Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)最新文献

{"title":"Airway management and ventilation techniques in resuscitation during advanced life support: an update.","authors":"Clemens Kill, Randi Katrin Manegold, David Fistera, Joachim Risse","doi":"10.1186/s44158-024-00195-x","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s44158-024-00195-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For many years, ventilation has been an essential part of advanced life support (ALS) in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Nevertheless, there is little evidence about the best method of ventilation during resuscitation for both out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and inhospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) patients. Effective ventilation is one of the two main keys to successful resuscitation. In this context, the question always arises as to which airway management, along with which ventilation mode, constitutes the best strategy. Conventional ventilation modes are not designed for cardiac arrest and show important limitations that must be considered when used in CPR. Manual ventilation without the use of an automated transport ventilator (ATV) could be shown to be uncontrolled in applied volumes and pressures and should be avoided. Mechanical ventilation with an ATV is therefore superior to manual ventilation, but both volume- and pressure-controlled ventilation modes are significantly influenced by chest compressions. With the newly designed chest compression synchronized ventilation (CCSV), a special ventilation mode for resuscitation is available. Further research should be conducted to obtain more evidence of the effect of ventilation during CPR on outcomes following OHCA and not only about how to secure the airway for ventilation during CPR.</p>","PeriodicalId":73597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","volume":"4 1","pages":"58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11344389/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142057502","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Nociception level index variations in ICU: curarized vs non-curarized patients - a pilot study.","authors":"Emilio Bonvecchio, Davide Vailati, Federica Della Mura, Giovanni Marino","doi":"10.1186/s44158-024-00193-z","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s44158-024-00193-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pain is a major physiological stressor that can worsen critical medical conditions in many ways. Currently, there is no reliable monitoring tool which is available for pain monitoring in the deeply sedated ± curarized critically ill patients. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of the multiparameter nociception index (NOL®) in the critical care setting. We compared NOL with traditionally used neurovegetative signs and examined its correlation with sedation depth measured by bispectral index (BIS®) electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective monocentric cohort study was conducted in a general intensive care unit, including patients who required moderate-to-deep levels of sedation with or without continuous neuromuscular blockade. The performance of NOL was evaluated both in the entire studied population, as well as in two subgroups: curarized and non-curarized patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NOL demonstrated greater accuracy than all other indicators in pain detection in the overall population. In the non-curare subgroup, all indices correctly recognized painful stimulation, while in the patients subjected to neuromuscular blocking agent's infusion, only NOL properly identified nociception. In the former group, EEG's relation to nociception was on the border of statistical significance, whereas in the latter BIS showed no correlation with NOL.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NOL emerges as a promising device for pain assessment in the critical care setting and exhibits its best performance precisely in the clinical context where reliable pain assessment methods are most lacking. Furthermore, our research confirms the distinction between sedation and analgesia, highlighting the necessity for distinct monitoring instruments to accurately assess them.</p>","PeriodicalId":73597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","volume":"4 1","pages":"57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11337812/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142010051","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The use of angiotensin II for the management of distributive shock: expert consensus statements.","authors":"Giovanni Landoni, Andrea Cortegiani, Elena Bignami, Gennaro De Pascale, Katia Donadello, Abele Donati, Giacomo Grasselli, Fabio Guarracino, Gianpaola Monti, Gianluca Paternoster, Luigi Tritapepe, Massimo Girardis","doi":"10.1186/s44158-024-00186-y","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s44158-024-00186-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the growing body of evidence supporting the use of angiotensin II (ATII) in distributive shock, its integration into existing treatment algorithms requires careful consideration of factors related to patient comorbidities, hemodynamic parameters, cost-effectiveness, and risk-benefit balance. Moreover, several questions regarding its use in clinical practice warrant further investigations. To address these challenges, a group of Italian intensive care specialists (the panel) developed a consensus process using a modified Delphi technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The panel defined five clinical questions during an online scoping workshop and then provided a short list of statements related to each clinical question based on literature review and clinical experience. A total of 20 statements were collected. Two coordinators screened and selected the final list of statements to be included in the online survey, which consisted of 17 statements. The consensus was reached when ≥ 75% of respondents assigned a score within the 3-point range of 1-3 (disagreement) or 7-9 (agreement).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, a consensus on agreement was reached on 13 statements defining the existing gaps in scientific evidence, the possibility of evaluating the addition of drugs with different mechanisms of action for the treatment of refractory shock, the utility of ATII in reducing the catecholamine requirements in the treatment of vasopressor-resistant septic shock, and the effectiveness of ATII in treating patients in whom angiotensin-converting enzyme activity is reduced or pharmacologically blocked. It was widely shared that renin concentration can be used to identify patients who most likely benefit from ATII to restore vascular tone. Thus, the patients who might benefit most from using ATII were defined. Lastly, some potential barriers to the use of ATII were described.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ATII was recognized as a useful treatment to reduce catecholamine requirements in treating vasopressor-resistant septic shock. At the same time, the need for additional clinical trials to further elucidate the efficacy and safety of ATII, as well as investigations into potential mechanisms of action and optimization of treatment protocols in patients with refractory distributive shock, emerged.</p>","PeriodicalId":73597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","volume":"4 1","pages":"56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11328364/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141997035","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"VV-ECMO in critical COVID-19 obese patients: a cohort study.","authors":"Joana Nogueira, Ricardo Freitas, José Eduardo Sousa, Luís Linhares Santos","doi":"10.1186/s44158-024-00191-1","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s44158-024-00191-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obesity causes significant difficulties in successful extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support and may interfere with patient outcomes. During the COVID-19 pandemic, we experienced an increased number of obese patients supported with ECMO in our intensive care unit due to severe illness in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed a single-center retrospective study to identify prognostic factors for 180-day survival in obese critical COVID-19 patients receiving venovenous ECMO (VV-ECMO). We included adult critical COVID-19 patients on VV-ECMO, who were obese and overweight (according to the World Health Organization) and admitted to a tertiary hospital's intensive care unit from April 1, 2020, to May 31, 2022. Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess differences in 180-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-one patients were included. The median age was 55 (IQR 45-60) years, and 70.7% of the patients were male. The median body mass index (BMI) was 36 (IQR 31-42.5) kg/m²; 39% of patients had a BMI ≥ 40 kg/m². The participants had 3 (IQR 1.5-4) days of mechanical ventilation prior to ECMO, and 63.4% were weaned from VV-ECMO support after a median of 19 (IQR 10-34) days. The median ICU length of stay was 31.9 (IQR 17.5-44.5) days. The duration of mechanical ventilation was 30 (IQR 19-49.5) days. The 180-day mortality rate was 41.5%. Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that a higher BMI was associated with greater 180-day survival (OR 1.157 [1.038-1.291], p = 0.009). Younger age, female sex, less invasive ventilation time before ECMO, and fewer complications at the time of ECMO cannulation were associated with greater 180-day survival [OR 0.858 (0.774-0.953), p 0.004; OR 0.074 (0.008-0.650), p 0.019; OR 0.612 (0.401-0.933), p 0.022; OR 0.13 (0.03-0.740), p 0.022), respectively].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this retrospective cohort of critical COVID-19 obese adult patients supported by VV-ECMO, a higher BMI, younger age, and female sex were associated with greater 180-day survival. A shorter invasive ventilation time before ECMO and fewer complications at ECMO cannulation were also associated with increased survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":73597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","volume":"4 1","pages":"55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11320846/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141972415","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Anesthesiologists ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia core curriculum: a Delphi consensus from Italian regional anesthesia experts.","authors":"Alessandro De Cassai, Astrid Behr, Dario Bugada, Danilo Canzio, Gianluca Capelleri, Fabio Costa, Giorgio Danelli, Grazia De Angelis, Romualdo Del Buono, Fabrizio Fattorini, Pierfrancesco Fusco, Fabio Gori, Alberto Manassero, Ilaria Pacini, Giuseppe Pascarella, Mauro Proietti Pannunzi, Gianluca Russo, Raffaele Russo, Domenico Pietro Santonastaso, Marco Scardino, Giuseppe Sepolvere, Paolo Scimia, Alessandro Strumia, Mario Tedesco, Andrea Tognù, Vito Torrano","doi":"10.1186/s44158-024-00190-2","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s44158-024-00190-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The need for a standardized core curriculum in regional anesthesia has become essential, particularly with the integration of ultrasound revolutionizing and exponentially increasing clinical practice and possibilities. In fact, numerous novel techniques, often overlapping, can confuse practitioners. This study aims to establish a core curriculum for upper limb, lower limb, paraspinal and fascial plane blocks for residency training, addressing potential educational gaps caused by the multitude of techniques, through a Delphi consensus process involving recognized Italian regional anesthesia experts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A steering committee was formed in order to select a panel of experts in regional anesthesia. A three-round Delphi consensus was planned: two rounds of electronic voting and a final round of mixed electronic voting and round table discussion. The consensus was defined as ≥ 75% agreement for inclusion and lower than ≤ 25% agreement for exclusion from the core curriculum list. Techniques reaching the 50% threshold were included with low consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine techniques were selected to be included in the ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia core curriculum. Twenty-two were included with strong consensus: Upper limb: interscalene brachial plexus block, supraclavicular brachial plexus block, infraclavicular brachial plexus block, axillary brachial plexus block, intermediate cervical plexus block Lower limb: femoral nerve block, pericapsular nerve group block, adductor canal block, sciatic nerve block (transgluteal approach, infragluteal approach, and at the popliteal fossa), ankle block Paraspinal/fascial plane blocks: erector spinae plane block, deep serratus anterior plane block, superficial pectointercostal plane block, interpectoral plane block, pectoserratus plane block, rectus sheath block, ilioinguinal iliohypogastric nerves block, transversus abdominis plane block (with subcostal and midaxillary approaches) The remaining seven techniques were included with low consensus: superficial cervical plexus block, lumbar plexus block, fascia iliaca block (suprainguinal approach), anterior quadratus lumborum block, lateral quadratus lumborum block, paravertebral block, and serratus anterior plane block.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This curriculum aims to standardize training and ensure that residents acquire the essential skills required for effective and safe practice regardless of the residents' subsequent specialization. By incorporating these techniques, educational programs can provide a structured and consistent approach to regional anesthesia, enhancing the quality of patient care and improving outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":73597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","volume":"4 1","pages":"54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11316303/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141914748","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Advanced statistical approaches for predicting pain after pediatric thoracotomy: a cross-sectional study using zero-inflated and Poisson models.","authors":"Alessandro Vittori, Marco Cascella, Piergiacomo Di Gennaro, Giuliano Marchetti, Elisa Francia, Ilaria Mascilini, Riccardo Tarquini, Massimo Antonio Innamorato, Emiliano Petrucci, Franco Marinangeli, Sergio Coluccia, Sergio Giuseppe Picardo","doi":"10.1186/s44158-024-00188-w","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s44158-024-00188-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thoracotomy is one of the surgical procedures most burdened by chronic post-operative pain. There is poor evidence regarding the possibility that even in pediatric patients, thoracotomy can be followed by post-operative pain. The primary objective of this analysis is to identify associations with home pain therapy, pain intensity, and possible protective factors acting on chronic pain in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù IRCCS. The study included pediatric patients undergoing thoracotomy. For statistical analyses, a logistic model and a zero-inflated strategy were implemented to explore associations and predict factors related to home-based analgesic therapy and pain intensity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Gender and age were identified as significant factors in the assignment of home therapy, with males having over seven times the risk compared to females (OR = 7.06, 95% CI = [2.11, 29.7]). At the last measurement, pain intensity was positively associated with age and the number of pain events during the week.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study highlights significant factors influencing post-thoracotomy pain management in pediatric patients. These findings underscore the importance of tailored pain management strategies that consider gender and age to improve post-operative care and outcomes in pediatric thoracotomy patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":73597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","volume":"4 1","pages":"53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11299347/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141894953","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Influence of aging on opioid dosing for perioperative pain management: a focus on pharmacokinetics.","authors":"Sebastiano Mercadante","doi":"10.1186/s44158-024-00182-2","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s44158-024-00182-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The older population continues to grow in all countries, and surgeons are encountering older patients more frequently. The management of postoperative pain in older patients can be a difficult task. Opioids are the mainstay of perioperative pain control. This paper assesses some pharmacokinetic age-related aspects and their relationship with the use of opioids in the perioperative period. Changes in body composition and organ function, and pharmacokinetics in older patients, as well as characteristics of opioids commonly used in the perioperative period are described. Specific problems, dose titration, and patient-controlled analgesia in the elderly are also reviewed. Opioids can be safety used in perioperative period, even in the elderly. The choice of drugs and doses can be individualized according to the surgery, opioid pharmacokinetics, comorbidities, and routes of administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":73597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","volume":"4 1","pages":"51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11292879/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141861860","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Correction: Anesthetic approach to pregnant patients with malaria: a narrative review of the literature.","authors":"Itay Zahavi, Meir Fons, Michal Meir, Mark Volevich, Emilia Guasch, Mark Nunnally, Sharon Einav","doi":"10.1186/s44158-024-00189-9","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s44158-024-00189-9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","volume":"4 1","pages":"52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11293122/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141876896","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Lung ultrasound among Expert operator'S: ScOring and iNter-rater reliability analysis (LESSON study) a secondary COWS study analysis from ITALUS group.","authors":"Enrico Boero, Luna Gargani, Annia Schreiber, Serena Rovida, Giampaolo Martinelli, Salvatore Maurizio Maggiore, Felice Urso, Anna Camporesi, Annarita Tullio, Fiorella Anna Lombardi, Gianmaria Cammarota, Daniele Guerino Biasucci, Elena Giovanna Bignami, Cristian Deana, Giovanni Volpicelli, Sergio Livigni, Luigi Vetrugno","doi":"10.1186/s44158-024-00187-x","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s44158-024-00187-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lung ultrasonography (LUS) is a non-invasive imaging method used to diagnose and monitor conditions such as pulmonary edema, pneumonia, and pneumothorax. It is precious where other imaging techniques like CT scan or chest X-rays are of limited access, especially in low- and middle-income countries with reduced resources. Furthermore, LUS reduces radiation exposure and its related blood cancer adverse events, which is particularly relevant in children and young subjects. The score obtained with LUS allows semi-quantification of regional loss of aeration, and it can provide a valuable and reliable assessment of the severity of most respiratory diseases. However, inter-observer reliability of the score has never been systematically assessed. This study aims to assess experienced LUS operators' agreement on a sample of video clips showing predefined findings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-five anonymized video clips comprehensively depicting the different values of LUS score were shown to renowned LUS experts blinded to patients' clinical data and the study's aims using an online form. Clips were acquired from five different ultrasound machines. Fleiss-Cohen weighted kappa was used to evaluate experts' agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a period of 3 months, 20 experienced operators completed the assessment. Most worked in the ICU (10), ED (6), HDU (2), cardiology ward (1), or obstetric/gynecology department (1). The proportional LUS score mean was 15.3 (SD 1.6). Inter-rater agreement varied: 6 clips had full agreement, 3 had 19 out of 20 raters agreeing, and 3 had 18 agreeing, while the remaining 13 had 17 or fewer people agreeing on the assigned score. Scores 0 and score 3 were more reproducible than scores 1 and 2. Fleiss' Kappa for overall answers was 0.87 (95% CI 0.815-0.931, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The inter-rater agreement between experienced LUS operators is very high, although not perfect. The strong agreement and the small variance enable us to say that a 20% tolerance around a measured value of a LUS score is a reliable estimate of the patient's true LUS score, resulting in reduced variability in score interpretation and greater confidence in its clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":73597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","volume":"4 1","pages":"50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11293153/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141861861","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Correction: Value-based preoperative assessment in a large academic hospital.","authors":"Maurizio Cecconi, Giulia Goretti, Andrea Pradella, Patrizia Meroni, Martina Pisarra, Guido Torzilli, Marco Montorsi, Antonino Spinelli, Alessandro Zerbi, Carlo Castoro, Paolo Casale, Efrem Civilini, Vittorio Quagliuolo, Marco Klinger, Giuseppe Spriano, Domenico Vitobello, Leonardo Maradei, Bernhard Reimers, Federico Piccioni, Maria Rosaria Martucci, Niccolò Stomeo, Elena Vanni, Marco Babbini, Roberta Monzani, Maria Rosaria Capogreco, Michele Lagioia, Massimiliano Greco","doi":"10.1186/s44158-024-00184-0","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s44158-024-00184-0","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","volume":"4 1","pages":"49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11290238/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141857310","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}