在HTA方法中反映社会价值:以南非为例。

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Peter Murphy, Celeste Holden, Yirui Qian, Simon Walker, Evelyn Thsehla, Susan Griffin
{"title":"在HTA方法中反映社会价值:以南非为例。","authors":"Peter Murphy, Celeste Holden, Yirui Qian, Simon Walker, Evelyn Thsehla, Susan Griffin","doi":"10.1007/s40258-025-00990-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>South Africa proposes the creation of a new health technology assessment (HTA) agency. In anticipation, the South African Values and Ethics for Universal Health Coverage (SAVE-UHC) value assessment framework has been created to make explicit the attributes of social value to inform priority setting. However, operationalising these values in an HTA process requires technical economic evaluation-based methods and little consideration has been given to appropriate approaches to determine these. We therefore used a novel pragmatic approach to identify economic evaluation methods to incorporate the SAVE-UHC value attributes in HTA methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We mapped the SAVE-UHC elements to value attributes described in an existing value assessment framework to help identify previously described methods. A survey of experts and a workshop were conducted to supplement the methods identified in the mapping. The combined results were compiled as a list of ways the SAVE-UHC elements could be measured, valued and incorporated into economic evaluation methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results revealed a comprehensive list of approaches to measuring and valuing the SAVE-UHC elements. The results were further categorised into health and the distribution of health, financial risk, healthcare utilisation, well-being, healthcare costs, performance indicators and constraints.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>South Africa is in the process of institutionalising HTA to guide prioritisation of new healthcare technologies. This research presents a wide range of methods that could be used in South Africa to implement SAVE-UHC. The approach could also be used in other countries seeking to implement their own value assessment frameworks and identify appropriate methods to incorporate them in HTA processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8065,"journal":{"name":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reflecting Social Values in HTA Methods: A Case Study of South Africa.\",\"authors\":\"Peter Murphy, Celeste Holden, Yirui Qian, Simon Walker, Evelyn Thsehla, Susan Griffin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40258-025-00990-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>South Africa proposes the creation of a new health technology assessment (HTA) agency. In anticipation, the South African Values and Ethics for Universal Health Coverage (SAVE-UHC) value assessment framework has been created to make explicit the attributes of social value to inform priority setting. However, operationalising these values in an HTA process requires technical economic evaluation-based methods and little consideration has been given to appropriate approaches to determine these. We therefore used a novel pragmatic approach to identify economic evaluation methods to incorporate the SAVE-UHC value attributes in HTA methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We mapped the SAVE-UHC elements to value attributes described in an existing value assessment framework to help identify previously described methods. A survey of experts and a workshop were conducted to supplement the methods identified in the mapping. The combined results were compiled as a list of ways the SAVE-UHC elements could be measured, valued and incorporated into economic evaluation methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results revealed a comprehensive list of approaches to measuring and valuing the SAVE-UHC elements. The results were further categorised into health and the distribution of health, financial risk, healthcare utilisation, well-being, healthcare costs, performance indicators and constraints.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>South Africa is in the process of institutionalising HTA to guide prioritisation of new healthcare technologies. This research presents a wide range of methods that could be used in South Africa to implement SAVE-UHC. The approach could also be used in other countries seeking to implement their own value assessment frameworks and identify appropriate methods to incorporate them in HTA processes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-025-00990-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-025-00990-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:南非提议建立一个新的卫生技术评估机构。预计,南非全民健康覆盖的价值观和伦理(SAVE-UHC)价值评估框架已经建立,以明确社会价值的属性,为确定优先事项提供信息。然而,在HTA过程中操作这些值需要基于技术经济评价的方法,很少考虑确定这些值的适当方法。因此,我们使用了一种新颖实用的方法来确定经济评估方法,将SAVE-UHC价值属性纳入HTA方法。方法:我们将SAVE-UHC元素映射到现有价值评估框架中描述的价值属性,以帮助识别先前描述的方法。进行了一次专家调查和一次讲习班,以补充绘图中确定的方法。综合结果汇编成一份清单,列出了SAVE-UHC要素可被衡量、评估和纳入经济评价方法的方法。结果:结果揭示了测量和评估SAVE-UHC要素的全面方法清单。结果进一步分为健康和健康分布、财务风险、医疗保健利用、福祉、医疗保健成本、绩效指标和限制。结论:南非正在将HTA制度化,以指导新医疗技术的优先次序。这项研究提出了可在南非用于实施SAVE-UHC的广泛方法。这一方法也可用于寻求实施其自身价值评估框架的其他国家,并确定适当的方法将其纳入卫生评估进程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reflecting Social Values in HTA Methods: A Case Study of South Africa.

Background and objective: South Africa proposes the creation of a new health technology assessment (HTA) agency. In anticipation, the South African Values and Ethics for Universal Health Coverage (SAVE-UHC) value assessment framework has been created to make explicit the attributes of social value to inform priority setting. However, operationalising these values in an HTA process requires technical economic evaluation-based methods and little consideration has been given to appropriate approaches to determine these. We therefore used a novel pragmatic approach to identify economic evaluation methods to incorporate the SAVE-UHC value attributes in HTA methods.

Methods: We mapped the SAVE-UHC elements to value attributes described in an existing value assessment framework to help identify previously described methods. A survey of experts and a workshop were conducted to supplement the methods identified in the mapping. The combined results were compiled as a list of ways the SAVE-UHC elements could be measured, valued and incorporated into economic evaluation methods.

Results: The results revealed a comprehensive list of approaches to measuring and valuing the SAVE-UHC elements. The results were further categorised into health and the distribution of health, financial risk, healthcare utilisation, well-being, healthcare costs, performance indicators and constraints.

Conclusions: South Africa is in the process of institutionalising HTA to guide prioritisation of new healthcare technologies. This research presents a wide range of methods that could be used in South Africa to implement SAVE-UHC. The approach could also be used in other countries seeking to implement their own value assessment frameworks and identify appropriate methods to incorporate them in HTA processes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy provides timely publication of cutting-edge research and expert opinion from this increasingly important field, making it a vital resource for payers, providers and researchers alike. The journal includes high quality economic research and reviews of all aspects of healthcare from various perspectives and countries, designed to communicate the latest applied information in health economics and health policy. While emphasis is placed on information with practical applications, a strong basis of underlying scientific rigor is maintained.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信