Alternative Payment Models for Innovative Medicines: A Framework for Effective Implementation.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Frederick McElwee, Amanda Cole, Gomathi Kaliappan, Andrea Masters, Lotte Steuten
{"title":"Alternative Payment Models for Innovative Medicines: A Framework for Effective Implementation.","authors":"Frederick McElwee, Amanda Cole, Gomathi Kaliappan, Andrea Masters, Lotte Steuten","doi":"10.1007/s40258-025-00960-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Scientific advancements offer significant opportunities for better patient outcomes, but also present new challenges for value assessment, affordability and access. Alternative payment models (APMs) can offer solutions to the ensuing payer challenges. However, a comprehensive framework that matches the spectrum of challenges with the right solution, and places them within a framework for implementation, is currently missing. To fill this gap, we propose evidence-based steps for the effective selection and implementation of APMs. First, contracting challenges should be identified and mapped to potential APM solutions. We developed a decision guide that can serve as a starting point to articulate core problems and map these to APM solutions. The main problem categories identified are: budget impact and uncertainty, value uncertainty, and the scope of value assessment and negotiation. Sub-categories include affordability, uncertainty of effectiveness, and patient heterogeneity, which map onto APM solutions such as outcome-based agreements, instalments, and subscription models. Just as important are the subsequent identification and assessment of the feasibility of potential solutions as well as collaboration to reach agreement on the terms of the APM and lay the groundwork for effective implementation. We adduce recent examples of APM implementation as evidence of how commonly cited implementation barriers can be overcome by applying pragmatic design choices and collaboration. This step-by-step framework can aid payers and manufacturers in the process of effectively identifying, agreeing on, and implementing APMs to advance patient access to cost-effective medicines, while at the same time providing appropriate incentives to support future innovation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8065,"journal":{"name":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-025-00960-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scientific advancements offer significant opportunities for better patient outcomes, but also present new challenges for value assessment, affordability and access. Alternative payment models (APMs) can offer solutions to the ensuing payer challenges. However, a comprehensive framework that matches the spectrum of challenges with the right solution, and places them within a framework for implementation, is currently missing. To fill this gap, we propose evidence-based steps for the effective selection and implementation of APMs. First, contracting challenges should be identified and mapped to potential APM solutions. We developed a decision guide that can serve as a starting point to articulate core problems and map these to APM solutions. The main problem categories identified are: budget impact and uncertainty, value uncertainty, and the scope of value assessment and negotiation. Sub-categories include affordability, uncertainty of effectiveness, and patient heterogeneity, which map onto APM solutions such as outcome-based agreements, instalments, and subscription models. Just as important are the subsequent identification and assessment of the feasibility of potential solutions as well as collaboration to reach agreement on the terms of the APM and lay the groundwork for effective implementation. We adduce recent examples of APM implementation as evidence of how commonly cited implementation barriers can be overcome by applying pragmatic design choices and collaboration. This step-by-step framework can aid payers and manufacturers in the process of effectively identifying, agreeing on, and implementing APMs to advance patient access to cost-effective medicines, while at the same time providing appropriate incentives to support future innovation.

创新药物的替代支付模式:有效实施框架。
科学进步为改善患者预后提供了重要机会,但也对价值评估、可负担性和可及性提出了新的挑战。替代支付模式(APMs)可以为随后的付款人挑战提供解决方案。然而,目前缺乏一个将各种挑战与正确的解决方案相匹配并将其置于实施框架内的全面框架。为了填补这一空白,我们提出了有效选择和实施apm的循证步骤。首先,应确定合同挑战,并将其映射到潜在的APM解决方案中。我们开发了一个决策指南,可以作为阐明核心问题并将其映射到APM解决方案的起点。确定的主要问题类别是:预算影响和不确定性,价值不确定性,价值评估和谈判的范围。子类别包括可负担性、有效性的不确定性和患者异质性,这些都映射到APM解决方案,如基于结果的协议、分期付款和订阅模式。同样重要的是,随后确定和评估潜在解决方案的可行性,以及就APM的条款达成协议并为有效执行奠定基础的合作。我们引用了最近的APM实现的例子,作为通过应用实用的设计选择和协作来克服常见的实现障碍的证据。这一循序渐进的框架可以帮助支付方和制造商有效地确定、商定和实施apm,以促进患者获得具有成本效益的药物,同时提供适当的激励措施,以支持未来的创新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy provides timely publication of cutting-edge research and expert opinion from this increasingly important field, making it a vital resource for payers, providers and researchers alike. The journal includes high quality economic research and reviews of all aspects of healthcare from various perspectives and countries, designed to communicate the latest applied information in health economics and health policy. While emphasis is placed on information with practical applications, a strong basis of underlying scientific rigor is maintained.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信