Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology最新文献

{"title":"Association Between P-Wave Duration, Dispersion, and Interatrial Block and Atrial High-Rate Episodes in CIED Patients.","authors":"Phuuwadith Wattanachayakul, Adivitch Sripusanapan, Narathorn Kulthamrongsri, Vitchapong Prasitsumrit, Napat Suriyathumrongkul, Abiodun Idowu, Jakrin Kewcharoen, Sumeet Mainigi","doi":"10.1111/pace.15084","DOIUrl":"10.1111/pace.15084","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Atrial high-rate episodes (AHRE) have been linked to increased thromboembolic risk and all-cause mortality in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Various predictors of AHRE development have been identified, emphasizing the need for close monitoring and the potential transition to clinical atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the predictive value of P wave characteristics on AHRE development remains conflicting. This meta-analysis aims to summarize existing data to investigate this association.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We examined studies from MEDLINE and EMBASE databases up to May 2024 to investigate the association of baseline P-wave duration (PWD), P-wave dispersion (PWDIS), and interatrial block (IAB) with the risk of developing AHRE. We extracted the mean and standard deviations of PWD and PWDIS to calculate the pooled mean difference (MD). Risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the association between IAB and AHRE risk, using the generic inverse variance method for combination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis included nine studies. Patients with AHRE had longer PWD and PWDIS compared to those without AHRE, with a pooled MD for PWD of 9.17 ms (95% CI: 4.74-13.60; I² = 47%, p < 0.001) and a pooled MD for PWDIS of 20.56 ms (95% CI: 11.57-29.56; I² = 57%, p < 0.001). Additionally, patients with IAB had a higher risk of developing AHRE, with a pooled RR of 3.33 (95% CI: 2.53-4.38; I² = 0%, p < 0.001), compared to those without IAB.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our meta-analysis found that patients with AHRE had higher PWD and PWDIS than those without AHRE. Additionally, IAB was associated with a higher risk of developing AHRE. These findings emphasize the importance of close monitoring and risk stratification, particularly for patients with P wave abnormalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":54653,"journal":{"name":"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"1548-1555"},"PeriodicalIF":16.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142378618","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Intermittent Loss of Capture: A Forgotten Phenomenon at Play.","authors":"Anindya Ghosh, Chenni S Sriram, Ulhas M Pandurangi","doi":"10.1111/pace.15085","DOIUrl":"10.1111/pace.15085","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54653,"journal":{"name":"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"1478-1480"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142378619","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Cost-Effectiveness Ratio Analysis of LBBaP Versus BVP in Heart Failure Patients With LBBB.","authors":"Shengchan Wang, Siyuan Xue, Zhixin Jiang, Xiaofeng Hou, Fengwei Zou, Wen Yang, Xiujuan Zhou, Shigeng Zhang, Jiangang Zou, Qijun Shan","doi":"10.1111/pace.15077","DOIUrl":"10.1111/pace.15077","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For the initial treatment strategy for patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) indications, whether to choose left bundle branch area pacing (LBBaP) or biventricular pacing (BVP) remains controversial. We aimed to investigate the cost-effectiveness ratio (CER) of LBBaP and BVP in heart failure (HF) patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study included HF patients with LBBB who underwent successful LBBaP or BVP. The primary outcomes were echocardiographic response (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] increase ≥5%), LVEF improvement, hospitalization costs, and CER (CER = cost/echocardiographic response rate). Secondary outcomes included other echocardiographic parameters, New York Heart Association (NYHA), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), pacemaker parameters, complications, ventricular arrhythmia (VA) events, HF hospitalization (HFH), and all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 130 patients (85 LBBaP and 45 BVP) were included (65.6 ± 10.0 years, 70.77% men). The median follow-up period was 16(12,30), months. Compared with BVP, the LBBaP group showed a greater increase in LVEF (20.2% ± 11.8% vs. 10.5% ± 13.9%; p < 0.001), higher echocardiographic response rate (86.1% vs. 57.8%; p < 0.001), and lower hospitalization costs [$9707.7 (7751.2, 18,088.5) vs. $20,046.1 (18,840.1, 22,447.3); p < 0.0001]. The CER was 112.7 and 346.8 in LBBaP and BVP, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER = △cost/△echocardiographic response rate) was $-365.3/per 1% increase in effectiveness. LBBaP improved cardiac function more significantly than BVP. There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LBBaP-CRT is more cost-effective than BVP, offering greater LVEF improvement, higher echocardiographic response rates, lower hospitalization costs, and more significantly improved cardiac function. These findings need large randomized clinical trials for further confirmation.</p>","PeriodicalId":54653,"journal":{"name":"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"1539-1547"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142332534","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Gradual development of left bundle branch current of injury during left bundle branch pacing lead implantation.","authors":"Yoji Iida, Junzo Inamura","doi":"10.1111/pace.14996","DOIUrl":"10.1111/pace.14996","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A larger left bundle branch (LBB) potential or LBB current of injury (COI) indicates a low LBB capture threshold in LBB pacing. During LBB pacing in an 85-year-old woman, achieving a low LBB capture threshold did not initially present with a larger LBB potential or LBB COI, but rather with a new initial negative deflection in a ventricular electrogram. LBB COI gradually developed over 7 min thereafter, which suggested that the lead tip had reached the left ventricular subendocardium. Therefore, this negative deflection may be the first sign to avoid further lead rotation.</p>","PeriodicalId":54653,"journal":{"name":"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"1387-1390"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140871296","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A case of repeated rate-dependent pacing threshold elevation after leadless pacemaker implantation.","authors":"Tomotaka Yoshiyama, Kenichi Nakatsuji, Tomoya Yanagishita, Shota Tamura, Daiju Fukuda","doi":"10.1111/pace.14999","DOIUrl":"10.1111/pace.14999","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The pacing threshold is important for leadless pacemakers, as the pacing output has a significant impact on battery longevity. Acute pacing rate-dependent threshold increases have also been reported with leadless pacemakers. In the present case, we experienced a case in which the threshold, which had been raised in the acute phase, once showed a tendency to improve, but then worsened again. And, as in previous reports, thresholds improved completely in the chronic phase. Repeated retrieval and reimplantation of leadless pacemakers increases the likelihood of fatal complications, so being aware of such phenomenon may prevent unnecessary procedure and complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":54653,"journal":{"name":"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"1391-1393"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140960956","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Role of impedance drop and lesion size index (LSI) to guide catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.","authors":"Milena Leo, Abhirup Banerjee, Andre Briosa E Gala, Michael Pope, Michala Pedersen, Kim Rajappan, Matthew Ginks, Yaver Bashir, Ross J Hunter, Tim Betts","doi":"10.1111/pace.15046","DOIUrl":"10.1111/pace.15046","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>When using lesion size index (LSI) to guide catheter ablation, it is unclear what combination of power, contact force and time would be preferable to use and what LSI target value to aim for. This study aimed at identifying desirable ablation settings and LSI targets by using tissue impedance drop as indicator of lesion formation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients, undergoing their first left atrial (LA) catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation, with radiofrequency energy (RF) powers of 20, 30 and 40 W were enrolled. Tissue impedance, contact force (CF), Force Time Integral (FTI) and LSI values were continuously recorded during ablation and sampled at 100 Hz. Mean CF and Contact Force Variability (CFV) were calculated for every lesion. The effect of RF power, ablation time, CF and CFV on impedance drop and LSI were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3258 lesions were included in the analysis. For any target LSI value, use of higher RF powers translated into progressively higher impedance drops. The impact of lower CF and higher CFV on impedance drop was more relevant when using lower powers. Target LSI values corresponding to maximum impedance drop were identified depending on RF power, mean CF and CFV used.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Even in the context of an LSI-guided ablation strategy, use of lower or higher powers might lead to different lesion sizes. Different LSI targets might be needed depending on the combination of RF power, CF and CFV used for ablation. Incorporating indicators of catheter stability, like CFV, in the LSI formula could improve the predictive value of LSI for lesion size. Studies with clinical outcomes are required to confirm the clinical relevance of these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":54653,"journal":{"name":"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"1404-1411"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141898929","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Decision-making regarding subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator as primary prevention in patients with low ejection fraction.","authors":"Ho-Ting Ngan, Ka-Ying Li, Shing-Lung Wong, Hung-Fat Tse","doi":"10.1111/pace.15065","DOIUrl":"10.1111/pace.15065","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Conventional transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (TV-ICD) is the standard device used for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Nonetheless its use is associated with lead-related complications including infection and malfunction. A subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) offers an alternative option without the need for a transvenous lead but has limitations. The decision to implant a TV-ICD or S-ICD in patients with impaired LVEF for primary prevention of SCD is controversial. Several randomised controlled trials and large observational studies have confirmed similar safety and efficacy of S-ICDs and TV-ICDs in such population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature review was conducted to compare the outcomes of subcutaneous (S-ICD) versus transvenous (TV-ICD) implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane were searched for relevant peer-reviewed articles. Studies were selected based on relevance and quality. Key outcomes like complication rates, efficacy, and patient survival were summarized in a comparative table.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Different factors that influence the choice between an TV-ICD and S-ICD for primary prevention of SCD in patients with LVEF are highlighted to guide selection of the appropriate device in different patient populations. Moreover, future perspective on the combination of SICD with leadless pacemaker, and the latest development of the extravascular implantable cardioverter defibrillator are also discussed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>S-ICD offers a safe and efficacious option to primary prevention in reduced ejection fraction. Future development including incorporation of leadless pacemaker will add to the arsenal of choice to protect patients from sudden cardiac death.</p>","PeriodicalId":54653,"journal":{"name":"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"1285-1292"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142005944","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Intracardiac echocardiography-guided catheter ablation of highly symptomatic accelerated idioventricular rhythm originating from the right ventricular apical diverticulum.","authors":"Sen Yang, Sui Li, Shaolong Li, Qiwei Liao, Deyong Long, Mengmeng Li, Chengde He","doi":"10.1111/pace.14966","DOIUrl":"10.1111/pace.14966","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ventricular diverticula are saccule-like structures formed by the protrusion of the ventricular myocardium from the endocardial surface towards the free wall. Most diverticula are muscular structures, and patients usually have no obvious clinical symptoms. However, diverticula may contribute to arrhythmogenesis due to localized myocardial structural disturbances. Right ventricular apical diverticulum (RVAD) is very rare, and we report a case of highly symptomatic accelerated idioventricular rhythm (AIVR) originating from the RVAD that underwent intracardiac echocardiography (ICE)-guided catheter ablation with no recurrence during follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":54653,"journal":{"name":"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"1366-1369"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140159534","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices to predict acute clinical decompensation events.","authors":"Mariana Tinoco, Margarida Castro, Marta Mota, Filipa Almeida, Silvia Ribeiro, Bebiana Faria, Lucy Calvo, Filipa Cardoso, Victor Sanfins, António Lourenço","doi":"10.1111/pace.15060","DOIUrl":"10.1111/pace.15060","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heart failure (HF) patients are at constant risk of decompensation, and urgent hospital admissions can be life-threatening events. Monitoring biological variables has been proved to be an important mechanism to anticipate decompensations. TriageHF is a validated diagnostic algorithm tool available on Medtronic® cardiac implantable electronic devices that combines physiological data to stratify a patient's risk of HF hospitalization in the following 30 days in low, medium or high risk. We aimed to evaluate the utility of TriageHF algorithm to predict the occurrence of acute clinical decompensation events (ACDE), including HF and non-HF cardiovascular events, within a 30-day period in a population of HF patients with reduced ejection fraction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed the transmissions received by the Medtronic® Carelink™ Network between August 2022 and July 2023. The heart failure risk status (HFRS) and the device parameters contributing to that risk, from the previous 30 days, were collected, along with the occurrence of ACDEs within 30 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We retrospectively assessed 207 transmissions from the 64 patients included in the study. Among the 93 medium HFRS transmissions, 16 (17.2%) resulted in ACDEs. For the 21 high HFRS transmissions, 10 (47.6%) resulted in ACDEs. Considering the ACDEs, 60.7% were preceded by an alarm-initiated transmission. Except for heart rate variability, each diagnostic parameter demonstrated effectiveness in stratifying risk for ACDEs. Optivol® and the Combined Heart Rhythm showed independent association with ACDEs (p < .001). Patients with medium and high HFRS were, respectively, 8.6 and 29.1 times more likely to experience an ACDE in the next 30 days than low risk patients. A medium-high HFRS conferred a sensitivity of 92.9% and a NPV of 97.8% for an ACDE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TriageHF is a useful method for predicting ACDEs and has the potential to trigger medical actions to prevent hospitalizations.</p>","PeriodicalId":54653,"journal":{"name":"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"1300-1307"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142005948","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comparison of clinical and echocardiographic outcomes between left bundle branch area pacing and right ventricular pacing in older patients.","authors":"Qian Wang, Chen He, Xiaohan Fan, Haojie Zhu, Xiaofei Li, Zhimin Liu, Yan Yao","doi":"10.1111/pace.15056","DOIUrl":"10.1111/pace.15056","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is safe and effective, but studies in older patients are lacking. This study compared the clinical and echocardiographic outcomes of LBBAP and right ventricular pacing (RVP) in patients aged ≥75 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational study included older patients with symptomatic bradycardia who underwent LBBAP or RVP between 2019 and 2022. Clinical data, including pacing and electrophysiological characteristics, echocardiographic measurements, and device-related complications were collected. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, and upgrade to biventricular pacing. Secondary outcomes included changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 267 included patients, 110 underwent LBBAP and 157 underwent RVP. LBBAP was successful in 109 patients (success rate: 99.1%), with one patient eventually undergoing RVP. The pacing parameters of LBBAP were similar to those of RVP, except for a significantly narrower paced QRS duration (112.8 ± 11.6 vs. 138.3 ± 23.9 ms, p < .001). Ventricular lead implanting procedural duration was longer for LBBAP than RVP (14.0 vs. 6.0 min, p < .001), as was the fluoroscopy time (4.0 vs. 2.0 min, p < .001). During a mean follow-up period of 31.0 ± 16.8 months, the primary outcome incidence was significantly lower following LBBAP than RVP (15.1% vs. 21.1%; hazard ratio, 0.471; 95% confidence interval, 0.215-1.032; p = .036) in 149 patients (55.8%) with ventricular pacing burden > 20%. RVP reduced LVEF from 62.7 ± 4.1% at baseline to 59.8 ± 7.8% at the final follow-up (p = .001), whereas LBBAP preserved LVEF (61.4 ± 6.3% vs. 60.1 ± 7.4%, p = .429).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LBBAP demonstrated improved clinical outcomes compared with RVP and maintained LVEF in older patients with high ventricular pacing burdens.</p>","PeriodicalId":54653,"journal":{"name":"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"1346-1357"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142114838","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}