{"title":"Green self-image boosts online volunteering for environmental causes: Experimental evidence","authors":"C. Mónica Capra , Bing Jiang , Yuxin Su","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2024.102186","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.socec.2024.102186","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We investigate the effect of salient green self-image on the willingness to participate in online volunteering for an environmental cause. Our experimental study shows that when the information about participants’ own perceived consciousness and responsibility is made salient, the likelihood of volunteering increases by 11.85 percentage points. Our study contributes to the literature by showing a causal relationship between self-image and pro-environmental volunteering. Our findings have implications for the promotion of online volunteering.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140045651","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Peter Imbriale, Jeffrey A. Livingston, Euthemia Stavrulaki
{"title":"Can Media Reports Encourage Donors to Give Cash Instead of In-kind? Evidence from an Experiment","authors":"Peter Imbriale, Jeffrey A. Livingston, Euthemia Stavrulaki","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2024.102206","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2024.102206","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140399466","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Deepak Kumar Behera , Dil B Rahut , M Padmaja , Ajit Kumar Dash
{"title":"Socioeconomic determinants of happiness: Empirical evidence from developed and developing countries","authors":"Deepak Kumar Behera , Dil B Rahut , M Padmaja , Ajit Kumar Dash","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2024.102187","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2024.102187","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aims to understand the factors that contribute to people's happiness or life satisfaction in 166 countries (51 developed, 115 developing) from 2005 to 2020. The study considers the effects of various socioeconomic factors, such as per capita income, social support, freedom to make life choices, perception of corruption, air pollution exposure, and gender inequality, on the level of happiness. We used panel two-way robust fixed effects and panel quantile regression for empirical analysis. The results show that per capita income, social support, and freedom to make life choices positively impact happiness, while air pollution exposure has a negative impact. However, gender inequality does not significantly affect happiness levels. These findings highlight the relevance of the Easterlin Paradox, which suggests that income can mediate happiness by promoting emotional well-being, gender equality, and a clean environment. Therefore, policymakers should focus on creating a more holistic approach to improving the well-being and happiness of its citizens.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804324000272/pdfft?md5=b0493f0f5f76368dc6aa97f97f4959ea&pid=1-s2.0-S2214804324000272-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140015932","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Uncertainty and climate change: The IPCC approach vs decision theory","authors":"Anastasios Xepapadeas","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2024.102188","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2024.102188","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Uncertainty is one of the most important challenges in the study of climate change and its interactions with the economy. This paper looks at this uncertainty from two different points of view. The first one is the way in which the IPCC deals with uncertainty in its reports, and the way in which that uncertainty is communicated. The IPCC approach is implemented using a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods as well as heuristics. The IPCC studies climate change, its evolution, and its impact in a context which, in terms of the decision-making approach, is akin to analysis under risk. The second point of view is the one adopted by decision theory, which deals with uncertainty in the Knightian sense and, more specifically, with uncertainty that is manifested in multiple probabilistic models or priors. The presence of multiple priors is associated with ambiguity aversion and misspecification concerns that necessitate the use of maxmin optimizing approaches. The IPCC and the decision theory approaches are briefly reviewed and compared, with the objective of finding ways to accommodate the concept of risky parameters or impacts of the IPCC framework within the framework of optimization under uncertainty in multiple probabilistic models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804324000284/pdfft?md5=ce6ba503028506afd3e52a1e28ff7b7d&pid=1-s2.0-S2214804324000284-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139941750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Victor von Loessl , Christoph Bühren , Björn Frank , Heike Wetzel , Elina Wiederhold
{"title":"Would you lie about your mother's birthday? A new online dishonesty experiment","authors":"Victor von Loessl , Christoph Bühren , Björn Frank , Heike Wetzel , Elina Wiederhold","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2024.102191","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.socec.2024.102191","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We ask a representative sample of German household decision-makers to enter their mother's birthday, with potential payments depending on the month and the day they state. Thus, we create an incentive to lie. Compared to the die-under-the-cup experiment, our alternative has a lower probability that the income-maximizing outcome is true. Furthermore, it is better suited for online surveys and samples in which gambling is socially stigmatized. We conduct different variations of this game to crystalize design recommendations for researchers interested in our tool. Participants lied to receive higher payoffs, but only with real monetary incentives and only to a relatively small extent. Our results are largely insensitive to several design elements that we vary, such as the probability of being paid and the magnitude of the payoffs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804324000314/pdfft?md5=d111fbc57445fbb10b03f47e915d6ba9&pid=1-s2.0-S2214804324000314-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139954853","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The positionality of goods and the positional concern’s origin","authors":"Martín Leites , Analía Rivero , Gonzalo Salas","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2024.102184","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.socec.2024.102184","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper investigates what goods are positional, the degree of individuals’ positional concern, and their possible drivers for a sample of Uruguayan younger. The participants’ degree of positional concern is generated using a choice experimental approach. The study combines longitudinal information about participants’ perceptions of the visibility of the goods and their reference groups and randomized information treatments to prime participants into competing narratives regarding (i) the goods, (ii) gender, and (iii) sources of inequality in society. The main findings are: (1) the visibility of the goods would not be a necessary condition for their position: jewelry, cars, and health insurance are positional goods; (2) relative income matters, but less than relative consumption of these goods; (3) the positional concern is heterogeneous at the individuals level with a bimodal distribution: one group of individuals has a high prevalence of relative concern, while the other is positional-neutral; (4) there are no differences by gender, visibility perceptions and declared reference group; and (5) individuals are less likely to report positional concerns (and inequality aversion) when differences in income come from effort and inheritance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139954973","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Incomplete promises and the norm of keeping promises","authors":"Sergio Mittlaender","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2024.102182","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2024.102182","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Promises, like contracts, are inherently incomplete and rarely specify what the promisor ought to do in different possible contingencies, thereby being apt to be interpreted differently by the promisor and promisee, with their conflicting interests, and in a self-serving manner whenever circumstances change. This article studies the effect of the incompleteness of a promise on the decision to keep the promise and on individual beliefs that are relevant for the social norm of keeping promises. It investigates, in a laboratory experiment, how individuals form beliefs about how promisors behave, how promisees expect promisors to behave, and how neutral individuals evaluate the immorality of breaking promises when a contingency that was not explicitly addressed by the promise materializes. Promisors distort their beliefs to breach without incurring guilt or moral costs when the promise is incomplete, but even neutral individuals believe that breach is more socially acceptable in this case. Results further reveal substantial heterogeneity in individual beliefs, providing insights into why people do not always respect a fundamental social norm such as keeping promises, at times violating it and at times keeping it.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804324000223/pdfft?md5=1cca73863c8ea1720fd3af20a47764f6&pid=1-s2.0-S2214804324000223-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139743984","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Valuing insurance against small probability risks: A meta-analysis","authors":"Selim Mankaï , Sébastien Marchand , Ngoc Ha Le","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2024.102181","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.socec.2024.102181","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The demand for voluntary insurance against low-probability, high-impact risks is lower than expected. To assess the magnitude of the demand, we conduct a meta-analysis of contingent valuation studies using a dataset of experimentally elicited and survey-based estimates. We find that the average stated willingness to pay (WTP) for insurance is 87 % of expected losses. We perform a meta-regression analysis to examine the heterogeneity in aggregate WTP across these studies. The meta-regression reveals that information about loss probability and probability levels positively influence relative willingness to pay, whereas respondents’ average income and age have a negative effect. Moreover, we identify cultural sub-factors, such as power distance and uncertainty avoidance, that provided additional explanations for differences in WTP across international samples. Methodological factors related to the sampling and data collection process significantly influence the stated WTP. Our results, robust to model specification and publication bias, are relevant to current debates on stated preferences for low-probability risks management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139885916","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Climate change, tipping points, and economics","authors":"Aart de Zeeuw","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2024.102185","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2024.102185","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper discusses the response of the economics profession to a possible occurrence of tipping points in natural systems, with a drop in welfare. For a climate tipping point, the hazard-rate model is relevant, and the paper shows that in a Ramsey growth model with climate tipping, the effect on policy is increased saving and increased taxation of greenhouse gas emissions. Climate change is often seen as a tragedy of the commons because incentives to deviate undermine cooperation and prevention of climate change. However, a climate tipping point can be prevented in a Nash equilibrium or with partial cooperation if the drop in welfare is sufficiently high. In case of uncertainty about the threshold, this result remains if the uncertainty is not too large. In the conclusion, the paper makes a few remarks on including tipping points in teaching environmental and resource economics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804324000259/pdfft?md5=b0dd9096fac97611c66d2d51e1926a61&pid=1-s2.0-S2214804324000259-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139743986","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Gender effects in dictator game giving under voluntary choice of the recipient’s gender: Women favour female recipients","authors":"Maximilian Baltrusch , Philipp C. Wichardt","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2024.102183","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2024.102183","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Allowing for free choice of the recipient’s gender in a dictator game (<span><math><mrow><mi>N</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>357</mn></mrow></math></span>), women give more frequently to their own gender (70.3% vs 9.4%) while men do not prefer a specific recipient’s gender (33.3% vs 27.8%). Conditional on a positive transfer being made, the average amount of transfers to each gender does not vary between genders, though. Once a charity recipient is added to the possible choices, overall transfers increase and gender differences in average giving mostly vanish, as the charity becomes the primary recipient for all participants. The literature on cognitive dissonance (the feeling of distress once we act against our internalised values) emphasises the importance of voluntary choice for dissonance effects to take hold. Accordingly, we interpret our results as hinting at an important detail regarding the ongoing gender debate about altruistic giving: primary differences may not be found in the amount of transfers made but in the choice of the beneficiary’s gender.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804324000235/pdfft?md5=3fd920ba69ad31ca16eac0ae8cacd8cf&pid=1-s2.0-S2214804324000235-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139675078","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}