Martine Visser , Chalmers K. Mulwa , Zachary Gitonga , Max Baard
{"title":"Weather uncertainty and demand for information in technology adoption: Case of Namibia","authors":"Martine Visser , Chalmers K. Mulwa , Zachary Gitonga , Max Baard","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2025.102346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the impact of risk and ambiguity preferences on farmers‘ technology adoption decisions under uncertainty, with an emphasis on the role of precise weather information in guiding these decisions. Using framed lab-in-the-field experiments conducted with rural households in the North-Central region of Namibia, we elicit individual risk and ambiguity attitudes and observe technology choices across varying levels of known and unknown probabilities of favourable weather. Our findings show that risk-seeking behaviour significantly increases the likelihood of adopting higher-risk, higher-return agricultural technologies when probabilities are known. Under ambiguity, both risk and ambiguity preferences significantly influence technology choices, with ambiguity-averse farmers tending towards safer options. Importantly, we demonstrate that farmers’ willingness to pay for precise weather information escalates with the level of objective uncertainty that they face. Access to accurate weather forecasts leads to significant improvements in weather-related decisions under complete uncertainty, promoting the adoption of improved technologies and increasing expected payoffs. These results underscore the crucial role of objective uncertainty in shaping demand for information and highlight the potential of targeted weather information services to enhance farmers’ agricultural decision-making, particularly in the arid and semi-arid regions of sub-Saharan Africa. Our study contributes to the literature by providing empirical evidence on how reducing uncertainty through information provision can facilitate technology adoption, suggesting that investments in weather forecasting and dissemination could substantially benefit farmers in regions vulnerable to climate variability and when there are high levels of objective uncertainty.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","volume":"116 ","pages":"Article 102346"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804325000138","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study examines the impact of risk and ambiguity preferences on farmers‘ technology adoption decisions under uncertainty, with an emphasis on the role of precise weather information in guiding these decisions. Using framed lab-in-the-field experiments conducted with rural households in the North-Central region of Namibia, we elicit individual risk and ambiguity attitudes and observe technology choices across varying levels of known and unknown probabilities of favourable weather. Our findings show that risk-seeking behaviour significantly increases the likelihood of adopting higher-risk, higher-return agricultural technologies when probabilities are known. Under ambiguity, both risk and ambiguity preferences significantly influence technology choices, with ambiguity-averse farmers tending towards safer options. Importantly, we demonstrate that farmers’ willingness to pay for precise weather information escalates with the level of objective uncertainty that they face. Access to accurate weather forecasts leads to significant improvements in weather-related decisions under complete uncertainty, promoting the adoption of improved technologies and increasing expected payoffs. These results underscore the crucial role of objective uncertainty in shaping demand for information and highlight the potential of targeted weather information services to enhance farmers’ agricultural decision-making, particularly in the arid and semi-arid regions of sub-Saharan Africa. Our study contributes to the literature by providing empirical evidence on how reducing uncertainty through information provision can facilitate technology adoption, suggesting that investments in weather forecasting and dissemination could substantially benefit farmers in regions vulnerable to climate variability and when there are high levels of objective uncertainty.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly the Journal of Socio-Economics) welcomes submissions that deal with various economic topics but also involve issues that are related to other social sciences, especially psychology, or use experimental methods of inquiry. Thus, contributions in behavioral economics, experimental economics, economic psychology, and judgment and decision making are especially welcome. The journal is open to different research methodologies, as long as they are relevant to the topic and employed rigorously. Possible methodologies include, for example, experiments, surveys, empirical work, theoretical models, meta-analyses, case studies, and simulation-based analyses. Literature reviews that integrate findings from many studies are also welcome, but they should synthesize the literature in a useful manner and provide substantial contribution beyond what the reader could get by simply reading the abstracts of the cited papers. In empirical work, it is important that the results are not only statistically significant but also economically significant. A high contribution-to-length ratio is expected from published articles and therefore papers should not be unnecessarily long, and short articles are welcome. Articles should be written in a manner that is intelligible to our generalist readership. Book reviews are generally solicited but occasionally unsolicited reviews will also be published. Contact the Book Review Editor for related inquiries.