{"title":"Correction to “Insights into Variations in the Gut Virome of Tibetan Macaques (Macaca Thibetana) Across Wild, Captive, and Semi-Provisioned Environments”","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/ajp.70176","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.70176","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Yang D, Bao C, Xia Y, Ling Y, Zhang F, Ji R, Zhong J, Zhang T, Tian H, Xu X, Sun B. Insights Into Variations in the Gut Virome of Tibetan Macaques (<i>Macaca thibetana</i>) Across Wild, Captive, and Semi-Provisioned Environments. <i>American Journal of Primatology</i>. 2026;88:e70148. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.70148</p><p>Upon reviewing the final published version, we identified a typographical error in the Figure 4 legend, where the subpanel labels were mismatched. The originally published incorrect legend was:</p><p>FIGURE 4 (a) PCoA of gut viral KEGG functional profiles (Level 3) based on Bray-Curtis distance. (b) PCoA of gut bacterial KEGG functional profiles (Level 3). (c) Mantel test correlation between viral and bacterial KEGG functional distance matrices. (d) Comparative LEfSe analysis(LDA > 2.5) of bacterial KEGG pathways among groups. (e) Comparative LEfSe analysis (LDA > 2.5) of viral KEGG pathways among groups. (f) Correlation heatmap of viral-bacterial functional associations in the wild group.</p><p>In the published legend, panels d and e were incorrectly labeled as the LEfSe analyses, while panels b and c were incorrectly labeled as the PCoA and Mantel test. This was a caption labeling error only and does not affect the original data, analytical results, or research conclusions.</p><p>The corrected Figure 4 legend is as follows:</p><p><b>FIGURE 4</b> (a) PCoA of gut viral KEGG functional profiles (Level 3) based on Bray-Curtis distance. (b) Comparative LEfSe analysis (LDA > 2.5) of bacterial KEGG pathways among groups. (c) Comparative LEfSe analysis (LDA > 2.5) of viral KEGG pathways among groups. (d) PCoA of gut bacterial KEGG functional profiles (Level 3). (e) Mantel test correlation between viral and bacterial KEGG functional distance matrices. (f) Correlation heatmap of viral-bacterial functional associations in the wild group.</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":7662,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Primatology","volume":"88 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajp.70176","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148102603","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Desensitization Reduces Fear and Reactivity to Routine Husbandry Procedures in Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta) Relocated Indoors From Outdoors","authors":"Ori Pomerantz, Jonelle L. Mason","doi":"10.1002/ajp.70171","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.70171","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Relocation and housing transitions are routine in captive settings, including biomedical facilities, and can negatively affect welfare by increasing restriction and reducing control. This study tested whether desensitization to human activity reduces fear and reactivity in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) during indoor husbandry procedures. Fifty-six macaques were assigned to a treatment group receiving structured desensitization training (mean ± SE: 8.4 ± 3.4 sessions) or to a control group with no training. Fear and behavioral reactivity were assessed using a modified Human Intruder Test (mHIT) at baseline (day 0), day 15, and day 30. The mHIT included five conditions with progressively increasing mild aversive stimuli, with responses scored for each condition. No baseline differences were detected when conditions were combined. Significant Group × Time interactions showed greater improvement from baseline in the treatment group (Day 15: β = 0.59, <i>p</i> < 0.001; Day 30: β = 0.71, <i>p</i> < 0.001), with estimated marginal mean differences of 0.63 and 0.75 mHIT units, indicating moderate to large effects. Condition-specific analyses showed the strongest effects in tasks involving direct human interaction, particularly the Lixit Rod condition, with additional improvement in the Hand Feeding condition. Although a baseline difference was present in Hand Feeding, it did not explain the greater improvement over time in the treatment group. These findings indicate that structured desensitization reduces reactivity to human-related stimuli and may facilitate adaptation to routine procedures following relocation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7662,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Primatology","volume":"88 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148102598","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Desensitization Reduces Fear and Reactivity to Routine Husbandry Procedures in Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta) Relocated Indoors From Outdoors","authors":"Ori Pomerantz, Jonelle L. Mason","doi":"10.1002/ajp.70171","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.70171","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Relocation and housing transitions are routine in captive settings, including biomedical facilities, and can negatively affect welfare by increasing restriction and reducing control. This study tested whether desensitization to human activity reduces fear and reactivity in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) during indoor husbandry procedures. Fifty-six macaques were assigned to a treatment group receiving structured desensitization training (mean ± SE: 8.4 ± 3.4 sessions) or to a control group with no training. Fear and behavioral reactivity were assessed using a modified Human Intruder Test (mHIT) at baseline (day 0), day 15, and day 30. The mHIT included five conditions with progressively increasing mild aversive stimuli, with responses scored for each condition. No baseline differences were detected when conditions were combined. Significant Group × Time interactions showed greater improvement from baseline in the treatment group (Day 15: β = 0.59, <i>p</i> < 0.001; Day 30: β = 0.71, <i>p</i> < 0.001), with estimated marginal mean differences of 0.63 and 0.75 mHIT units, indicating moderate to large effects. Condition-specific analyses showed the strongest effects in tasks involving direct human interaction, particularly the Lixit Rod condition, with additional improvement in the Hand Feeding condition. Although a baseline difference was present in Hand Feeding, it did not explain the greater improvement over time in the treatment group. These findings indicate that structured desensitization reduces reactivity to human-related stimuli and may facilitate adaptation to routine procedures following relocation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7662,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Primatology","volume":"88 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148102586","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Dina Hanitrininosy Felantsoa, Hanssi Andrianiaina Rasolomanana, Lala Harivelo Ravaomanarivo
{"title":"Influence of Tourist Group Size and Behavior on Indri (Indri indri) Responses During Encounters in Analamazaotra Forest, Madagascar","authors":"Dina Hanitrininosy Felantsoa, Hanssi Andrianiaina Rasolomanana, Lala Harivelo Ravaomanarivo","doi":"10.1002/ajp.70170","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajp.70170","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Despite being a flagship species for tourism in Analamazaotra forest, the direct impact of tourists on the critically endangered lemurs Indri remains poorly understood. During two separate periods (November 2022 and April 2023), we monitored encounters between tourists and Indri, categorizing tourist group size into small (1–5) and large (> 5) groups, recording who the initiator of encounters was and the behaviors of both actors. Observations were recorded using <i>ad libitum</i> sampling. Tourists mainly initiated interactions during encounters, accounting for 65.4% of observed cases (<i>N</i> = 144/220). Indri initiated 28.2% (<i>N</i> = 62/220) of interactions while guides accounted for the remaining 6.4% (<i>N</i> = 14/220). Tourist-initiated behaviors primarily included approaching Indri (44.5%, <i>N</i> = 64/144), observing them (38.9%, <i>N</i> = 56/144), remaining indifferent (9.02%, <i>N</i> = 13/144), imitating their calls (6.2%, <i>N</i> = 9/144), and shaking a branch and feeding them (1.38%, <i>N</i> = 2/144). Only tourist-initiated acts had a noticeable effect on Indri responses. Indri tended to avoid approaching when tourists approached, but approached when tourists looked away. Tourist's group size seemed strongly associated to Indri. Smaller tourist groups often responded by emitting Indri vocalizations, presumably unaware that they were territorial vocalizations. The territorial calls of Indri are very famous in Analamazaotra, and the guides probably explained their significance to tourists. Larger tourist groups tended to result in Indri either “looking away” or “ignoring” them. No significant difference was observed between the number of daily interactions and Indri responses. If choosing indifference instead of escaping were to limit energy expenses in Indri, conservation efforts should take this into account when educating ecotourists.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7662,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Primatology","volume":"88 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148040783","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Silvia Carboni, Tyler R. Bonnell, Luke Stover, Mrinalini Watsa, Gideon Erkenswick, Amanda D. Melin
{"title":"Responses to Scent Marks in a Wild Group of Leontocebus Weddelli: Insights for Sexual Communication","authors":"Silvia Carboni, Tyler R. Bonnell, Luke Stover, Mrinalini Watsa, Gideon Erkenswick, Amanda D. Melin","doi":"10.1002/ajp.70167","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajp.70167","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Olfaction is a key sensory modality in primate sexual communication; yet, studies examining scent marking behavior and its sex-biased expression remain relatively rare. Furthermore, even fewer have examined the responses elicited by these markings. In this study, we investigated the response behaviors to scent marking in wild tamarins. We hypothesized that scent serves a sexual communication function to facilitate mate attraction and/or mate guarding, and predicted differences in the number and type of responses by males and females. We further predicted increased response rates at the periphery of the home range, where reproductive competition with neighboring groups may be higher. We focused on a group of wild saddleback tamarins (<i>Leontocebus weddelli</i>) and recorded investigatory and overmarking responses to each observed scent marking event, together with the GPS location where the scent was deposited. We found that scent marks of the single breeding female received the highest number of responses, consistent with a role of olfaction in mate attraction. Additionally, most overmarks were performed by primary breeding males in response to female scent marks, suggesting that odor may play a role in mate guarding, potentially mediating male–male competition. However, location within the home range was not associated with the likelihood of responses. Overall, olfactory communication within the social group occurred primarily between the breeding female and the breeding males, with males responding to her scent marks through both investigation and overmarking. Our results provide new data on scent-based communication and putative reproductive dynamics among group members.</p>","PeriodicalId":7662,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Primatology","volume":"88 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajp.70167","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148040723","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}