社交通常与感染有关吗?基于恒河猴和日本猕猴的研究

IF 2 3区 生物学 Q1 ZOOLOGY
Zhihong Xu, Chengfeng Wu, Yun Yang, Alba Castellano-Navarro, Emilio Macanás-Martínez, Bojun Liu, Tao Chen, Xiaochen Ma, Andrew J. J. MacIntosh
{"title":"社交通常与感染有关吗?基于恒河猴和日本猕猴的研究","authors":"Zhihong Xu,&nbsp;Chengfeng Wu,&nbsp;Yun Yang,&nbsp;Alba Castellano-Navarro,&nbsp;Emilio Macanás-Martínez,&nbsp;Bojun Liu,&nbsp;Tao Chen,&nbsp;Xiaochen Ma,&nbsp;Andrew J. J. MacIntosh","doi":"10.1002/ajp.70037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Parasite infection is one key risk inherent in group living and is considered to influence the formation and evolution of animal societies. Previous studies investigating the relationship between sociability (a measure of an individual's level of social engagement) and parasite infection have yielded mixed results, with some observing positive relationships between social network centrality and infection and others observing negative or no sociability-infection links. Here, we aggregated behavioral and parasitological data from three groups of rhesus macaques (<i>Macaca mulatta brevicaudus</i>) in China and two groups of Japanese macaques (<i>Macaca fuscata</i> and <i>Macaca fuscata yakui</i>) to test whether sociability generally predicts geohelminth infection in macaques with similar social structure. We discovered variability in the relationship between sociability and geohelminth infection across these different groups of macaques, and results did not support a general pattern linking sociability to geohelminth infection. Among the five groups, we found a significant positive relationship between sociability and infection in only one group. These results call into question how generally useful an indicator social network centrality metrics are in predicting geohelminth parasite infection across individuals, at least relative to other factors that influence infection dynamics. We discuss potential confounds when examining relationships between sociability and infection across populations and groups, and encourage future studies that can account for these while focusing on the mechanisms that might link social factors and parasite infection to fully understand this relationship.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7662,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Primatology","volume":"87 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Sociability Generally Linked to Infection? A Study Based on Rhesus and Japanese Macaques\",\"authors\":\"Zhihong Xu,&nbsp;Chengfeng Wu,&nbsp;Yun Yang,&nbsp;Alba Castellano-Navarro,&nbsp;Emilio Macanás-Martínez,&nbsp;Bojun Liu,&nbsp;Tao Chen,&nbsp;Xiaochen Ma,&nbsp;Andrew J. J. MacIntosh\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ajp.70037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Parasite infection is one key risk inherent in group living and is considered to influence the formation and evolution of animal societies. Previous studies investigating the relationship between sociability (a measure of an individual's level of social engagement) and parasite infection have yielded mixed results, with some observing positive relationships between social network centrality and infection and others observing negative or no sociability-infection links. Here, we aggregated behavioral and parasitological data from three groups of rhesus macaques (<i>Macaca mulatta brevicaudus</i>) in China and two groups of Japanese macaques (<i>Macaca fuscata</i> and <i>Macaca fuscata yakui</i>) to test whether sociability generally predicts geohelminth infection in macaques with similar social structure. We discovered variability in the relationship between sociability and geohelminth infection across these different groups of macaques, and results did not support a general pattern linking sociability to geohelminth infection. Among the five groups, we found a significant positive relationship between sociability and infection in only one group. These results call into question how generally useful an indicator social network centrality metrics are in predicting geohelminth parasite infection across individuals, at least relative to other factors that influence infection dynamics. We discuss potential confounds when examining relationships between sociability and infection across populations and groups, and encourage future studies that can account for these while focusing on the mechanisms that might link social factors and parasite infection to fully understand this relationship.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Primatology\",\"volume\":\"87 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Primatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajp.70037\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Primatology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajp.70037","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

寄生虫感染是群居生活中固有的一个主要风险,被认为会影响动物社会的形成和进化。以往对社会性(衡量个体社会参与程度的指标)与寄生虫感染之间关系的研究结果不一,有些研究观察到社会网络中心性与感染之间存在正相关关系,有些研究则观察到社会性与感染之间存在负相关或无相关关系。在这里,我们汇总了中国三组猕猴(Macaca mulatta brevicaudus)和两组日本猕猴(Macaca fuscata 和 Macaca fuscata yakui)的行为学和寄生虫学数据,以检验社会性是否能普遍预测具有相似社会结构的猕猴的地虫感染。我们发现,在这些不同的猕猴群体中,交际能力与地线虫感染之间的关系存在差异,结果并不支持交际能力与地线虫感染之间存在普遍联系的模式。在五组猕猴中,我们发现只有一组猕猴的交际能力与感染之间存在显著的正相关关系。这些结果令人质疑社会网络中心度指标在预测个体感染地虫寄生虫方面的普遍作用,至少相对于其他影响感染动态的因素而言是如此。我们讨论了在研究跨人群和群体的社会性与感染之间的关系时可能存在的混淆因素,并鼓励未来的研究在关注可能将社会因素与寄生虫感染联系起来的机制的同时,能够考虑到这些混淆因素,以充分理解这种关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is Sociability Generally Linked to Infection? A Study Based on Rhesus and Japanese Macaques

Parasite infection is one key risk inherent in group living and is considered to influence the formation and evolution of animal societies. Previous studies investigating the relationship between sociability (a measure of an individual's level of social engagement) and parasite infection have yielded mixed results, with some observing positive relationships between social network centrality and infection and others observing negative or no sociability-infection links. Here, we aggregated behavioral and parasitological data from three groups of rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta brevicaudus) in China and two groups of Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata and Macaca fuscata yakui) to test whether sociability generally predicts geohelminth infection in macaques with similar social structure. We discovered variability in the relationship between sociability and geohelminth infection across these different groups of macaques, and results did not support a general pattern linking sociability to geohelminth infection. Among the five groups, we found a significant positive relationship between sociability and infection in only one group. These results call into question how generally useful an indicator social network centrality metrics are in predicting geohelminth parasite infection across individuals, at least relative to other factors that influence infection dynamics. We discuss potential confounds when examining relationships between sociability and infection across populations and groups, and encourage future studies that can account for these while focusing on the mechanisms that might link social factors and parasite infection to fully understand this relationship.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
103
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The objective of the American Journal of Primatology is to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas and findings among primatologists and to convey our increasing understanding of this order of animals to specialists and interested readers alike. Primatology is an unusual science in that its practitioners work in a wide variety of departments and institutions, live in countries throughout the world, and carry out a vast range of research procedures. Whether we are anthropologists, psychologists, biologists, or medical researchers, whether we live in Japan, Kenya, Brazil, or the United States, whether we conduct naturalistic observations in the field or experiments in the lab, we are united in our goal of better understanding primates. Our studies of nonhuman primates are of interest to scientists in many other disciplines ranging from entomology to sociology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信