解开性别规范:优先促进妇女的社会和个人规范

IF 1.6 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Manuel E. Lago, Margaret Samahita, Orla Doyle
{"title":"解开性别规范:优先促进妇女的社会和个人规范","authors":"Manuel E. Lago,&nbsp;Margaret Samahita,&nbsp;Orla Doyle","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2025.102336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Gender norms are a major barrier to achieving equality in the labor market. This study investigates the role of gender norms on attitudes towards preferentially promoting women to senior-level positions. Using an information provision experiment (<em>N</em> = 1,360), we test whether providing information that targets social or personal norms influences attitudes and behavior towards promoting women. We find that respondents underestimate the overall level of support for affirmative action in the U.S. However, neither the social nor personal norm interventions were effective in changing attitudes towards preferentially promoting women. These null effects are precisely measured and do not result from an underpowered study. We find evidence that Republican respondents are less likely to promote female candidates when exposed to information about the increasing proportion of U.S. citizens in favor of preferential promotion policies, i.e., when we target social norms. These results suggest that customized interventions or legislative changes addressing norms may be more effective strategies than general informational campaigns.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","volume":"115 ","pages":"Article 102336"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unraveling gender norms: Social and personal norms in the preferential promotion of women\",\"authors\":\"Manuel E. Lago,&nbsp;Margaret Samahita,&nbsp;Orla Doyle\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socec.2025.102336\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Gender norms are a major barrier to achieving equality in the labor market. This study investigates the role of gender norms on attitudes towards preferentially promoting women to senior-level positions. Using an information provision experiment (<em>N</em> = 1,360), we test whether providing information that targets social or personal norms influences attitudes and behavior towards promoting women. We find that respondents underestimate the overall level of support for affirmative action in the U.S. However, neither the social nor personal norm interventions were effective in changing attitudes towards preferentially promoting women. These null effects are precisely measured and do not result from an underpowered study. We find evidence that Republican respondents are less likely to promote female candidates when exposed to information about the increasing proportion of U.S. citizens in favor of preferential promotion policies, i.e., when we target social norms. These results suggest that customized interventions or legislative changes addressing norms may be more effective strategies than general informational campaigns.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics\",\"volume\":\"115 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102336\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804325000035\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804325000035","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

性别规范是实现劳动力市场平等的主要障碍。本研究探讨性别规范对优先提拔女性担任高级职位的态度所起的作用。利用信息提供实验(N = 1,360),我们测试了提供针对社会或个人规范的信息是否会影响对提升女性的态度和行为。我们发现受访者低估了美国平权行动的总体支持水平。然而,无论是社会规范还是个人规范干预都不能有效地改变人们对优先提拔女性的态度。这些无效效应是经过精确测量的,并不是由于研究不足而产生的。我们发现有证据表明,当共和党受访者得知越来越多的美国公民支持优惠的晋升政策时,即当我们以社会规范为目标时,他们不太可能提拔女性候选人。这些结果表明,针对规范的定制干预措施或立法变化可能比一般的信息宣传活动更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unraveling gender norms: Social and personal norms in the preferential promotion of women
Gender norms are a major barrier to achieving equality in the labor market. This study investigates the role of gender norms on attitudes towards preferentially promoting women to senior-level positions. Using an information provision experiment (N = 1,360), we test whether providing information that targets social or personal norms influences attitudes and behavior towards promoting women. We find that respondents underestimate the overall level of support for affirmative action in the U.S. However, neither the social nor personal norm interventions were effective in changing attitudes towards preferentially promoting women. These null effects are precisely measured and do not result from an underpowered study. We find evidence that Republican respondents are less likely to promote female candidates when exposed to information about the increasing proportion of U.S. citizens in favor of preferential promotion policies, i.e., when we target social norms. These results suggest that customized interventions or legislative changes addressing norms may be more effective strategies than general informational campaigns.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
113
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly the Journal of Socio-Economics) welcomes submissions that deal with various economic topics but also involve issues that are related to other social sciences, especially psychology, or use experimental methods of inquiry. Thus, contributions in behavioral economics, experimental economics, economic psychology, and judgment and decision making are especially welcome. The journal is open to different research methodologies, as long as they are relevant to the topic and employed rigorously. Possible methodologies include, for example, experiments, surveys, empirical work, theoretical models, meta-analyses, case studies, and simulation-based analyses. Literature reviews that integrate findings from many studies are also welcome, but they should synthesize the literature in a useful manner and provide substantial contribution beyond what the reader could get by simply reading the abstracts of the cited papers. In empirical work, it is important that the results are not only statistically significant but also economically significant. A high contribution-to-length ratio is expected from published articles and therefore papers should not be unnecessarily long, and short articles are welcome. Articles should be written in a manner that is intelligible to our generalist readership. Book reviews are generally solicited but occasionally unsolicited reviews will also be published. Contact the Book Review Editor for related inquiries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信