COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL最新文献

{"title":"Artefacts on magnetic resonance imaging with Osia®2 bone conduction hearing aid: A cadaver study.","authors":"Beata Diosi, Zsofia Bere, Angela Csomor, Tamara Tapai, Zoltan Toth, Edina Kovacs, Balint Posta, Miklos Csanady, Antal Nogradi, Zsigmond Tamas Kincses, Laszlo Rovo, Adam Perenyi","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2024.2398833","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2024.2398833","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Hearing implants often limit the assessment of magnetic resonance examinations due to susceptibility artefacts. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of artefacts attributed to the Osia®2 implant system in terms of utility in visualizing selected cranial structures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A BI300 implant and an OSI200 actuator were implanted into a human cadaver head in the audiologically most favourable position according to the manufacturer's guidelines. Scanning was accomplished using the institutional <i>head and inner ear</i> protocol with a General Electric 1.5 Tesla scanner with retained and removed implant magnet, extended with T1 and T2 weighted sequences with metal-artefact reduction (MAVRIC SL). Image quality was evaluated by three radiologists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Osia®2 produced significant artefacts in most of the series of standard imaging sequences predominantly on the ipsilateral side of the head. The majority of the artefacts were caused by the implant magnet. Even without removing the magnet, MAVRIC SL improved image quality to such an extent that it became comparable with that after magnet removal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The standard sequences suffer considerable quality loss due to the artefacts, attributed predominantly to the magnetic component. Metal-artefact reduction sequences are effective in obtaining sufficient-to-good quality images without surgical magnet removal.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142480595","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Cochlear implant usage in single sided deafness and factors affecting usage.","authors":"Vanessa Y J Tan, Rodney Hollow, Sylvia Tari, Alex Rousset, Raoul Wills, Robert J S Briggs, Richard Charles Dowell","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2024.2403224","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14670100.2024.2403224","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary objective was to examine duration of daily cochlear implant (CI) usage at 12 and 24 months post-operatively in single sided deafness (SSD). The secondary objective was to examine factors that could affect CI usage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort of patients with SSD who received CI from January 2015 to March 2020. CI usage was evaluated at 12 and 24 months. Hearing loss duration, tinnitus scores and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were correlated with CI usage at 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Usage data was available for 54 patients at 12 months and 38 patients at 24 months. The mean usage was 8.2 h/day (SD 4.2) at 12 months, 7.0 h/day (SD 5.1) at 24 months. 5 out of 54 (9.3%) and 7 out of 38 patients (18.4%) were non-users at 12 and 24 months post-operatively. An improved mean SNR score from pre-operative 4.4 dB (SD 2.8) to - 0.70 dB (SD 4.2) at 12 months post-operative was positively correlated with CI usage at 12 and 24 months. Hearing loss duration and tinnitus scores were not associated with CI usage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>18.4% of our patients were non-users at 24 months. Mean usage at 24 months was 7.0 h/day. Improved hearing in noise at 12 months was correlated with better usage.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":" ","pages":"387-393"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142395234","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comparing remote programming of cochlear implants using two methods: portable laptop and remote hosted site.","authors":"Amy H C Ng, Jessica Banh, Laura Shaw, Yasmeen Aboulhawa, Maria Simone, Trung Le, Vincent Lin, Joseph Chen","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2024.2427507","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14670100.2024.2427507","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Compare two remote programming methods as a clinical service for user satisfaction, ease of use, preparation time and accessibility.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Method 1 (Portable Laptop): A 'Programming Kit' including laptop was shipped to cochlear implant users' homes (<i>N</i> = 20). The audiologist at the implant center used remote desktop control of this laptop to adjust subjects' speech processors. Method 2 (Remote Hosted Site): Eight distant clinics were recruited as host sites to house cochlear implant programming hardware and software so that CI users (<i>N</i> = 19) could attend their facility. The audiologist at the implant center used remote desktop control of the host sites' computers to adjust the subjects' CI speech processors. All parties were asked to fill out a questionnaire following their remote session.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Remote hosted site method was rated higher for ease of use by the Remote Experts (12/15, 80%), compared to portable laptop method (11/19, 57.9%) and is more accessible to CI users of all levels of computer abilities while requiring less preparation time per session.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Remote hosted site method is an easier, more efficient method of remote programming as a clinical service delivery method compared to the Portable Laptop.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":" ","pages":"360-372"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142734264","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Worldwide differences in surgeon intraoperative practices for cochlear implantation.","authors":"Nicole T Jiam, Archana Podury, Alicia M Quesnel, Ophir Handzel","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2024.2367309","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14670100.2024.2367309","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize practice patterns of intraoperative imaging and/or functional confirmation of cochlear implant electrode location worldwide.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey of otolaryngologists performing cochlear implantation was conducted between March 1 and May 6, 2023. Participants were recruited worldwide using an international otologic society membership email list and at professional meetings. Ninety-seven of the 125 invited participants (78%) completed the survey. Participants were categorized by continent.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>North American surgeons use intraoperative X-rays more frequently than surgeons in Europe and Asia (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Otolaryngologists in Europe and Asia more frequently use no intraoperative imaging (<i>p</i> = 0.02). There is no regional difference between the intraoperative use of electrophysiologic instruments. European and Asian surgeons implant MED-EL devices (<i>p</i> = 0.012) more frequently than North American surgeons, who more frequently use Cochlear Corporation devices (<i>p</i> = 0.003). MED-EL use is related to less frequent intraoperative X-ray use (<i>p</i> = 0.02). Advanced Bionics use is related to more frequent intraoperative CT use (<i>p</i> = 0.03). No significant association existed between years of practice, number of cochlear implantation surgeries performed yearly, volume of pediatric CI practice, and use of intraoperative tools.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intraoperative practice for radiologic and functional verification of cochlear implant electrode positioning varies worldwide. Practice guidelines may help establish a standard of care for cochlear implantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":" ","pages":"344-351"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141472579","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Reading achievement and deaf students with cochlear implants.","authors":"Connie Mayer, Beverly J Trezek","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2024.2394313","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14670100.2024.2394313","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to investigate the reading outcomes of a Canadian cohort of school-aged deaf learners with cochlear implants (CIs). The goal was to investigate whether achievement approached that of hearing age peers and identify demographic factors influencing performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants represent a subset of 13 students with CIs from a larger sample of 70 deaf students in grades four through 12 educated in inclusive settings within a large school board in central Canada. Data sources included demographic information, teachers' ratings on the Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP), and scores from the <i>Woodcock-Johnson III Diagnostic Reading Battery</i> [WJ III-DRB].Results/Discussion: Participants performed within the low average range in all areas except for Phonological Awareness, which was in the low range; however, there was wide variability in scores across participants. None of the demographic variables (e.g. home language, additional disabilities) had a statistically significant association with performance, although older students had higher mean scores on the Phonological Awareness cluster.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings add to the body of research on literacy achievement and cochlear implantation, providing evidence that this technology has a significant positive effect on outcomes for a population that has heretofore underperformed in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":" ","pages":"394-402"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142086399","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Factors impacting outcomes of cochlear implantation in children at two University centres in China: Multi-year analysis from the Paediatric Implanted Recipient Observational Study (P-IROS).","authors":"Chongxian Yu, Jianfen Luo, Mei Zhong, Ruijie Wang, Xiuhua Chao, Jianxin Qiu, Lei Xu, Petra L Graham, Colleen Psarros","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2024.2382579","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14670100.2024.2382579","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify factors affecting functional hearing performance and quality of life (QoL) outcomes in paediatric cochlear implantation (CI) recipients at two University centres in mainland China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two university centres in mainland China, part of the prospective longitudinal Paediatric Implanted Recipient Observational Study (P-IROS), contributed participant data. Participants were aged under 10 years at time of CI. Functional hearing performance and QoL measures were collected prior to device activation, and at 6-monthly intervals for 2 years post-implantation. Functional hearing endpoints including Categories of Auditory Performance-II (CAP-II) and QoL were evaluated and analysed using ordinal mixed-effects regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were from 288 children with a mean age at implant of 2.74 years. Overall follow-up at 1 year was 59% and 51% at 2 years. Younger age at implantation (p<0.001) and hearing aid use preimplantation (p=0.026) were associated with significant benefit. Bilateral device users (both CI and bimodal) achieved significantly better functional hearing performance on the CAP-II than unilateral CI users (p<0.001). Slower functional hearing improvements were observed in those with lower parental expectations compared to higher expectations (p<0.001). QoL improved over time but followed a different initial trajectory between centres.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All participants demonstrated significant improvements in auditory performance and QoL over time. Younger age at CI, and bilateral/bimodal device fitting contributed to earlier improvements. Other potential factors that could help inform families, professionals, and health authorities about choice of hearing device and educational supports required included aetiology of hearing loss and level of maternal education.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":" ","pages":"373-386"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141898905","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Taste disturbance following cochlear implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Maisie Fitzgerald, Alex Fleet, Michele Tomasoni, Veronica Phillips, Neil Donnelly, Patrick Axon, James Tysome, Matthew Smith, Manohar Bance, Paolo Boscolo-Rizzo, Daniele Borsetto","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2024.2398834","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14670100.2024.2398834","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the rate of taste disturbance following cochlear implantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review was designed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Included studies psychophysically measured taste. DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models were used. An overall mean from studies reporting a single mean of taste strip performance was calculated using inverse variance method for pooling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 380 studies identified, 9 were included across which 55 cases of postoperative taste disturbance were reported in 498 patients. Taste was tested at variable timepoints, from <1 week to ≥6 months postoperatively. The overall rate of postoperative taste disturbance was 13.5% (95% CI, 7.6-20.7%) with high heterogeneity between studies (I²= 62%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>13.5% might indicate a higher prevalence of taste disturbance following cochlear implantation compared to the general population. However, the confidence we can assign to our calculated rate is limited by significant heterogeneity and potential publication bias. Studies reporting mean taste strip scores generally found reduced taste function on the side of the tongue ipsilateral to implantation, but this reduction wasn't statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Further research, employing more robust and standardised methodologies, is necessary to accurately ascertain the rate and nature of taste disturbance following cochlear implantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":" ","pages":"403-415"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142134418","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Development of a cochlear implant program in Malawi: progress and challenges.","authors":"W Mulwafu, C Chabuluka, I Anderson, D R Strachan, C H Raine","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2024.2316463","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2024.2316463","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":"25 5","pages":"339-343"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142866451","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Current status of pediatric auditory brainstem implantation in inner ear malformations; consensus statement of the Third International Pediatric ABI Meeting.","authors":"Levent Sennaroglu, Thomas Lenarz, J Thomas Roland, Daniel J Lee, Liliana Colletti, Robert Behr, Dan Jiang, Shakeel R Saeed, Jan Casselman, Manuel Manrique, Vicente Diamante, Simon R M Freeman, Simon K W Lloyd, Andrzej Zarowski, Erwin Offeciers, Mohan Kameswaran, Daniel Andrés de la Torre Diamante, Burçak Bilginer, Nick Thomas, Ricardo Bento, Gonca Sennaroglu, Esra Yucel, Munir Demir Bajin, Chelsea Cole, Amy Martinez, Janice Loggins, Laurie S Eisenberg, Eric P Wilkinson, Cheryl A Bakey, Christine L Carter, Barbara S Herrmann, Susan Waltzman, William Shapiro, Mario Svirsky, Norma Pallares, Gabriela Diamante, Florencia Heller, Maria Palacios, Lic Leticia Diamante, Waitsz Chang, Michael Tong, Hao Wu, Merve Ozbal Batuk, Mehmet Yarali, Betul Cicek Cinar, Hilal Burcu Ozkan, Filiz Aslan, Karin Hallin, Helge Rask-Andersen, Alicia Huarte, Carlos Prieto-Matos, Vedat Topsakal, Anouk Hofkens-Van den Brandt, Vincent Van Rompaey, An Boudewyns, Paul van de Heyning, Lutz Gaertner, Yisgav Shapira, Yael Henkin, Saba Battelino, Eva Orzan, Enrico Muzzi, Raffaella Marchi, Rolien Free, Johan H M Frijns, Courtney Voelker, Margaret Winter, Debra Schrader, Dianne Hammes Ganguly, Dana Egra-Dagan, Khassan Diab, Nikolai Dayxes, Ashen Nanan, Robinson Koji, Ayça Karaosmanoğlu, Elif Günay Bulut, Berit Verbist, Mahan Azadpour, Marco Mandala, Maria Valeria Goffi, Marek Polak, Kathy Y S Lee, Katherine Wilson, David R Friedmann, Ranjith Rajeswaran, Rafael Monsanto, Sebahattin Cureoglu, Sandra Driver, Roman Bošnjak, Gorkem Dundar, Ergin Eroglu","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2024.2413273","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14670100.2024.2413273","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to synthesize current knowledge and outcomes related to pediatric auditory brainstem implantation (ABI) in children with severe inner ear malformations (IEMs). It highlights the clinical management practices, challenges, and potential future directions for consensus development in this field.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of findings presented at the Third International Pediatric ABI Symposium organized by the Hacettepe Cochlear Implant team between 3 and 5 September 2020 was conducted, incorporating data from 41 departments across 19 countries. Relevant clinical outcomes, imaging techniques, surgical approaches, and rehabilitation strategies were analyzed to identify key trends and variability in practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review indicates that children receiving ABIs exhibit diverse auditory outcomes influenced by individual anatomical variations and developmental factors. Early implantation, particularly before the age of three, positively correlates with better auditory and language development. Multicenter experiences underscore the necessity of tailored decision-making, which considers both surgical candidacy and comprehensive rehabilitation resources.</p><p><strong>Discussion:: </strong>The variability in outcomes emphasizes the need for improved consensus and guidelines regarding eligibility, surgical techniques, and multidisciplinary rehabilitation approaches. Notable complications and the necessity for thorough imaging assessments were also identified as critical components affecting clinical decisions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A formal consensus statement is warranted to standardize best practices in ABI management. This will not only enhance patient outcomes but also guide future research efforts to address the remaining challenges in the treatment of children with severe IEMs. Enhanced collaboration among team members will be pivotal in achieving these objectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":" ","pages":"316-333"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142741211","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the hearing implant sound quality index questionnaire (HISQUI₁₉).","authors":"Betul Cicek Cinar, Muslume Kubra Koc, Cennet O Z Baran, Merve Ozses, Edda Amann","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2024.2401239","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14670100.2024.2401239","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim was to construct validity and reliability of the Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index Questionnaire (HISQUI19) in Turkish.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a methodologic study to validate HISQUI19 in Turkish. The study included 62 cochlear implant users. Guttman's split half-coefficient and Cronbach's alpha tests were used for construct validity and internal consistency. Pearson correlation test was used to assess the relationship of the HISQUI19 total score to the SSQ49 scales for CI users and to show test - retest reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Cronbach's α value was 0.94 overall score with high internal consistency (Guttman's split-half-coefficient: 0.912). Test-retest reliability results showed high repeatability and consistency of the measure across time (<i>r</i> = 0.708; <i>P</i> = 0.002). Support for conducting factor analysis was provided by the KMO test, with a value of 0.876, which is 'great'.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Subjective evaluation of cochlear implant users' daily life experiences is a useful tool to reveal the auditory benefits of cochlear implant usage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Turkish version of the HISQUI19 is a reliable and valid assessment tool for adults with CIs. This questionnaire provides clinicians with a valuable, reliable, and valid tool for determining the subjective benefit of CI for patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":" ","pages":"298-307"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142332232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}