General anesthesia for cesarean delivery: Israeli national survey.

IF 3.1
Daniel Shatalin, Yair Binyamin, Jacob Weinstein, Jana Pirogov, Carolyn F Weiniger, Sharon Orbach-Zinger, Alexander Ioscovich
{"title":"General anesthesia for cesarean delivery: Israeli national survey.","authors":"Daniel Shatalin, Yair Binyamin, Jacob Weinstein, Jana Pirogov, Carolyn F Weiniger, Sharon Orbach-Zinger, Alexander Ioscovich","doi":"10.1186/s44158-025-00257-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cesarean delivery is one of the most common surgeries performed worldwide. Given the unavoidable use of general anesthesia in some situations, and the potential for complications, we performed a multicenter national survey in order to investigate aspects related to the use of general anesthesia for cesarean delivery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter national survey questionnaire study was performed from October 2020 to March 2021. After Institutional Review Board waiver, we surveyed 25 eligible medical centers with an active obstetric anesthesia unit. The survey covered issues related to general anesthesia: preoperative management, personnel, induction, maintenance and emergence phases of anesthesia, intraoperative and postoperative pain management, protocol use, availability of difficult airway algorithm, and complications that are related to cesarean delivery under general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 113 participants among the 25 medical centers participated in the study. Routine pharmacological aspiration prophylaxis use was reported by 100/113 (88.5%). Administration of opiates during induction before fetal delivery was in 16.8%. We found only 27/113 (23.9%) of respondents ventilate their patients during RSI. Routine use of depth of anesthesia monitoring was reported by 21/113 (18.6%) respondents. Routine postoperative intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) use with morphine was reported by 6/113 (5.3%) respondents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this national survey, we emphasize the importance of the presence of highly qualified anesthesiologic personnel during the surgery, benefit from the use of short-acting opiates during induction, availability of videolaryngoscope, ventilation of the patient during RSI, and availability of institutional difficult airway protocols. We observe underuse of intraoperative anesthesia-depth monitoring and poor postoperative pain control.</p>","PeriodicalId":73597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","volume":"5 1","pages":"41"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12217191/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-025-00257-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cesarean delivery is one of the most common surgeries performed worldwide. Given the unavoidable use of general anesthesia in some situations, and the potential for complications, we performed a multicenter national survey in order to investigate aspects related to the use of general anesthesia for cesarean delivery.

Methods: This multicenter national survey questionnaire study was performed from October 2020 to March 2021. After Institutional Review Board waiver, we surveyed 25 eligible medical centers with an active obstetric anesthesia unit. The survey covered issues related to general anesthesia: preoperative management, personnel, induction, maintenance and emergence phases of anesthesia, intraoperative and postoperative pain management, protocol use, availability of difficult airway algorithm, and complications that are related to cesarean delivery under general anesthesia.

Results: A total of 113 participants among the 25 medical centers participated in the study. Routine pharmacological aspiration prophylaxis use was reported by 100/113 (88.5%). Administration of opiates during induction before fetal delivery was in 16.8%. We found only 27/113 (23.9%) of respondents ventilate their patients during RSI. Routine use of depth of anesthesia monitoring was reported by 21/113 (18.6%) respondents. Routine postoperative intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) use with morphine was reported by 6/113 (5.3%) respondents.

Conclusions: In this national survey, we emphasize the importance of the presence of highly qualified anesthesiologic personnel during the surgery, benefit from the use of short-acting opiates during induction, availability of videolaryngoscope, ventilation of the patient during RSI, and availability of institutional difficult airway protocols. We observe underuse of intraoperative anesthesia-depth monitoring and poor postoperative pain control.

剖宫产的全身麻醉:以色列全国调查。
背景:剖宫产是世界范围内最常见的手术之一。考虑到全身麻醉在某些情况下不可避免的使用,以及潜在的并发症,我们进行了一项多中心的全国调查,以调查与剖宫产使用全身麻醉有关的方面。方法:于2020年10月至2021年3月进行多中心全国调查问卷研究。在机构审查委员会豁免后,我们调查了25个有产科麻醉单位的合格医疗中心。该调查涵盖了与全身麻醉相关的问题:术前管理、人员、麻醉诱导、维持和出现阶段、术中和术后疼痛管理、方案使用、难气道算法的可用性以及全身麻醉下剖宫产相关的并发症。结果:在25个医疗中心中,共有113名参与者参与了研究。有100/113(88.5%)报告了常规药物误吸预防用药。在胎儿分娩前的诱导中使用阿片类药物的占16.8%。我们发现只有27/113(23.9%)的受访者在RSI期间给患者通气。21/113(18.6%)的受访者报告常规使用麻醉深度监测。6/113(5.3%)的应答者报告术后常规静脉病人自控镇痛(IV-PCA)使用吗啡。结论:在这项全国调查中,我们强调了手术中高素质麻醉人员的重要性,在诱导过程中使用短效阿片类药物,可获得的视频喉镜,RSI期间患者的通气,以及机构困难气道方案的可获得性。我们观察到术中麻醉深度监测使用不足和术后疼痛控制不良。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信