{"title":"《赞美祢》通谕与人文主义的克服","authors":"F. Damour","doi":"10.5325/jpoststud.5.2.0190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In June 2015, Pope Francis published Laudato Si’, an encyclical that, in many ways, constitutes a split. For the first time, although the magisterium of the Catholic church has, since the time of John Paul II, repeatedly expressed its views on the topic, an encyclical approached the theme of ecology and climate crisis, in the tradition of Catholic social doctrine. The break is also within ecological thought, into which Pope Francis invites himself, seeking to open another path between anthropocentrism, biocentrism, ecocentrism, and so on. The worldwide echo of its reception testifies to the novelty of the text, and also demonstrates the power of the pontifical voice in the collective imagination. In his encyclical, Francis conducts a powerful denunciation of a “techno- scientific paradigm” and its anthropocentric and Western-centric perspective. Can the pontifical voice be added to the posthumanist movement, whose horizon is inseparable from the technological changes and the environmental question? Does his criticism concern only anthropocentrism or the idea of centrality? Reading Laudato Si’ from the perspective of posthumanism debates is a way moving these debates forward.","PeriodicalId":55935,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Posthuman Studies-Philosophy Technology Media","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Encyclical Laudato Si’ and the Overcoming of Humanism\",\"authors\":\"F. Damour\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/jpoststud.5.2.0190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In June 2015, Pope Francis published Laudato Si’, an encyclical that, in many ways, constitutes a split. For the first time, although the magisterium of the Catholic church has, since the time of John Paul II, repeatedly expressed its views on the topic, an encyclical approached the theme of ecology and climate crisis, in the tradition of Catholic social doctrine. The break is also within ecological thought, into which Pope Francis invites himself, seeking to open another path between anthropocentrism, biocentrism, ecocentrism, and so on. The worldwide echo of its reception testifies to the novelty of the text, and also demonstrates the power of the pontifical voice in the collective imagination. In his encyclical, Francis conducts a powerful denunciation of a “techno- scientific paradigm” and its anthropocentric and Western-centric perspective. Can the pontifical voice be added to the posthumanist movement, whose horizon is inseparable from the technological changes and the environmental question? Does his criticism concern only anthropocentrism or the idea of centrality? Reading Laudato Si’ from the perspective of posthumanism debates is a way moving these debates forward.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Posthuman Studies-Philosophy Technology Media\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Posthuman Studies-Philosophy Technology Media\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/jpoststud.5.2.0190\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Posthuman Studies-Philosophy Technology Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/jpoststud.5.2.0190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
2015年6月,教皇方济各(Pope Francis)发表了《愿祢受赞颂》(Laudato Si)通谕,在很多方面构成了分裂。自约翰·保罗二世(John Paul II)时代以来,天主教教会的训导机构就这一主题多次表达了自己的观点,但这是天主教社会教义传统中第一次有一份通谕触及生态和气候危机的主题。这种分裂也出现在生态思想中,弗朗西斯教皇邀请自己进入生态思想,试图在人类中心主义、生物中心主义、生态中心主义等之间开辟另一条道路。它的接受在世界范围内的回响证明了文本的新颖性,也表明了在集体想象中教皇的声音的力量。在他的通谕中,方济各对“科技范式”及其以人类为中心和以西方为中心的观点进行了有力的谴责。教皇的声音是否可以加入到与技术变革和环境问题密不可分的后人类主义运动中?他的批判只关注人类中心主义还是中心思想?从后人文主义辩论的角度阅读《赞美你》是推动这些辩论向前发展的一种方式。
The Encyclical Laudato Si’ and the Overcoming of Humanism
In June 2015, Pope Francis published Laudato Si’, an encyclical that, in many ways, constitutes a split. For the first time, although the magisterium of the Catholic church has, since the time of John Paul II, repeatedly expressed its views on the topic, an encyclical approached the theme of ecology and climate crisis, in the tradition of Catholic social doctrine. The break is also within ecological thought, into which Pope Francis invites himself, seeking to open another path between anthropocentrism, biocentrism, ecocentrism, and so on. The worldwide echo of its reception testifies to the novelty of the text, and also demonstrates the power of the pontifical voice in the collective imagination. In his encyclical, Francis conducts a powerful denunciation of a “techno- scientific paradigm” and its anthropocentric and Western-centric perspective. Can the pontifical voice be added to the posthumanist movement, whose horizon is inseparable from the technological changes and the environmental question? Does his criticism concern only anthropocentrism or the idea of centrality? Reading Laudato Si’ from the perspective of posthumanism debates is a way moving these debates forward.