Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
How could relativity be anything other than physical? 相对论怎么可能不是物理的呢?
Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics Pub Date : 2019-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2017.05.007
Wayne C. Myrvold
{"title":"How could relativity be anything other than physical?","authors":"Wayne C. Myrvold","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsb.2017.05.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.shpsb.2017.05.007","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Harvey Brown's <em>Physical Relativity</em> defends a view about the nature of spacetime, which he calls the <em>dynamical perspective</em>, that goes beyond the familiar dichotomy of substantivalist/relationist views. A full defense of this view requires attention to the way that our use of spacetime concepts connect with the physical world. Reflection on such matters, I argue, reveals that the dynamical perspective affords the only possible view about the ontological status of spacetime, in that putative rivals fail to express anything, either true or false. I conclude with remarks aimed at clarifying what is and isn't in dispute with regards to the explanatory priority of spacetime and dynamics, at countering an objection raised by John Norton to views of this sort, and at clarifying the relation between background and effective spacetime structure.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54442,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics","volume":"67 ","pages":"Pages 137-143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.shpsb.2017.05.007","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77713062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21
Gauging the boundary in field-space 测量场空间的边界
Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics Pub Date : 2019-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.04.002
Henrique Gomes
{"title":"Gauging the boundary in field-space","authors":"Henrique Gomes","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.04.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.04.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Local gauge theories are in a complicated relationship with boundaries. Whereas fixing the gauge can often shave off unwanted redundancies, the coupling of different bounded regions requires the use of gauge-variant elements. Therefore, coupling is inimical to gauge-fixing, as usually understood. This resistance to gauge-fixing has led some to declare the coupling of subsystems to be the <em>raison d’être</em> of gauge (Rovelli, 2014).</p><p>Indeed, while gauge-fixing is entirely unproblematic for a single region without boundary, it introduces arbitrary boundary conditions on the gauge degrees of freedom themselves—these conditions lack a physical interpretation when they are not functionals of the original fields. Such arbitrary boundary choices creep into the calculation of charges through Noether's second theorem (Noether, 1971), muddling the assignment of physical charges to local gauge symmetries. The confusion brewn by gauge at boundaries is well-known, and must be contended with both conceptually and technically.</p><p>It may seem natural to replace the arbitrary boundary choice with new degrees of freedom, for using such a device we resolve some of these confusions while leaving no gauge-dependence on the computation of Noether charges (Donnelly &amp; Freidel, 2016). But, concretely, such boundary degrees of freedom are rather arbitrary—they have no relation to the original field-content of the field theory. How should we conceive of them?</p><p>Here I will explicate the problems mentioned above and illustrate a possible resolution: in a recent series of papers (Gomes, Hopfmller,&amp; Riello, 2018; Gomes &amp; Riello, 2017, 2018) the notion of a connection-form was put forward and implemented in the field-space of gauge theories. Using this tool, a modified version of symplectic geometry—here called ‘horizontal’—is possible. Independently of boundary conditions, this formalism bestows to each region a physically salient, relational notion of charge: the horizontal Noether charge. Meanwhile, as required, the connection-form mediates a composition of regions, one compatible with the attribution of horizontal Noether charges to each region. The aims of this paper are to highlight the boundary issues in the treatment of gauge, and to discuss how gauge theory may be conceptually clarified in light of a resolution to these issues.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54442,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics","volume":"67 ","pages":"Pages 89-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.04.002","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87376209","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34
Physical Relativity: the dynamical approach to space-time 物理相对论:时空的动力学方法
Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics Pub Date : 2019-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2018.01.001
Simon Saunders
{"title":"Physical Relativity: the dynamical approach to space-time","authors":"Simon Saunders","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsb.2018.01.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.shpsb.2018.01.001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54442,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics","volume":"67 ","pages":"Page 117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.shpsb.2018.01.001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"55178319","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A no-go result on common cause approaches via Hardy relations 通过哈代关系对共因方法的否定结果
Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics Pub Date : 2019-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.04.003
Katsuaki Higashi
{"title":"A no-go result on common cause approaches via Hardy relations","authors":"Katsuaki Higashi","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.04.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.04.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>According to a conventional view, there exists no common cause model of quantum correlations satisfying locality requirements. Indeed, Bell's inequality is derived from some locality requirements and the assumption that the common cause exists, and the violation of the inequality has been experimentally verified. On the other hand, some researchers argued that in the derivation of the inequality, the existence of a common common-cause for multiple correlations is implicitly assumed and that the assumption is unreasonably strong. According to their idea, what is necessary for explaining the quantum correlation is a common cause for each correlation. However, Graβhoff et al. showed that when there are three pairs of perfectly correlated events and a common cause of each correlation exist, we cannot construct a common cause model that is consistent with quantum mechanical prediction and also meets several locality requirements. In this paper, first, as a consequence of the fact shown by Graβhoff et al., we will confirm that there exists no local common cause model when a two-particle system is in any maximally entangled state. After that, based on Hardy's famous argument, we will prove that there exists no local common cause model when a two-particle system is in any non-maximally entangled state. Therefore, it will be concluded that for any entangled state, there exists no local common cause model. It will be revealed that the non-existence of a common cause model satisfying locality is not limited to a particular state like the singlet state.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54442,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics","volume":"67 ","pages":"Pages 12-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.04.003","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85293193","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Who's afraid of coordinate systems? An essay on representation of spacetime structure 谁会害怕坐标系统?时空结构的表征
Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics Pub Date : 2019-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2017.07.002
David Wallace
{"title":"Who's afraid of coordinate systems? An essay on representation of spacetime structure","authors":"David Wallace","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsb.2017.07.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.shpsb.2017.07.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Coordinate-based approaches to physical theories remain standard in mainstream physics but are largely eschewed in foundational discussion in favour of coordinate-free differential-geometric approaches. I defend the conceptual and mathematical legitimacy of the coordinate-based approach for foundational work. In doing so, I provide an account of the Kleinian conception of geometry as a theory of invariance under symmetry groups; I argue that this conception continues to play a very substantial role in contemporary </span>mathematical physics<span><span> and indeed that supposedly “coordinate-free” differential geometry relies centrally on this conception of geometry. I discuss some foundational and pedagogical advantages of the coordinate-based formulation and briefly connect it to some remarks of Norton on the historical development of geometry in physics during the establishment of the </span>general theory of relativity.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":54442,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics","volume":"67 ","pages":"Pages 125-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.shpsb.2017.07.002","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85131199","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39
Hawking radiation and analogue experiments: A Bayesian analysis 霍金辐射与模拟实验:贝叶斯分析
Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics Pub Date : 2019-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.04.004
Radin Dardashti , Stephan Hartmann , Karim Thébault , Eric Winsberg
{"title":"Hawking radiation and analogue experiments: A Bayesian analysis","authors":"Radin Dardashti ,&nbsp;Stephan Hartmann ,&nbsp;Karim Thébault ,&nbsp;Eric Winsberg","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.04.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.04.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We present a Bayesian analysis of the epistemology of analogue experiments with particular reference to Hawking radiation. First, we prove that such experiments can be confirmatory in Bayesian terms based upon appeal to ‘universality arguments’. Second, we provide a formal model for the scaling behaviour of the confirmation measure for multiple distinct realisations of the analogue system and isolate a generic saturation feature. Finally, we demonstrate that different potential analogue realisations could provide different levels of confirmation. Our results provide a basis both to formalise the epistemic value of analogue experiments that have been conducted and to advise scientists as to the respective epistemic value of future analogue experiments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54442,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics","volume":"67 ","pages":"Pages 1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.04.004","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86750053","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32
The question of negative temperatures in thermodynamics and statistical mechanics 热力学和统计力学中的负温度问题
Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics Pub Date : 2019-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.02.002
David A. Lavis
{"title":"The question of negative temperatures in thermodynamics and statistical mechanics","authors":"David A. Lavis","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.02.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.02.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We show that both positive and negative absolute temperatures and monotonically increasing and decreasing entropy in adiabatic processes are consistent with Carathéodory's version of the second law and we explore the modifications of the Kelvin–Planck and Clausius versions which are needed to accommodate these possibilities. We show, in part by using the equivalence of distributions and the canonical distribution, that the correct microcanonical entropy, is the surface (Boltzmann) form rather than the bulk (Gibbs) form thereby providing for the possibility of negative temperatures and we counter the contention on the part of a number of authors that the surface entropy fails to satisfy fundamental thermodynamic relationships.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54442,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics","volume":"67 ","pages":"Pages 26-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.02.002","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85598710","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
A remark on ‘time machines’ in honor of Howard Stein 为纪念霍华德·斯坦因,对“时光机”的评论
Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics Pub Date : 2019-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.05.003
JB Manchak
{"title":"A remark on ‘time machines’ in honor of Howard Stein","authors":"JB Manchak","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.05.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.05.003","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54442,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics","volume":"67 ","pages":"Pages 111-116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.05.003","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85789947","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How did Lorentz find his theorem of corresponding states? 洛伦兹是如何找到对应态定理的?
Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics Pub Date : 2019-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2017.06.006
Michel Janssen
{"title":"How did Lorentz find his theorem of corresponding states?","authors":"Michel Janssen","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsb.2017.06.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.shpsb.2017.06.006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>I offer a reconstruction of how Lorentz found his theorem of corresponding states or, in modern terms, the Lorentz invariance of the source-free Maxwell equations. I show that, to arrive at Lorentz's theorem, both the approximate version of 1895 and the exact version of 1899/1904, Lorentz had to do little more than regroup terms and repeatedly apply the chain rule of differentiation. My reconstruction should thus help dispel the aura of complexity that still surrounds the theorem. I also show how the theorem can be extended to Maxwell's equations with sources and briefly review how Lorentz, after 1905, went from considering Lorentz-transformed quantities purely as auxiliary variables to recognizing them as the measured quantities for moving observers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54442,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics","volume":"67 ","pages":"Pages 167-175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.shpsb.2017.06.006","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90756071","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
A note on rods and clocks in Newton's Principia 牛顿原理中关于杆和钟的注释
Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics Pub Date : 2019-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2017.07.004
Katherine Brading
{"title":"A note on rods and clocks in Newton's Principia","authors":"Katherine Brading","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsb.2017.07.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.shpsb.2017.07.004","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54442,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics","volume":"67 ","pages":"Pages 160-166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.shpsb.2017.07.004","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79262410","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信