时间驱动的作业成本法及其在卫生经济分析中的应用:系统文献综述。

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Sangita Shakya, Shalika Bohingamu Mudiyanselage, Suzanne Robinson, Sean Randall, Lan Gao
{"title":"时间驱动的作业成本法及其在卫生经济分析中的应用:系统文献综述。","authors":"Sangita Shakya, Shalika Bohingamu Mudiyanselage, Suzanne Robinson, Sean Randall, Lan Gao","doi":"10.1007/s40258-025-00988-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>With rising global healthcare expenditures, there is an increasing demand for value-based healthcare (VBHC). Time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) has been proposed as a key component of VBHC for addressing cost-related challenges. This study aimed to review the application of TDABC in health economic analyses across the continuum of care, explore its methodological advantages, and assess adherence to the 7-step or 8-step methodological reporting frameworks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was conducted by screening the MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, including all studies published until April 2025. Studies that used TDABC for diagnosis and treatment of health conditions were included, while costing studies involving any surgeries were excluded. The NVivo qualitative data analysis software was used to analyse data through content analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 32 studies met inclusion criteria, including 25 partial economic evaluations (costing) and seven full economic evaluations (EEs). Time-driven activity-based costing was predominantly applied in cancer treatment and management, followed by diabetes care. This methodology proved applicable across all stages of healthcare, helping to accurately identify the cost of care and resource waste, enhancing value in healthcare, and overcoming the current cost accounting challenges. Studies that used hybrid data collection approaches combining direct observation with staff input were more likely to report detailed and actionable cost assessments. Studies using 8-step framework demonstrated improved methodological adherence and reduced reporting variability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Time-driven activity-based costing supports more accurate, transparent, and resource-sensitive health economic analysis enabling informed decision making and system-level efficiency. Its application across diverse care stages and conditions demonstrates its adaptability and relevance for modern health-economic evaluation. Policy makers and healthcare providers should consider adopting TDABC to strengthen costing practices and advance the transition toward value-based healthcare.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>ID CRD42023447085.</p>","PeriodicalId":8065,"journal":{"name":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing and Its Use in Health Economic Analysis: A Systematic Literature Review.\",\"authors\":\"Sangita Shakya, Shalika Bohingamu Mudiyanselage, Suzanne Robinson, Sean Randall, Lan Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40258-025-00988-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>With rising global healthcare expenditures, there is an increasing demand for value-based healthcare (VBHC). Time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) has been proposed as a key component of VBHC for addressing cost-related challenges. This study aimed to review the application of TDABC in health economic analyses across the continuum of care, explore its methodological advantages, and assess adherence to the 7-step or 8-step methodological reporting frameworks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was conducted by screening the MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, including all studies published until April 2025. Studies that used TDABC for diagnosis and treatment of health conditions were included, while costing studies involving any surgeries were excluded. The NVivo qualitative data analysis software was used to analyse data through content analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 32 studies met inclusion criteria, including 25 partial economic evaluations (costing) and seven full economic evaluations (EEs). Time-driven activity-based costing was predominantly applied in cancer treatment and management, followed by diabetes care. This methodology proved applicable across all stages of healthcare, helping to accurately identify the cost of care and resource waste, enhancing value in healthcare, and overcoming the current cost accounting challenges. Studies that used hybrid data collection approaches combining direct observation with staff input were more likely to report detailed and actionable cost assessments. Studies using 8-step framework demonstrated improved methodological adherence and reduced reporting variability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Time-driven activity-based costing supports more accurate, transparent, and resource-sensitive health economic analysis enabling informed decision making and system-level efficiency. Its application across diverse care stages and conditions demonstrates its adaptability and relevance for modern health-economic evaluation. Policy makers and healthcare providers should consider adopting TDABC to strengthen costing practices and advance the transition toward value-based healthcare.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>ID CRD42023447085.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-025-00988-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-025-00988-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:随着全球医疗保健支出的增加,对基于价值的医疗保健(VBHC)的需求不断增加。时间驱动的作业成本法(TDABC)已被提议作为VBHC解决成本相关挑战的关键组成部分。本研究旨在回顾TDABC在整个护理连续期卫生经济分析中的应用,探索其方法学优势,并评估7步或8步方法学报告框架的依从性。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南筛选MEDLINE、Embase和Scopus数据库,包括2025年4月前发表的所有研究。使用TDABC诊断和治疗健康状况的研究被纳入,而涉及任何手术的成本研究被排除在外。采用NVivo定性数据分析软件对数据进行内容分析。结果:共有32项研究符合纳入标准,包括25项部分经济评价(成本)和7项全面经济评价(EEs)。时间驱动的作业成本法主要应用于癌症治疗和管理,其次是糖尿病护理。事实证明,这种方法适用于医疗保健的所有阶段,有助于准确识别医疗保健成本和资源浪费,提高医疗保健价值,并克服当前的成本会计挑战。采用直接观察与工作人员投入相结合的混合数据收集方法的研究更有可能报告详细和可操作的成本评估。使用8步框架的研究表明,方法的依从性得到改善,报告的可变性减少。结论:时间驱动的作业成本法支持更准确、透明和资源敏感的卫生经济分析,从而实现明智的决策和系统级效率。它在不同护理阶段和条件下的应用表明了它对现代健康经济评估的适应性和相关性。决策者和医疗保健提供者应考虑采用TDABC来加强成本核算实践,并推进向基于价值的医疗保健的过渡。普洛斯彼罗注册号:ID CRD42023447085。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing and Its Use in Health Economic Analysis: A Systematic Literature Review.

Objectives: With rising global healthcare expenditures, there is an increasing demand for value-based healthcare (VBHC). Time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) has been proposed as a key component of VBHC for addressing cost-related challenges. This study aimed to review the application of TDABC in health economic analyses across the continuum of care, explore its methodological advantages, and assess adherence to the 7-step or 8-step methodological reporting frameworks.

Methods: This systematic review was conducted by screening the MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, including all studies published until April 2025. Studies that used TDABC for diagnosis and treatment of health conditions were included, while costing studies involving any surgeries were excluded. The NVivo qualitative data analysis software was used to analyse data through content analyses.

Results: A total of 32 studies met inclusion criteria, including 25 partial economic evaluations (costing) and seven full economic evaluations (EEs). Time-driven activity-based costing was predominantly applied in cancer treatment and management, followed by diabetes care. This methodology proved applicable across all stages of healthcare, helping to accurately identify the cost of care and resource waste, enhancing value in healthcare, and overcoming the current cost accounting challenges. Studies that used hybrid data collection approaches combining direct observation with staff input were more likely to report detailed and actionable cost assessments. Studies using 8-step framework demonstrated improved methodological adherence and reduced reporting variability.

Conclusions: Time-driven activity-based costing supports more accurate, transparent, and resource-sensitive health economic analysis enabling informed decision making and system-level efficiency. Its application across diverse care stages and conditions demonstrates its adaptability and relevance for modern health-economic evaluation. Policy makers and healthcare providers should consider adopting TDABC to strengthen costing practices and advance the transition toward value-based healthcare.

Prospero registration number: ID CRD42023447085.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy provides timely publication of cutting-edge research and expert opinion from this increasingly important field, making it a vital resource for payers, providers and researchers alike. The journal includes high quality economic research and reviews of all aspects of healthcare from various perspectives and countries, designed to communicate the latest applied information in health economics and health policy. While emphasis is placed on information with practical applications, a strong basis of underlying scientific rigor is maintained.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信