中国老年人临床心理韧性评估量表(CHEES)的开发。

IF 3.3 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
J Li, P Liu, Y Zhang, G Wang, Y Zhou, Y Xing, L Zhang, Y Li, L Ma
{"title":"中国老年人临床心理韧性评估量表(CHEES)的开发。","authors":"J Li, P Liu, Y Zhang, G Wang, Y Zhou, Y Xing, L Zhang, Y Li, L Ma","doi":"10.14283/jfa.2024.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physical resilience is an emerging concept that describes an individual's capacity to recover from stressors. However, few instruments are currently available for assessing physical resilience.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a scale to assess physical resilience in older adults.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Development of a clinical scale.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>A total of 172 hospitalized older adults were recruited.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>This study comprised two stages. First, a pool of physical resilience scale items was created through a literature review, and the Delphi method was used to establish an initial scale. Second, the initial physical resilience scale was tested on hospitalized older adults.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five primary and 19 secondary items were identified after reviewing the literature. After two rounds of expert consultations, three primary and 16 secondary items were determined. The overall Cronbach's alpha for the scale was 0.760. Except for items N2, N4, N5, N8, and N14, Pearson's correlation between the scores of the remaining items and the total score ranged from 0.407 to 0.672. Except for items N2, N4, and N5, the corrected item-total correlation results ranged from 0.301 to 0.580, indicating good consistency between each item and the overall scale. Factor analysis showed that except for N7, the factor loadings of the remaining items were between 0.584 and 0.844. After expert discussions, items N2, N4, N7, and N14 were included in the scale, and items N5 and N8 were removed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A 14-item physical resilience scale, CHEES, was developed to assess physical resilience levels in older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":51629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of the Clinical pHysical rEsilience assEssment Scale (CHEES) in Chinese Older Adults.\",\"authors\":\"J Li, P Liu, Y Zhang, G Wang, Y Zhou, Y Xing, L Zhang, Y Li, L Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.14283/jfa.2024.24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physical resilience is an emerging concept that describes an individual's capacity to recover from stressors. However, few instruments are currently available for assessing physical resilience.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a scale to assess physical resilience in older adults.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Development of a clinical scale.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>A total of 172 hospitalized older adults were recruited.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>This study comprised two stages. First, a pool of physical resilience scale items was created through a literature review, and the Delphi method was used to establish an initial scale. Second, the initial physical resilience scale was tested on hospitalized older adults.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five primary and 19 secondary items were identified after reviewing the literature. After two rounds of expert consultations, three primary and 16 secondary items were determined. The overall Cronbach's alpha for the scale was 0.760. Except for items N2, N4, N5, N8, and N14, Pearson's correlation between the scores of the remaining items and the total score ranged from 0.407 to 0.672. Except for items N2, N4, and N5, the corrected item-total correlation results ranged from 0.301 to 0.580, indicating good consistency between each item and the overall scale. Factor analysis showed that except for N7, the factor loadings of the remaining items were between 0.584 and 0.844. After expert discussions, items N2, N4, N7, and N14 were included in the scale, and items N5 and N8 were removed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A 14-item physical resilience scale, CHEES, was developed to assess physical resilience levels in older adults.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Frailty & Aging\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Frailty & Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2024.24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2024.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:身体复原力是一个新兴概念,它描述了个人从压力中恢复的能力。然而,目前用于评估身体复原力的工具很少:设计:开发临床量表:设计:开发临床量表:环境和参与者:共招募了 172 名住院老年人:本研究包括两个阶段。首先,通过文献综述建立身体复原力量表项目库,并采用德尔菲法建立初始量表。其次,在住院的老年人中测试了最初的身体复原力量表:结果:在查阅文献后,确定了 5 个一级项目和 19 个二级项目。经过两轮专家咨询,确定了 3 个一级项目和 16 个二级项目。量表的总体 Cronbach's alpha 为 0.760。除项目 N2、N4、N5、N8 和 N14 外,其余项目得分与总分之间的皮尔逊相关性在 0.407 至 0.672 之间。除项目 N2、N4 和 N5 外,校正后的项目-总分相关结果介于 0.301 至 0.580 之间,表明各项目与整个量表之间具有良好的一致性。因子分析显示,除 N7 外,其余项目的因子载荷在 0.584 至 0.844 之间。经过专家讨论,N2、N4、N7 和 N14 项被纳入量表,N5 和 N8 项被删除:结论:CHEES 是一个包含 14 个项目的身体复原力量表,用于评估老年人的身体复原力水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of the Clinical pHysical rEsilience assEssment Scale (CHEES) in Chinese Older Adults.

Background: Physical resilience is an emerging concept that describes an individual's capacity to recover from stressors. However, few instruments are currently available for assessing physical resilience.

Objective: To develop a scale to assess physical resilience in older adults.

Design: Development of a clinical scale.

Setting and participants: A total of 172 hospitalized older adults were recruited.

Measurements: This study comprised two stages. First, a pool of physical resilience scale items was created through a literature review, and the Delphi method was used to establish an initial scale. Second, the initial physical resilience scale was tested on hospitalized older adults.

Results: Five primary and 19 secondary items were identified after reviewing the literature. After two rounds of expert consultations, three primary and 16 secondary items were determined. The overall Cronbach's alpha for the scale was 0.760. Except for items N2, N4, N5, N8, and N14, Pearson's correlation between the scores of the remaining items and the total score ranged from 0.407 to 0.672. Except for items N2, N4, and N5, the corrected item-total correlation results ranged from 0.301 to 0.580, indicating good consistency between each item and the overall scale. Factor analysis showed that except for N7, the factor loadings of the remaining items were between 0.584 and 0.844. After expert discussions, items N2, N4, N7, and N14 were included in the scale, and items N5 and N8 were removed.

Conclusion: A 14-item physical resilience scale, CHEES, was developed to assess physical resilience levels in older adults.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Frailty & Aging
Journal of Frailty & Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Frailty & Aging is a peer-reviewed international journal aimed at presenting articles that are related to research in the area of aging and age-related (sub)clinical conditions. In particular, the journal publishes high-quality papers describing and discussing social, biological, and clinical features underlying the onset and development of frailty in older persons.          The Journal of Frailty & Aging is composed by five different sections: - Biology of frailty and aging In this section, the journal presents reports from preclinical studies and experiences focused at identifying, describing, and understanding the subclinical pathophysiological mechanisms at the basis of frailty and aging. - Physical frailty and age-related body composition modifications Studies exploring the physical and functional components of frailty are contained in this section. Moreover, since body composition plays a major role in determining physical frailty and, at the same time, represents the most evident feature of the aging process, special attention is given to studies focused on sarcopenia and obesity at older age. - Neurosciences of frailty and aging The section presents results from studies exploring the cognitive and neurological aspects of frailty and age-related conditions. In particular, papers on neurodegenerative conditions of advanced age are welcomed. - Frailty and aging in clinical practice and public health This journal’s section is devoted at presenting studies on clinical issues of frailty and age-related conditions. This multidisciplinary section particularly welcomes reports from clinicians coming from different backgrounds and specialties dealing with the heterogeneous clinical manifestations of advanced age. Moreover, this part of the journal also contains reports on frailty- and age-related social and public health issues. - Clinical trials and therapeutics This final section contains all the manuscripts presenting data on (pharmacological and non-pharmacological) interventions aimed at preventing, delaying, or treating frailty and age-related conditions.The Journal of Frailty & Aging is a quarterly publication of original papers, review articles, case reports, controversies, letters to the Editor, and book reviews. Manuscripts will be evaluated by the editorial staff and, if suitable, by expert reviewers assigned by the editors. The journal particularly welcomes papers by researchers from different backgrounds and specialities who may want to share their views and experiences on the common themes of frailty and aging.The abstracting and indexing of the Journal of Frailty & Aging is covered by MEDLINE (approval by the National Library of Medicine in February 2016).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信