Annals of SciencePub Date : 2026-05-30DOI: 10.1080/00033790.2026.2676567
Flynn Allott
{"title":"Queries and <i>quaestiones</i>: Edward Lhwyd between Natural History and Natural Philosophy.","authors":"Flynn Allott","doi":"10.1080/00033790.2026.2676567","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00033790.2026.2676567","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article reads the antiquary and Fellow of the Royal Society Edward Lhwyd's works with attention to the different forms of questioning which he associated with various forms of natural enquiry. It argues that Lhwyd associated two forms of question - the 'Query' and the <i>quaestio</i> - with different styles of information: in Lhwyd's view, 'Queries' asked for precise, observed points of fact; <i>quaestiones</i> were discursive, argumentative prompts for thought not strictly dependent on experiment or observations, and connected with the oldest forms of university education and examination. Building on Richard Yeo's work, the article argues that Lhwyd divided his own preoccupations along these lines: for his lexicographical and local-historical work, he produced a voluminous set of 'Parochial Queries'; by contrast, when he addressed the hotly controverted and apparently insoluble question of the Earth's origin and the deposition of fossils, he referred to the matter persistently as a <i>quaestio</i>. The article further shows the possible influences on Lhwyd in making this latter move: the influence of John Ray's <i>Three Physico-Theological Discourses</i>; Lhwyd's personal animus against Robert Plot; and Lhwyd's more generally unorthodox academic credentials all contributed, I argue, to his use of the much-disputed <i>quaestio</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":8086,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Science","volume":" ","pages":"1-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2026-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148052136","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Annals of SciencePub Date : 2026-05-20DOI: 10.1080/00033790.2026.2661915
Maria Rentetzi
{"title":"From ambition to restraint the WMO, atomic energy, and UN institutional rivalry in the early Cold War.","authors":"Maria Rentetzi","doi":"10.1080/00033790.2026.2661915","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00033790.2026.2661915","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper explores the evolving relationship between the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) and the emerging international governance of atomic energy during the early Cold War. In the mid-1950s, widespread public concern that nuclear weapons testing might influence the weather prompted the WMO to investigate the atmospheric effects of atomic explosions. The organization initially envisioned coordinating international research on atomic weather and proposed the creation of a global network of monitoring stations to measure atmospheric radioactivity. This paper shows how these ambitions unfolded within a rapidly evolving institutional landscape shaped by Cold War geopolitics. The founding of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in 1957 marked a turning point in the WMO's nuclear engagement. Gradually, the WMO's efforts were curtailed by institutional competition, limited resources for technical assistance, and shifting geopolitical priorities. By the early 1960s, the organization had assumed a supporting role in the emerging architecture of international atomic governance.</p>","PeriodicalId":8086,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Science","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2026-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147980115","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Annals of SciencePub Date : 2026-05-12DOI: 10.1080/00033790.2026.2661195
José María Moreno Madrid
{"title":"De Tellescopiis Stellarum (1666). Was Galileo experimenting with four-lens terrestrial telescopes by 1630?","authors":"José María Moreno Madrid","doi":"10.1080/00033790.2026.2661195","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00033790.2026.2661195","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper presents a hitherto unknown seventeenth-century component-by-component description of a four-lens terrestrial telescope attributed to Galileo Galilei (1564-1642), complete with diagrams and measurements. The author is the Spanish friar Ignacio Muñoz O.P. (ca. 1608/1612-1686), who penned it on August 8, 1666, in Mexico City. The owner of the telescope was Antonio Sebastián de Toledo Molina y Salazar (1608-1715), II Marquis of Mancera and viceroy of New Spain (1664-1673). Images of the source, a transcription in the original Latin, an English translation, and the measured values derived from the piece-by-piece analysis are provided. The study also contextualizes the document and examines the reliability of the attribution, reflecting on its potential implications for the history of the telescope.</p>","PeriodicalId":8086,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Science","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2026-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147925949","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Annals of SciencePub Date : 2026-05-12DOI: 10.1080/00033790.2026.2664526
John Henry
{"title":"Isaac Newton's physics of interparticulate forces and the aether queries.","authors":"John Henry","doi":"10.1080/00033790.2026.2664526","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00033790.2026.2664526","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Contemporaries who only knew Newton's natural philosophy from his published works would have seen him as a thinker who was thoroughly opposed to the concept of an all-pervasive universal aether. There was no need, mathematically or physically, for an aether in the natural philosophy presented in his <i>Principia</i> (1687). Newton insisted that an aether was not only not required, but would actually prevent the smooth running of the world system. This state of affairs changed dramatically, however, when Newton published the second English edition of the <i>Opticks</i> (1717). In a series of eight new 'Queries' interpolated into the sequence of speculative proposals which brought the <i>Opticks</i> to a conclusion, Newton suggested that an aether might be responsible for some optical phenomena and even for gravitational attraction. The aim of this article is to show that this was not a concession on Newton's part to the age-old concept of a mechanical aether, working by material contact action, but was rather a further attempt to promote the speculative physics, presented in earlier queries, which was based on the assumption that many phenomena may be explained by attractive and repulsive forces operating between the invisibly small particles of matter which were held to constitute all bodies.</p>","PeriodicalId":8086,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Science","volume":" ","pages":"1-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2026-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147873122","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Annals of SciencePub Date : 2026-05-06DOI: 10.1080/00033790.2026.2638942
Christoph Sander
{"title":"Magnetic margins: insights from the digital descriptive census of William Gilbert's <i>De Magnete</i>.","authors":"Christoph Sander","doi":"10.1080/00033790.2026.2638942","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00033790.2026.2638942","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This essay investigates the reception of William Gilbert's foundational work on magnetism, <i>De Magnete</i>, through a comprehensive analysis of extant copies of its early modern printed editions (1600, 1628, 1629, 1633). By employing a hybrid methodology combining quantitative and qualitative approaches to readers' annotations, this study charts patterns of engagement with Gilbert's text across diverse contexts and intellectual traditions. While celebrated for its experimental innovations and practical applications in navigation, it also elicited cosmological and humanist interests. Statistical analyses of readers' marks demonstrate a skewed distribution of engagement, with the majority of annotations concentrated in a small fraction of extant copies. This study moreover contributes to the historiography of early modern science by illustrating the methodological potential of combining large-scale digital datasets with close textual analysis, advocating for more systematic, collaborative approaches to the history of reading and book culture. In addition, a near-complete census of copies of <i>De magnete</i> is provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":8086,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Science","volume":" ","pages":"1-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2026-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147832815","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Annals of SciencePub Date : 2026-04-19DOI: 10.1080/00033790.2026.2638933
Ofer Gal, Victor D Boantza
{"title":"Method and Melancholy: Aristotle and the defence against Cartesian estrangement.","authors":"Ofer Gal, Victor D Boantza","doi":"10.1080/00033790.2026.2638933","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00033790.2026.2638933","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>From the publication of Descartes's <i>Dioptrique</i> in 1637 to the end of the century, leading English scholars declared their preference for '<i>Aristotle</i>, not <i>des Cartes</i>'. Modern commentators tended to interpret these declarations as defences of tradition or theologically motivated manoeuvres, yet the positions of these savants, especially concerning perception, were closer to Descartes's than to Aristotle's: they shunned substantial forms and their theories were materialistic and causal. We examine the works of John Sergeant (1621-1707) and his intellectual predecessors, Thomas White (1593-1676) and Kenelm Digby (1603-1665), to show that these thinkers were above all concerned with the troubling implications of Descartes's theory of vision. If the eye is just a screen on which mere stains of light fall, vision and the senses in general, deliver to the mind 'nothing of the thing'. This 'estrangement', as we call it, rather than the ontological dichotomy between body and soul, was the problem they sought to address. They turned to Aristotle to reinstate the once taken-for-granted compatibility between humans and their world.</p>","PeriodicalId":8086,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Science","volume":" ","pages":"1-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2026-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147721660","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Annals of SciencePub Date : 2026-04-01Epub Date: 2025-01-09DOI: 10.1080/00033790.2025.2449861
Helge Kragh
{"title":"Antimatter in astronomy and cosmology: the early history.","authors":"Helge Kragh","doi":"10.1080/00033790.2025.2449861","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00033790.2025.2449861","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>So-called antimatter in the form of elementary particles such as positive electrons (antielectrons alias positrons) and negative protons (antiprotons) has for long been investigated by physicists. However, atoms or molecules of this exotic kind are conspicuously absent from nature. Since antimatter is believed to be symmetric with ordinary matter, the flagrant asymmetry constitutes a problem that still worries physicists and cosmologists. As first suggested by Paul Dirac in 1933, in distant parts of the universe there might be entire stars and galaxies made of antiparticles alone. Why not? This paper examines how the concepts of antiparticles and antimatter slowly migrated from particle physics to astronomy and cosmology. At around 1970 a few physicists speculated about an anti-universe separate from ours while others looked for the charge asymmetry in quantum processes in the early big-bang explosion of the universe. Others again proposed a 'plasma cosmology' that kept our world and the hypothetical world of antimatter apart. Soviet physicists and astronomers were no less interested in the problem than their colleagues in the West. The paper details the development up to the late 1970s, paying attention not only to mainstream scientific works but also to more speculative ideas, some of them very speculative. By that time the antimatter mystery remained mysterious - which is still the situation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8086,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Science","volume":" ","pages":"399-423"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142943317","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Annals of SciencePub Date : 2026-04-01Epub Date: 2024-11-20DOI: 10.1080/00033790.2024.2426814
Cristiano Zanetti
{"title":"<i>'Made in the Galleries of His Most Serene Highness, Florence'</i>. Conflicts in instrument invention at the Medici court: the pendulum clock, and the Accademia del Cimento.","authors":"Cristiano Zanetti","doi":"10.1080/00033790.2024.2426814","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00033790.2024.2426814","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This essay proposes that the only publication of the Accademia del Cimento, referred to as <i>Saggi</i>, had as one of its main goals the celebration of the House of Medici's paternity of cutting-edge experiments and instruments during the reign of Grand Duke Ferdinando II. These included Ferdinando II's thermometers and hygrometers, Torricelli's experiment and barometer, and Galileo's pendulum as a clock-regulator. It seems that this agenda went unnoticed, not at the time of its initial circulation, but rather in modern historiography. Christiaan Huygens's challenged invention of the pendulum clock provides a case study to explore the agenda of this publication and the problem of defining an invention in seventeenth-century Europe. This paper presents for the first time the document that attests to when the first specimen of Huygens's clock arrived in Florence, disproving the previously believed date of September 1657. The paper argues that over the last two centuries, this error has made the Medici narratives of this dispute appear inconsistent and marginalized them. In light of this new find, they must be reconsidered.</p>","PeriodicalId":8086,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Science","volume":" ","pages":"279-325"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142680682","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Annals of SciencePub Date : 2026-04-01Epub Date: 2025-03-27DOI: 10.1080/00033790.2025.2483304
Elisabetta Rossi
{"title":"The 'tale' of a <i>termometro cinquantigrado</i> kept at the Whipple Museum, Cambridge.","authors":"Elisabetta Rossi","doi":"10.1080/00033790.2025.2483304","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00033790.2025.2483304","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The 50-degree thermometer currently exhibited at the Whipple Museum of the History of Science in Cambridge (Wh.1116), was originally crafted by skilled Italian glassmakers for the Florentine Accademia del Cimento's activities in the 1650s. Used for early meteorological observations, it remained forgotten for over a century and a half, until Vincenzo Antinori's 1829 rediscovery. Donated by Henry Babbage to the University of Cambridge in 1872, the instrument reflects the wide-ranging approach of James Clerk Maxwell, the first director of the Cavendish Laboratory, who sought to build a collection integrating historical artifacts with experimental apparatus. This paper contextualizes the journey of the artifact, exploring its cultural value across centuries and portraying it as a tangible link between past and present scientific practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":8086,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Science","volume":" ","pages":"352-368"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143727659","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Annals of SciencePub Date : 2026-04-01Epub Date: 2025-03-26DOI: 10.1080/00033790.2025.2483311
Jole Shackelford
{"title":"Normal and abnormal rhythms in the search for biological clocks: an epistemological gap between early twentieth-century biology and experimental psychology.","authors":"Jole Shackelford","doi":"10.1080/00033790.2025.2483311","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00033790.2025.2483311","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When American experimental psychologists began to study activity cycles in the early twentieth century, their research methods and interpretations of experimental results were guided by a commitment to behaviourism and neglected the work of biological rhythms researchers, now called chronobiologists, who approached behaviours from physiological and ecological perspectives, exploring activity and other rhythmic behaviours as governed by innate organic stimuli, biological clocks. The epistemological gap that developed between rhythms researchers and behavioural psychologists can be seen already in the work of Maynard S. Johnson and Curt P. Richter, both working with rodents in the 1920s and 1930s. This gap persisted into the 1960s, when psychologists began to realize that biological clocks help to explain some of their experimental results. This epistemological gap is plain from psychologists' reaction to the 1963 work of Michael Treisman, who was credited 50 years later with discovering the biological clock in humans, despite more than half a century of effort to study rhythms and locate clocks; recognition in the mid-1960s that clock-controlled circadian rhythms were useful in psychology began to close this gap.</p>","PeriodicalId":8086,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Science","volume":" ","pages":"369-398"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143708121","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}