Different artificial neural networks for predicting burnout risk in Italian anesthesiologists.

Marco Cascella, Alessandro Simonini, Sergio Coluccia, Elena Giovanna Bignami, Gilberto Fiore, Emiliano Petrucci, Alessandro Vergallo, Giacomo Sollecchia, Franco Marinangeli, Roberto Pedone, Alessandro Vittori
{"title":"Different artificial neural networks for predicting burnout risk in Italian anesthesiologists.","authors":"Marco Cascella, Alessandro Simonini, Sergio Coluccia, Elena Giovanna Bignami, Gilberto Fiore, Emiliano Petrucci, Alessandro Vergallo, Giacomo Sollecchia, Franco Marinangeli, Roberto Pedone, Alessandro Vittori","doi":"10.1186/s44158-025-00255-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Burnout (BO) is a serious issue affecting professionals across various sectors, leading to adverse psychological and occupational consequences, even in anesthesiologists. Machine learning, particularly neural networks, can offer effective data-driven approaches to identifying BO risk more accurately. This study aims to develop and evaluate different artificial dense neural network (DNN)-based models to predict BO based on occupational, psychological, and behavioral factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A dataset (300 Italian anesthesiologists) comprising workplace stressors, psychological well-being indicators, and demographic variables was used to train DNN models. Model performance was measured using standard evaluation metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. Statistical tests were adopted to assess differences in prediction across the DNNs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The best neural architecture achieved a predictive accuracy of 0.68, with key contributors to BO including workload, emotional exhaustion, job dissatisfaction, and lack of work-life balance. Despite substantial differences among the six implemented algorithms, no significant variation in prediction performance was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Psychological distress scores are significantly higher in the high-risk BO group, suggesting greater anxiety, depression, and overall distress in this category. While challenges remain, continued advancements in artificial intelligence and data science promise more effective and personalized mental health care solutions.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":73597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","volume":"5 1","pages":"40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12220590/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-025-00255-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Burnout (BO) is a serious issue affecting professionals across various sectors, leading to adverse psychological and occupational consequences, even in anesthesiologists. Machine learning, particularly neural networks, can offer effective data-driven approaches to identifying BO risk more accurately. This study aims to develop and evaluate different artificial dense neural network (DNN)-based models to predict BO based on occupational, psychological, and behavioral factors.

Methods: A dataset (300 Italian anesthesiologists) comprising workplace stressors, psychological well-being indicators, and demographic variables was used to train DNN models. Model performance was measured using standard evaluation metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. Statistical tests were adopted to assess differences in prediction across the DNNs.

Results: The best neural architecture achieved a predictive accuracy of 0.68, with key contributors to BO including workload, emotional exhaustion, job dissatisfaction, and lack of work-life balance. Despite substantial differences among the six implemented algorithms, no significant variation in prediction performance was observed.

Conclusion: Psychological distress scores are significantly higher in the high-risk BO group, suggesting greater anxiety, depression, and overall distress in this category. While challenges remain, continued advancements in artificial intelligence and data science promise more effective and personalized mental health care solutions.

Trial registration: Not applicable.

不同人工神经网络预测意大利麻醉师职业倦怠风险。
背景:职业倦怠(BO)是影响各行各业专业人员的一个严重问题,导致不良的心理和职业后果,甚至在麻醉医师中也是如此。机器学习,特别是神经网络,可以提供有效的数据驱动方法来更准确地识别BO风险。本研究旨在开发和评估基于人工密集神经网络(DNN)的不同模型,以预测基于职业、心理和行为因素的BO。方法:使用包含工作压力源、心理健康指标和人口统计学变量的数据集(300名意大利麻醉师)来训练深度神经网络模型。模型性能使用标准评估指标进行测量,包括准确性、精密度、召回率和F1分数。采用统计检验来评估不同dnn的预测差异。结果:最佳神经结构的预测准确率为0.68,影响BO的主要因素包括工作量、情绪耗竭、工作不满和缺乏工作与生活的平衡。尽管六种实现的算法之间存在实质性差异,但预测性能没有显着变化。结论:BO高危组的心理困扰得分显著高于BO高危组,提示该高危组的焦虑、抑郁和整体困扰程度较高。尽管挑战依然存在,但人工智能和数据科学的持续进步有望带来更有效和个性化的心理健康护理解决方案。试验注册:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信