-II as part of standard clinical protocol during outpatient pediatric neuropsychology visits. The factor structure of the CPT-II was determined with a principal component analysis (PCA) using Promax rotation. Pearson correlation analyses and regression models examined the relationship between the generated factor structure, parent-reported clinical symptoms, and pre-determined clinical diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results from the PCA suggested a three-factor model best supported the structure of the CPT-II, and were subsequently defined as inattention, impulsivity, and vigilance. Performance-based inattention was significantly correlated with parent-reported hyperactivity, aggression, conduct problems, and depression. Parent-reported depressive symptoms and conduct problems were the strongest correlates of performance-based inattention, not hyperactivity or aggression. Performance-based inattention was significantly associated with an ADHD diagnosis but not a depression or anxiety diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest attentional deficits are not specific to any one disorder. To enhance the identification, classification, and treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders, both researchers and clinicians alike must diminish the importance of categorical approaches to child/adolescent psychopathology and continue to consider the dimensionality of transdiagnostic characteristics such as inattention.</p>","PeriodicalId":8176,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"783-793"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12093228/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142613645","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Moderating Role of Online Awareness in the Association between Strategy Use and Performance Accuracy on a Test of Functional Cognition in Individuals with Acquired Brain Injury.","authors":"Daniel Salazar-Frías, María Jesús Funes, Ana Clara Szot, Lucía Laffarga, Alba Navarro-Egido, María Rodríguez-Bailón","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acae114","DOIUrl":"10.1093/arclin/acae114","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Deficits in online self-awareness (SA) are common after acquired brain injury (ABI), leading to safety concerns and impacting daily activities and rehabilitation outcomes. Early identification is recommended as a critical first step in cognitive rehabilitation following ABI. The aim of this observational study was to examine differences in online SA and strategy use between individuals with ABI and healthy controls. It also investigated whether online SA moderates the relationship between strategy use and performance accuracy on a test designed to assess cognitive-functional deficits.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>80 individuals with ABI and 76 controls completed the Spanish Weekly Calendar Planning Activity-10. Measures of online SA included strategy use and self-recognized errors assessed during task. An after-task interview assessed individuals' self-evaluation of task difficulty and accuracy of performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individuals with ABI performed worse than controls on most measures of online SA. They were less likely to self-recognize errors and use self-monitoring strategies. They also tended to overestimate their performance and showed greater discrepancy between self-rated and actual performance. Moderation analyses show that better performance was significantly associated with greater strategy use among ABI individuals who were aware of their performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Online SA appears to moderate the use of cognitive strategies during functional cognitive performance after ABI. Therefore, it is important to include assessments of online SA and strategy use for individuals with ABI. Furthermore, these findings highlight the importance of focusing on SA and self-generated strategies as key goals of cognitive rehabilitation aimed at improving daily functioning after ABI.</p>","PeriodicalId":8176,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"842-857"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12093226/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142827149","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Neuropsychological Profile in Older Adults with End-Stage Kidney Disease during Kidney Transplantation Evaluation.","authors":"Elodie Pongan, Isabelle Rouch, Julien Vernaudon, Romain Bachelet, Teddy Novais, Marie-Hélène Coste, Arlette Edjolo, Antoine Garnier-Crussard","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acaf001","DOIUrl":"10.1093/arclin/acaf001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>End-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a significant concern for older adults and is often associated with cognitive impairment (CI). The origin of this CI is multifactorial, involving vascular and metabolic factors. Additionally, renal treatments, including dialysis, may affect cognition. This study aimed to assess the neuropsychological profiles of these patients and understand the effects of dialysis treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an observational retrospective study including older adults with end-stage CKD attending for kidney transplantation (KT). Comprehensive neuropsychological assessments were conducted. Composite cognitive scores were computed. Multivariate regression models were used to assess associations between cognition and dialysis status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 223 patients (151 treated with dialysis, 72 with conservative management), mean age of 73.5 ± 3.4. We observed a high prevalence of CI, around 30% for global cognition and affecting all neuropsychological domains. Patients treated with dialysis exhibited lower cognitive performance compared to those not undergoing dialysis, particularly in episodic (p = .031) and working memory (p = .024).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study confirms the high prevalence of CI in end-stage CKD, with dialysis being associated with worse episodic and working memory compared to non-dialyzed participants. Future investigations are needed to track the long-term cognitive trajectory of patients on the KT waiting list and post-transplantation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Retrospectively registered, no 22-808 on July 7th, 2022, CNIL register number 22-5808.</p>","PeriodicalId":8176,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"734-743"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142998923","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Recognition Subtests for Form B of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status: Preliminary Validation.","authors":"Kevin Duff, Nora Grace Turok, Irene Piryatinsky","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acae095","DOIUrl":"10.1093/arclin/acae095","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Develop and preliminarily validate recognition subtests for Form B of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>49 older adults with no cognitive impairment were compared to 53 individuals with a primary neurocognitive disorder (e.g., dementia, mild cognitive impairment, and traumatic brain injury) and 22 individuals with a primary psychiatric disorder (e.g., depression and anxiety) on three recognition subtests (list, story, and figure) for Form B of the RBANS in this observational study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The individuals with a primary neurocognitive disorder performed significantly poorer on most of the recognition scores compared to those with no cognitive impairment and those with a primary psychiatric disorder, with these latter two groups being largely comparable. In the entire sample, for the recognition subtests, education only correlated with figure recognition scores, and neither age nor gender influenced recognition scores. The RBANS indexes correlated with most of the recognition scores in the expected directions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The group differences in performance on these recognition subtests preliminarily validate these scores on Form B, which were not previously available. Furthermore, these scores tended to not be influenced by age, education, or gender, although they were related to overall cognitive functioning. Additional validation is needed in larger, better clinically-defined, and more diverse samples. Nonetheless, these findings support the inclusion of the newly-developed Form B recognition subtests in future clinical practice and research settings to enhance the accuracy of diagnoses and treatment recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":8176,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"814-821"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12093225/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142456716","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Release of Protected Test Information Under Protective Order: Viable Solution or Illusory Safeguard? An Interorganizational† Position Paper.","authors":"Kyle Brauer Boone, Jerry J Sweet, Robert A Beattey, Paul M Kaufmann, Nancy Hebben, Catherine Marreiro, Joette James, Delia Silva, Tara Victor, Anita Hamilton, Tannahill Glen, Thomas F Kinsora, H Allison Bender, Mark Barisa","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acae101","DOIUrl":"10.1093/arclin/acae101","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To critically examine the assumption that protective orders are adequately protective of sensitive psychological/neuropsychological test information. Attorneys at times claim that to adequately cross-examine neuropsychological experts, they require direct access to protected test information, rather than having test data analyzed by retained neuropsychological experts. As a compromise, judges sometimes order that protected test information be released to attorneys under a protective order.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An appointed writing group of forensic experts developed a position paper addressing the history of protective orders and their presumed effectiveness in protecting psychological and neuropsychological test content. The expert panel consisted of 12 forensic neuropsychologists, a forensic neuropsychologist/attorney, and a forensic psychologist/attorney.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight reasons are enumerated as to why protective orders do not sufficiently safeguard protected psychological/neuropsychological information and thereby jeopardize future use of the tests. Recommendations are provided to the expert witness practitioner for navigating demands by non-psychologists for direct access to protected test information.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is strong agreement within the practicing neuropsychology community that test security is a vital matter, which, if properly enforced, can ensure the validity of present and future psychological and neuropsychological assessments but, if ineffectively managed, will undermine such evaluations. Because the effectiveness of protective orders has not been, and cannot be, guaranteed, protected psychological and neuropsychological test information should not be released under a protective order.</p>","PeriodicalId":8176,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"723-733"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142602868","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Diagnosed and Nondisclosed Concussions Among Young Athletes With ADHD.","authors":"Ara J Schmitt, Michael Matta, Abigail C Bretzin, Maria Tina Benno, Kirstin Franklin, Erica Beidler","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acae108","DOIUrl":"10.1093/arclin/acae108","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Within a sample of young athletes with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), to explore the frequency of disclosed and nondisclosed concussions, identify reasons the youth did not report a suspected concussion, and learn the frequency that the youth still practiced or played in a game after a suspected concussion.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Cross-sectional surveys were completed by 448 youth athletes (ages 8-14 years) and a corresponding parent (or caregiver). As part of larger respective surveys, questions regarding ADHD status and concussion history were asked of the youth and parents. Data regarding 40 youth with ADHD were available for analyses. Due to the low frequency of concussive injuries within the total sample, descriptive statistics and qualitative techniques were used to contextualize the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The youth with ADHD were not more likely to experience at least one diagnosed concussion or nondisclosed concussion as compared to non-ADHD controls. Three of 40 youth athletes with ADHD (8%) had been diagnosed with a concussion, whereas 5 (13%) self-reported a nondisclosed concussion. Not wanting to lose playing time and not wanting to miss a game were the two most endorsed reasons for concussion nondisclosure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>More research is needed to understand the present results considering other research that puts similarly aged athletes with ADHD at greater risk for concussion. Education for youth with ADHD might help reduce the number of nondisclosed concussions that have a more complex recovery trajectory in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":8176,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"794-801"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142675003","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Ubiquity of Cognitive Impairment in Human Illness: a Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses.","authors":"David J Schretlen, John-Christopher A Finley, Victor A Del Bene, Mark Varvaris","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acae113","DOIUrl":"10.1093/arclin/acae113","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cognitive dysfunction occurs in many neurological, psychiatric, and other health conditions. This review aimed to characterize the breadth and degree of cognitive morbidity associated with varied health conditions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We systematically reviewed Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for meta-analyses of cognitive dysfunction associated with any health condition. Meta-analyses were eligible if they reviewed studies that compared patients with health conditions to healthy controls on cognitive testing and provided effect sizes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found 91 meta-analyses for 94 health conditions. Among >800,297 participants, healthy controls out-performed clinical participants in every condition on cognitive testing. Mean effect sizes ranged from -2.02 to -0.00 across conditions and were ≤ -0.5 on average, denoting moderate to very severe dysfunction for 41% of them.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cognitive dysfunction is ubiquitous in medicine. Both primary care and specialist physicians likely treat patients with cognitive dysfunction. Depending on its severity, cognitive dysfunction can affect treatment adherence, everyday functioning, quality of life, and the capacity to provide informed consent for treatment. These findings highlight the transdiagnostic nature of cognitive symptoms and the potential value of establishing collaborations between physicians and clinical neuropsychologists to integrate cognitive assessment into patient care. Even brief assessments can identify cognitive deficits that likely affect treatment adherence and functional outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8176,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"863-877"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142817072","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Just the Tip of the Iceberg: a Brief Report of the Tip-of-the-Tongue Score as an Embedded Validity Indicator for the Children's Auditory and Visual Naming Tests.","authors":"Jared B Hammond, Jonathan D Lichtenstein","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acae117","DOIUrl":"10.1093/arclin/acae117","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Explore the tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) scores from the Children's Auditory and Visual Naming Tests (cANT, cVNT) as embedded validity indicators (EVIs).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective design of 98 consecutively referred youth aged 6-15 years (M = 11.28, SD = 2.80) that completed neuropsychological evaluation at a tertiary-care academic medical center.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Invalid performance (i.e., ≥2 failed PVTs) occurred in 12.2% of the sample, with base rates of failure on individual PVTs ranging from 1.0% to 30.6%. Area under the curve (AUC) showed statistical significance for the auditory (AUC = 0.811, p = .004) but not the visual TOT. Logistic regression indicated the combination of both TOT scores with other PVTs increased correct identification of invalid performance to 85.7% versus 75% without TOT scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The utility of the TOT as a language-based EVI is one of many potential advantages of the cANT and cVNT compared to other confrontation naming tests. To confirm this, future studies with more diverse populations are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":8176,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"858-862"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142875811","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Longitudinal Patterns and Predictors of Cognitive Impairment Classification Stability.","authors":"Cynthia McDowell, Nicholas Tamburri, Jodie R Gawryluk, Stuart W S MacDonald","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acae107","DOIUrl":"10.1093/arclin/acae107","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Classifications such as Cognitive Impairment, No Dementia (CIND) are thought to represent the transitory, pre-clinical phase of dementia. However, increasing research demonstrates that CIND represents a nonlinear, unstable entity that does not always lead to imminent dementia. The present study utilizes a longitudinal repeated measures design to gain a thorough understanding of CIND classification stability patterns and identify predictors of future stability. The objectives were to i) explore patterns of longitudinal stability in cognitive status across multiple assessments and ii) investigate whether select baseline variables could predict 6-year CIND stability patterns.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants (N = 259) included older adults (aged 65-90 years) from Project MIND, a six-year longitudinal repeated measures design in which participants were classified as either normal cognition (NC) or CIND at each annual assessment. A latent transition analysis approach was adapted in order to identify and characterize transitions in CIND status across annual assessments. Participants were classified as either Stable NC, Stable CIND, Progressers, Reverters, or Fluctuaters. Multinomial logistic regression was employed to test whether baseline predictors were associated with cognitive status stability patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample demonstrated high rates of reversion and fluctuation in CIND status across annual assessments. Additionally, premorbid IQ and CIND severity (i.e., single vs. multi-domain impairment) at baseline were significantly associated with select stability outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CIND status was unstable for several years following baseline assessment and cognitive reserve may delay or protect against demonstrable cognitive impairment. Further, consideration of cognitive impairment severity at the time of initial classification may improve CIND classifications.</p>","PeriodicalId":8176,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"802-813"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12093227/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142666950","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}