CBCT颞骨图像质量:设备和方案的变化。

IF 1.4 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Seyed Hossein Razavi, Mohammad Poormohammadi, Arezoo Ansarilari
{"title":"CBCT颞骨图像质量:设备和方案的变化。","authors":"Seyed Hossein Razavi, Mohammad Poormohammadi, Arezoo Ansarilari","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2025.2478739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Considering the high prevalence of temporal bone imaging and the growing tendency to replace the CT scan with CBCT in this field, it seems necessary to determine the optimal radiation conditions in each commercial CBCT brand to obtain the best diagnostic images with minimal patient radiation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A dry human skull was imaged by 6 radiation protocols in 4 different CBCT devices. The images of anatomical landmarks including cochlea, lamina spiralis, facial canal, semicircular canals, and modiolus, were reconstructed. Then, the quality of these images was determined by 3 observers based on a 4-point scoring system. The Kappa coefficient was adopted to evaluate the observer's agreement, and the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare the mean scores of the protocols and the superiority of the protocols in each device, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistically significant difference between the mean scores of the protocols in the Acteon and NewTom devices. In the Kodak and Planmeca devices, the recommended protocol for imaging the temporal bone is protocol 1 and protocol 3, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Considering the replacement of the CBCT device for temporal bone imaging and the variety of related protocols in these devices, to reduce the overall society dose, it seems necessary to conduct further studies to determine the optimal radiation conditions in each device. In addition, the ability to unilaterally image the temporal bone is an underappreciated advantage of the CBCT over the CT, which prescribers are not familiar with.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporal bone image quality in CBCT: Device and protocol variations.\",\"authors\":\"Seyed Hossein Razavi, Mohammad Poormohammadi, Arezoo Ansarilari\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14670100.2025.2478739\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Considering the high prevalence of temporal bone imaging and the growing tendency to replace the CT scan with CBCT in this field, it seems necessary to determine the optimal radiation conditions in each commercial CBCT brand to obtain the best diagnostic images with minimal patient radiation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A dry human skull was imaged by 6 radiation protocols in 4 different CBCT devices. The images of anatomical landmarks including cochlea, lamina spiralis, facial canal, semicircular canals, and modiolus, were reconstructed. Then, the quality of these images was determined by 3 observers based on a 4-point scoring system. The Kappa coefficient was adopted to evaluate the observer's agreement, and the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare the mean scores of the protocols and the superiority of the protocols in each device, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistically significant difference between the mean scores of the protocols in the Acteon and NewTom devices. In the Kodak and Planmeca devices, the recommended protocol for imaging the temporal bone is protocol 1 and protocol 3, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Considering the replacement of the CBCT device for temporal bone imaging and the variety of related protocols in these devices, to reduce the overall society dose, it seems necessary to conduct further studies to determine the optimal radiation conditions in each device. In addition, the ability to unilaterally image the temporal bone is an underappreciated advantage of the CBCT over the CT, which prescribers are not familiar with.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2025.2478739\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2025.2478739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:考虑到颞骨成像的高流行率和CBCT在该领域取代CT扫描的趋势,确定各商用CBCT品牌的最佳辐射条件,以最小的患者辐射获得最佳诊断图像似乎是必要的。方法:在4种不同的CBCT设备上采用6种辐射方案对干燥的人头骨进行成像。重建耳蜗、螺旋板、面管、半规管、小舌等解剖标志图像。然后,这些图像的质量由3名观察员根据4分评分系统来确定。采用Kappa系数评价观察者的一致性,采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Mann-Whitney检验分别比较各设备中各方案的平均得分和各方案的优越性。结果:Acteon和NewTom两种器械的平均评分差异无统计学意义。在Kodak和Planmeca设备中,推荐的颞骨成像方案分别为方案1和方案3。结论:考虑到CBCT颞骨成像设备的替代以及这些设备中相关方案的多样性,为降低社会总剂量,有必要进一步研究确定每种设备的最佳辐射条件。此外,与CT相比,CBCT单侧颞骨成像的能力被低估了,这是开处方者不熟悉的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Temporal bone image quality in CBCT: Device and protocol variations.

Objectives: Considering the high prevalence of temporal bone imaging and the growing tendency to replace the CT scan with CBCT in this field, it seems necessary to determine the optimal radiation conditions in each commercial CBCT brand to obtain the best diagnostic images with minimal patient radiation.

Methods: A dry human skull was imaged by 6 radiation protocols in 4 different CBCT devices. The images of anatomical landmarks including cochlea, lamina spiralis, facial canal, semicircular canals, and modiolus, were reconstructed. Then, the quality of these images was determined by 3 observers based on a 4-point scoring system. The Kappa coefficient was adopted to evaluate the observer's agreement, and the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare the mean scores of the protocols and the superiority of the protocols in each device, respectively.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the mean scores of the protocols in the Acteon and NewTom devices. In the Kodak and Planmeca devices, the recommended protocol for imaging the temporal bone is protocol 1 and protocol 3, respectively.

Conclusion: Considering the replacement of the CBCT device for temporal bone imaging and the variety of related protocols in these devices, to reduce the overall society dose, it seems necessary to conduct further studies to determine the optimal radiation conditions in each device. In addition, the ability to unilaterally image the temporal bone is an underappreciated advantage of the CBCT over the CT, which prescribers are not familiar with.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Cochlear Implants International was founded as an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal in response to the growing number of publications in the field of cochlear implants. It was designed to meet a need to include scientific contributions from all the disciplines that are represented in cochlear implant teams: audiology, medicine and surgery, speech therapy and speech pathology, psychology, hearing therapy, radiology, pathology, engineering and acoustics, teaching, and communication. The aim was to found a truly interdisciplinary journal, representing the full breadth of the field of cochlear implantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信