Sangita Shakya, Shalika Bohingamu Mudiyanselage, Suzanne Robinson, Sean Randall, Lan Gao
{"title":"Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing and Its Use in Health Economic Analysis: A Systematic Literature Review.","authors":"Sangita Shakya, Shalika Bohingamu Mudiyanselage, Suzanne Robinson, Sean Randall, Lan Gao","doi":"10.1007/s40258-025-00988-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-025-00988-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>With rising global healthcare expenditures, there is an increasing demand for value-based healthcare (VBHC). Time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) has been proposed as a key component of VBHC for addressing cost-related challenges. This study aimed to review the application of TDABC in health economic analyses across the continuum of care, explore its methodological advantages, and assess adherence to the 7-step or 8-step methodological reporting frameworks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was conducted by screening the MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, including all studies published until April 2025. Studies that used TDABC for diagnosis and treatment of health conditions were included, while costing studies involving any surgeries were excluded. The NVivo qualitative data analysis software was used to analyse data through content analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 32 studies met inclusion criteria, including 25 partial economic evaluations (costing) and seven full economic evaluations (EEs). Time-driven activity-based costing was predominantly applied in cancer treatment and management, followed by diabetes care. This methodology proved applicable across all stages of healthcare, helping to accurately identify the cost of care and resource waste, enhancing value in healthcare, and overcoming the current cost accounting challenges. Studies that used hybrid data collection approaches combining direct observation with staff input were more likely to report detailed and actionable cost assessments. Studies using 8-step framework demonstrated improved methodological adherence and reduced reporting variability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Time-driven activity-based costing supports more accurate, transparent, and resource-sensitive health economic analysis enabling informed decision making and system-level efficiency. Its application across diverse care stages and conditions demonstrates its adaptability and relevance for modern health-economic evaluation. Policy makers and healthcare providers should consider adopting TDABC to strengthen costing practices and advance the transition toward value-based healthcare.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>ID CRD42023447085.</p>","PeriodicalId":8065,"journal":{"name":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144658186","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Peter Murphy, Celeste Holden, Yirui Qian, Simon Walker, Evelyn Thsehla, Susan Griffin
{"title":"Reflecting Social Values in HTA Methods: A Case Study of South Africa.","authors":"Peter Murphy, Celeste Holden, Yirui Qian, Simon Walker, Evelyn Thsehla, Susan Griffin","doi":"10.1007/s40258-025-00990-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-025-00990-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>South Africa proposes the creation of a new health technology assessment (HTA) agency. In anticipation, the South African Values and Ethics for Universal Health Coverage (SAVE-UHC) value assessment framework has been created to make explicit the attributes of social value to inform priority setting. However, operationalising these values in an HTA process requires technical economic evaluation-based methods and little consideration has been given to appropriate approaches to determine these. We therefore used a novel pragmatic approach to identify economic evaluation methods to incorporate the SAVE-UHC value attributes in HTA methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We mapped the SAVE-UHC elements to value attributes described in an existing value assessment framework to help identify previously described methods. A survey of experts and a workshop were conducted to supplement the methods identified in the mapping. The combined results were compiled as a list of ways the SAVE-UHC elements could be measured, valued and incorporated into economic evaluation methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results revealed a comprehensive list of approaches to measuring and valuing the SAVE-UHC elements. The results were further categorised into health and the distribution of health, financial risk, healthcare utilisation, well-being, healthcare costs, performance indicators and constraints.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>South Africa is in the process of institutionalising HTA to guide prioritisation of new healthcare technologies. This research presents a wide range of methods that could be used in South Africa to implement SAVE-UHC. The approach could also be used in other countries seeking to implement their own value assessment frameworks and identify appropriate methods to incorporate them in HTA processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8065,"journal":{"name":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144636010","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rachael Maree Hunter, Rachael Frost, Sarah Kalwarowsky, Louise Marston, Shengning Pan, Cristina Avgerinou, Andrew Clegg, Claudia Cooper, Vari M Drennan, Benjamin Gardner, Claire Goodman, Pip Logan, Dawn A Skelton, Kate Walters
{"title":"Funding Health Promotion Activities to Reduce Avoidable Hospital Admissions in Frail Older Adults (HomeHealth): Further Challenges to the \"Cost-Effective but Unaffordable\" Paradox.","authors":"Rachael Maree Hunter, Rachael Frost, Sarah Kalwarowsky, Louise Marston, Shengning Pan, Cristina Avgerinou, Andrew Clegg, Claudia Cooper, Vari M Drennan, Benjamin Gardner, Claire Goodman, Pip Logan, Dawn A Skelton, Kate Walters","doi":"10.1007/s40258-025-00987-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-025-00987-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Health promotion initiatives are often promoted as being worth the investment given future cash-savings. This paper uses the findings of HomeHealth, a health promotion service for older adults with mild frailty, to examine how economic evaluation relates to local decision making in England.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The HomeHealth trial randomised 388 participants aged 65+ years with mild frailty to receive HomeHealth (195 participants) or treatment as usual (193 participants). Health and social care resource use and carer time were self-completed at baseline, 6 months and 12 months. Primary and secondary healthcare resource use and medications were collected from patient files at 12 months post recruitment, covering the past 18 months. Stakeholders including commissioners were consulted on the results of the trial and budget impact.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants allocated to HomeHealth had a significant reduction in emergency hospital admissions at 12 months (incident rate ratio (IRR) 0.65; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45-0.92) and unpaid carer hours at 6 months (- 16 h (95% CI - 18 to - 14 h) or - £360 (95% CI - 369 to - 351) per patient). Although the intervention is cost saving overall due to fewer emergency admissions, at a cost of £457 per patient commissioners do not have the budget to fund it.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This case study illustrates the problem with using standard economic evaluation methods to argue for implementation of health promotion initiatives in publicly financed healthcare systems. Although HomeHealth resulted in reduced emergency admissions and may be cost saving to the system as a whole, it is not locally cash releasing. Health promotion initiatives are unlikely to be funded from local budgets without significant system-wide changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8065,"journal":{"name":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144590319","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rachel Milte, Matthew Crocker, Gang Chen, Gordon Duff, Julie Ratcliffe
{"title":"New Horizons? Assessing General Public Preferences for a Wellbeing Economy in the Post-COVID-19 World.","authors":"Rachel Milte, Matthew Crocker, Gang Chen, Gordon Duff, Julie Ratcliffe","doi":"10.1007/s40258-025-00951-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40258-025-00951-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>As societies emerge from the COVID-19 pandemic, governments are increasingly moving away from a focus on economic growth at any cost towards the principles of a wellbeing economy, focused on achieving a more equitable distribution of wealth and wellbeing. This study aimed to assess the relative importance to the Australian general public of the key principles of a wellbeing economy and to investigate heterogeneity in preferences between demographic subgroups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was developed and delivered to a general public sample of 2042 Australian adults (aged 18 years and above). Respondents were invited to rank the key principles of a wellbeing economy (dignity, nature and climate, social connection, fairness and participation) plus two additional traditional economic indicators of societal success ('economic growth' and 'economic prosperity') in order of their relative importance for informing future policy directions. Data analysis was conducted using simple summative scoring, which involved the use of a point system allocated to rankings as a dependent variable. In addition, a rank-ordered logit model was used to explore preferences for the entire sample and subgroups defined by key socio-demographic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>'Dignity' (people have enough to live in comfort, safety and happiness) and 'fairness' (equal opportunity for all Australians and the gap between richest and poorest greatly reduced) were ranked as the most important priorities for the total sample and for key socio-demographic subgroups differentiated by age, level of education and level of socio-economic advantage. Traditional economic indicators of societal success including 'economic prosperity' and 'economic growth' were considered important but generally ranked below the principles of 'dignity' and 'fairness'.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings indicate that government movements away from traditional economic indicators and towards new broader wellbeing economy measures of societal success are likely to be supported by the general public.</p>","PeriodicalId":8065,"journal":{"name":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","volume":" ","pages":"679-691"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12170691/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143536409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Predicting Health Utilities Using Health Administrative Data: Leveraging Survey-linked Health Administrative Data from Ontario, Canada.","authors":"Yue Niu, Nazire Begen, Guangyong Zou, Sisira Sarma","doi":"10.1007/s40258-025-00947-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40258-025-00947-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The quality-adjusted life year (QALY) is widely used to measure health outcome that combines the length of life and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). To be a reliable QALY measure, HRQoL measurements with a preference-based scoring algorithm need to be converted into health utilities on a scale from zero (dead) to one (perfect health). However, preference-based health utility data are often not available. We address this gap by developing a predictive model for health utilities.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop a predictive model for health utilities using available demographic and morbidity variables in a health administrative dataset for non-institutionalised populations in Ontario, Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data were obtained from the 2009 to 2010 Canadian Community Health Survey containing Health Utilities Index Mark3 (HUI3), a generic multi-attribute preference-based health utility instrument linked with Ontario health administrative (OHA) data that were collected for administrative or billing purposes for patient encounters with the health care system. We employed four regression models (linear, Tobit, single-part beta mixture, and two-part beta mixture) and a calibration technique to identify the best-fit regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings indicate that the two-part beta mixture model is the best-fit for predicting health utilities in the OHA data. The proposed predictive model reflects the original distribution of HUI3 in the population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our proposed predictive model generates reasonably accurate health utility predictions from OHA data. Our model-based prediction approach is a useful strategy for real-world applications, particularly when preference-based utility data are unavailable.</p>","PeriodicalId":8065,"journal":{"name":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","volume":" ","pages":"661-677"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143254528","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Thi Quynh Anh Ho, Lidia Engel, Jemimah Ride, Long Khanh-Dao Le, Glenn Melvin, Ha N D Le, Cathrine Mihalopoulos
{"title":"Young People's Preferences for Web-Based Mental Health Interventions for Managing Anxiety and Depression: A Discrete Choice Experiment.","authors":"Thi Quynh Anh Ho, Lidia Engel, Jemimah Ride, Long Khanh-Dao Le, Glenn Melvin, Ha N D Le, Cathrine Mihalopoulos","doi":"10.1007/s40258-025-00958-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40258-025-00958-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Anxiety and depression are prevalent in young people. Web-based mental health interventions (W-MHIs) have the potential to reduce anxiety and depression, yet the level of engagement remains low. This study aims to elicit young people's preferences towards W-MHIs and the relative importance of intervention attributes in influencing choice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted online among young people aged 18-25 years who lived in Australia, self-reported experiences of anxiety and/or depression in the past 12 months and had an intention to use W-MHIs and/or previous experience with W-MHIs for managing anxiety and/or depression. Participants were recruited via social media and Deakin University notice boards. The DCE design comprised six attributes, including out-of-pocket cost, access to trained instructors (e.g., therapists, coaches) to help users stay engaged with the intervention, total time required to complete the intervention, initial screening, quizzes within the W-MHIs to check user's understanding about the intervention content, and communication with other users. The DCE design consisted of three blocks, each with eight unlabelled choice tasks, each with two alternatives. Data were analysed using a mixed logit model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred ninety-nine participants completed the DCE (mean age: 21.43 ± 2.29 years, 64.32% female). Lower cost, access to instructors, and moderate time required to complete the intervention (5 h) were significant facilitators. The W-MHIs including audio- or video-call access to instructors were 23 percentage points more likely to be chosen than those without and W-MHI with a moderate completion time (5 h) was 18 percentage points more likely to be chosen than one with a shorter time (2 h).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results highlight that low-cost W-MHIs with access to trained instructors and moderate completion time could increase uptake. More research is required to confirm these findings and examine whether these preferences vary across different population characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":8065,"journal":{"name":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","volume":" ","pages":"737-749"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12170702/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143742009","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Steven Simoens, Walter Van Dyck, Rosanne Janssens, Liese Barbier, Jeroen Luyten
{"title":"Compulsory Licensing as an Instrument to Tackle High Medicine Prices: A Realist Review of Industrial and Health Consequences.","authors":"Steven Simoens, Walter Van Dyck, Rosanne Janssens, Liese Barbier, Jeroen Luyten","doi":"10.1007/s40258-025-00956-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40258-025-00956-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although compulsory licensing of medicines is traditionally discussed in the context of low- and middle-income countries tackling high prices, it has recently sparked debate in several high-income countries. This study aims to examine the industrial and health consequences of compulsory licensing when applied by a high-income country. Our literature review found that the impact of compulsory licensing is challenging to predict as it can have multiple (opposing) consequences in terms of economic activity, patient outcomes and public health. Compulsory licensing can, under particular circumstances, serve as a lever of industrial policy in a country that wishes to develop its domestic generic pharmaceutical industry. However, originator pharmaceutical companies and other industries may reduce investment, which can be negative for countries with a high presence of innovators, adversely impacting long-term economic activity. Compulsory licensing may also induce state retaliation against the license-issuing country. From a health policy perspective, compulsory licensing likely increases patient access to expensive medicines and frees up resources that can be invested in other (health) programs. However, pharmaceutical companies may delay medicine launches or cancel clinical trials in the license-issuing country. Although there are benefits resulting from a credible threat to use compulsory licensing, the overall desirability of actually using it depends on the specific context and needs to be assessed on a case-by-case basis.</p>","PeriodicalId":8065,"journal":{"name":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","volume":" ","pages":"613-624"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143957184","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Zainab Abdali, Tuba Saygın Avşar, Sue Jowett, Muslim Syed, Khalifa Elmusharaf, Louise Jackson
{"title":"Decision-Analytical Modelling of Medicines in the Middle East: A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluation Studies.","authors":"Zainab Abdali, Tuba Saygın Avşar, Sue Jowett, Muslim Syed, Khalifa Elmusharaf, Louise Jackson","doi":"10.1007/s40258-024-00940-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40258-024-00940-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Economic evaluations through decision-analytical models have played a limited role in shaping healthcare resource optimisation and reimbursement decisions in the Middle East.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review aims to systematically examine economic evaluation studies focusing on decision-analytical models of medicines in the Middle East, defining methodological characteristics and appraising the quality of the identified models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review approach was employed to identify published decision-analytical models of medicines in the Middle East. Six databases were searched (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Econlit, Web of Science, Global Health Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry and the Global Index Medicus) from 1998 to July 2024. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria-full economic evaluations of medicines using decision-analytical models in the Middle East-were considered. Data were extracted and tabulated to include study characteristics and methodological specifications, and data were narratively analysed. The Philips checklist was used to assess the quality of studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-three decision-analytical modelling studies of medicines were identified and reviewed, from eight Middle Eastern countries, with the majority (90%) conducted in Iran, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Egypt. The cost-effectiveness of medications for non-communicable diseases was explored in 77% of the models. Gross domestic product-based cost-effectiveness thresholds were commonly used, and international sources provided data on intervention effectiveness and health outcomes, while national sources were mainly used for the costs of resource use. Most models incorporated an assessment of parameter uncertainty, whereas other types of uncertainty were not explored. Studies from high-income countries were generally of higher quality than those from middle-income countries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The number of published decision-analytical models in the Middle East was low, considering the available medicinal products and disease burden. Key elements related to the quality of decision-analytical models, including analysis of the model structure, appropriateness of model inputs and uncertainty assessment, were not consistently fulfilled. Recommendations are provided to enhance the quality of future economic evaluation studies. This includes strengthening the existing health economics capacities, establishing country-specific health technology assessment systems (where possible), and initiating collaborations to generate national cost and outcome data. PROSPERO registration: CRD42021283904.</p>","PeriodicalId":8065,"journal":{"name":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","volume":" ","pages":"569-612"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143967422","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Frederick McElwee, Amanda Cole, Gomathi Kaliappan, Andrea Masters, Lotte Steuten
{"title":"Alternative Payment Models for Innovative Medicines: A Framework for Effective Implementation.","authors":"Frederick McElwee, Amanda Cole, Gomathi Kaliappan, Andrea Masters, Lotte Steuten","doi":"10.1007/s40258-025-00960-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40258-025-00960-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Scientific advancements offer significant opportunities for better patient outcomes, but also present new challenges for value assessment, affordability and access. Alternative payment models (APMs) can offer solutions to the ensuing payer challenges. However, a comprehensive framework that matches the spectrum of challenges with the right solution, and places them within a framework for implementation, is currently missing. To fill this gap, we propose evidence-based steps for the effective selection and implementation of APMs. First, contracting challenges should be identified and mapped to potential APM solutions. We developed a decision guide that can serve as a starting point to articulate core problems and map these to APM solutions. The main problem categories identified are: budget impact and uncertainty, value uncertainty, and the scope of value assessment and negotiation. Sub-categories include affordability, uncertainty of effectiveness, and patient heterogeneity, which map onto APM solutions such as outcome-based agreements, instalments, and subscription models. Just as important are the subsequent identification and assessment of the feasibility of potential solutions as well as collaboration to reach agreement on the terms of the APM and lay the groundwork for effective implementation. We adduce recent examples of APM implementation as evidence of how commonly cited implementation barriers can be overcome by applying pragmatic design choices and collaboration. This step-by-step framework can aid payers and manufacturers in the process of effectively identifying, agreeing on, and implementing APMs to advance patient access to cost-effective medicines, while at the same time providing appropriate incentives to support future innovation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8065,"journal":{"name":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","volume":" ","pages":"535-549"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12170698/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143762645","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A Head-On Comparison of EQ-VT- and Crosswalk-Based EQ-5D-5L Value Sets.","authors":"Henry Bailey, Bram Roudijk","doi":"10.1007/s40258-025-00954-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40258-025-00954-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>No systematic country-level comparison has been undertaken between crosswalk- and EQ-VT-derived EQ-5D-5L value sets. Crosswalk values can differ from EQ-VT-based EQ-5D-5L value sets owing to valuation protocols, changes in societal preferences over time, and a change in the label of the highest level on mobility in moving from EQ-5D-3L to EQ-5D-5L. This study aimed to compare the five-level (5L) crosswalk and EQ-VT value sets to explore differences between them at the country level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From the countries with both time trade-off (TTO)- or discrete choice experiment (DCE) + TTO-based EQ-5D-3L value sets and EQ-VT-based EQ-5D-5L value sets, 19 pairs of EQ-5D-3L/EQ-5D-5L sets were found. For each of these EQ-5D-3L value sets, 5L crosswalk sets were developed and compared with the corresponding national EQ-5D-5L valuation set using correlation analysis, ranges, values of specific states, Bland-Altman plots, and scatter plots. Three of the countries have EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L valuation data for the same set of respondents. These three cases were analyzed separately, as they provide a \"true\" test of the differences between the two value sets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Spearman correlation between the crosswalk and valuation sets ranged from 0.831 to 0.989, being below 0.9 in 11 pairs of value sets. The difference in the percentage of negative values ranged from +22.5 to -18.8%, and the difference in the ranges within each pair of value sets ranged from +42.7 to -18.4%. The average mean absolute difference of values (crosswalk versus EQ-VT) was 0.149. This was below 0.1 in only 5 of the 19 EQ-VT/crosswalk set pairs. For the states comprising one level 5 and four level 1s, no country preserved its ranking of importance of the five dimensions in moving from crosswalk to EQ-VT values. Most of the Bland-Altman plots and scatterplots revealed a pattern that placed states with the highest level on mobility as a separate band from other states.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>All of the criteria showed poor agreement between the crosswalk- and EQ-VT-based value sets. The differences in labels for the most extreme response option for the mobility dimension leads to substantial differences in values between these value sets.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Crosswalk and EQ-VT value sets should not be used interchangeably, except under circumstances where it is not possible or feasible to conduct a direct EQ-5D-5L valuation study.</p>","PeriodicalId":8065,"journal":{"name":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","volume":" ","pages":"725-736"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12170785/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143603668","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}