Journal of Posthuman Studies-Philosophy Technology Media最新文献_第2页

Virtual Immortality—God, Evolution, and the Singularity in Post- and Transhumanism. by Oliver Krüger 虚拟永生——后人类主义和超人类主义中的上帝、进化和奇点。奥利弗·克拉格尔著

IF 0.4

Journal of Posthuman Studies-Philosophy Technology Media Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI: 10.5325/jpoststud.6.1.0089

Bastiaan Van Rijn, Sarah Perez

引用次数: 0

South Asian Transhumanist Posthuman Ontologies: The Relationship between Vehicle Art and Mind Uploading in Uzma Aslam Khan’s Trespassing 南亚超人类主义后人类本体:乌兹玛·阿斯拉姆·汗《擅闯》中交通工具艺术与心灵上传的关系

IF 0.4

Journal of Posthuman Studies-Philosophy Technology Media Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI: 10.5325/jpoststud.6.1.0033

Qurratulaen Liaqat

引用次数: 0

Art on the Moon, Poetry for Homo spaciens: An Interview with Eduardo Kac about His Artwork Adsum 月球上的艺术，太空人的诗歌:采访爱德华多·卡茨关于他的艺术作品《Adsum》

IF 0.4

Journal of Posthuman Studies-Philosophy Technology Media Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI: 10.5325/jpoststud.6.1.0019

S. Osthoff

引用次数: 0

Ontology and Closeness in Human–Nature Relationships: Beyond Dualisms, Materialism and Posthumanism, by Neil H. Kessler 人与自然关系的本体论与亲近:超越二元论、唯物主义和后人文主义，作者:尼尔·h·凯斯勒

IF 0.4

Journal of Posthuman Studies-Philosophy Technology Media Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI: 10.5325/jpoststud.6.1.0094

G. Meyer

引用次数: 0

Space Art: My Trajectory 太空艺术:我的轨迹

IF 0.4

Journal of Posthuman Studies-Philosophy Technology Media Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI: 10.5325/jpoststud.6.1.0004

E. Kac

引用次数: 0

Adsum Chronology 2019–2022

IF 0.4

Journal of Posthuman Studies-Philosophy Technology Media Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI: 10.5325/jpoststud.6.1.0026

Simone Osthoff, Eduardo Kac

引用次数: 0

Evolution of Enactive Transhuman Beings: Moderate Transhumanism in Conservation of Adaptation 主动超人类的进化:适应性保护中的适度超人类主义

IF 0.4

Journal of Posthuman Studies-Philosophy Technology Media Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI: 10.5325/jpoststud.5.2.0109

Stefan Günthner

{"title":"Evolution of Enactive Transhuman Beings: Moderate Transhumanism in Conservation of Adaptation","authors":"Stefan Günthner","doi":"10.5325/jpoststud.5.2.0109","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/jpoststud.5.2.0109","url":null,"abstract":"This article is intended to offer constructive criticism of the transhumanist imperative of advancing the creation of living beings beyond the human. For this purpose, the conditions of possibility for the emergence and long-term survival of transhuman beings will be identified and examined, particularly within the framework of an enactive understanding of evolution according to Francisco Varela, Evan Thompson, and others. Transhuman beings, that is, technically corrected and upgraded entities, have their origin in human individuals whose essential characteristics I consider to be (1) their participation in life and their performance of life and (2) their sense-making cognitive activity—both describable by the autopoietic idea of Humberto Maturana and Francisco Varela. I demonstrate that transhuman beings, which are assumed to share these features with humans and which I therefore describe by the term enactive, can only develop and stay alive if mutual adaptation between them and their environment is maintained. To achieve adaptation, enactive transhuman beings must exhibit the ability to adapt on their own—making adaptedness and adaptability conditions of possibility for the emergence and long-term survival of enactive transhuman beings. From this perspective, optimizing and therapeutic interventions into so-called human nature, which has always possessed a technical–cultural side, are an expression of human adaptability and enable new adaptive equilibria between transhuman being and environment on a phylogenetic level. Therefore, I advocate a moderate transhumanism that seeks to preserve this mutual adaptedness while expanding the (trans)human capacity for adaptation.","PeriodicalId":55935,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Posthuman Studies-Philosophy Technology Media","volume":"148 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77343188","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Nemesis in Mordor: The Possibility of Posthuman Savagery 魔多的复仇女神:后人类野蛮的可能性

IF 0.4

Journal of Posthuman Studies-Philosophy Technology Media Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI: 10.5325/jpoststud.5.2.0169

W. Bainbridge

{"title":"Nemesis in Mordor: The Possibility of Posthuman Savagery","authors":"W. Bainbridge","doi":"10.5325/jpoststud.5.2.0169","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/jpoststud.5.2.0169","url":null,"abstract":"Innovative computer games can sometimes serve as valid simulations of real sociocultural processes, exploring hypotheses about the possible impact of future technology on civilization. In February 2021, Warner Brothers was granted a patent for an artificial social intelligence system that it first used in Shadow of Mordor, a very popular computer game based on the legendarium of J.R.R. Tolkien, but reversing his humanistic and precautionary values. The main theme of Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings was development of genuine friendship in a crusade to destroy a technology that gave its user superhuman powers at the cost of replacing sympathy with total selfishness. Shadow of Mordor and its successor Shadow of War promoted sadism and enslavement as tools for transcending human limitations, implicitly slandering transhumanism. This article surveys this troubling dynamic in four parts: (1) a conceptual introduction drawing upon a diverse literature about the human dimensions of current technological progress, (2) an overview of recent developments in the genre of Tolkien computer games, (3) a close examination of how the Nemesis multiagent system was designed, and (4) an initial assessment of public reactions to the Shadows expressed through videos and text comments on YouTube.","PeriodicalId":55935,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Posthuman Studies-Philosophy Technology Media","volume":"124 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74760382","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Encyclical Laudato Si’ and the Overcoming of Humanism 《赞美祢》通谕与人文主义的克服

IF 0.4

Journal of Posthuman Studies-Philosophy Technology Media Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI: 10.5325/jpoststud.5.2.0190

F. Damour

{"title":"The Encyclical Laudato Si’ and the Overcoming of Humanism","authors":"F. Damour","doi":"10.5325/jpoststud.5.2.0190","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/jpoststud.5.2.0190","url":null,"abstract":"In June 2015, Pope Francis published Laudato Si’, an encyclical that, in many ways, constitutes a split. For the first time, although the magisterium of the Catholic church has, since the time of John Paul II, repeatedly expressed its views on the topic, an encyclical approached the theme of ecology and climate crisis, in the tradition of Catholic social doctrine. The break is also within ecological thought, into which Pope Francis invites himself, seeking to open another path between anthropocentrism, biocentrism, ecocentrism, and so on. The worldwide echo of its reception testifies to the novelty of the text, and also demonstrates the power of the pontifical voice in the collective imagination. In his encyclical, Francis conducts a powerful denunciation of a “techno- scientific paradigm” and its anthropocentric and Western-centric perspective. Can the pontifical voice be added to the posthumanist movement, whose horizon is inseparable from the technological changes and the environmental question? Does his criticism concern only anthropocentrism or the idea of centrality? Reading Laudato Si’ from the perspective of posthumanism debates is a way moving these debates forward.","PeriodicalId":55935,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Posthuman Studies-Philosophy Technology Media","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87094501","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Review 审查

IF 0.4

Journal of Posthuman Studies-Philosophy Technology Media Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI: 10.5325/jpoststud.5.2.0221

Natasha Beranek

引用次数: 0