测量场空间的边界

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Henrique Gomes
{"title":"测量场空间的边界","authors":"Henrique Gomes","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Local gauge theories are in a complicated relationship with boundaries. Whereas fixing the gauge can often shave off unwanted redundancies, the coupling of different bounded regions requires the use of gauge-variant elements. Therefore, coupling is inimical to gauge-fixing, as usually understood. This resistance to gauge-fixing has led some to declare the coupling of subsystems to be the <em>raison d’être</em> of gauge (Rovelli, 2014).</p><p>Indeed, while gauge-fixing is entirely unproblematic for a single region without boundary, it introduces arbitrary boundary conditions on the gauge degrees of freedom themselves—these conditions lack a physical interpretation when they are not functionals of the original fields. Such arbitrary boundary choices creep into the calculation of charges through Noether's second theorem (Noether, 1971), muddling the assignment of physical charges to local gauge symmetries. The confusion brewn by gauge at boundaries is well-known, and must be contended with both conceptually and technically.</p><p>It may seem natural to replace the arbitrary boundary choice with new degrees of freedom, for using such a device we resolve some of these confusions while leaving no gauge-dependence on the computation of Noether charges (Donnelly &amp; Freidel, 2016). But, concretely, such boundary degrees of freedom are rather arbitrary—they have no relation to the original field-content of the field theory. How should we conceive of them?</p><p>Here I will explicate the problems mentioned above and illustrate a possible resolution: in a recent series of papers (Gomes, Hopfmller,&amp; Riello, 2018; Gomes &amp; Riello, 2017, 2018) the notion of a connection-form was put forward and implemented in the field-space of gauge theories. Using this tool, a modified version of symplectic geometry—here called ‘horizontal’—is possible. Independently of boundary conditions, this formalism bestows to each region a physically salient, relational notion of charge: the horizontal Noether charge. Meanwhile, as required, the connection-form mediates a composition of regions, one compatible with the attribution of horizontal Noether charges to each region. The aims of this paper are to highlight the boundary issues in the treatment of gauge, and to discuss how gauge theory may be conceptually clarified in light of a resolution to these issues.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54442,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics","volume":"67 ","pages":"Pages 89-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.04.002","citationCount":"34","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gauging the boundary in field-space\",\"authors\":\"Henrique Gomes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.04.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Local gauge theories are in a complicated relationship with boundaries. Whereas fixing the gauge can often shave off unwanted redundancies, the coupling of different bounded regions requires the use of gauge-variant elements. Therefore, coupling is inimical to gauge-fixing, as usually understood. This resistance to gauge-fixing has led some to declare the coupling of subsystems to be the <em>raison d’être</em> of gauge (Rovelli, 2014).</p><p>Indeed, while gauge-fixing is entirely unproblematic for a single region without boundary, it introduces arbitrary boundary conditions on the gauge degrees of freedom themselves—these conditions lack a physical interpretation when they are not functionals of the original fields. Such arbitrary boundary choices creep into the calculation of charges through Noether's second theorem (Noether, 1971), muddling the assignment of physical charges to local gauge symmetries. The confusion brewn by gauge at boundaries is well-known, and must be contended with both conceptually and technically.</p><p>It may seem natural to replace the arbitrary boundary choice with new degrees of freedom, for using such a device we resolve some of these confusions while leaving no gauge-dependence on the computation of Noether charges (Donnelly &amp; Freidel, 2016). But, concretely, such boundary degrees of freedom are rather arbitrary—they have no relation to the original field-content of the field theory. How should we conceive of them?</p><p>Here I will explicate the problems mentioned above and illustrate a possible resolution: in a recent series of papers (Gomes, Hopfmller,&amp; Riello, 2018; Gomes &amp; Riello, 2017, 2018) the notion of a connection-form was put forward and implemented in the field-space of gauge theories. Using this tool, a modified version of symplectic geometry—here called ‘horizontal’—is possible. Independently of boundary conditions, this formalism bestows to each region a physically salient, relational notion of charge: the horizontal Noether charge. Meanwhile, as required, the connection-form mediates a composition of regions, one compatible with the attribution of horizontal Noether charges to each region. The aims of this paper are to highlight the boundary issues in the treatment of gauge, and to discuss how gauge theory may be conceptually clarified in light of a resolution to these issues.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics\",\"volume\":\"67 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 89-110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.04.002\",\"citationCount\":\"34\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1355219818302144\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1355219818302144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

摘要

局部规范理论与边界有着复杂的关系。虽然固定量规通常可以减少不必要的冗余,但不同有界区域的耦合需要使用量规可变元素。因此,正如通常所理解的那样,耦合不利于量规固定。这种对仪表固定的抵制导致一些人宣布子系统的耦合是仪表的être原因(Rovelli, 2014)。事实上,虽然规范固定对于一个没有边界的单一区域来说是完全没有问题的,但它在规范自由度本身上引入了任意的边界条件——当这些条件不是原始场的泛函时,它们缺乏物理解释。这种任意的边界选择通过Noether第二定理(Noether, 1971)渗透到电荷的计算中,混淆了物理电荷对局部规范对称性的分配。边界测量带来的混乱是众所周知的,必须在概念上和技术上加以解决。用新的自由度代替任意的边界选择似乎是很自然的,因为使用这样的装置,我们解决了其中的一些混乱,同时不依赖于诺特电荷的计算(Donnelly &弗里德尔,2016)。但是,具体地说,这样的边界自由度是相当任意的,它们与场论的原场内容没有关系。我们应该如何看待它们?在这里,我将解释上述问题,并说明一个可能的解决方案:在最近的一系列论文(Gomes, hopfmiller,&雷诺士,2018;戈麦斯,Riello, 2017,2018)在规范理论的场空间中提出并实现了连接形式的概念。使用这个工具,辛几何的修改版本——这里称为“水平”——是可能的。独立于边界条件,这种形式主义赋予每个区域一个物理上显著的、相关的电荷概念:水平诺特电荷。同时,根据需要,连接形式介导了区域的组合,与水平诺特电荷对每个区域的归属相兼容。本文的目的是强调规范处理中的边界问题,并讨论如何在解决这些问题的基础上从概念上澄清规范理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gauging the boundary in field-space

Local gauge theories are in a complicated relationship with boundaries. Whereas fixing the gauge can often shave off unwanted redundancies, the coupling of different bounded regions requires the use of gauge-variant elements. Therefore, coupling is inimical to gauge-fixing, as usually understood. This resistance to gauge-fixing has led some to declare the coupling of subsystems to be the raison d’être of gauge (Rovelli, 2014).

Indeed, while gauge-fixing is entirely unproblematic for a single region without boundary, it introduces arbitrary boundary conditions on the gauge degrees of freedom themselves—these conditions lack a physical interpretation when they are not functionals of the original fields. Such arbitrary boundary choices creep into the calculation of charges through Noether's second theorem (Noether, 1971), muddling the assignment of physical charges to local gauge symmetries. The confusion brewn by gauge at boundaries is well-known, and must be contended with both conceptually and technically.

It may seem natural to replace the arbitrary boundary choice with new degrees of freedom, for using such a device we resolve some of these confusions while leaving no gauge-dependence on the computation of Noether charges (Donnelly & Freidel, 2016). But, concretely, such boundary degrees of freedom are rather arbitrary—they have no relation to the original field-content of the field theory. How should we conceive of them?

Here I will explicate the problems mentioned above and illustrate a possible resolution: in a recent series of papers (Gomes, Hopfmller,& Riello, 2018; Gomes & Riello, 2017, 2018) the notion of a connection-form was put forward and implemented in the field-space of gauge theories. Using this tool, a modified version of symplectic geometry—here called ‘horizontal’—is possible. Independently of boundary conditions, this formalism bestows to each region a physically salient, relational notion of charge: the horizontal Noether charge. Meanwhile, as required, the connection-form mediates a composition of regions, one compatible with the attribution of horizontal Noether charges to each region. The aims of this paper are to highlight the boundary issues in the treatment of gauge, and to discuss how gauge theory may be conceptually clarified in light of a resolution to these issues.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics
Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 物理-科学史与科学哲学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics is devoted to all aspects of the history and philosophy of modern physics broadly understood, including physical aspects of astronomy, chemistry and other non-biological sciences. The primary focus is on physics from the mid/late-nineteenth century to the present, the period of emergence of the kind of theoretical physics that has come to dominate the exact sciences in the twentieth century. The journal is internationally oriented with contributions from a wide range of perspectives. In addition to purely historical or philosophical papers, the editors particularly encourage papers that combine these two disciplines. The editors are also keen to publish papers of interest to physicists, as well as specialists in history and philosophy of physics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信