心脏起搏器诱发心肌病的深间隔起搏。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1111/pace.15135
Jordi Mercé, Ignasi Anguera, Marcos Rodríguez, Valentina Faga, Julián Rodríguez, Paolo D Dallaglio, Rodolfo San Antonio, Andrea Di Marco
{"title":"心脏起搏器诱发心肌病的深间隔起搏。","authors":"Jordi Mercé, Ignasi Anguera, Marcos Rodríguez, Valentina Faga, Julián Rodríguez, Paolo D Dallaglio, Rodolfo San Antonio, Andrea Di Marco","doi":"10.1111/pace.15135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Right ventricular (RV) pacing can impair left ventricular function and cause heart failure, known as pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM). Upgrade to cardiac resynchronization (CRT) is its usual treatment; recently left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has emerged as a potential alternative. Deep septal pacing (DSP), a simplified alternative to LBBAP, is still able to achieve narrower paced QRS than during conventional RV pacing. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of DSP in a cohort of patients with PICM.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Consecutive patients diagnosed with PICM were included. The aim was to upgrade patients to DSP. The procedure was considered successful if a paced QRS duration ≤140 ms was obtained, in the absence of a terminal R wave in V1. Twelve patients were included. The mean baseline LVEF was 33% (SD 4%), and the mean percentage of RV pacing was 99% (SD 1%). All patients had symptomatic heart failure. The mean paced QRS duration was 172 ms (SD 14 ms) with RV pacing, and 130 ms (SD 7 ms) with DSP (mean difference 42 ms, p < 0.001). At 6 months, the mean LVEF after the upgrade was 46% (SD 9%), significantly superior to LVEF with RV pacing (p = 0.001), a mean improvement of 13% (SD 10%). All patients except one experienced an improvement in LVEF of at least 5%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data suggest that DSP may be an effective and simpler alternative to biventricular or LBBAP in patients with PICM. Narrower paced QRS complexes can be achieved, which may lead to an improvement in left ventricular function.</p>","PeriodicalId":54653,"journal":{"name":"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"145-148"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep Septal Pacing for Pacemaker-Induced Cardiomyopathy.\",\"authors\":\"Jordi Mercé, Ignasi Anguera, Marcos Rodríguez, Valentina Faga, Julián Rodríguez, Paolo D Dallaglio, Rodolfo San Antonio, Andrea Di Marco\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/pace.15135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Right ventricular (RV) pacing can impair left ventricular function and cause heart failure, known as pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM). Upgrade to cardiac resynchronization (CRT) is its usual treatment; recently left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has emerged as a potential alternative. Deep septal pacing (DSP), a simplified alternative to LBBAP, is still able to achieve narrower paced QRS than during conventional RV pacing. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of DSP in a cohort of patients with PICM.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Consecutive patients diagnosed with PICM were included. The aim was to upgrade patients to DSP. The procedure was considered successful if a paced QRS duration ≤140 ms was obtained, in the absence of a terminal R wave in V1. Twelve patients were included. The mean baseline LVEF was 33% (SD 4%), and the mean percentage of RV pacing was 99% (SD 1%). All patients had symptomatic heart failure. The mean paced QRS duration was 172 ms (SD 14 ms) with RV pacing, and 130 ms (SD 7 ms) with DSP (mean difference 42 ms, p < 0.001). At 6 months, the mean LVEF after the upgrade was 46% (SD 9%), significantly superior to LVEF with RV pacing (p = 0.001), a mean improvement of 13% (SD 10%). All patients except one experienced an improvement in LVEF of at least 5%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data suggest that DSP may be an effective and simpler alternative to biventricular or LBBAP in patients with PICM. Narrower paced QRS complexes can be achieved, which may lead to an improvement in left ventricular function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"145-148\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.15135\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.15135","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

右心室(RV)起搏可损害左心室功能并引起心力衰竭,称为起搏性心肌病(PICM)。升级到心脏再同步化(CRT)是其常用的治疗方法;最近,左束分支区域起搏(LBBAP)成为一种潜在的替代方法。深间隔起搏(DSP)是LBBAP的简化替代方案,仍然能够实现比传统RV起搏更窄的QRS。本研究的目的是评估DSP在一组PICM患者中的效果。方法与结果:纳入连续诊断为PICM的患者。目的是将患者升级到DSP。如果在V1中没有终端R波的情况下,获得的有节奏QRS持续时间≤140 ms,则认为该过程成功。纳入12例患者。平均基线LVEF为33% (SD为4%),RV起搏平均百分比为99% (SD为1%)。所有患者均有症状性心力衰竭。RV起搏时平均QRS持续时间为172 ms (SD 14 ms), DSP起搏时平均QRS持续时间为130 ms (SD 7 ms)(平均差42 ms)。结论:我们的数据表明DSP可能是PICM患者有效且更简单的替代双心室或LBBAP的方法。较窄的QRS复合体可以实现,这可能导致左心室功能的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deep Septal Pacing for Pacemaker-Induced Cardiomyopathy.

Introduction: Right ventricular (RV) pacing can impair left ventricular function and cause heart failure, known as pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM). Upgrade to cardiac resynchronization (CRT) is its usual treatment; recently left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has emerged as a potential alternative. Deep septal pacing (DSP), a simplified alternative to LBBAP, is still able to achieve narrower paced QRS than during conventional RV pacing. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of DSP in a cohort of patients with PICM.

Methods and results: Consecutive patients diagnosed with PICM were included. The aim was to upgrade patients to DSP. The procedure was considered successful if a paced QRS duration ≤140 ms was obtained, in the absence of a terminal R wave in V1. Twelve patients were included. The mean baseline LVEF was 33% (SD 4%), and the mean percentage of RV pacing was 99% (SD 1%). All patients had symptomatic heart failure. The mean paced QRS duration was 172 ms (SD 14 ms) with RV pacing, and 130 ms (SD 7 ms) with DSP (mean difference 42 ms, p < 0.001). At 6 months, the mean LVEF after the upgrade was 46% (SD 9%), significantly superior to LVEF with RV pacing (p = 0.001), a mean improvement of 13% (SD 10%). All patients except one experienced an improvement in LVEF of at least 5%.

Conclusions: Our data suggest that DSP may be an effective and simpler alternative to biventricular or LBBAP in patients with PICM. Narrower paced QRS complexes can be achieved, which may lead to an improvement in left ventricular function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
209
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology (PACE) is the foremost peer-reviewed journal in the field of pacing and implantable cardioversion defibrillation, publishing over 50% of all English language articles in its field, featuring original, review, and didactic papers, and case reports related to daily practice. Articles also include editorials, book reviews, Musings on humane topics relevant to medical practice, electrophysiology (EP) rounds, device rounds, and information concerning the quality of devices used in the practice of the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信