{"title":"Consumers’ privacy concerns and price setting in a multichannel monopoly","authors":"M. Sánchez , A. Urbano","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2025.102471","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.socec.2025.102471","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper develops a dynamic model of multichannel price setting under market signaling and learning. A monopolist sells a good through two channels: brick-and-mortar and online. We introduce two novel features: (i) instrumental and idiosyncratic privacy concerns for consumers purchasing online, and (ii) the idea that firms possess better information about the market’s average privacy concerns than individual consumers, and signal this information through prices. In any fully revealing equilibrium, price signaling can distort prices upward compared to a setting in which the monopolist’s private information is common knowledge. Moreover, social welfare may be higher under a non-informative (pooling) equilibrium than under a fully revealing equilibrium if the realized market signal is sufficiently high. These results offer new insights into the interplay between privacy concerns, information asymmetry, and dynamic pricing in the digital economy, with implications for policy design.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 102471"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145465652","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Work meaningfulness and effort","authors":"Femke Cnossen , Milena Nikolova","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2025.102460","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.socec.2025.102460","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Does experiencing work meaningfulness—defined as perceiving one’s work as personally or socially significant and worthwhile—influence employee effort? Drawing on self-determination theory, we define need satisfaction as the fulfillment of autonomy, competence, and relatedness at work. We develop a utility framework in which need satisfaction enhances motivation, lowers the perceived marginal cost of effort, and fosters work meaningfulness, which in turn increases effort. Using original Dutch LISS panel survey data, we find that autonomy, competence, and relatedness are positively associated with work meaningfulness, which in turn relates to higher self-reported effort and stronger pro-effort attitudes. These results indicate that meaningfulness is not a fixed outcome but one that may be shaped by job design. This would imply that organizations can boost productivity and worker well-being by creating conditions that satisfy employees’ psychological needs. Our findings contribute to labor economics by integrating motivation as an endogenous outcome into labor supply models and by providing empirical evidence on the link between meaningfulness and effort.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 102460"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145319919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Achilleas Vassilopoulos , Marcin Adam Antoniak , Marija Cerjak
{"title":"Risk perception in food safety and the Value of Statistical Mild Food-Induced Adverse Reactions","authors":"Achilleas Vassilopoulos , Marcin Adam Antoniak , Marija Cerjak","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2025.102461","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.socec.2025.102461","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper presents a novel approach to structurally estimating the value of eliminating mild adverse food reactions (Value of Statistical Mild Food-Induced Adverse Reactions, VSFAR) using a discrete choice experiment (DCE), without assuming objective perception of risk or any particular functional form for utility. We showcase our method using a Forthright panel of 1,190 US consumers with some type of food intolerance and find VSFAR values ranging from 22 to 229 USD per case, with substantial variation across models and consumer classes. We also find meaningful differences in likelihood insensitivity and pessimism across consumer segments, underscoring the need to incorporate flexible probability weighting functions and account for heterogeneity in preferences when valuing food-related health risks. Because our estimates are not tied to specific food items or types of adverse reactions, they can be scaled by the expected case numbers to inform societal cost estimates for mild food-borne illness or used in marketing to quantify the effect of risk reduction on the value chain of relevant products.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 102461"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145319916","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Cognitive perspective on the self-reinforcing nature of poverty: Is subjective scarcity related to financial behaviour via the ability to think analytically?","authors":"Viktória Sunyík , Matúš Grežo , Magdalena Adamus","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2025.102481","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.socec.2025.102481","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous research suggests that the conditions of poverty can create cycles in which economic strain and certain financial behaviours reinforce each other over time. According to the scarcity theory, this pattern arises because scarcity depletes cognitive resources and narrows individuals’ attention to poverty-related concerns. The present study introduces a third, previously unexplored mechanism, positing that subjective scarcity indirectly affects financial behaviour by impairing analytic thinking. A representative sample of 712 participants completed a self-report survey, providing information about appraisal of their current financial situation (subjective scarcity), completing a test on analytic thinking, and responding to scales measuring financial management behaviour and impulsive self-gifting financial behaviour. Whilst the results offer limited support for the proposed mechanism, subjective scarcity was found to be directly associated with diminished analytic thinking and lower engagement in both financial management and self-gifting behaviour. These findings suggest that experiencing scarcity is not necessarily linked to impulsive financial behaviour that exacerbates financial strain, but rather to a lower tendency to pursue adaptive financial actions that might help relieve it.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 102481"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145579150","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Madison Ashworth , Linda Thunström , Klaas van't Veld , Robin A. Thompson , David Johnson
{"title":"Perceived agency and paternalism: Increasing support for people with substance use disorder","authors":"Madison Ashworth , Linda Thunström , Klaas van't Veld , Robin A. Thompson , David Johnson","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2025.102465","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.socec.2025.102465","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Substance use disorder (SUD) is a public health and economic crisis in the United States, yet funding for recovery services remains limited. We designed an experiment to examine whether presenting people in SUD recovery as having high or low agency impacts how much donors give in support of SUD recovery, and how donors allocate donations across paternalistic and non-paternalistic aid. Participants in our experiment could donate up to $100 to paternalistic and non-paternalistic SUD recovery support (aid to a recovery house and direct aid to those with SUD, respectively). We found that participants donated about $40 to SUD recovery, of which two-thirds was allocated to recovery houses (paternalistic aid). Both the low and high agency treatments increased recovery house donations, and the high agency treatment significantly increased overall donation amounts. In a follow-up experiment, we tested two additional treatments to rule out alternative explanations (besides agency) for our treatment effects, namely empathy towards residents (tested for by eliminating the description of the residents) and perceived recovery housing effectiveness (tested for by using an agency neutral description). The follow-up experiment replicated the main findings and the agency neutral treatment weakly increased overall donations in support of SUD recovery. These findings suggest that donors have strong preferences for providing paternalistic rather than non-paternalistic aid when supporting a stigmatized population. They also suggest that communicating characteristics of a stigmatized population may help increase donations, particularly if beneficiaries’ positive characteristics (such as agency) are emphasized and donors have the option to provide paternalistic aid.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 102465"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145361962","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Optimism about human pro-sociality correlates with higher confidence in free markets","authors":"Raúl López-Pérez , Diego Santamaría","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2025.102476","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.socec.2025.102476","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The way individuals perceive free markets plays a pivotal role in shaping policy preferences. In this study, we investigate the potential correlation between beliefs about human pro-sociality and the perception that free markets contribute to overall societal well-being. To explore this relationship, we employ incentivized belief elicitation techniques, capturing individuals' perspectives on the prevalence of self-interested, damaging, and helping behavior across diverse situations in four experimental games. Our findings reveal that the most significant predictor of a high confidence in free markets is an optimistic or uncynical worldview. Specifically, this refers to the belief that disinterested and reciprocal helping behavior occurs frequently. In contrast, interpersonal trust and beliefs about the frequency of some specific pro-social and anti-social behaviors do not influence confidence in free markets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 102476"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145528498","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Best practices for reproducibility, research assessment reforms, and implications for experimental economists","authors":"Zacharias Maniadis","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2025.102472","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.socec.2025.102472","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Scientists are under pressure to adhere to best practices for enhancing reproducibility, such as preregistration and data sharing. This tendency will certainly increase with the unfolding reforms in researcher assessment, and it brings new challenges. Heterogeneity in the amenability of different domains to reproducibility-enhancing practices raises an issue of possible inequity: will different scientific domains bear disparate adjustment costs? Is this justified and efficient? To illustrate the problem, we consider recent concerns expressed by experimental economists, namely that they are unfairly burdened relative to other economics domains. Our analysis indicates that such fairness concerns may have merit, but only insofar as research assessment does not fully internalize the costs of adjusting to new practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 102472"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145528423","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jana Eßer , Daniela Flörchinger , Manuel Frondel , Stephan Sommer
{"title":"Avoiding cognitive inconsistency: Experimental evidence on sustainable online shopping","authors":"Jana Eßer , Daniela Flörchinger , Manuel Frondel , Stephan Sommer","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2025.102387","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.socec.2025.102387","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cognitive inconsistency, the discrepancy between individuals’ behavior and their self-image, can cause the psychological discomfort called cognitive dissonance. Drawing on the results of a large-scale online survey experiment conducted in Germany in 2021, this paper investigates whether cognitive dissonance is reduced through self-deception and behavior change. After their attitudes toward sustainable production were elicited, participants could opt for a voucher from either a conventional or a sustainable online marketplace in an incentivized discrete-choice task. The task was combined with an experimental setting in which the salience of cognitive inconsistency was increased by either randomly reminding participants of their previously stated attitudes toward sustainable production or by providing information about the negative aspects of conventional online shopping. While we do not find evidence for self-deception, respondents adapt their behavior to their attitudes when their cognitive inconsistency is more salient.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 102387"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144654311","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Julieth Santamaria, Benjamin Roseth, Florencia Aguirre
{"title":"Does reluctance to share personal data reduce citizen demand for personalized services? Evidence from a survey experiment","authors":"Julieth Santamaria, Benjamin Roseth, Florencia Aguirre","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2025.102447","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.socec.2025.102447","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Digital transformation has brought two conflicting trends: a demand for more customized services requiring the use of personal data, and a concern for data protection. Reconciling these trends may influence personalized public service design and adoption strategies. This study explores how to mitigate citizens’ reluctance to share data on personalized public services. Through a survey experiment, we offered two hypothetical services: one educational service (scholarship) and one health-related service (checkup). Respondents were randomly assigned to one of three groups, receiving different information: (i) a summary of service benefits; (ii) a summary of benefits with a data use disclosure; and (iii) a data usage disclosure. The findings show strong baseline interest in personalized services. However, data-use disclosures reduced interest in both services, resulting in declines of 2.7 to 3.0 percentage points. Providing detailed service descriptions increased interest by 5.0 and 6.1 percentage points for education and health services, respectively. This suggests that offering information about the benefits of the service can offset concerns about data privacy. These effects remained consistent among different population groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 102447"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145104973","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A comparison of endogenous and exogenous group formation to increase cooperation","authors":"Andrea Guido , Louis Putterman , Rustam Romaniuc","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2025.102451","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.socec.2025.102451","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Grouping cooperatively disposed subjects with one another has been shown to slow the decline of contributions in public goods games. So far, similar findings have been obtained both when groups are exogenously formed by the experimenter and when they are endogenously formed by algorithms taking subjects’ preferences for partners into account. We designed an experiment in which internally homogeneous groups – composed of like-minded subjects – can form either exogenously or endogenously, testing the conjecture that endogenously formed groups of cooperators will outperform similar exogenously formed groups due to subjects’ decision rights in the endogenous procedure. We find that the conjecture is not supported, discussing potential explanations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 102451"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145218959","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}