The role of the tidal volume challenge test in volume responsiveness assessment: a narrative review.

IF 3.1
Panagiota Griva, Christina Talliou, Eleftheria Soulioti, Orestis Milionis, Tatiana Sidiropoulou
{"title":"The role of the tidal volume challenge test in volume responsiveness assessment: a narrative review.","authors":"Panagiota Griva, Christina Talliou, Eleftheria Soulioti, Orestis Milionis, Tatiana Sidiropoulou","doi":"10.1186/s44158-025-00256-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The accurate prediction of volume responsiveness is fundamental to goal-directed fluid administration. Targeted fluid administration during surgery is critical to avoid hypervolemia or hypovolemia and their associated postoperative complications. Recently, lung-protective ventilation strategies with tidal volumes of less than 8 mL/kg of ideal body weight have been recommended as standard practice during surgeries. Nevertheless, these reduced tidal volumes diminish the reliability of dynamic indices, such as pulse pressure variation, for predicting volume responsiveness. To address this limitation, the tidal volume challenge has proven to be a reliable method. This challenge involves increasing the tidal volume from 6 to 8 mL/kg of ideal body weight and observing the impact on hemodynamic parameters. Multiple studies have validated the efficacy of this test in both surgical patients and critically ill patients in the intensive care unit. The tidal volume challenge effectively improves the accuracy of predicting fluid responsiveness by increasing both sensitivity and specificity. Established threshold values for changes in pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation offer precise clinical recommendations. However, additional cohorts and randomized controlled trials are imperative to validate the efficacy of the tidal volume challenge and advance fluid management strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":73597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","volume":"5 1","pages":"37"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12211439/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-025-00256-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The accurate prediction of volume responsiveness is fundamental to goal-directed fluid administration. Targeted fluid administration during surgery is critical to avoid hypervolemia or hypovolemia and their associated postoperative complications. Recently, lung-protective ventilation strategies with tidal volumes of less than 8 mL/kg of ideal body weight have been recommended as standard practice during surgeries. Nevertheless, these reduced tidal volumes diminish the reliability of dynamic indices, such as pulse pressure variation, for predicting volume responsiveness. To address this limitation, the tidal volume challenge has proven to be a reliable method. This challenge involves increasing the tidal volume from 6 to 8 mL/kg of ideal body weight and observing the impact on hemodynamic parameters. Multiple studies have validated the efficacy of this test in both surgical patients and critically ill patients in the intensive care unit. The tidal volume challenge effectively improves the accuracy of predicting fluid responsiveness by increasing both sensitivity and specificity. Established threshold values for changes in pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation offer precise clinical recommendations. However, additional cohorts and randomized controlled trials are imperative to validate the efficacy of the tidal volume challenge and advance fluid management strategies.

潮汐体积挑战测试在体积反应性评估中的作用:叙述性回顾。
体积反应性的准确预测是目标导向的流体管理的基础。手术中有针对性的输液对于避免高血容量或低血容量及其相关的术后并发症至关重要。最近,潮气量小于8ml /kg理想体重的肺保护性通气策略被推荐为手术期间的标准做法。然而,这些减少的潮汐量降低了动态指标的可靠性,如脉冲压力变化,用于预测体积响应性。为了解决这一限制,潮汐量挑战已被证明是一种可靠的方法。这项挑战包括将潮气量从6毫升/公斤理想体重增加到8毫升/公斤,并观察对血流动力学参数的影响。多项研究证实了该测试在外科患者和重症监护病房危重患者中的有效性。潮汐容量挑战通过提高灵敏度和特异性,有效地提高了预测流体响应性的准确性。建立的脉压变化和脑卒中容量变化的阈值提供了精确的临床建议。然而,为了验证潮汐量挑战的有效性和推进流体管理策略,还需要更多的队列和随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信