Journal of Frailty & Aging最新文献

{"title":"Yubi-Wakka Test for Sarcopenia Screening in the Community: Comparative Agreement, Diagnostic Performance and Validity with Calf Circumference Measurements.","authors":"M R B Piodena-Aportadera, S Lau, C N Tan, J Chew, J P Lim, N H Ismail, Y Y Ding, W S Lim","doi":"10.14283/jfa.2024.25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2024.25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Screening tools such as calf circumference (CC) and Yubi-wakka (finger-ring) test have been recognized as effective tools by Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 (AWGS'19) for sarcopenia screening but their comparative agreement, diagnostic performance and validity are unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to determine: (i)agreement between calf and finger-ring circumference, (ii)diagnostic performance for low muscle mass and AWGS'19 sarcopenia diagnosis, (iii)correlation with muscle mass, strength, and physical performance, and (iv)association with frailty, life space mobility and physical activity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied 187 healthy community-dwelling older adults (mean age=66.8+7.0years) from the GERILABS-2 study. CC was measured via (i) both calves in sitting and standing positions, and (ii) Yubi-wakka test by encircling the thickest part of the non-dominant calf with index fingers and thumbs of both hands. We performed Cohen's kappa to check for agreement, area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to compare diagnostic performance, partial correlations adjusted for age and gender to compare convergent validity, and logistic regression to determine predictive validity for outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sarcopenia prevalence was 24.0% (AWGS'19). Yubi-wakka identified 16.6% of participants as screen-positive (\"smaller\"), showing moderate agreement only with non-dominant sitting CC measurements (k=0.421,p<0.001) and having lower diagnostic performance in determining low muscle mass (AUC=0.591 vs 0.855-0.870,p<0.001; sensitivity=57.1% vs 75.5-90.8%; specificity=58.4% vs 70.8-80.9%) and sarcopenia diagnosis (AUC=0.581 vs 0.788-0.818,p<0.001; sensitivity=55.6% vs 57.5-71.8%; specificity=74.4% vs 75.6-88.9%) compared to CC measurements. Yubi-wakka correlated significantly with muscle mass, grip strength and knee extension but not physical performance. When adjusted for age, gender and hypertension, Yubi-wakka was significantly associated with frailty (OR=3.96,95%CI:1.09-14.38), life space mobility (OR=2.38,95%CI:1.08-5.24) and physical activity (OR=2.50,95%CI:1.07-5.86).</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>Yubi-wakka provides a self-administered, low-cost and practicable community screening tool for sarcopenia. Our study affirmed the convergent and predictive validity of Yubi-wakka, albeit with lower sensitivity and specificity in diagnostic performance compared to CC measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":51629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","volume":"13 2","pages":"98-107"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140873532","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Modulates Gut Microbiome Composition and Glial Signaling in Brain and Colon of Rats with Neuropathic Pain: Evidence for Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis.","authors":"C-L Shen, H Deshmukh, J M Santos, M M Elmassry, P Presto, Z Driver, V Bhakta, V Yakhnitsa, T Kiritoshi, G Ji, J Lovett, A Hamood, V Neugebauer","doi":"10.14283/jfa.2024.65","DOIUrl":"10.14283/jfa.2024.65","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite evidence linking the gut microbiome to neuropathic pain (NP), it is not known if altering gut microbiota can alleviate NP via the microbiome-gut-brain axis. This study examined if healthy gut microbiota of sham male rats (Sham+V) and dysbiotic gut microbiota of NP rats (spinal nerve ligation: NP, SNL+V) can be disrupted and restored, respectively, via fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) from the opposite group [Sham+(SNL-FMT) and SNL+(Sham-FMT), respectively]. All groups received FMT daily for two weeks, followed by three weeks without FMT. SNL rats showed higher mechanical hypersensitivity [SNL+V vs. Sham+V] throughout the study. After two weeks, the FMT of healthy gut microbiota decreased mechanical hypersensitivity in SNL rats [SNL+(Sham-FMT) vs. SNL+V]. A temporal shift in microbiome profiles after 2-week FMT treatment was observed in Sham+(SNL-FMT) and SNL+(Sham-FMT) groups, while the microbiome profile shifted back a certain extent after FMT ceased. At the end of study, the Sham+(SNL-FMT) group acquired low abundance of UCG-001, Odoribacter, and Peptococcaceae, and high abundance of UBA1819 and Victivallis. The SNL+(Sham-FMT) group maintained high abundance of Butyricimonas and Escherichia-Shigella. The SNL+(Sham-FMT) group had altered glial and macrophage activation/inflammation markers in the brain/colon than the SNL+V group. Relative to the SNL+V group, the SNL+(Sham-FMT) group had significantly lower gene expressions of GFAP (hypothalamus), IBA-1 (colon), and NF-κB (amygdala/colon), but higher gene expressions of complex I (amygdala/hypothalamus) and claudin-3 (amygdala/hypothalamus/colon). In conclusion, FMT containing healthy microbiota given to SNL rats attenuates mechanical hypersensitivity, modulates microbiota composition, and mitigates downstream glial activation/inflammation markers in a NP model.</p>","PeriodicalId":51629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","volume":"13 4","pages":"319-330"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142689606","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Application of a Social Vulnerability Index and Its Associations with Physical Frailty and Disability in a Cross-sectional Study of Older Kenyan Women Living with and without HIV.","authors":"S Prabhu, B Oyaro, G Wanje, F M Aunon, N Gomez Juarez, B P Flaherty, W McCormick, M K Andrew, W Jaoko, R S McClelland, S M Graham","doi":"10.14283/jfa.2024.71","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2024.71","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social vulnerability reflects deficits in social resources that may disproportionally impact older women with HIV (WWH) in Africa.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the relationship between scores on an adapted Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) and measures of physical frailty and disability.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>293 women (156 HIV-positive, 137 HIV-negative) aged >40 years in Mombasa, Kenya who were recruited from the Mombasa Cohort of women with a history of transactional sex and the general community.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Assessments including an SVI adapted for the Kenyan context (SVI-Kenya), the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and the World Health Organization Disability Assessment (WHODAS) were compared by HIV status. Linear regression was used to determine the relationship between SVI-Kenya score and both CFS and WHODAS, after adjustment for potential confounders. An exploratory analysis identified factors associated with SVI-Kenya score. An age-by-HIV-status interaction term was tested and retained if significant in unadjusted analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean SVI-Kenya score was 34.1 (SD, 12.9) and did not differ by HIV status (p=0.49). In adjusted analyses, each increment in SVI-Kenya score was associated with a 1.10-point higher WHODAS score (95%CI:0. 21, 1.99), but not with CFS. In exploratory analysis, factors associated with higher SVI-Kenya score included WHODAS score (adjusted beta=0.20; 95%CI: 0.05,0.35) and Mombasa Cohort recruitment (adjusted beta=5.91; 95%CI: 2.07,9.75). Being married, separated/divorced, or widowed predicted lower SVI-Kenya scores (by 5.52-9.09 points) compared to being single. Age did not predict SVI-Kenya score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Social vulnerability as measured by the SVI-Kenya score was associated with greater disability but not physical frailty. Social vulnerability was also associated with prior sex work and never having married. Our findings suggest that social vulnerability is a distinct construct from physical frailty among older Kenyan women and not related to HIV status.</p>","PeriodicalId":51629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","volume":"13 4","pages":"552-560"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142689430","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Food Insecurity, Vision Impairment, and Longitudinal Risk of Frailty and Falls in The National Health and Aging Trends Study.","authors":"A M Wennberg, S Ek, M Na","doi":"10.14283/jfa.2024.21","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2024.21","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Both food insecurity (FI) and vision impairment (VI), which are linked, have been independently associated with frailty and falls.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Understand how FI and VI may together contribute to frailty and fall risk could improve insight into these growing public health challenges.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, participants, measurements: </strong>This study included 5,963 participants aged 65 and older enrolled in the National Health and Aging Trends Study. Participants were divided into four exposure groups (\"No FI or VI,\" \"FI, no VI,\" \"VI, no FI,\" and \"Both\") based on self-report. The Fried Frailty Index and self-reported falls were assessed annually. We used adjusted logistic and Poisson regression models to examine cross-sectional associations and generalized estimating equations to examine longitudinal associations between FI/VI status and falls and frailty outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most study participants reported neither FI nor VI (n=5169, 86.7%); however, having both FI and VI (n=57, 1%) was cross-sectionally associated with higher frailty score and higher odds of falling multiple times in the last year. FI and/or VI were longitudinally associated with higher frailty score and increased frailty risk, with the strongest association for Both (RRR=1.29, 95% CI 1.23, 1.58; OR=3.18, 95% CI 1.78, 5.69), and with falling, again highest among those with Both, for one (OR=2.47, 95% CI 1.41, 3.96) and multiple (OR=2.46, 95% CI 1.50, 4.06) falls in the last year.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinical and public health interventions could address the intersection of FI and VI with the aim of ameliorating the impact of these risk factors and health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","volume":"13 3","pages":"285-292"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141857070","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Integrated Service Delivery Model in Primary Care to Improve Frailty in Older Malaysians: GeKo Integrated Service Delivery.","authors":"S S Ahip, C Y Ting, M A B Abdillah, Y J Tan, S A B Sabri, O Theou, S Shariff-Ghazali, R Visvanathan","doi":"10.14283/jfa.2024.42","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2024.42","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the implementation stage of Malaysia's GeKo-Integrated Service Delivery (ISD) model for frailty management in primary care and explore its effectiveness in improving frailty scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The implementation stage of Malaysia's first three GeKo- ISD clinics was assessed using the WHO-ICOPE (Integrated Care of the Older Persons) scorecard. This involved evaluating documents related to the GeKo services and conducting in-depth interviews with key informants identified from those documents. The efficacy of GeKo-ISD was assessed by documenting the change in mean frailty scores between baseline and 3 months post intervention, measured by the Pictorial Fit Frail Scale Malay Version (PFFS-M), in patients who received GeKo-ISD care from October 2022 to April 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All three GeKo clinics achieved the sustaining implementation level, scoring a total of 50 out of 52. The paired t-test reported a significant reduction (p= 0.001) in the PFFS-M scores from baseline to 3 months after the GeKo-ISD intervention. The mean (SD) scores were 8.6 (4.6) at baseline and 7.0 (4.1) at 3 months post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GeKo-ISD is a comprehensive approach of integrated care for older people, leveraging existing public funded primary care infrastructure. It shows promise, was impacted by the pandemic but now, with support from the government, exists in 32 centers across one state in Malaysia.</p>","PeriodicalId":51629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","volume":"13 3","pages":"313-318"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141857075","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Teaching Frailty to Medical Residents: A Needs Assessment Among Geriatrics Faculty.","authors":"M Cheslock, A Nahas, A R Orkaby, A W Schwartz","doi":"10.14283/jfa.2024.26","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2024.26","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Knowledge of frailty is essential for meeting the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education core competencies for US trainees. The UK General Medical Council requires that frailty be included in undergraduate and graduate medical education curricula. Trainees are expected to appropriately modify care plans and help make patient-centered decisions, while incorporating diagnostic uncertainty, such as frailty, in older adults. Little is known about current needs for frailty instruction in graduate medical education in the US and beyond.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We sought to capture faculty perceptions on how frailty should be defined and identified, and what aspects and level of detail should be taught to residents.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The authors developed a 4-item short response questionnaire, and faculty had the option to respond via electronic survey or via semi-structured interviews.</p><p><strong>Setting and subjects: </strong>Respondents included 24 fellowship-trained geriatricians based at 6 different academic medical centers in a single urban metropolitan area.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An invitation to participate in either an electronic survey or semi-structured virtual interview was e-mailed to 30 geriatricians affiliated with an academic multi-campus Geriatric Medicine fellowship. Responses were transcribed and coded independently by two authors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses were received from 24 geriatricians via a combination of digital questionnaires (n=18) and semi-structured online interviews (n=6), for a response rate of 80%. Responses revealed significant diversity of opinion on how to define and identify frailty and how these concepts should be taught.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As frailty is increasingly incorporated into clinical practice, consensus is needed on how to define and teach frailty to residents.</p>","PeriodicalId":51629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","volume":"13 2","pages":"189-192"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140853518","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Myokines and Biomarkers of Frailty in Older Inpatients with Undernutrition: A Prospective Study.","authors":"H Liu, W Li, M Zhu, X Wen, J Jin, H Wang, D Lv, S Zhao, X Wu, J Jiao","doi":"10.14283/jfa.2024.9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2024.9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Population aging might increase the prevalence of undernutrition in older people, which increases the risk of frailty. Numerous studies have indicated that myokines are released by skeletal myocytes in response to muscular contractions and might be associated with frailty. This study aimed to evaluate whether myokines are biomarkers of frailty in older inpatients with undernutrition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The frailty biomarkers were extracted from the Gene Expression Omnibus and Genecards datasets. Relevant myokines and health-related variables were assessed in 55 inpatients aged ≥ 65 years from the Peking Union Medical College Hospital prospective longitudinal frailty study. Serum was prepared for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using the appropriate kits. Correlations between biomarkers and frailty status were calculated by Spearman's correlation analysis. Multiple linear regression was performed to investigate the association between factors and frailty scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of frailty was 13.21%. The bioinformatics analysis indicated that leptin, adenosine 5'-monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK), irisin, decorin, and myostatin were potential biomarkers of frailty. The frailty group had significantly higher concentrations of leptin, AMPK, and MSTN than the robust group (p < 0.05). AMPK was significantly positively correlated with frailty (p < 0.05). The pre-frailty and frailty groups had significantly lower concentrations of irisin than the robust group (p < 0.05), whereas the DCN concentration did not differ among the groups. Multiple linear regression suggested that the 15 factors influencing the coefficients of association, the top 50% were the ADL score, MNA-SF score, serum albumin concentration, urination function, hearing function, leptin concentration, GDS-15 score, and MSTN concentration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Proinflammatory myokines, particularly leptin, myostatin, and AMPK, negatively affect muscle mass and strength in older adults. ADL and nutritional status play major roles in the development of frailty. Our results confirm that identification of frailty relies upon clinical variables, myokine concentrations, and functional parameters, which might enable the identification and monitoring of frailty.</p>","PeriodicalId":51629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","volume":"13 2","pages":"82-90"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140854424","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Combined Social Frailty and Life-Space Activities Associated with Risk of Disability: A Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"T Doi, K Tsutsumimoto, K Makino, S Nakakubo, F Sakimoto, S Matsuda, H Shimada","doi":"10.14283/jfa.2024.17","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2024.17","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the association between social frailty and life-space activities, and determine whether a combined status of life-space activities and social frailty is associated with risk of disability among older adults.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>The participants were 8,301 older adults (mean age 72.9 ± 5.6 years, women [53.3%]) from a community setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Life-space activities were evaluated using the Active Mobility Index (AMI) to assess activities in each life-space (distance from the respondent's home: up to 1 km, 1-10 km, or greater than 10 km) during the past 1 month. Activities were also assessed according to physical or social activity. Social frailty and characteristics were measured at the baseline. Incident disability was assessed according to long term care insurance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The lowest scoring group was based on the quartile in each of the AMI scores (Q1), with reference to the highest scoring group, which had a higher odds ratios for social frailty (AMI total score Q1: OR 4.32, 95% CI 3.43-5.45, AMI physical score Q1: 2.19, 95% CI 1.79-2.69, AMI social score Q1: 5.04, 95% CI 3.94-6.44). During the follow-up (mean 23.5 months), 330 participants had incident disability. Incident disability was associated with social frailty. Combined status of social frailty and low AMI increased the risk of disability (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.52-3.03), with reference to non-frailty and higher AMI scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>Social frailty or reduced activity in life-space assessment were identified as risk factors for incident disability. To decrease the risk of disability, the development of an intervention program to enhance activities and cope with social frailty is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":51629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","volume":"13 2","pages":"184-188"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140860270","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Social Vulnerability, Frailty and Self-Perceived Health: Findings from The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA).","authors":"L Orlandini, E Patrizio, A M O'Halloran, C A McGarrigle, R Romero-Ortuno, R A Kenny, M Proietti, M Cesari","doi":"10.14283/jfa.2024.1","DOIUrl":"10.14283/jfa.2024.1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social vulnerability interacts with frailty and influences individuals' health status. Although frailty and social vulnerability are highly predictive of adverse outcomes, their relationship with self-perceived health(SPH) has been less investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data are from the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing(TILDA), a population-based longitudinal study of ageing. We included 4,222 participants aged ≥50 years (age 61.4±8.5 years;women 56%) from Wave 1 (2009-2011) followed over three longitudinal waves (2012,2014-2015,2016). Participants responded to single questions with five response options to rate their 1)physical health, 2)mental health, and 3)health compared to peers. 30-item Frailty (FI) and Social Vulnerability (SVI) indices were calculated using standardised methods. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to establish the association between FI and SVI cross-sectionally and longitudinally over 6 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cross-sectionally, SVI (mean:0.40±0.08; range:0.14-0.81) and FI (mean: 0.13±0.08; range:0.10-0.58) were modestly correlated (r=0.256), and independently associated with poor physical health (SVI: OR 1.43, 95%CI 1.15-1.78; FI: OR 3.16, 95%CI 2.54-3.93), poor mental health (SVI: OR 1.65, 95%CI 1.17-2.35; FI: OR 3.64, 95%CI 2.53-5.24), and poor health compared to peers (SVI: OR 1.41,95%CI 1.06-1.89; FI: OR 3.86, 95%CI 2.9-5.14). Longitudinally, FI and SVI were independently and positively associated with poor physical health (SVI: β 1.08, 95%CI 0.76-1.39; FI: β 1.97, 95%CI 1.58-2.36), poor mental health (SVI: β 1.18, 95%CI 0.86-1.5; FI: β 1.58, 95%CI 1.2-1.97), and poor overall health compared to peers (SVI: β 0.78, 95%CI 0.89-1.33; FI: β 1.74, 95%CI 0.47-1.1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a large cohort of community-dwelling older adults, frailty and social vulnerability were associated with poor SPH and with risk of SPH decline over six years.</p>","PeriodicalId":51629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","volume":"13 1","pages":"50-56"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139673633","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Loneliness Predicts Progression of Frailty in Married and Widowed, but Not Unmarried Community Dwelling Older Adults.","authors":"C Pollak, J Verghese, A S Buchman, Y Jin, H M Blumen","doi":"10.14283/jfa.2024.27","DOIUrl":"10.14283/jfa.2024.27","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Loneliness is highly prevalent among older adults and is associated with frailty. Most studies consider loneliness in isolation without consideration for structural and functional measures of social relationships - and longitudinal studies are scarce.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examined longitudinal associations between loneliness and frailty and analyzed how structural and functional social measures influence these associations.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Linear mixed effects models examined longitudinal associations between loneliness and frailty assessed with the frailty index (scale 0-100). Models were adjusted for baseline age, gender, education, depressive symptoms, global cognition, and structural (e.g., social network, marital status), and functional social measures (e.g., social, cognitive, and physical activity, and social support).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Loneliness and frailty data from 1,931 older adults without dementia at baseline from the Rush Memory and Aging Project were examined (mean age 79.6 ± 7.7 years, 74.9% female).</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Baseline loneliness assessed by the de Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale was the predictor of interest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Frailty increased significantly over a mean follow-up period of 4.6 years. Effects of loneliness on frailty were modified by marital status. Loneliness predicted an additional accumulation of 0.37 and 0.34 deficits on the frailty index per year in married and widowed individuals respectively, compared to those who were not lonely (married: p=0.009, CI 0.09, 0.64; widowed: p=0.005, CI 0.1, 0.58). Loneliness did not predict frailty progression in unmarried individuals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Loneliness predicts frailty progression, highlighting the importance of social determinants on physical health in aging.</p>","PeriodicalId":51629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","volume":"13 2","pages":"163-171"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11898203/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140873441","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}