电声刺激对门控词识别的影响。

IF 1.4 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Chhayakanta Patro, Ellen Shephard, Nirmal Kumar Srinivasan
{"title":"电声刺激对门控词识别的影响。","authors":"Chhayakanta Patro, Ellen Shephard, Nirmal Kumar Srinivasan","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2025.2475618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to determine how the presentation of unprocessed speech, either ipsilaterally (to simulate electro-acoustic stimulation, EAS) or contralaterally (to simulate bimodal stimulation), alongside vocoder-processed speech affects the efficiency of spoken word processing.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Gated word recognition was performed under four listening conditions: full-spectrum speech, vocoder-processed speech, electro-acoustic stimulation (EAS), and bimodal stimulation. In the EAS condition, low-frequency unprocessed speech and high-frequency vocoder-processed speech were presented to the same ear, while in the bimodal condition, full-spectrum speech was presented to one ear and vocoder-processed speech to the other.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Listeners identified target words accurately with just over half of the word duration in the full-spectrum condition, whereas nearly the entire word was required for correct identification with vocoder-processed speech. Combining full-spectrum speech and vocoder-processed speech, whether ipsilaterally or contralaterally, led to significant improvements in gated word recognition. Full-spectrum speech yielded the best-gated word recognition performance, followed by bimodal stimulation, with intermediate results from EAS and the lowest performance from the vocoder condition.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Inherent limitations in CI spectral resolution can impair spoken word processing. Adding acoustic stimulation can improve gated word recognition performance. Bimodal stimulation significantly enhances lexical processing timing compared to EAS in one ear.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of electro-acoustic stimulation on gated word recognition.\",\"authors\":\"Chhayakanta Patro, Ellen Shephard, Nirmal Kumar Srinivasan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14670100.2025.2475618\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to determine how the presentation of unprocessed speech, either ipsilaterally (to simulate electro-acoustic stimulation, EAS) or contralaterally (to simulate bimodal stimulation), alongside vocoder-processed speech affects the efficiency of spoken word processing.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Gated word recognition was performed under four listening conditions: full-spectrum speech, vocoder-processed speech, electro-acoustic stimulation (EAS), and bimodal stimulation. In the EAS condition, low-frequency unprocessed speech and high-frequency vocoder-processed speech were presented to the same ear, while in the bimodal condition, full-spectrum speech was presented to one ear and vocoder-processed speech to the other.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Listeners identified target words accurately with just over half of the word duration in the full-spectrum condition, whereas nearly the entire word was required for correct identification with vocoder-processed speech. Combining full-spectrum speech and vocoder-processed speech, whether ipsilaterally or contralaterally, led to significant improvements in gated word recognition. Full-spectrum speech yielded the best-gated word recognition performance, followed by bimodal stimulation, with intermediate results from EAS and the lowest performance from the vocoder condition.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Inherent limitations in CI spectral resolution can impair spoken word processing. Adding acoustic stimulation can improve gated word recognition performance. Bimodal stimulation significantly enhances lexical processing timing compared to EAS in one ear.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2025.2475618\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2025.2475618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是确定未处理语音的呈现,无论是同侧(模拟电声刺激,EAS)还是对侧(模拟双峰刺激),以及声码处理语音如何影响口语单词处理的效率。方法:在全频谱语音、声码处理语音、电声刺激和双峰刺激四种听力条件下进行门控词识别。在EAS条件下,低频未处理语音和高频声码处理语音被呈现在同一只耳朵上,而在双峰条件下,全频谱语音被呈现在一只耳朵上,声码处理语音被呈现在另一只耳朵上。结果:在全谱条件下,听者只需要超过一半的单词时长就能准确识别目标单词,而在声码处理的情况下,听者几乎需要准确识别整个单词。结合全频谱语音和声码处理语音,无论是同侧还是对侧,导致门控词识别的显着改善。全频谱语音产生了最好的门控单词识别性能,其次是双峰刺激,EAS的结果中等,声码器条件的表现最低。结论:CI频谱分辨率的固有限制会损害口语文字处理。加入声刺激可以提高门控词识别性能。与单耳外刺激相比,双峰刺激显著提高词汇处理时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of electro-acoustic stimulation on gated word recognition.

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine how the presentation of unprocessed speech, either ipsilaterally (to simulate electro-acoustic stimulation, EAS) or contralaterally (to simulate bimodal stimulation), alongside vocoder-processed speech affects the efficiency of spoken word processing.

Method: Gated word recognition was performed under four listening conditions: full-spectrum speech, vocoder-processed speech, electro-acoustic stimulation (EAS), and bimodal stimulation. In the EAS condition, low-frequency unprocessed speech and high-frequency vocoder-processed speech were presented to the same ear, while in the bimodal condition, full-spectrum speech was presented to one ear and vocoder-processed speech to the other.

Results: Listeners identified target words accurately with just over half of the word duration in the full-spectrum condition, whereas nearly the entire word was required for correct identification with vocoder-processed speech. Combining full-spectrum speech and vocoder-processed speech, whether ipsilaterally or contralaterally, led to significant improvements in gated word recognition. Full-spectrum speech yielded the best-gated word recognition performance, followed by bimodal stimulation, with intermediate results from EAS and the lowest performance from the vocoder condition.

Conclusion: Inherent limitations in CI spectral resolution can impair spoken word processing. Adding acoustic stimulation can improve gated word recognition performance. Bimodal stimulation significantly enhances lexical processing timing compared to EAS in one ear.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Cochlear Implants International was founded as an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal in response to the growing number of publications in the field of cochlear implants. It was designed to meet a need to include scientific contributions from all the disciplines that are represented in cochlear implant teams: audiology, medicine and surgery, speech therapy and speech pathology, psychology, hearing therapy, radiology, pathology, engineering and acoustics, teaching, and communication. The aim was to found a truly interdisciplinary journal, representing the full breadth of the field of cochlear implantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信